Joseph Maynor

Let's let @Inliytened1 back on here guys. What is up with this?

We have a desire to curate our relationships so only those who agree with me are comfortable to me and us.

Exactly.

Okay.

I think it is sad that so many people have been banned on here that we all knew and loved. What's up with that?

I'm not sure man. Maybe this is your assessment.

I think most women think guys are creeps unless they have a reason to think they know them.

Actually Stage Green is all about empathy.

I get a lot of value out of collaborating with AI when that is useful, but you have to know the limitations of this kind of relation too. AI is a tool.

Some people are really good at MBTI typing. If I met you or you post a video I could probably type you.

@Xonas Pitfall Do you know your MBTI?

My Enneagram is 4w5, tri-type 4-5-9, and instinctual variant sx-so-sp.

Be careful what you wish for lol.

The two coolest cats I know right now are an all black cat and a tuxedo cat.

It is called a shadow type in MBTI where you have the first letter in common but the i and e are switched. https://chatgpt.com/share/6ab4c510-d4d4-83e8-a917-577c2d55a8b3

I think what are really doing is just sharing our own perspectives.

The comparison is the elephant in the room.

I have no regret for enjoying coffee in the morning.

What is interesting is me and @yetineti have the same cognitive functions but the introvert and extrovert qualities are inverted. Me: INFJ Ni Fe Ti Se Him: ENFP Ne Fi Te Si

Ti is my tertiary function. This is why INFJs can sometimes look like a thinking type. I learned this recently through investigation. Tertiary function is like the wild card in MBTI typology. INFJ Ni Fe Ti Se

One thing I will say here is try to convince an insane person that they are insane. For them, their reality is very real. So who values insanity really?

God forbid anyone create a finite self that is self-developing. That would be impossible LOL.

Yes. The desire to rationally resolve is also an assumption in spirituality. This has to examined too. Because does a rational resolution of an issue actually capture it or not? Maybe it does. To say it does or does not is another rational presumption and conclusion.

I think is what the neo-advaita people try to point out, and it is a genuine problem.