UnbornTao

Why? And who's 'they'? Leo only warned you about the repetitive, spiritually convoluted expression you're using, which could be more suitable as creative writing or poetry - or at least that's what I make of that. You felt hurt, perhaps? Notice your reaction. In any case, good luck.

👍

Just in case, I was being sarcastic in my response above.

Anytime.

Yes, I've heard something like that before: https://www.discovermagazine.com/health/why-caffeine-affects-people-differently

Theme cover:

"Each specializes on just one species." Cordyceps, and fungi in general, are quite fascinating.

What is the worry accomplishing for you? You can always act without the myriad of complementary activities you believe are necessary - many of which are little more than mental masturbation. Taking effective action is clearly not the same as pissing in the wind. But what that kind of action entails is something you need to clarify for yourself - depending on your purpose and goals. What do you actually want to do, and why? What would be an intelligent way to pursue that course of action? Which actions would yield powerful results in this case?

Isn't that just an intellectual recognition? Otherwise, we wouldn't be having this conversation. You're too smart for me. For sure. Which doesn't mean that it is always easy to do, but it is essentially simple.

The picture above is not Kant, by the way.

SOLD!

Melatonin: the "psychedelic" we didn't know we wanted. I've tried high dosage melatonin pills and loved the effects during the first few days - a peaceful, natural, progressive deep sleepiness. However, it did seem to build some sort of tolerance with repeated use.

Ocasionally yes, with a machete. Razor blade.

I think I understand now, thanks. No, wait - how is motivation metaphysical?

@Osaid so?

@Sugarcoat Stop treating suffering as something external that is imposed on you. It's not. "The mind, the psyche, the thought, the structure." No - you! We could put it like this, somewhat poetically: Circumstances don't care about you - you do. What happens is what happens; your relationship to it, believe it or not, is based on you. This is where you experience suffering - not in what factually or objectively occurs. What is is inherently free of suffering. You're commited to defending suffering. So why resist it? Surely, embracing it would change your experience of it. From there, you'll be able to contemplate it more effectively. In the end, it's entirely up to you.

I guess it largely depends on factors such as the type of coffee, the quantity, the caffeine content, the preparation method, the person's weight, etc. - but I wouldn't recommend it if you feel anxiety, or want to be calm/er. @inFlow

I spontaneously quit for 5 days last week, but since then I've been back on it. To be honest, I hadn't intended to quit - just to start using it more sparingly from now on. I didn't experience intense withdrawal symptoms, just slight irritability, some tiredness, and a lack of focus. I also felt more balanced and calm overall.

What if space turned out to be a form of context, too?

For context: For example, what turns meaningless symbols into language? Symbols could be considered a form or structure, yet on their own, they aren't language. Can language - which is a context - be said to be an idea, a form, or a structure? To begin with, I'd say there's nothing strictly objective about language: it isn't found anywhere, and yet it exists. Is context the way or space in which something is held? A kind of holding? Trying to phrase this into a neat definition might actually do a disservice to the exploration. It gives the impression that it's a simplistic matter. I see, thank you. Say the self and language are contexts - what do we make of that? The more we look, the more we realize we don't know what the nature of context is. edit: the question "What turns meaningless symbols into language?" above should have been something like: "What turns squiggles into symbols?"

I'd say the self is the context for your experience. Again, language as a context is a useful example for our purposes here. Consider Helen Keller: This makes it real, not just something to intellectualize about - even though it is still quite an abstract matter.

@Sugarcoat The stories are invented and extraneous to the simple action of not doing something - of not thinking one thought over another thought. Didn't you do the exercise? It should have clarified that principle to a degree. Bear in mind that by thinking, we don't just mean the usual internal chatter as a superficial activity. What and how you "think" at a deep level is what creates your experience - perhaps. Entertain the simple idea of not doing something. And then practice not doing it - like fear or depression. As you suggest, this may require some practice, since our habits are strong. But it can be done now. Okay. So what is it you're inquiring into? We don't need to get into any of this right now in order to solve this apparent dilemma. Actually recognize "where" you are generating the activity - and that by itself will allow you to stop generating it. What are you not feeling right now? Are you "not bored" or "not excited"? How come? It's because you aren't doing those! You just need to make that process conscious for yourself.