Willy Phallicus

The greatest truth in the bible is the one that goes "my people perish for lack of knowledge".

Unity is love because love is unity. When you love someone you feel connected with them and ultimately, you are them.

Its not the patriarchy. It's not the vatican or the rosicross. It's not the jews or the elites or the new world order. It's not reptoids or revolutionaries, it's not grey aliens or hermaphrodites, it's not bankers or pandimensional entities, it's not lucifer or troglodytes, it's not social engineers or eugenecists, it's not politicians or chupacabra, it's not the morlocks or the eloi - these are all just front groups for the real problem: Reality. Gravity, the element carbon, self awareness, opposable thumbs, electro-magnetism, genitalia and digestive enzymes have all conspired and colluded to make a perfectly shitty order of things.

We can't have a dialogue and that's entirely your fault. I point you to my argument and you point back at me and don't address a damn thing I said. I do understand, I just don't agree. Are you too employed to spot the difference? That's the real problem you have with me but Ill just point out that its your problem and you're the negative element here. It would have been more honest to say you just don't care to have a dialogue unless I steer away from the facts of the matter so I can somehow validate the OPs short sighted, misguided and completely biased perspective. Respect isn't a given, its earned and the OPs position deserves no respect whatsoever so Im not giving it any. Cry me another river. Saying we need the extreme of matriarchy to bring balance to human governance because the extreme that is patriarchy is unbalanced and domineering is straight up cognitive dissonance of the fanatical first order. Balance and equality are one man and one woman and neither exercising power or influence over the other to arrive at an agreed upon set of goals. Thats not what the OP is proposing and again, Im just calling it out and youre trying to call me out in the lamest way imaginable. So unless you have something to actually refute the above paragraph about what balance is Miss Good Faith Discussion I highly recommend you stick to your guns, stop replying and maybe try discussions more your speed.

Ive said this in other threads. The argument, if you will, is exactly that - circular (so is everything in the solar system from planets to orbits). That's not a mistake or some weird coincidence either. See the ouroboros. Now of course circular reasoning isn't logically coherent but that's just par for the course when you're talking about the absolute or God. I can't logically prove Inliytened1 is God but I know that he is. So yeah, its circular and there's plenty of clues that's the case.

Maybe you shouldn't assume so much. This isn't my first rodeo on this topic. I've done my homework. I understand their perspective better than they do and that's not a boast. Im not giving you my opinion here. This isn't Willy's perspective its the reality and Willy is putting it in perspective. I put the time and research in and I did it dispassionately and objectively. The OP is openly operating from an extremely biased perspective which, like Christianity, can't handle a modicum of criticism about their faith. Thats fanaticism, Im over and done with them and Im not making any fuckin apologies. I don't owe anyone jack shit and the universe damn well knows it. Look at the OPs latest offerings. Do you honestly think the USA is going to be run by clan mothers or a clan mothers system? And where's the evidence that states that's the way we have to go there OR ELSE. Or else what? Who are the clan mothers going to be? How and when do we decide to go to a Clan mother system (who can tell men to fuck off btw)? What's the obviously sane protocol for choosing our clan mothers? This is the shit they can't tell you and when they do you find out is has nothing to do with your individual human rights. Lets keep it in mind the fact that nature don't give a fuck about your opinions or theories. Nature doesn't suffer fools like the OP. You either got what it takes or you get run over - thats life on planet earth and that's not mans fault or womens fault. Human life could be better for everyone but the problem isn't male or female its just fucking human. Men and women are both shitty options. I want option C: Out of the us vs them perpetual civil war so Im not brutalized until the bitter, agonizing end and the OPs ideology is the path right to it. You can't rationalize saying that Patriarchy is extremist and evil and then logically conclude its opposite, Matriarchy is egalitarian and good and wholesome. Its a pipe dream for imbeciles. Equality looks like this: A council of 10, five men, five women elected by all men and women and they all have equal say. If that's not what you're advocating for then youre not on the same team as me. Edit: Let me correct myself here and say I don't care for a council either. If humans are running it no system is safe from corruption. Every peoples government always turns on the people, I think what humans need are a good sheppard but we just crucify those.

Its the same question as "what is the absolute? or what is oneness?" - a question that can only be answered by the individual who goes beyond choronzon where the doors of perception are cleansed and everything is revealed. When that individual comes back, they can't tell you what it is in a way that can be truly understood by someone who never experienced it. It just is and you just know it. Love is Infinity and vice versa but saying it as concisely as that still wholly fails to do it any kind of justice. You need the experience not the answer to a question. The experience shows you are the answer to the question and there was never any question to begin with. Total mindfuckery. Its like when people go 'i just had this realization and felt this type of way' and you tell them they are God. Its true but most of them will never believe/embody it so they doubt it like Ralstons doing. The quote provided from Ralston from Unborn Tao shows where the fly in Ralstons ointment is. It sounds like he caught only a glimpse (albeit a real good one) of the mystery so he was never really transformed or touched by it and then used his brain exclusively to say something completely redundant (and derivative) about the nature of being but with a closed mind. Basically, he didn't turn into a living depiction of Jesus Christ upon reveal so in his estimation there's no way Love can be the heart of this matrix.

None of what youre linking here matters because its gonna be what its gonna be - and its likely not going to be clan mother primitive. Let me put it another way: You have just as much power over the future as you do the present. Saving the world is a tall order.

A dude didn't write 50 Shades of Grey and men didn't turn it into a nearly two billion dollar franchise.

What men? Where? What are the numbers? Based off your proclamations of the problem the majority of women should already be raped and dead. So why arent they? Why are there female rapists then if its a man thing? Why arent there female NFL players then genius? You have a patriarchy because the dominate sex in nature is male. You have a patriarchy because men built civilization. Men are physically superior to women, its not up for debate. Go look at the primate world in case you need a refresher course on how nature implements gender roles. There are alphas, the alphas are male, the alpha runs the group and everyone goes along or gets fucked up by the alpha. Ability = might. If the mighty have a respect for the concept of self determination then the weak will go unmolested. If the mighty have no such respect then the weak will be subjugated. The weak are always at the mercy of the strong - if the strong are merciless then the weak are simply fucked. That's how nature works. Now contrast that to western society where rape is a thing that can happen but its not because all men are cool with it and think it should be a thing and women are lawfully equal to men. Most men find rape despicable and don't engage in it. You sound just like those female athletes who can't figure out the very practical reasons why they aren't paid as much as their male counterparts and just call it oppression so they don't have to come to grips with how inferior womens sports are to mens sports. What's the name of the fallacy and explain to me exactly, in detail, where and how I used the fallacy. Otherwise you're doing that thing I already accused you of which is completely ignoring my argument to tell me my argument is bad without proving any of the shit you type. Pointing out the stupidly in your face hypocrisy of someone's position is a completely valid form of counter argumentation and mind you I have to tell this to someone with the audacity to talk about good faith discussions. I'd say that's mighty hypocritical of you but apparently pointing out hypocrisy isn't a valid position. I don't need to be reminded that you don't have any argument, Ive only pointed it out like three times already. What you have is an axe to grind and you can't even manage that with any degree of effectiveness. Put your money where your mouth is and prove it or stop replying to me and wasting my time. Yeah that can happen when you actually know and understand the facts. My bad. Im completely open to having a real discussion but people like you and the OP make that impossible. You dont want a discussion, you want immediate validation and can't stand it when you don't get it. Y'know, like a typical western woman.

I provided an answer to this very question lastnight but it looks like the thread was deleted for no good reason. Not a good look. Not the first time either. I wonder why that is. Anyhoo, Hojo has your answer.

If you were approaching this in good faith, you would actually make an attempt to debunk what Im saying instead of just pointing out how you dont like it. Thats what a good faith discussion is, in case you were wondering. Then why are you making it about me? I am countering the OP because the OP is wrong. If Patriarchy is bad then Matriarchy is bad when you're talking egalitarianism. Now this is the point someone would refute that with empirical evidence but the OP has no case of any kind and doesn't try to hide their stupidly obvious bias. Just saying it doesn't make it true. You kind of have to back up what you're saying. Im not just telling the OP they are wrong Im showing them why they are wrong. Big difference. Matriarchy being totally antithetical to equality and thus being stupid ain't my fault. I'm just pointing it out. Maybe less shooting the messenger and more critical thinking. Men didnt just wake up one day and decide to be the dominant sex. Nature created this dynamic and it holds true for just about every mammal on the planet. Bitching and moaning about it ain't going to change that fact. The notion that females are just poor innocent victims of a brutal male system is an extremely elitist stance. Females are fully complicit in this system and its hypocrisy and that's the information everyone needs to transcend it into equilibrium but no, they just want matriarchy to take over the world because "men suck".

While we pull shit like this out of a cracker jack box if you need someone to blame then blame fuckin Nature dude but recognize the hypocrisy there because men couldn't have done it without women.

You gonna explain how I did that or am I just supposed to believe you? If you think Patriarchy = bad then you should think Matriarchy = bad. But thats not whats being presented. So Im calling the shit out. Nah it means Im having the honest discussion but people want the emphasis on nonsense so they can spew their nonsense.

There's his problem. Big assumption followed by the assumption he is correct.

What strawman? And why would I ask the OP when the OP doesn't have the first clue about what they're into? Who in their right mind advocates that the solution to extremism is the polar opposite extreme? One of the links provided is "Why Matriarchy is the next wave of feminism". If its an egalitarian movement why not just call it the egalitarian movement? I watched a few minutes of a handful of the videos posted. Its mostly feels and good intentions with zero vision and no real practical solutions - we're all supposed to just go numb and believe. The problem with mass movements is the fringe extreme always ends up running it. Even if Rafael Thundercat personally knows where to draw the line that doesn't the movement cant take on a life of its own so the feminists who want orgies of blood atonement can get their matriarchy. Start the revolution without me.

Sorry, I thought I was on the #1 epistemic rigor forum. Go take a look at what all these empathic policies have produced. Then realize the system isnt broken and its designed to be this way. The chaos is intentional. Matriarchy doesnt just have a few stated views about the state of things. Its a full blown agenda with winners and losers. Anyone endorsing matriarchy as a system that needs implementing to improve life for all is either a jackass or a shill and likely both. Anyone concerned about equality would be exposing the religion of matriarchy instead of justifying it. Anyone proposing the idea should be regarded with extreme skepticism and suspicion. The Susan B Anthony womens sufferage movement did what it needed to do. Everything from 1960s onwards, coined third wave feminism, is blatant misandry. Fuck them.

I love that life is meaningless. An insignificant life is the best life to have. Who the hell wants to be burdened with universal meaning? It also frees me to find my own meaning and purpose.

Its the opposite. Consciousness is projecting outward so it can view the corruption from that vantage point so it can correctly identify and mend the malformed dialectics that lead to the corruption. Its all pattern and energy caught in a bad trip and thats working itself out in the here and now so a new and better trip can emerge. Man might not survive the process and thats no big deal to me. The one and only God. God is the projector, the screen and the content. There's no way to explain it, it can only be experienced.

Man may not be free of corruption but one day life will be free of man.

Power doesn't corrupt man. Man corrupts power.

It turns out woke marxist femiminist policies work out great when you need rape as an excuse to demonize men. Its nice and convenient when you can invite the rapists right into your neighborhoods and hand them your daughters to be violated when you want to get that message across.

Its just an assumption they're working with because its dialectical opposite isn't giving them enough of a free ride. Women got it pretty good in the western world and you know thats true because they can't shut the fuck up about how they dont have it all (aka matriarchy). Things being what they are, men could easily crush women into the dirt and there wouldnt be a goddamn fucking thing the women could do about it so if they're whining about stuff as they love to do you know the power dynamics theyre complaining about dont exist in the way that they say they do.

It cant be anything else lol The clues have been there the whole time.

I wont say you fucked up because you learned an important lesson which looks like you probably took too much. I've been there. It aint pretty. My advice would be to either stop entirely or start lower and gradually increase your doses until you find that sweet spot.