Nahm

Member
  • Content count

    26,563
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Nahm

  1. @studentofthegame Is there codependency in your life now, or only in memory? What is the ideal, the best case scenario outcome for you from such a course?
  2. Could be a gravity to that. Some attracting of things wanted. A which thought in sensation rather than no thought, intuition, etc, possibly creative and useful in life.
  3. “Can't imagine why God has created man and knowingly could have placed the thoughtless Awareness in all but didn't” @Lowerplanedweller
  4. @Lowerplanedweller Do you see the inherent issue with the situation?
  5. @zeroISinfinity No worries. There’s no I to be right though, sensations already know. That is what is recognized. ♥️ @Aakash ☺️
  6. Because you are not neutral. It simple won’t do, because it’s a thought. Negative is on each of us if we created the concept, we can purify it too. It was created in, and is washed away in, innocence. You are the love, which can choose to believe a thought to the contrary, you are free to. In that way, meaning is created for ‘neutral’. But you are the love, and you just created that, by choosing it. I am suggesting you are the authority on all matters of love and truth. “The brain”, duality, thoughts, their usefulness, is very often revealed on very large dry erase boards. Uniquely difficult in ‘your’ case, maybe, because you’re actually humble. That’d make things a bit more tricky.
  7. @Aakash No worries. ?? @zeroISinfinity Devoid is the way though. What to believe about it, overlaying of stories, up to you.
  8. @Lowerplanedweller Look at the emptiness of this post box as infinite consciousness, and the X as the instantly manifested finite thing, and keep in mind the emptiness is conscious of it’s infinite self. X .
  9. God is the thoughtless awareness in all.
  10. @phoenix666 Soooo happy for you man. Very inspiring. Thanks for sharing so much! ??
  11. It is because a pointer can not point to itself, that the word pointer is used. What is the distinction between thought and reality that you are referencing? What was written which you are referencing as practicing duality without even knowing? These are specific reference to what has been said, not pointers. Can you paste what you are referencing?
  12. @Truth Addict So, you aren’t saying anything, then...? Pointing, but not even pointing?
  13. Can you explain a little more what it is you’re saying? Are you asking if Truth has an opposite?
  14. Looking at this forum, not making an account, not asking any questions.
  15. @Dan502 Just a reminder about the love, and a way you can never forget it... It would not be possible to feel any discord whatsoever, such as anger, frustration, guilt, resentment, etc - if the basis of reality was not love. There would be no relativity, it would not be possible to feel any “negative emotions” without choosing a thought which does not feel good to you. We all to often glance over that “to you” part, but it’s the most important part. The most important question is, “why is it that way? How is it even possible this thought does not feel good to me?”