Hatfort

Elon Musk on Dave Chappelle’s show being strongly booed by the audience, who would have guessed it? He is used to having a troop of dickriders on Twitter, but out of that context, other common people spoke. Twitter is a big bubble, but still a bubble. Precisely we know for certain that Chappelle’s audience is not particularly woke, as the man had some controversies with his jokes about the trans community very recently, so those were already filtered in there. The original video posted on Twitter was removed. What about that? The freedom of speech absolutist is really fast at removing a video that harms his image. He says in another tweet that technically 90% of the people were clapping and %10 booing. I hightly doubt it, it seems like the majority in the video booed him.

Well, what I understand about Sinema is that she is not a centrist, she is very effectively blocking any leftwing policy as much to the right as she can from her position without being kicked out. Basically, being a rightist on a leftist position. When I refer to the right-left parameter, I mostly mean economical issues like inequality, taxation, public budget spending, working-class rights, poverty, housing, social protection, etc... I know the right is conservative and the left more progressive about those other culture war issues, there must be reasons for that, and I think Biden is fairly open with the LGTBQ+ people, which is cool, but that's not where I was framing his position on this right-left frame. Nobody needs to chop his dick. I don't want to make this thread about trans issues, and I'd say it's enough to live and let live with respect, dignity and treating everyone equaly in essence. Unfortunately, I don't think that's enough, as there is a historical and current hostility towards trans people, many times violent, which makes them a vulnerable community that may need specific measures of protection.

Well, I disagree, I think Biden is in the center at most. But one of the politicians that's blocking him is precisely Sinema.

There is the center, and then there is the right. Sinema is on the right. Perhaps Biden is in the center, it's like the Democrats chose the most acceptable candidate for the right in aesthetics and past politics like the failed war on drugs. Only Bloomberg was worse, who should have been a republican candidate, but maybe he fulfilled the job of making Biden and others look more centrist than they really are. To be fair, Biden is being better than I would have thought, but he has much room left yet. Sinema and Manchin have the best position in the world to be lobbied. I'd say it's not easy to get there, so my congratulations to them and their interest. They are Troyan horses in the Democratic party working for the Republican-aligned policies. They have my congrats for that and my big despise as well. Not that they care, but all for them. Sinema was not going to make it in the next primaries. Her best position to continue being funded and lobbied by companies is to face Democrats as an independent next time and maybe divide the vote. That's her last move.

What she says about being independent is bullshit. No senator of the Democratic party should always agree with everything, that's a given. But they are there representing their voters, not themselves and their personal interests. There may be instances when deviating from whatever the party says could be fine. But, come on, this woman was against all policies that could affect big companies one bit in favor of the people. She got to be in power by advocating for a much more progressive agenda and then she just changed her mind, in some cases being a decisive vote. She didn't get there on her own, no way she could have done that without the Democrat apparatus. Unlike Bernie Sanders, it didn't work against her, but for her. This is also a calculation for her own interest, she wasn't going to make it in the next primaries, so she prefers to at least run as an independent. This is just the best way for her to continue doing what she was already doing, supporting the economic conservative agenda. She may be done though, we'll see.

Replacing policemen with social workers doesn't work like sending them to dangerous crime scenes in their place. No, the police is still needed, it's naive to think otherwise. Of course, they are not saints, but they do dangerous things when needed (not in Uvalde) and their presence serves as a persuasion for people not to commit crimes as well. The job of social workers can be preventive, it's needed and it lowers crime rates by a lot. Most people who engage in violence are in social and economical exclusion situations. People with income, shelter, food, and basic needs fulfilled don't engage in violent crimes, they have more to lose. But some people and some communities have it harder, and they may be more exposed to violence in their surroundings. But social workers can't do enough without funding, money is required. Social workers are also needed after crimes. Jail or detention centers rarely fix any root problem, make them worse probably. I'm not saying people who commit crimes shouldn't be punished, but there has to be a culture of reinsertion as well. Again, funding. What's happening in the USA with guns and fire weapons is lunacy. In most of Europe, nobody has firearms, it's mostly the law enforcement corps, hunters, and not many more than that. You obviously need to have a legal license to have them. The regular municipal policemen don't have firearms on duty. Gun confrontations are extremely rare. If a lunatic like Kyle Rittenhouse would show up with a rifle in a riot, the police would go to detain him on the spot. Militias in the streets full of rifles and guns would be stopped too, probably by the army. It's crazy. The US population has been brainwashed into this madness, there are lobbies dedicated to that. But you do you. Are the police in the US easy with the trigger? Probably yes. It's not a paranoia they have that anyone can have a gun hidden, it's the reality. I'm not justifying them, it's their job to be sure that someone has a gun before shooting theirs. You don't like it? Well, be a firefighter then.

They discuss how people that don't accept Jesus Christ shouldn't be allowed in positions of power and even jobs. Those are the libertarians, right?

I would have been very surprised if Walker had won this second round. His blatant hypocrisy about abortion, continuous lies, or private life issues could have had a pass. But this man was just so unqualified and, sorry to say, but just so dumb. I would feel insulted if I was told this is the man to represent me to make important decisions about lawmaking, public budget management, and politics in general. The case of voting for your preferred policies holding your nose about the candidate wasn't even enough. I had big fun with his speech about vampires and werewolves, it felt surreal.

That's not how it works. Euthanasia is for medically terminal cases where patients are in extreme pain or really bad conditions and already dying anyway. Also for people with incurable extreme paralysis cases that want to die and cannot do it by themselves and are being kept alive against their will. Once legalized, there are protocols to follow, it's not something done lightly. No one is giving drugs to suicidal people so they kill themselves.

There's no a way around of manipulating children in the first place, it's a problem not to recognize that. That doesn't mean we can't treat each child as a unique individual, we should do that, but at the same time offer some guidance from the experience only adults can offer. There are some good values like discipline, compassion, love, etc... Why not teach those?

Yeah, Twitter's business model was not working before, but I think it had a chance. However, now it has an extra hole of 44 billion plus the interest that Elon has paid for it with loans. It is also struggling with advertisers at the moment, lost millions desperately needed in weeks. But we'll see, it's still a huge platform and that's power. SpaceX's business model is, my private company does the work the government used to do with NASA before, but now to projects' expenses I have to charge the money I add to my own pocket and my shareholder's pockets. It's a good model for private big pockets, not for taxpayers' where the money came from before and still comes from now. Tesla was a good business model as well. Electric cars are a good thing, but now he got in the shoes of Twitter. Does it change anything? Well, it could be, because Tesla buyers were people with money, but with some concern about the environment, so in general leaning to the left. Elon has placed himself unequivocally in the right, so it could repeal his potential clients of Tesla. Also, one of the marks of Tesla was not to advertise because the product was so good that didn't need it. But the man is begging companies to advertise on his platform and give him money now. If I was a big company owner, and I'm sure they know who they are in their rich people circles, I'd tell Elon I wouldn't advertise in his company now and do it somewhere else instead. In fact, without having to tell him anything. Mike Lindell can advertise his pillows though. Tesla is also a great business model as it has a little big help from daddy state in the form of subsidies. Yeah, everyone is paying for those cars, whether you drive them or not. Oh, for the cars and for the dividends for the Tesla owner and shareholders. I almost forgot to mention that.

No, I'm not sure at all, who knows... But Twitter ironically got quite interesting with all this drama, so it could be. I did leave it though, but I'm one person. It's really a personal gain to leave those kind of social media for most people, certainly for me. The value they provide doesn't make up for the time they take from you. Twitter was successfully designed to be addictive. Not by Elon Musk, has to be said.

Kanye literally saying he likes Nazis and a lot of things he loveeeeees about Hitler. A lot of things.

Elon is at war with Apple. Is it a genius move or a childish tantrum? Twitter is growing, more people are signing than left, apparently. I believe it, people love drama and Elon is bringing much of that. But will they stay there for long once the drama gets old? Not so sure about that. He still will need to make a profit though.

Is Elon Musk out of his mind or what? Freedom of speech includes advertising wherever you want to. If Apple doesn't want to advertise on Twitter, what is his problem with that? Crazy. Twitter is not just Twitter now, is Twitter-Elon Musk, whether he likes it or not. He is also endorsing one political party over the other, which may be understandably a concern for some companies that want to appeal to everyone, not just conservatives. Twitter is still working thanks to inertia, even with the previous and actual economical losses, but so many voices and ears were and are still there.

According to Ben Shapiro, Kanye has assembled the Antisemite Avengers team. lol Kanye West, Catholic ex-gay Milo Yiannopoulos, and the neo-nazi Nick Fuentes, all of them with Tim Pool. Also, Sneako somewhere there. Ye brought at least Nick Fuentes to Trump. I'm sure that Trump personally doesn't have a problem with that, but this Fuentes is too nazi for average or moderate Republicans, so that was a bad move for him to make.

It was predicted and expected by some that a Red Wave would turn the Senate and the House to the Republican side. Well, that has not happened, seems Democrats and young people particularly have moved their asses to cast their votes. I Just wanted to share these two maps, as it can be a bit misleading to see the two colors divided by the land, because when you do it by counting the actual number of votes, it is not as red.

Herschel Walker is asked what message he has for the new generation of voters that don't know how it was to grow up without the Internet. His message is that if they don't like America they can leave and go somewhere else. Lovely man. He does prefer werewolves to vampires though. That's important.

Yeah, nice try twisting this into the exact opposite. Rightists are much more sexually repressed than leftists overall. As I said, most people on the left are cool with Hunter Biden doing drugs and having sex, that doesn't bother us at all. Well, crack is not the best choice, and there is certainly some danger about its usage, but we are much more tolerant about drugs in general and less repressing. The same about sexual experimentation. The ones trying to make a scandal story about it, those are the ones you are referring to. I also want to add that I don't consider it fine to reveal intimate images of other people, I don't care what political views they have. I do respect privacy and I would say the same if it was one of Trump's sons in a similar situation.

To feed right-wing conspiranoics for longer? Not that they need much either, they kind of produce their own garbage from nothing anyway.

What's big? Hunter Biden doing drugs and having sex? We kind of like that on the left, good for him. We are not grannies like you. Was he using his last name for his own benefit and business? So what. I'm not against that either.

Not all misinformation is equally relevant. If I lie online with a fake story of two birds on my roof, who cares, that doesn't have any repercussions. If someone spreads misinformation about a disease or an election result, real cases, you know what I'm talking about, that's different, Flat-Earthers are loonies, but I don't think their ideas have many significant negative repercussions overall, so that's why they may not be de-platformed like others. That's the job of moderators to value, a machine or an algorithm cannot do it, and there are no clear lines.

Elon Musk has discovered that managing Twitter was more complicated than sprouting easy slogans like 'I'm a freedom of speech absolutist', something he has proved not to abide by once in charge. He has confronted many public figures that brought a lot of users to the platform like Stephen King, while he was on good terms with weirdo anonym users like one called Catturd. Sorry, but this is not a genius move, it's the opposite. Most of the advertisers left by their own decision, no activist group did that, he lied, and he is a coward for blaming imaginary scapegoats. The paid blue verification situation was a fiasco. A wise manager comes to a company, first observes, then fires, then hires. He got rid of half his staff in the first week. and he sent an ultimatum email to the rest asking for 80-100 work weeks. I'm not even sure if this last is true, because it sounds absurd. His employees are leaving and he had to bring engineers from Tesla and money from SpaceX. SpaceX is private, okay, but all their contracts are bought exclusively by the government, so in the end, it's taxpayer money. The government and NASA sent men to the moon in the 60s with no help from private companies getting their pockets and money sacks bigger. Shareholders want profits first. Twitter was so big that it was difficult to destroy, but he is getting closer and closer to it. If he seals the deal, I don't think he'll recover the image of the visionary he had in the eyes of the world before. He fucked up a lot. Let's see what else he does.

Fair. Going vegan happens mostly on stage green, which makes sense, although I've seen some stage orange self-proclaimed libertarians on a few occasions being vegan. Stage yellow people can continue being vegan too, I don't see why not. Vegans don't cause more animal death than non vegans, that statement is incorrect, is actually the contrary. Be or not be vegan, but don't fool yourself with some misleading comments you may read. You can make money in stage yellow, you have integrated some of the good things of orange and green, and combined them. Then you cannot use any means to get there. You gotta be conscious of where your money comes from, and perhaps say no in the instances that it comes from the suffering of other people or maybe the environment. That's why stage orange make more money, because they don't give a fuck. Is that good? Not caring if your business is polluting a river where people used to drink or people die because of lack of proper medical attention or because they make money from selling land mines that end up blowing up children's limbs or lives? You tell me.

My advice is that you revisit the discipline from stage blue to learn how to use capital letters and also the value of separated paragraphs in your writing. That way your ideas will be easier to read and understand by others. I'm not an orthography nazi, but these kinds of comments are a pain. Sorry.