Hardkill

Yeah, I've also hooked up with a few girls in the past who just wanted sex with me and nothing more. So, then how would I communicate that to a girl I want to have casual sex with in a way that doesn't objectify her or disrespects her? What kinds of things did those guys who made you feel disrespected say or do to you to make you feel that way?

Yeah, I know that pickup coaches and seduction experts say that you want to have a player vibe, but don't girls reject guys who come off as players? Often times, when a girl rejects a guy who comes off as player she'll be thinking to herself or tell her friends stuff like: "That guy who was hitting on me seemed like a player who was just trying to get into my pants. I am not sure I trust him." "He seemed a bit too friendly and kinda too touchy. I feel like the guy was just saying anything just to try to sleep with me as soon as he gets the chance to and then dump me." Then her friends will go: "Oh yeah, that guy really does sound like a sleazy player. Yeah, glad you stayed away from him, girl." "Sounds like that guy thought he was really slick like a greasy politician or snake oil salesman. I would definitely not touch with a ten foot pole if I were you. A guy like seems very dishonest and he could ruin your life." Afterwards, that girl will perceive that guy to be another creep and fraud who's just trying to trick her into using her body as a sex object.

So, why are men hornier or have a higher sex drive than women?

So, how do you think some women are able to enjoy casual sex without ever feeling like a sex object or feeling like the guy they had sex with was just using her body for sex?

That's why I've tried before being sexual right away with girls at bars and clubs, but it creeped out a lot of them and it got me into trouble a couple times with security. There was this one time at a bar I was at several years ago, where I got tipsy and I randomly approached this woman at a bar by going up to her and saying "I am incredibly hard!" Her response was "What did you say?!" I told her again that "I am incredibly hard!" She of course was shocked by that and then asked how old I was. I told her my age and then I asked how old she was. I think she said that she was in her late 30s/early 40s. I don't remember how exactly the rest of the convo went with her but she did leave after about a minute of talking. A few minutes later, the manager of the bar came up to me and told me that they received complaints about me making some girls feel uncomfortable and so he asked me to leave the bar, which I did.

Oh yeah, I agree with that!

Yeah, that's what I thought. But at the same time, I don't want to be too sexual too fast either, even if I want just casual sex, right?

But why are there studies out there that say that its still not clear as to whether or not a woman taking any androgen based drugs works does increase her libido? https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/menopause/expert-answers/testosterone-therapy/faq-20057935#:~:text=Answer From Yvonne Butler Tobah,for women also is unknown. So, a very feminine woman could have above average levels of testosterone for her gender?

Do you know for sure that if a woman took anabolic steroids, testosterone drugs, or some of form of androgenic drug will make her as horny as men are? Also, given that weightlifting does increase your testosterone levels and if more testosterone does increase a person's desire to have sex with others for fun and no attachment or higher significance, then does that mean that female weightlifters and bodybuilders actually have more casual sex than most other women?

Do you think that having casual sex with women is always disrespectful? Do you think it makes women feel like sex objects?

Yet, most conservatives in the US don't want most Americans to become much more educated than they already are. Otherwise, the American people will become too knowledgeable and too smart to be manipulated by the right wing fear mongering and they will eventually demand the government to enact more liberal and progressive policies that would improve greater social justice and economic equality in our country. Other than that, I am sure that Tik Tok really is full of unnecessary junk.

That’s not true. When Obama ran for the-election, he already got the military/foreign policy success key after taking credit for getting Osama Bin Ladin assassinated. Assassination of Ayman Al-Zawahiri (Bid Laden's number 2 man and the brains of the 9/11 attacks). Also his relations with NATO and his support for Ukraine in the War has arguably become the greatest military military/foreign policy initiative that any US president has ever had since FDR or Truman in WWII. If it wasn’t for the Biden administration and Biden’s ernomous amount of experience and wisdom on military and foreign affairs, then Ukraine very likely wouldn’t have been able to defy the initial expectations of the War in Ukraine.

No contest key is a separate key from the incumbency key. So, that would be 2 keys he would already have. plus, the no military/foreign policy failure key and the military/foreign policy keys he likely has now, would give him 2 more keys. He also has the no scandal key and likely the no social unrest key. That’s two more keys for Biden. He further has both the major policy change key and likely will have the uncharismatic challenger key. That would give him another 2 keys. That should total up to 8 keys so far, if I am not mistaken.

I feel really sad about this. What a tragedy. It's so unfair.

Maybe they aren't lying, but I have yet to see proof of them having such great in-depth knowledge and understanding of the world like that of a true intellectual.

Yeah, they are in the way that malignant narcissists like Trump are for themselves.

How do you know they aren't lying about the amount and quality of books they've read? Also, neither of them graduated from a college or university. Moreover, have they talked about any high intellectual topics in-depth like Leo has? Have they had intellectual discussions with intellectuals like Sam Harris, Ken Wilbur, Noam Chomsky, Cornel West, or even Jordan Peterson?

You know, I was worried about him and his whole Forward Party thing that he's got going on. However, it right now doesn't look like they will actually be a spoiler in 2024. According to wikipedia, "'The Forward Party has no plans to run a candidate for President in 2024 and plans on working to elect state and local officials. The party stated they will 'do anything we can to make sure that Donald Trump does not get near the White House.'" Btw, I just realized that there's one more key that Biden would have if he were to run again, which didn't mention before: Contest - There is no serious contest for the incumbent-party nomination. He would definitely have a lock on that one as everyone would totally united him and there would be no in party fighting at all for the Democratic nomination. That means at this point he very likely has at least 8 out the 13 keys working in his favor: Incumbency key - He would be the incumbent presidential candidate if he ran again. No contest key - There would be no serious contest for the incumbent-party nomination if Biden runs again. Major policy changes key - The major executive policy changes from the Trump administration. Plus, the surprisingly large number of landmark laws he passed with Congress. Scandal-free term key - So far the Biden administration has not had any real scandals, despite what Republicans say. No foreign/military failure key - Despite the chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan, it will likely not be a salient issue in 2024. Plus, Biden at least completed the withdrawal from Afghanistan unlike Bush, Obama, or Trump. Foreign/military success key - Assassination of Ayman Al-Zawahiri (Bid Laden's number 2 man and the brains of the 9/11 attacks). Also his relations with NATO and his support for Ukraine in the War has arguably become the greatest military military/foreign policy initiative that any US president has ever had since FDR or Truman in WWII. No Social Unrest key - Despite murders rate and overt racism in the US having been higher than they were before 2020, I don't think we have had any real any kind of serious level of sustained social unrest within the last 2 years. Also, the overall murder rate in the US did dropped significantly in 2022 from what it was in the2020 to 2021. Plus, crime rates overall in the US in 2021 and 2022 weren't anywhere near as high as they were in the 80s or 90s, contrary to the gross exaggerations made from Trump and Republicans about the US being a "cesspool of crime" under Biden and the Democrats. No Challenger charisma key - It really doesn't look like there are going to any Republican candidates running for the GOP presidential nomination who will be able to achieve this key. Allan Lichtman never even gave Trump either of the charisma keys in 2016 or 2020. The reason for this was because even though certainly has some kind of charisma and has always been incredibly popular within the Republican Party, he has never had historic levels of charisma or truly broad appeal like Ronald Reagan or Barack Obama did when they ran for president. Trump has always been too polarizing and his approval rating, never won the popular vote in either 2016 or 2020, and according to the polling averages his approval rating has never been at or above 50%. More of the general public as a whole hate Trump than love him. Ron DeSantis has even less appeal than Trump. He really doesn't have much charisma because of how boring and uninspiring he is. Other than Trump or DeSantis, there aren't any other Republicans out there now who are seen as being potentially strong presidential candidates.

Running a sex business is definitely creepy and disgusting. I even find the idea of paying a prostitute for sex also really creepy and disgusting. Another reason I don't want to pay any woman for sex is because I want to know that any woman I have sex with is genuinely attracted to me or loves me.

Yeah, I just watched some recent vids of Allan Lichtman being interviewed by his son on his son's YT channel called Today's History w/ Allan Lichtman. In those vids the Historian has said that believes that Biden so far does have all of those 7 out of 13 keys. Hopefully the War in Ukraine does not turn into some of nuclear war. I think that Biden has a chance to gain the long-term economy, given that the GDP of the US economy has already grown by 6.7%-6.9% within just the first 2 years of Biden's presidency. the GDP of the US economy grew by 5.7%-5.9% during his first year as president, which was already an historic amount. Hopefully, we also don't have a recession by the end of this year or next year as well. I also really hope that the progressive Dems or some other large faction of Dems don't end up creating a third-party spoiler in 2024 like what happened with Ralph Nader in 2000 or like Jill Stein and many Bernie supporters did in 2016. We also gotta hope that Biden doesn't get impeached, otherwise, that could technically cost him the scandal key.

Yeah, that's exactly what professor Lichtman has been saying lately. I've been following his material for more than 2 years now. He's really brilliant and has been an amazing predictor of many different kinds of elections. Hopefully, the Democratic leadership will realize this.

Also, this is what Tristan Tate said to pornstar and male escort, Stirling Cooper, about meeting girls and getting laid: He talks about how having a certain kind of confidence with a bad boy vibe and charm has always been key. Plus, talks about how this one old African dude from his past taught him that you gotta talk to all kinds of you encounter where ever you go if want to get laid with any kind of woman you want. He further talks about how in terms of your overall appearance that your height and have a model face don't matter anywhere near as much as how big, strong, and fit you are and how cool you look overall.

Tate said that he doesn't do pickup or cold approach probably just to make himself sound like he knows how to get laid better than any of the pickup and dating coaches. He's full of it.

Yeah, that's true too.

It's not clear that Blinken or Heinrich actually have the charisma to pull it off until they have been tested in the primaries. Cory Booker, Julian Castro, Kamala Harris, and Tim Ryan were first seen as very promising charismatic top-tier presidential candidates in their prime before they ran in the 2020 Democratic primaries. Yet, they unfortunately all ended up doing very poorly in the primaries and had to drop out relatively early. I was really surprised that none of them made it very far. If someone like Blinken or Heinrich were to run they could become false dawns in the primaries. In fact, almost every candidate throughout US history that has ever run for president and who at first seemed very promising end up having very disappointing results in the primaries. Don't count on their being any decent Republicans running in the Republican primaries. It will either be Trump or DeSantis or some other right-wing extremist monster out there who will become the 2024 Republican nominee. The Republican party as a whole has not shown any signs of shifting back to the center or having any moral principles. In fact, the GOP is only getting worse and worse. Let's not forget all of the kinds of greedy, racist, and disgraced Republicans we've ever had starting all the way back in 1968 to the present time.