Shermaningeorgia

It is naive to think that power cannot be used

Governments can and do abuse power. That’s indisputable. Conspiracy theorists often are a mix of egoists who claim the truth or those legitimately highly sceptical of power.

This is rape. Come on. Don’t do this. she cannot consent

Aren’t you the one who hates professionalism and says nobody ever jokes? Ok then….

Not bothered. Your temple clearly told you false engagement

Complaining is part of life. Maybe find somebody to push your subjective ideals on, father. lol. For somebody so "wise", you don't really relate to people. So if a person is stuck in a traffic jam. don't complain. they get caught in rain, don't complain. fair enough! some blunted view from some gruff midwestern American with a limited perspective, is it. blaming victims is kind of cringe. I don't subscribe to harming others or think it's virtuous to do so. If youdo, so be it. Humans have biases, doesn't mean one can not be subject to such. nobody should take negativity or be expected such. Your views tend to be "suck it up". what then is to be sucked up? Should Iranians suck up the Ayatollah? Should black Americans suck up police brutality? I'm under no obligation to heed your goofy and ill-founded points as they stand. Proof you're not that socially gered as you think. SO yes, i do despise hot ladies. must i like them? they're human beings like any other. Seems you also follow this "chase pussy" ideal and will use some pseudo-evolutionary guideline to support such. But i won't ever take somebody seriously who says others should take shit. There is more to life than sex. sex isn't all. If that fact makes me a "square" so be it. It's not really manly or becoming imho at least to just chase after pussy or put women on pedestals for their looks. It's hollow, shallow and done for ego. So your effort to "conform" a stranger has failed. Since hotties are scum overall, one doesn't have to like and tolerate that. since you see, people can and will oppose it.

i never cited being a victim. funny and odd reading there.

I cite truth. many are not decent. oh they're nice to their family and friends? So was Hitler. And? That's a low bar. Is this all down to sex and chasing pussy then?

Not everyone is Christian. And Jesus Himself said we’re all sinners

We all have biases. It's just funny. since many are racist, sexist, etc. and they advocate far more harm than i do, or ever would. but it's ok for them. but not me. such plotting is comical, and i will fight it to the ends of the Earth. And no, i do not despise attractive men. mainly since men and women are socialised differently. despite gender equality, this is a reality.

If she were ugly, far left woke, and not backed by her Islamic community who want any kind of rpresentation no matter how valid or toxic, then it stands to reason. Most hottie ladies globally are like her, and anybody else who says otherwise is a liar.

He is a strong debater in technical terms. Yes, that is true. But a person can be skilled and still be an ass. I watched his content often since I enjoyed his intellectual style and broadly shared his politics, but then I believe his issue wiht his friend Pxie turned me off him. I haven't seen his stuff since that incident arose. Like most big streamers, he turned out to be full of shit.

Aren’t you the Nazi who preaches kindness but then says some don’t deserve good medical treatment? I guess my church taught integrity.

i'm naturally a reserved person. i like it and it's who i am. saying people "must" be loud is a projected norm, it's not some innate thing of the universe. i remember working in a voluntary body. Some very hot lady (and yes, their "kind" tends to be scum) who was a fellow volunteer kept on pestering me "why don't you speak much?" I then said, as i'd lost my tether, "i am who I am. and are you that limited that you must have everybody conform to you and whatever random whims you have in your brain? you have more looks than nous." She complained that i was "rude". I supposed i was, and intended to be. However, I deem it "rude" to let minor shit like that bother somebody. It is true imho that people who push this "loud and chirpy" vibe do so out of conditioning, and not because it's truly inherent. Few things in humanity are truly intrinsic. Personally, I'd only be bothered by something others do if it really affects me. I'd let off minor "things I didn['t like" of others. We all have quirks and minor shit. I feel we should teach interpersonal skills in schools. and get graded for such as an actual exam. This could actually lessen social tensions. We don't have to like or feel comfortable around others. but generally this is due to internal prejudices and whims and things that aren't inherently harmful. We an either tolerate or not associate with others who don't make us feel comfortable, or otherwise don't engage to our liking. Because somebody does or says something we subjectively dislike, it doesn't make that person "bad" or "not as good". We can filter things and people out and move on. it's a shame most hottites don't get that.

I’m a person, yes.

It’s justified. My point stands. People can manage around others better.

I linked such above. Which is well-proven. Because you've never seen nor known somethng, it doesn't mean it cannot exist.

There can be cases where it's necessary. it's not as black and white as you're making out. And that countries cannot use intelligence, when spying is ubitiquous as it stands, to forestall a threat before it arises. it's not unfeasible, and not as blunted as you're making out. Pearl harbor is an example - https://www.nationalww2museum.org/war/articles/us-intelligence-failures-pearl-harbor. Not every war is like Iraq with patently bs intelligence.

Most online content creators are scum on some level. Either fake by word or deed. This includes big people on Twitch, YouTube, etc. I feel some person at Google or what have you saw her vids and boosted her via the algorithms. She's good-looking, anti-woke, and looking to "sort men out". perfect....

Whilst there is a rules-based order, countries always undertake foreign policy based on their own needs, ideologies, and whims. The USA's foreign policy has always suited its own ideals and agendas. Entering both world wars was as such, as ws he Cold War. And misguided acts like Iraq. The USA entered both world wars as it saw Germany as a threat to its ideals and values in both. It saw the USSR a threat in the Cold War for the same reason. Desinty is American, so of course supports American values. How else then should countries enable foreign policy? It has to stem from their own needs and realities. Generally speaking, the USA has been pro-democracy and anti-oppression, which was the standard case for its Cold War stance. The point is, Destiny despite being an ass isn't being "too subjective". His views actually align with what foreign policy is - countries advancing their own agendas albeit within a rules-based order.

It's a Jewish state formed as a result of a long Zionist process, and boosted by the Holocaust's aftermath.

A country might have good reason to invade another. There can be a feasible case for a pre-emptive strike on a country leading to war. You mentioned no wars the USA starts. it's never that black and white.

if it's consensual, it's fine.

wild and baseless take.

War is sometimes justified. Life isn't all peace, and part of humanity is dark.