Nahm

@Robert Yes absolutely.

@Aakash Vijayan

@yawning_ ❤️?

This seems to be the a priori thorn. Have you experienced otherwise, yet?

@The Don Ask your parents.

Good luck. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=eHiH1NytwjM

@bejapuskas Nobody’s eating anything for you.

@Baotrader Yes. It’s kind of up to you if it’s ‘painful or interesting’. Was that part of the cammode awakening? The groundlessness?

@Baotrader ??? https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CwzQJdvFMeI

@How to be wise Okay ??

@How to be wise I don’t understand what you mean by that.

@Rachityczny When you see their vision boards, tell them it is beautiful, and that you support their dream. If they do not have a vision board, at least you can then understand their criticism of yours.

@How to be wise I would not worry if you were angry with me. I understand anger.

@bejapuskas If you listen blindly, you hear nothing.

@How to be wise Uh, maybe the person who it is addressed to, the one who asked me to be more specific. What’s with your distaste for me? Somebody tell you I slept with Katie or somethin? What’s goin on?

@Misagh No worries ?? Maybe another time. ❤️

@okulele In emptying your cup, it disappears into consciousness - synchronicity in unification. Is the cup really empty is the variable, not infinite intelligence.

@Cepzeu Absolutely beautiful. ??

@Misagh “Basic” self realization? “Incredibly high level of enlightenment” ?

Coral will remain unattainable, an implication of, the “holy grail” - a punchline. If I am nondual, and you are nondual, what distinctions remain for words which unify? None. What words do you say to yourself, in samadhi? None. What words do you say to yourself in appearance of physicality? None. What would there be to say? Nothing. What reason to say it? None. Paradoxically, spiral dynamics doesn’t actually exist at the “coral level”. It’s a thought, in appearance, on appearance. SD’s strengthens perception of duality via distinctions, until it collapses on itself in nonduality. Coral is the innocence of the dreamer, the colorless rainbow, a promise, Horton.

@Baotrader You should, and no, nobody needs to aquire knowledge to realize the nondual nature, because it’s the actual situation, regardless of knowledge. Knowledge can be used to strengthen the appearance “I am separate” if there is insufficient inward inquiry. The identifying with knowledge is the veiling, not the knowledge, because the identity & knowledge are illusionary / appearance. You might only inflate the notion of separation via knowledge, thinking “my intelligence”, confusing being “intelligent” as “enlightened” - missing what it is which is being, and what it is which is intelligence. This can reinforce the ignorance that there is a separate being ( “ a person “) which is “becoming enlightened”. The vantage of understanding qm’s, etc, must be directed in inquiry into the self. Standard uninspected sensory input tells you the universe is real, & separate from you - that you are physical, individual and temporary. The study of ‘outside reality’ can reveal the knowledge that physicality in actually is vibration / energy / constant change & fluctuation - it just appears stationary & unchanging. Like an apple sitting on the counter appears physical, solid, and permanent, but watch it in the sun for 3 days, and it’s revealed to have never been stationary, always relative, always in a state of change. The ego sees the implication of this a mile away, and says “fuck that”, “we’re all set here”, “Good day sir”. And there is no inquiry into the ego. But alas, suffering is relentless - inherently present in ignorance. (Ignoring the relative vibratory implication of a fleeting self) How long can a drop of water in the middle of the ocean remain convinced is it a separate drop, through speculation and analysis of the ocean and ‘other drops’? What thought processes are defensively at play, which could allow a drop to remain convinced it is just a drop? The drop would need to look inward to the deeper currents which move it. Fear says “you did a lot of shit to be a solid stable drop, don’t fuck that up now”. But that ocean says otherwise, simply by saying “ok” to the drop. The drop “has conditions”, “has intelligence”, “loves”, “is loved”, “is free”. The ocean is intelligence, is love, is freedom. What is it which separates the drop from the ocean, but the uninspected notion, it is a separate, solid, physical, drop.

@Shin ❤️ “This place is a dream, only a sleeper considers it real. Then death comes like dawn, and you wake up laughing at what you thought was your grief.” - Mushrooms

Nice.

@How to be wise Great question! What did I say there? Did you understand it, first?

@Baotrader About the juice, I meant, if nonduality is accurate, then you are Einstein & Buddha, and “Einstein & Buddha” reveal something to you, about you, from you. I’d say the point is the teacher’s experience, and the student’s experience, and the experience of each allowing the experience of the other, unless they’re enlightened, then, like you pointed out, there’s no point, except the experience. I hear what you’re saying about Leo & Sadhguru, but in the same vein, what does that say to you, in your awakening? Maybe upon your enlightenment, you’ll be the one to resolve the hard problem of science, bridging the quantum & atomic. That’d be really cool I assume. Maybe Leo’s already done that though. It’s inherently confusing, the matter of what another person would do in enlightenment. Lol.