Salvijus

I support god

I suspect the psychological reasons of wanting to change your gender is off aswell. Although I never had a chance to really look at what's going on in their heads.

Sounds logical. I would've said "an accurate equivalent"

When people are overreacting so ridiculously, making a joke out of it is rather a healthy response imo.

@Emerald@Sugarcoat @The Crocodile @Something Funny 🙏

Cool

I don’t. Actually I wanted to avoid this convo. These esoteric matters I have no hope of convincing people here. It's a very slow process.

Someone with a fully enlightened energy body could do it like the resurrection of Jesus or a rainbow body phenomenona. These people can disintegrate their body at will and appear again at will. (I know it sounds crazy you don't have to say it to me.) You can listen to the person I linked describe his experience. He's very convincing because he is able to say things that he couldn't have possibly known. Anyhow, my experience is similar to his actually. Different entities appear in different forms. Some may appear in dark siluete. Ascended souls appear as intense light or sometimes an orb. Look up Mother Marry apparitions at Zeitoun. It's very well documented place for her apparitions. There are pictures, you can see an example of how spirits look.

Learn something about energy healing and it will become clear why. Energy body is more fundamental than the physical body. If there is a problem in the energy body, accordingly something will manifest in the physical body. Energy body is the blue print.

I have direct experience of communicating with dead spirits. These spirits have a gender even without a body. Your great grandma is still a woman in a disembodied realm. That means there's a gender beyond the body. I can't prove these things to you. But if you're open minded, you can watch psychics speak with dead people on YouTube(link below) . Maybe that will convince you. But I'm not going to try to convince you of these things myself.

Because your soul determines what type of body you will have. The blue print doesn't fail in producing the necessary body for itself. Although there could be some weird exceptions like 1 in 10 billion where someone is born with weird deformities. These esoteric things I can't prove easily. There's no point in trying. That's why chose to go a simpler route.

This video is proof that souls exist and that souls have inherent identity (male or female) which is beyond the body. This energy body is the blue print for the shape and development of the physical body. If your energy body is male then it shapes the physical body into a male body, and the energy circulates there differently than in a female body and vise versa. These differences in energy is what gives men and women different capabilities to play different roles. If you were given a male body is because you have a male energy body. The energy body is like a scaffolding upon which the physical body happens next. So that would debunk the transgenderism aswell from a different angle.

Never heard his opinion on this matter. There are cases of criminal men saying they are women, they get relocated to a women's prison, then they rape women there. Idk bro. Military maybe would be an example. The point is, the practicality of such identity is questionable. And doesn't pass the test imo. There could be more examples than I can think of.

There are more problems with transgenderism from a more esoteric point of view. But I don't think people here could stomach such takes. It involves souls and energy bodies. It would probably be too woo woo for most.

Also unpractical in prison, unpractical when we need to identify people for certain types of jobs to do etc. Let me rephrase it then, transgenderism is as valid as me identifying as a tree.

Its practicality is a debatable matter I would say. It seems unpractical in sports. It seems unpractical in sensitive areas like nude beach and toilets, unpractical in prison, unpractical when we need to identify people for certain types of jobs to do etc.

And if I was not attached to my identity, would that automatically mean my logic in previous comments was right?

Because identity is a fabrication, we can identify as anything. I can identify as a moon if I want to and it will be correct. Other people can also identify me whichever way they like. Why? Because it's all made up. Now the question is. Because identity serves a practical purpose in society. We have to draw a boundary somewhere of what is practical and what is not. Me identifying as a tree is technically possible by the same logic that a guy can say to be a woman. But if I start asking that a government give me the same rights that trees have, it will become ridiculous. See?

If it's true, then damn was she good at playing two different people at once. But candle had a crush on sugarcoat. Idk... You can't fake this stuff up lol. Unless she's a genius.

Let's be less snarky and more clear pls.

So if I were to put a tree costume. That would change my appearance. Would that mean I have become a tree?

I still can't believe they were the same person. They had a very distinct opinions on subjects and idk... I'm just in disbelief.

To add to what I wrote earlier, if identity is an important distinction for social context, then on what basis should be determine our identity? On the basis of race? Nationality? Gender. Okay cool. I agree that those are important distinction for social context. But what is a transgender? Makes makes somebody a transgenderer?

Not sure what you were trying to say here.

But does the change in appearance count as a change in identity?