Hatfort

Of course they do, as well as male and female bodies, but they are separated in sports because of the whole range difference. If they competed together, males would mostly win, because the top of their range is higher. In a lower degree, but the performance ranges of cis compared to trans are also different, being higher for the trans group at least in females, that's why they should be in another category in sports. Also, all transitions are not equal, some start early in life others later, but you can't really establish where to put the line for competing. It could be an issue for the trans category too, but it would definitely be a problem in a trans and cis mixed category.

There are some attempts, I've heard of Western feminist movements to help women from Afghanistan after the recent power moves, for example. Also about empowering women of Africa, which sounds great, but I don't think is that simple where so many men are extremely poor as well, and they won't get a wealthy wife to maintain them. In a sense, there's probably a surface understanding of the development stages, even if they are not yellow yet, most greens kind of get some societies are in previous battles yet. Criticize green contradictions all you want, but remember they are higher than orange and blue, so what's questionable about them, it's probably worse in the others.

I think it's an okay idea, at least for individual sports, they could compete with each other. For team sports, it's probably not possible.

These attacks are awful, but I'm not surprised Palestinians want Jewish people to sometimes experience the same suffering they do on a regular basis. However, Israel is going to crush them now, so it's worse for them in the very short term. Israel is an apartheid system country, Jewish people have all the rights and Palestinians don't. Moreover, any Jewish person in the world can migrate to Israel and get a free house, however, Palestinian refugees are not allowed to return. That's how you win elections, what a joke of democracy. Digging a bit.

Yeah, sports are exclusionary, not everyone is allowed to play automatically in whatever they want, you gotta have some physical conditions. Biological sex should be another threshold, especially trans women can have some biological traits that can give advantages to them, generaly speaking.

To the topic title and question. I don't think so, look at who conservatives elect, they look like spoiled teenagers who can't take a no for an answer. Marjory Taylor Greene, Lauren Boebert, Kari Lake, George Anthony Devolder Santos, Matt Gaetz, they almost elected this funny Herschel Walker, and what to say about Donald Trump. They are a reflection of their voters, the conservative people today. The Democrats are being the adults in the room right now. About green stage people. Yeah, they should be more aware that people being intolerant is a lower stage and maybe handle it some other way, but then they'd be getting into yellow. That being said, sometimes I find it fine intolerants taste their own medicine, otherwise, they don't learn. They need first-hand experience of hardship.

Look at this, is it Bernie Sanders? No. It's Joe Biden, the president, literally saying he supports the workers against corporate greed. I wouldn't have said it, it's awesome. Tell me now Trump is the one with average people and the working class. Yeah, no. Hasan Piker's cover of this rare happening:

The main courses are: Lobster anatomy Real pronouns Bedroom cleaning Get your degree!

It's not a metaphor, it's a mistake. I think he is sorry he did it too, and not only because he got caught. I'm not in his head, but neither you are. I respect that you don't vote for him if you cannot forgive his bad actions. Look, he is the governor, he is an influential man and successful before getting into politics too, if I have heard well. Eating in good restaurants in his position is normal, and even recommendable for many reasons. Yes, the state is in bad condition, a lot has to be made. It's a rich state, and with a lot of in-country migration because people think there are more and better job opportunities there, which is true, but handling that is a big challenge. Many more social programs are needed to fix the homelessness and criminality problems and more regulations for the high house price ones, but US citizens have been brainwashed to think the opposite with boogieman words like socialism, so it's a hard job. He seems to be implementing programs in the right direction, and certainly better than what Republicans propose about those.

Badly done, as a governor, he was the first one who had to follow the health protocol and guidelines. It was recommended not to gather people from more than three households, and they broke that. Leading by example is important. He admits the mistake, I can move on. I still love him, he is great. By the way, I'm fine with him going to good and or expensive restaurants. That's okay.

If it's a conspiracy against him for his views, why isn't for example Joe Rogan getting the same treatment? I'm sure he has been with multiple women too. If it was that easy to get false allegations for Brand, why wouldn't it be for Rogan too, and shut another truth-teller about vaccines and stuff? I'm sorry, but the investigation seems consistent. The guy was a monster. He may have embraced a spiritual route last years, I'm sure he has improved, but the girls he hurt are allowed to come back from his past and not be fine. YouTube did well according to their guidelines because it's not only about content. If a creator damages their corporate image with their life apart from the videos, they can and should take measures. To put an extreme example, if a serial killer of children would upload party song videos, wouldn't YouTube be allowed to demonetize or cut his content just because his videos are okay? Hell no, fuck him, banned, and so his content and videos. Elon Musk would be glad to show them in X anyway.

He speaks well and wisely, I love him. I would suck his balls. I prefer him to Biden for many reasons, age one of them. But I respect his loyalty too. A great Democrat presidential candidate for the future, if he decides so.

Yeah, maybe Kennedy would win too. Despite his position on some issues, he stands as the reasonable man near Trump. Williamson would reactivate the culture wars where Trump thrived in 2016, we don't want that.

Stinks badly for him. One of the girls kept calls and text messages and was treated in a specialized center the same day she claims she was raped. That means doctors who saw her that day can testify about her condition at least. There's another relationship where he was 30 and the girl was 16 and in fucking high school. Legally just reached the age of consent but it's a very bad look per se and more so in the current social and political environment where there's so much talk about grooming. This girl also alleges very inappropriate behavior of Brand towards her. Where are the right-winger defendants of minors now? In a cave with their mouth shut like bitches, there is where they are.

Biden is old, but he is not senile or anything like that for now. Could he deteriorate during the next five years? Yes. Also Trump, he is just three years younger. The important thing is that Biden can defeat Trump next year, 2024. Williamson is not an appropriate contendant against Trump. Neither is anybody else right now.

Western society is suffering some backlash and certainly a deceleration of development due to rightwingers, but they will probably get over that in a fair time, these fluctuations are normal throughout history. But there are considerable risks as we are seeing with Trump, attempting to hold power even after losing elections, and a lot of people and the Republican Party still supporting him after that. Other Western countries in Europe have also similar problems.

Quite serious allegations, four main ones: Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-66838794 On the other theme, quite a risky pick-up line that could go wrong and did.

Nietzsche had medical and mental problems, that episode with his horse doesn't disprove the validity of empathy. Please, be reasonable, you know I mean to put in the place of others but in a reasonable manner. Capitalism didn't put men on the Moon, it was socialism. The state through taxpayer money and good management, it wasn't a private endeavor. That notion that capitalism is the only thing that brings progress is very flawed and doesn't stick to history at all. Pure capitalism has never existed, it would fail. For individual greatness to thrive, it's much better a good public social safe base in fact. I prefer this video:

Stage green can detect the flaws of capitalism and also propose good improvements and alternatives. What they sometimes fail to see is that those changes can take time and also fail in strategy. Also, there's a powerful economic and media apparatus working against them. Empathy is fine, you put yourself in the place of others. This provides a lot of good answers.

Hasan is mostly green, his political views clearly show that. Beyond orange individualism, he has also a sense of community and general well-being that can be highly improved by different policies. Leftist ones, yes. Green can and should integrate healthy orange, as is the step above, but it does denounce unequivocally the unhealthy one, the one that puts profits above any other considerations and causes so much harm. So much harm for a lot in exchange for the unnecessary luxury of just a few. That's not fine. Hasan is successful in his career and he is making money, but sticks to some ethics. For example, he has an expensive house, but uses it for living, I'm fine with that. With his income and wealth, he could easily get into the unhealthy real estate business and rent homes to people with less money than him to profit from their work with zero effort. He doesn't say that the solution for homelessness is to bring a homeless person to your home, the ones that say that, I don't know what they are waiting for to do so, please do, we'll all applaud the kindness. He says it's something that can be addressed by public policies like social housing and others, which I agree.

I've heard they could prevent him from running for the crime of sedition, according to the Constitution. He clearly attempted to steal the election, the perfect phone call has been out for months. He asked an official to find him 11.780 votes, the number he needed to surpass Biden in Georgia. Votes are not sought and found, they are cast and counted. Guilty. However, I want him to run, I hope they don't prevent it.

He tweets like a lunatic. He could use a course, not to change his views, but to share them like a normal person.

The turning point could have been January 6th, but nope. Look at Liz Chenney, she denounced that a coup on democracy is off limits, and she has been kicked out. Very few conservative voices, including their media and online rightsphere, go openly against Trump. I can think of two, Chenney and Schwarzenegger. Three, I checked Clint Eastwood, he left him too. By the way, this man debunks the moans of crybaby right-wingers who say Hollywood censors their side. He has his worldview, he transfers it into his movies, he is a great director, and is respected and awarded in the industry all the fucking time. Conservative YouTubers like Peterson, Shapiro, Rogan, Tim Pool, Steven Crowder, Blaire White... None of them clearly denounce what Trump did, which was an attempt to steal an election to the rightful winner, Joe Biden, a coup. Drag shows, litter boxes, and pronouns my balls.

Was he a celebrity in Las Vegas? That's cool. Poor bird, killed by a psychopath.

Let them be. Part of getting to higher stages is to understand and tolerate the previous stages.