OBEler

Yes I think this should be highlighted more. You never know. However he got deeper after that. I didn't remember exactly so you would need to watch again.

@ActualizedJohn @ActualizedJohn limited is a construction of your mind. The true nature is unlimited and everything is one and unlimited. Language will break down yes.

@ActualizedJohn if it's just imagination and you are doing the imagination then..Welcome to Solipsismus.

@MotherEve it would be good if you watch Leo's solipsismus video. We don't talk here about NPC solipsismus at all.

Hey Ishanga. Don't get stuck into teacher against teacher. This topic is not about which teachings are best, which yoga or psychedelics are best. I don't care about Leo or sadhguru here, I think no one does but you. It's about discussing truth. Now. If I made your sadhguru looking like a chump I am sorry. I didn't mean that. I will make Leo look like a chump in a next post if you want. But please let's come back to discover what's truth.

@Ishanga "he's having a great affect on ppl, what affect are you having???" Why did you said that to me? What does that have to do with this discussion about what's true? What has having a great affect on people to do with truth.

@Ishanga I give you some advice: if you really want to come closer to truth you should not follow someone's thoughts just because he is popular. History should have teached you that the most popular don't always hold the truth (Hitler for example). Your answer makes you even more dogmatic. Instead of bringing a reasonable argument you say sadhguru must be right because he has so much follower and I am not popular so my argument has not any worth. With 5 Meo: I speak from own experience and share the best tools for that besides contemplating and thinking for yourself. That's not dogma at all. I am open to other great tools but haven't found so far better ones so this is what I recommend.

"But it will only ever exist within your existence. " It will for ME exists in my existence. Yes. But what if we switch perspective for a moment and take a meta perspective between my existence and other existences . Yes I hold this meta perspective in my mind. Yes I don't know. But just because I am forever locked in my existence doesn't mean that there are no existences outside my existence. Even if my existence is infinity there could be a copy of infinity outside of my existence.

Can't you see what I meant by that, of course I don't mean that so radical that you only watch sadhguru. It doesn't matter if you have all your dogma adopted from only sadhguru or also from another teachers which are similar to sadhgurus. You are picking up complementary dogmas which makes you feel good and you don't have original thoughts. And that's difficult to discuss with you because as soon there is an argument against your dogma you just call it insane. That's a good sign of holding a dogma.

"Well..its not really an assumption. All questions can indeed be answered by becoming Absolutely Omniscient " You can claim that but it's still an assumption. Because you can be only absolutely omniscient in your bubble. What's outside? You say there can't be an outside. Yes for you can't be an outside. But there could be things existing outside of you independently and souvereign. You don't know. Even if you are infinity. There could be infinity outside infinity with the same infinity like you.

You don't have really an ideology? Are you sure? Everything outside of sadhgurus dogma you claim as insane. We give you the best contradictions to your example with the bridge and you still don't want to hear that because it just sounds insane for you and then you stop there rather than thinking for yourself and try to argument. You cannot have original thoughts. They all probably come from sadhguru. You are not interested in truth at all just what feels good for you. And that's the difference to what we do here.

I think you are falling in a trap or are misunderstanding his video. How do you come to the conclusion something is bogus just because it doesn't fit in your assumption that you can answer all existential questions. How do you even know that this is possible to know everything.

Yes. But it was just a deeper version of solipsismus. But who knows where you come out if you go even deeper than that if possible.

That is a good question. But with direct experience you come closer to truth rather than philosophical thoughts about that. Your ego mind is too limited for that. You can experience every time with 5 Meo malt solipsismus if you take a certain dose. If you experience something deeper than that please share.

And upcoming interviews / debates (maybe with Peter Ralston)?

You are misunderstanding this: It was never about conceptualizing but direct experience.

@ActualizedJohn you must raise your consciousness so that you become so conscious that there is no doubt. Psychedelics (especially 5 Meos like 5 Meo DMT, -malt, -mipt ) are the most efficient tool for that. However this is not for beginners so research carefully. It's beyond your intellect only an awakening experience will get you to that.

@ActualizedJohn I can recommend watching Leo's infinity of god video where he answers your questions pretty good.

I won't because it will threaten my survival in a dream I have no control over. You can suffer in a dream. Why should you hurt yourself in your dream? It doesn't proof anything. It's still just imagination at play. What I say is a philosophy for you but not for awakened ones. You can become directly conscious that you create everything around you. It will be total obvious. No philosophy needed. Do you know why we use the term awakening in spirituality? Have you ever wondered? Because you awake from your dream if your consciousness is high enough.

@Ishanga you create right now everything around you with your mind. Linke in a dream but more solid. You then split yourself into you and others. You do that to experience a human life where you and others exist. But you hold yourself and them in your mind over and over again. You animate them including me and you forget that creating part , you make yourself less conscious about that. You do that So you can enjoy this dream more. Because you dream right now that you are a human being and human beings need a sense of others for survival in this dream world. You don't like this because it threatens your survival so it's dangerous to pursue further. It's a self created barrier so that you will not discover the truth. And to your brick example: You imagine a brick , you imagine how heavy this brick is. You imagine how it falls on your imaginary feed. You imagine the pain. You can still say that it's real if you define real as something experienced but It's completely self created. Pure imagination.

That's your imagination right now which creates this story. How do you know it's the subconscious of someone.

You will never get to the truth if you are so biased with your human emotions how reality should be.

@ivory one more tip of finding the dose. Don't orient your dose on people who already had an breakthrough in 5 Meo DMT. Because they need much less for a breakthrough after that. But yes it gets exponentially heavier. @RendHeaven Damn...thanks for description.

@ivory only 25 mg was a very small breakthrough for me.

@ivory for me there was almost zero difference between range 10-25 mg. zero. I don't know how the difference is when I take more.