Hardkill

At the same time, more women in western societies are become less relationship material, because most women in countries like the US, Britain, or Canada these days don't know how to behave in a feminine manner due the amount of the ever increasing amount of equal rights and pay that women, particularly those from the younger generations, in these countries have been experiencing. Even though, I am all for equal rights and equal pay for all women, this growing sense of equality that have had women in countries like US has influence them to behave in a more masculine manner. Most women in 1st countries these days have grown up believing that because they can now do just about everything that men can do and can become about as successful as men, they never learned how to become compliant and respectful with men in any kind of relationship. That's why there have so many women out these days who have a terrible attitude around men, act like spoiled brats, and get too controlling. This ruins the gender polarity needed to make attraction and relationships work between men and women. Of course most men in 1st world societies are also very much responsible for this because of how weak, lazy, and entitled they've become in their own ways. This is one big reason why more people in western societies have been getting divorces and why more families are breaking apart. It also one major reason why more and more men and women are becoming miserable in the relationships they are in.

Some polls are lately showing that most Democratic voters don't want Biden to run again. According to the Hill, "News of the discovery of classified documents at the president’s former office in Washington, D.C., and Wilmington, Del., home dominated the headlines during January. Gas prices have ticked upward again. And last week, Republicans blasted Biden for his handling of a Chinese spy balloon, saying the surveillance device should have been shot down immediately and calling the President 'weak.'" As Biden prepares to announce his reelection bid in the coming weeks, a survey out on Monday from the AP-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research shows that 37 percent of Democrats say they want Biden to run again for reelection, a significant slip from the fall when 52 percent said they wanted Biden to seek a second term. Most Democratic voters are saying that they think he's getting too old to run again and are hoping for someone else instead of him. Even after all of the historic accomplishments Biden has made over the past 2 years, the historic net win they had in the 2022 midterm elections, and the fact that he has demonstrated patriotism, decency, and integrity as a leader and as a person, he's still not getting nearly enough of the credit that he deserves. Yet, despite Trump's utter incompetence and profound devilry during his time as president, most Republican voters in 2019 to 2019 still wanted him to run again in 2020. One Democratic strategist said that “The president, his administration and staff must do a much better job getting the good word out or Biden and his party will pay the price in 2024.” This is so unfair. What is the Democratic leadership supposed to do? https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/3846228-bidens-post-midterm-honeymoon-shows-signs-of-ending/

Rejection rates for most men around the world have kept going up for several years now. This is getting to be very concerning.

I also forgot to mention that Bush jr. in the early 2000s also got the military/foreign policy success key for his 2004 re-election run because of the major rally-around-the flag effect he got after 9/11, which gave him sky high approval ratings during his first term as president. Yet, Bush also actually lost the no military/foreign policy failure key simultaneously by 2004 because the Bush administration had some noticeable military/foreign policy failures including during his 1st term including the 9/11 attack on our country (like what happen with Pearl Harbor in 1941), rising casualties in Iraq, and the failure to secure the peace in that strife-ridden country. That's why the polls on the eve of the 2004 general election day, actually showed the country evenly divided on the president's handling of foreign affairs, which was reflected in the split decision on those 2 military/foreign policy keys for his 2004 presidential election run. The news did bring about the importance of the assassination of Ayman Zahawi and how the Biden administration, the Pentagon, and the intelligence community were for the first ever finally able to come up with a successful method of counter-terrorism that doesn't involve the US military having any military bases or having any of our soldiers stationed in Afghanistan or in any other middle eastern countries. Professor has said that the War in Ukraine has so far been a success for the Biden administration and will probably continue to be a success as long as something catastrophic like a nuclear war doesn't happen there. However, he also said that there is still a potential for the 2 military/foreign policy keys to split, which is why he still hasn't made a firm call on them yet: Carville also said that Biden has probably the best foreign policy initiative than perhaps any other president has ever had since WWII:

I see. So, yes a lot of women do of course reject a guy who comes off as a player because women like that aren't interested in just having no strings attached sex at that point in time. But, there also will always be a lot of other women out there who will be down for sleeping with guys who are players if they just happen to have an appetite for it, if they are really attracted to that player they are interacting with, and if the player comes off as a guy who doesn't judge girls who sleep around. So, then why guys who are good with women say that one reason why a lot of guys don't know how to get laid is because they make the girl feel like all he wants is just sex? Why has Leo also said in his How to Get Laid series that women get turned off by guys who come off as just wanting to use her body for sex?

What actions did some of those guys do to make you feel objectified? Did they mislead you about their intentions with you? Did they not check to make sure you're doing okay after hooking up?

Yeah, I've also hooked up with a few girls in the past who just wanted sex with me and nothing more. So, then how would I communicate that to a girl I want to have casual sex with in a way that doesn't objectify her or disrespects her? What kinds of things did those guys who made you feel disrespected say or do to you to make you feel that way?

Yeah, I know that pickup coaches and seduction experts say that you want to have a player vibe, but don't girls reject guys who come off as players? Often times, when a girl rejects a guy who comes off as player she'll be thinking to herself or tell her friends stuff like: "That guy who was hitting on me seemed like a player who was just trying to get into my pants. I am not sure I trust him." "He seemed a bit too friendly and kinda too touchy. I feel like the guy was just saying anything just to try to sleep with me as soon as he gets the chance to and then dump me." Then her friends will go: "Oh yeah, that guy really does sound like a sleazy player. Yeah, glad you stayed away from him, girl." "Sounds like that guy thought he was really slick like a greasy politician or snake oil salesman. I would definitely not touch with a ten foot pole if I were you. A guy like seems very dishonest and he could ruin your life." Afterwards, that girl will perceive that guy to be another creep and fraud who's just trying to trick her into using her body as a sex object.

So, why are men hornier or have a higher sex drive than women?

So, how do you think some women are able to enjoy casual sex without ever feeling like a sex object or feeling like the guy they had sex with was just using her body for sex?

That's why I've tried before being sexual right away with girls at bars and clubs, but it creeped out a lot of them and it got me into trouble a couple times with security. There was this one time at a bar I was at several years ago, where I got tipsy and I randomly approached this woman at a bar by going up to her and saying "I am incredibly hard!" Her response was "What did you say?!" I told her again that "I am incredibly hard!" She of course was shocked by that and then asked how old I was. I told her my age and then I asked how old she was. I think she said that she was in her late 30s/early 40s. I don't remember how exactly the rest of the convo went with her but she did leave after about a minute of talking. A few minutes later, the manager of the bar came up to me and told me that they received complaints about me making some girls feel uncomfortable and so he asked me to leave the bar, which I did.

Oh yeah, I agree with that!

Yeah, that's what I thought. But at the same time, I don't want to be too sexual too fast either, even if I want just casual sex, right?

But why are there studies out there that say that its still not clear as to whether or not a woman taking any androgen based drugs works does increase her libido? https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/menopause/expert-answers/testosterone-therapy/faq-20057935#:~:text=Answer From Yvonne Butler Tobah,for women also is unknown. So, a very feminine woman could have above average levels of testosterone for her gender?

Do you know for sure that if a woman took anabolic steroids, testosterone drugs, or some of form of androgenic drug will make her as horny as men are? Also, given that weightlifting does increase your testosterone levels and if more testosterone does increase a person's desire to have sex with others for fun and no attachment or higher significance, then does that mean that female weightlifters and bodybuilders actually have more casual sex than most other women?

Do you think that having casual sex with women is always disrespectful? Do you think it makes women feel like sex objects?

Yet, most conservatives in the US don't want most Americans to become much more educated than they already are. Otherwise, the American people will become too knowledgeable and too smart to be manipulated by the right wing fear mongering and they will eventually demand the government to enact more liberal and progressive policies that would improve greater social justice and economic equality in our country. Other than that, I am sure that Tik Tok really is full of unnecessary junk.

That’s not true. When Obama ran for the-election, he already got the military/foreign policy success key after taking credit for getting Osama Bin Ladin assassinated. Assassination of Ayman Al-Zawahiri (Bid Laden's number 2 man and the brains of the 9/11 attacks). Also his relations with NATO and his support for Ukraine in the War has arguably become the greatest military military/foreign policy initiative that any US president has ever had since FDR or Truman in WWII. If it wasn’t for the Biden administration and Biden’s ernomous amount of experience and wisdom on military and foreign affairs, then Ukraine very likely wouldn’t have been able to defy the initial expectations of the War in Ukraine.

No contest key is a separate key from the incumbency key. So, that would be 2 keys he would already have. plus, the no military/foreign policy failure key and the military/foreign policy keys he likely has now, would give him 2 more keys. He also has the no scandal key and likely the no social unrest key. That’s two more keys for Biden. He further has both the major policy change key and likely will have the uncharismatic challenger key. That would give him another 2 keys. That should total up to 8 keys so far, if I am not mistaken.

I feel really sad about this. What a tragedy. It's so unfair.

Maybe they aren't lying, but I have yet to see proof of them having such great in-depth knowledge and understanding of the world like that of a true intellectual.

Yeah, they are in the way that malignant narcissists like Trump are for themselves.

How do you know they aren't lying about the amount and quality of books they've read? Also, neither of them graduated from a college or university. Moreover, have they talked about any high intellectual topics in-depth like Leo has? Have they had intellectual discussions with intellectuals like Sam Harris, Ken Wilbur, Noam Chomsky, Cornel West, or even Jordan Peterson?

You know, I was worried about him and his whole Forward Party thing that he's got going on. However, it right now doesn't look like they will actually be a spoiler in 2024. According to wikipedia, "'The Forward Party has no plans to run a candidate for President in 2024 and plans on working to elect state and local officials. The party stated they will 'do anything we can to make sure that Donald Trump does not get near the White House.'" Btw, I just realized that there's one more key that Biden would have if he were to run again, which didn't mention before: Contest - There is no serious contest for the incumbent-party nomination. He would definitely have a lock on that one as everyone would totally united him and there would be no in party fighting at all for the Democratic nomination. That means at this point he very likely has at least 8 out the 13 keys working in his favor: Incumbency key - He would be the incumbent presidential candidate if he ran again. No contest key - There would be no serious contest for the incumbent-party nomination if Biden runs again. Major policy changes key - The major executive policy changes from the Trump administration. Plus, the surprisingly large number of landmark laws he passed with Congress. Scandal-free term key - So far the Biden administration has not had any real scandals, despite what Republicans say. No foreign/military failure key - Despite the chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan, it will likely not be a salient issue in 2024. Plus, Biden at least completed the withdrawal from Afghanistan unlike Bush, Obama, or Trump. Foreign/military success key - Assassination of Ayman Al-Zawahiri (Bid Laden's number 2 man and the brains of the 9/11 attacks). Also his relations with NATO and his support for Ukraine in the War has arguably become the greatest military military/foreign policy initiative that any US president has ever had since FDR or Truman in WWII. No Social Unrest key - Despite murders rate and overt racism in the US having been higher than they were before 2020, I don't think we have had any real any kind of serious level of sustained social unrest within the last 2 years. Also, the overall murder rate in the US did dropped significantly in 2022 from what it was in the2020 to 2021. Plus, crime rates overall in the US in 2021 and 2022 weren't anywhere near as high as they were in the 80s or 90s, contrary to the gross exaggerations made from Trump and Republicans about the US being a "cesspool of crime" under Biden and the Democrats. No Challenger charisma key - It really doesn't look like there are going to any Republican candidates running for the GOP presidential nomination who will be able to achieve this key. Allan Lichtman never even gave Trump either of the charisma keys in 2016 or 2020. The reason for this was because even though certainly has some kind of charisma and has always been incredibly popular within the Republican Party, he has never had historic levels of charisma or truly broad appeal like Ronald Reagan or Barack Obama did when they ran for president. Trump has always been too polarizing and his approval rating, never won the popular vote in either 2016 or 2020, and according to the polling averages his approval rating has never been at or above 50%. More of the general public as a whole hate Trump than love him. Ron DeSantis has even less appeal than Trump. He really doesn't have much charisma because of how boring and uninspiring he is. Other than Trump or DeSantis, there aren't any other Republicans out there now who are seen as being potentially strong presidential candidates.

Running a sex business is definitely creepy and disgusting. I even find the idea of paying a prostitute for sex also really creepy and disgusting. Another reason I don't want to pay any woman for sex is because I want to know that any woman I have sex with is genuinely attracted to me or loves me.