Emerald

That sounds much more realistic than the way you said it in the first post. Careful not to misrepresent your data using hyperbolic language.

No one is trying to force you to be attracted to someone you aren't. No one really cares if you're interested in slim women or big women. And that you think the discussion about body positivity is about that, shows that you haven't done your research. You're just listening to anti-feminist talking points that are straw-manning and misrepresenting the stances. Body positivity is about women (and men) loving and accepting their own bodies, regardless of who does or doesn't find them attractive.

Knew what you were talking about from the title alone.

"Its a truly eye opening experiece, within hours you will get hundreds of matches and women will actively contact you. You can say the most braindead/evil/boring stuff and they wont loose interest. Just opening with "Sex?" will get a positive answer. A guy like this can arrange sex with 10+ different girls by putting in 1 hour of half assed effort." Here are my questions to you: So, within a few hours you got hundreds of matches? Of those 'matches', how many women actively contacted you? You opened with "Sex?" and got a positive or multiple positive answers? (This one's the biggest stretch to me) You arranged sex with 10+ different girls in 1-hour, barely trying? Are you telling me all of these things are true of your experience? Because it still sounds to me like a load of bullcrap.

Have you actually tried this? Because those results don't seem very likely.

Aesthetically yes. Functionally no.

Well, that's a shame. It seems I'm about 5 years too old for you. That sucks because I was really hoping... No. Never mind. Too painful. I don't make the cut.

De Nada!

I would say that a conversation about it is the best idea. Perhaps, not right before the act, but at some neutral time when you're both just communicating about your sex life. But the orientation (for him vs for you), you can also find ways to communicate that are organic and sexual. You can basically weave it into the experience as subtle dirty talk to communicate about it. For example, if it's for him you can make all the dirty talk very focused toward his orgasm. And you can focus on quickness by saying you want him to ravish you, do what feels good for him, have a quickie, and other much dirtier phrases to stir him into a primal state where he doesn't have much control over himself and just wants to cum. Or if it's for you, you can focus on slowness and sensuality. Like you can tell him that you want to make love all night or that you want him to make love to you very slowly. Or you can tell him something very full-body-focused, like you want his hands all over you or that you want him to kiss you all over. You can also communicate that you want to have one night like that every time you're really in a sexual/sensual mood. That way, he knows to watch for the signs every week, two weeks, month, etc. Also, on another note, I would do all of this on a very random schedule. That creates variety and excitement. Once you begin scheduling it, it becomes a chore.

What I'm realizing in recent years is that my enjoyment in sex, as a woman, comes far more from emotional immersion than physical stimulation. So, it doesn't really matter what kind of technique a man uses on me. If I am not bathed in a soup of erotic emotions and feeling very open and relaxed, there is just no way for the energy to flow. The energy is restricted because I'm too tense and my sexual center is not activated. The way I'll put it is this. Focus on your energy. Your emotions and body have to reflect a state of relaxation for an orgasm to reverberate through the body. It's sort of like plucking a guitar string. If you touch a guitar string, the sound is extremely muffled and stunted because the string isn't able to vibrate. But if the string is unobstructed, the string can vibrate quite a lot which allows the sound to reverberate through the room. Another example, when you try to do the motorboat sound with your mouth, it only works if your lips are relaxed. Otherwise, you just get a stunted hum. Same idea. So, you'll have to communicate with your partner that you need things that will put you in a more erotic and relaxed mood first. And teach him what works for you. You can also take matters into your own hands. But ideally, your partner will be the one that gets you to that state. It will probably take about 30 minutes of anticipation to warm up and relax. So, find out what makes your energy flow, and what keeps you riding the wave of that energy. Also, I recommend differentiating between "sex for him" versus "sex for you". Men are really quick with their sexual energy and don't really need time to warm up. So, in 'sex for him', you can just let him ravish you to his liking. That way, you don't feel pressure to cum and he doesn't feel pressure to make you cum. And this takes a lot less time and effort to please a man. And this is usually such little effort (usually 15 to 30 minutes) that you can do this a few times a week (45 minute to 1.5 hour commitment). And the man will be pleased with this because sexual quantity is most important to a man. But in a sex session that's 'sex for you', that's when sexual quality is most important. And that's when romance and teasing and foreplay and all of that can come into play. And this can be special times when you feel really in the mood... once every week or every two weeks or every month. Basically, to the tune of your libido. That way, you don't feel rushed. And communicate about this arrangement before. That way, he can focus totally on pleasing you as the goal during the 'sex for you'. And you can focus totally on receiving pleasure as opposed to feeling that you need to both give and receive... which is a libido killing juggling act, as far as I'm concerned. It gets me too focused on performance that I can't really enjoy myself or let the energy flow.

The one gets me...

My husband is Hungarian and is super white. I've been to Hungary, and the population is like 92% White 7% Roma (Gypsy) and 1% everyone else.

I wouldn't say it's gross persay to just want sexual pleasure. It just isn't a turn-on for women. It kind of goes from, 'a mutual expression of love, lust, and intimacy' to 'Okay. Time to do my girlfriend chore and help him with his cumming again.' So, if you want to keep the fire burning for her, you have to find sustainable ways to keep her emotionally stimulated. There has to be a bit of push pull, and a communication of desire for her presence. Also, lots of non-sexual affection and flirtation. But no-fap (and more specifically) sexual transmutation will help you stop losing your libidinal energy to base sexual pursuits. You can use that energy toward any kind of creative or loving pursuit. Also, an attractive man is like a lion tamer with a lion. The most attractive "lion-tamer show" is one with a very fierce lion but also a lion tamer who is very skilled at taming lions. So, your sexual desire makes you a very fierce lion because your lower nature is virile. But your lion tamer could probably use some work to gain more agency over the lion. And that combination of very fierce lion and very skilled lion tamer is something that women respond well to. It hits the right emotional buttons.

Women are really excited about sex in the first part of the relationship because there is a feeling like the guy really wants to have sex with her. And this hits the right emotional notes to drive a woman crazy. And this is easy to do in the first few months of a relationship. But often, especially if the male partner is just sexual in general, it can get very unsatisfying for a woman if she feels that you just want to have sex... and not specifically with her. That's when sex feels like a chore for women because sex is an emotional experience for women, more than it is physical. So, if a woman feels like you want her in particular and you use your lovemaking to communicate that desire for her, she will feel emotionally stimulated and loved and very turned on. The motivation to have sex will be naturally high. But if a woman feels like you mostly want sex to fulfill your need to cum, she will feel neutral or obligated about giving you that, but she won't experience that level of excitement and fulfillment. She will start to feel like your cum helper, which isn't a turn on because there is no intimacy there. So, you'll have to learn to work with her pace (which will be slower), build anticipation, be romantic and loving with lots of non-sexual attention, learning to use sex as a conversation and means of expression as opposed to a race to orgasm, etc. Otherwise, you won't be able to play her emotional instrument... which is what motivates women to have sex in the first place. Physical pleasure is so so for a woman, but emotional pleasure is absolutely transcendent. Women will never be motivated just by sexual pleasure alone. They have to be bathed in a soup of erotic emotions to feel sexual desire. So, if all that's left for her in sex with you is physical pleasure, she's going to be bored and will feel both unsatiated and turned off. So, she may use fantasy (or in extreme cases infidelity) instead to get her emotional and sexual needs met. TLDR: Female sexual needs are actually emotional needs.

Feeling the Bern!

There are no top-tier men or bottom-tier men. There is the man you want... and then there's everyone else on the planet.

I love Cornel West! Such a graceful man.

Could totally see the similarity branding-wise.

Perhaps you have fewer energetic and emotional blocks in the sexual center of the body compared to others.

I started watching this a few days ago. He was doing well until about halfway through when he began talking about hypergamy and veered completely off track. It’s not because women want Mr. Perfect to be completely open with them. That would be equally off putting if it happened. Women are attracted to mystery and ambiguity because female sexual attraction begins with curiosity. Women like a man who’s a challenge to get to know deeply. But the women in the video answer that way because they are unaware and have likely been burnt before by men who have been dishonest. So, they think that, in order to be safe, they need a man who is completely predictable and straightforward. But even though that makes them feel safer, it isn’t what attracts them. What they really want is an trustworthy man who is reserved enough to make her wonder about him but open enough to have a deep connection with. And she wants that feeling of emotional safety that comes from being in that man’s arms. The actual answer is that women are focused on what they want but not HOW they want it. They want a trustworthy man to open up to them... but not because he’s open in general. She wants to feel like the man sharing his feelings is something rare and special that only she gets to see shine through in intimate moments. She wants exclusive access to his secrets. So, the man in the video is saying the equivalent of “Men actually do want an easy woman. But when he says that, he’s not taking about you... only Ms. Perfect.” But the reality is, that men don’t usually want an easy woman, even if they think they do and even if she’s Ms. Perfect. Men want a challenge and to know that they have won that challenge in the woman’s eyes and been granted exclusive access to the woman’s companionship.

The reason why is because there are tons of women looking to hook-up. And they are attracted to men. So, because you are a man, you will be attractive to some women automatically... on a dating and hooking-up level.

I think you misinterpreted what I was responding to. The OP was saying that Trump will try y to break the rules and try to stay in office even if he loses or if he wins a second term and his two terms are up. And I told him that that’s not going to happen. And if he tries to, there would be far more people against that illegal move and not for it. Also, impeachment as a process, is a joke. Because of the partisan stakes and the need for a 2/3 majority vote in the senate to successfully impeach, it’s basically guaranteed that no president will ever be impeached because it’s unlikely that any political party will ever have 2/3 of Congress. And if a president were ever in danger of that, they could just pull a Nixon. So, Trump certainly violated the emoluments clause of the constitution. But because establishment Democrats like Trump in that they can use his corruption to mask their own and look like the good guys by contrast, they likely don’t actually want to get rid of him. So, they make a case for impeachment that’s impeachable but not very strong... likely because Trump was looking into Joe Biden’s corruption. So, the impeachment is mostly for show to please their constituents and perhaps to obscure view of DNC corruption, as they knew Trump would be acquitted in the Senate and that it would give him a ratings boost following the acquittal.

That’s not going to happen. And there a more people that dislike Trump than like him to counter-march on Washington.

No judgment here. And of course, there is no ethical issue with any of this if it breaches no one’s boundaries... and it appears that it doesn’t. That said, have you explored into the roots of the addiction together? Addiction of any kind can reveal deeper issues that don’t necessarily have to do with the content of the addiction itself. And since you both have the same addiction, your relationship can be great for exploring the underlying causes deeper.

So, the Iowa Caucus app is apparently malfunctioning. So, here are some facts. Do with them what you will... The App is called Shadow and was created by former Hillary Clinton backers (Edit) The Shadow company received money from Pete Buttigieg's campaign, apparently for another service they offer Bernie Sanders had members of his team monitoring about 60% of the caucusing sites that showed him having a 5 point lead over Pete on average Mayor Pete already claimed victory before the results have fully come out... in a pre-scheduled tweet and in his speech Mayor Pete's campaign is getting a ton of positive media coverage Still no clear results