UnbornTao

You missed his point. What he thinks about it is also irrelevant, and not it.

You seem to be conflating consciousness with the decision to live a certain way.

Let me reformulate that: Famous and wealthy: looks are secondary. Financially mediocre but funny, good in bed, socially valuable (charismatic, confident, lots of interesting friends): looks are secondary That was partly a joke. Anyone who wants to can seduce women. Playing the victim isn't necessary. Play with whatever you've got. It can also be improved and added upon.

Self-esteem, also survival.

Be willing to go through the withdrawal symptoms. Confront the cravings without acting them out. Try contemplating why they exist. Become deeply aware of the underlying motivation. Once you've grasped it, drop it. Hopefully, in theory, this is going to free you from that unwanted behavior. But you have to do it, not just think about it.

Social power, to clarify. This is social survival. I remember a story about the animal with the most extravagant, colorful looks wins the game. This involves not only looks but notably other factors like fame and wealth. It's a social show you put on in order to manipulate others (to make them see yourself attractive and interesting). Sure. An "ugly" and famous soccer player can be more successful in this regard than even attractive nobodies. Women look primarily for social status. That already predetermines their perception of a potential mate. Wealthy, famous and funny= ideal recipe.

@Mojoson you're welcome.

Forgot to add: There are several subreddits out there. Look up their wikis, too. There you'll find a plethora of recommended resources. Search Reddit for these and related terms: Microdosing LSD 5-MeO-DMT 1P-LSD Psychonauts Psychedelics Etc.

AL-LAD is a LSD analogue. I enjoyed my trips with it a lot. Pretty gentle, wonderful experiences. Great for reconnecting to the mystical feeling of wonder. Recommended for beginners. I'd imagine it would be ideal for microdosing, too. Of course, start low and slowly increment the dosage with subsequent trips.

That's my point. You can be enlightened (consciousness) but not necessarily make intelligent choices (intelligence).

No method is direct. It is not a process resulting from previous behaviors that caused it.

Smart but not intelligent. Subtle distinction. What are the differences? Honestly, I'm not clear on that. Intelligence seems to involve something more than smartness, like a deeper self-awareness, perhaps. You could say people like Putin are smart but not intelligent.

That "technology" is already present, and it is called you! Have a direct experience to see for yourself. It is direct, meaning you do it. Metaphorically speaking: What technology can be invented within the matrix that will make you transcend it? By definition, it still is part of that world. The one who escapes (awakens) is you. No method is direct. Direct is you. The eye seeing itself, so to speak. There won't ever be a technology of that kind because you are you. The question wouldn't arise in the first place if you were now directly and deeply conscious of your nature. What would that technology do? It'd still be limited to physiology. Modify the brain however you like, enlightenment is not about the brain -- or the body, for that matter.

Not basing my claims on any model. That involves education, as you say. Wiser and more conscious? I don't know about that. Maybe. Perhaps the difference between these people is education and awareness, being willing to acknowledge stuff and to be relatively impartial. I don't readily assume that political views and wisdom/consciousness are interrelated. What if Leo voted for Trump? Haha You can be profoundly conscious of who and what you are and still be illiterate and make poor choices. Nissargadatta is an example. He was enlightened, illiterate, and smoked like crazy (a dumb lifestyle choice), if I recall correctly.

Nahh, you're conflating knowledge, wisdom and consciousness. None of those are mutually inclusive.

It's fun trying I'm convinced some philosophers had enlightenment experiences: Da Vinci, Heraclitus, Plotinus, Parmenides, Kant, Dogen (obviously, but also produced philosophical work), maybe Wittgensteing, Hegel and Heidegger, too. Point being, philosophers gonna philosophize, bitches. Lol

Yes, they catalyze personal transformation. But Peter's talking about enlightenment. Overall, I agree with your statement.

Slogan for a Dolce Gabbana spot.

As far as I know, he's done his fair share of psychedelics and other drugs, and in high doses. 5-MeO is not one of them, though. Apparently he once did 1000ug of LSD (extremely high dose). He could equally tell you to become conscious of what he talks about before conflating truth with a change of state caused by drugs. I'm not against the intelligent use of psychedelics, by the way. But what they are useful for is the key question here.

So he basically calls 5-MeO "toad juice" in order to trivialize and ground the matter, I would say. It likely is specially directed to people who start making up cosmologies and idealized fantasies around psychedelics. But he does acknowledge that changes in state can be positive and conducive to insight.

This one is huge. Responsibility. Actually being in the driver's seat.

Turn it off. Sell it, give it or throw it away. If you find yourself using it more than you like, your intention to freeing yourself from that addiction isn't solid enough. It might even not be there at all, which is proved by the fact that you still use it compulsively. Not saying you have to stop using it, or that it has to be used either, for that matter.

As a young man, I feel the same. Set enlightenment work (especially psychedelic-assisted) aside for a few years.