Shermaningeorgia

Member
  • Content count

    307
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Shermaningeorgia

  1. I deem all therapists my enemies. since I KNOW they do not have a firm clinical part of me. But do for ALL OTHERS. So they are scum, and i treat them accordingly. I like how I offend them by doing things the masses do, since apparently there are standing medical ethics at play, and apparently it doesn't apply to me. GOOD. that signifies that we're enemies then.
  2. - less bias - more ethical treatment - program them to follow a treatment algorithm Humans can learn but can often be slow to unlearn. AI can be easily programmed. You cannot erase the thoughts or cognitive process of a human, not without causing traumas.
  3. Any flesh and blood human being IS BANNED from therapy. They can only form the DSM but NEVER, EVER execute it. This is enforced by a global treaty. Anybody caught is imprisoned for a decade or faces a MASSIVE fine. as in $USD 30m equivalent. We develop androids to act as therapists programmed with the DSM. They are then reviewed after a year to enusre they are performing per cited programming. this will be a transparent process, with the results of every android therapist posted publicly. Thus, there would be no to fewer petty biases. And only objective care. Those who oppose this in spirit had issues or morality by-passes.
  4. They would follow this basic algorithm: - Recognise a human, without reference to race, religion, appearance, attire, etc. - They would be programmed to judge all things by the DSM and the proper interpretation of such. - if they fail, they're terminated and then reprogrammed. This is done in public viewing to improve transparency
  5. I am nastier to pretty ladies than to others. I believe fully in being civil to all, but I admit I fail in this regard mainly since hotties tend to be scum. I make a point to yell if they get too close in public. As in, I often commute to work/uni. And part of the commute involves traversing a big international rail terminal - this means a near UN of hotties literally. I even swear at some in their own language - if I note they are Spanish-speaking, I'll do it. They often walk so fast with their heavy luggage, and they catch me, and I have no room or time to manoeuvre, so I yell at them. i don't like being hit, thus it's my right. And they have no right to hit me. nothing says their looks give them that "right". It's satisfying to hit them. In restaurants, I enjoy yelling at them. especially as on some occasions they would blindside me if I'm waiting in a busy entrance foyer with other patrons. I don't go to establishments to be manhandled or disrespected. SO will they ban me for shouting at their employees, when they're the ones who are aggressors? Good. There are so many other places to go to. Not skin off my nose. i don't respect looks. why must I? we're all there on the rock in space. So i call them out harshly when needed. Or can some hot bitch try and persuade me why she has a "right" to do what she wants? over all others ? odd logic
  6. A mental disorder is a condition of the mind or behaviour that causes either distress or social malfunctioning.
  7. I do not do this. You're massively projecting.
  8. Must say, I genuinely hate hot ladies. I don't put pussy on a pedestal. I think at my age (39) it's cringe and pathetic to smooch up to hotties. Sure, sex is nice. But sex isn't all. So would these said dudes not care if a hottie killed their kids, torched their house, or murdered their spouse and parents then? They'd want to shag her, despite the carnage she has caused? Really? I don't think hot ladies are very responsible or ethical people. I don't trust them in authority. They get spoiled and fucked over, and cannot handle it properly. They cannot be trusted to treat people fairly and in good faith. And what's more is that their supporters endorse this behaviour. So a person working with or under them, or even above them, has to tolerate their shitty conduct. Professionalism is evil, then. Clearly, if a person has been hired in good faith, they should thus expect a fair shake. And? Who can disagree with that? let uncouth loser bitch at that. Most hotties are thus uncouth losers. I am a postgrad uni student, and I commute often to classes. Part of the commute is via a big international train terminal, and there are lots of hot bitches from overseas. I hate it when people wheel luggage into me, since I feel it's done purposefully to mess me up, and I don't like people invading my space or attacking me. So I often yell at them in their own language. I find it funny, and it's deserved since people hold the right to go about unimpeded.
  9. social skills. More like the social OPINIONS of some scammer PUA.
  10. Did your church growing up tell you these "norms" of regulating others? Apparently, I didn't attend your church or have the critical thinking to question what your pastor told you. Funny how you gripe when people are irreverent. Sorry, sir, but that's part of life. Stop projecting your inner goofy "norms" onto the world. and stop assuming all must look on you kindly. it's baseless and weird and cringe. It belies you're a supposed "man" with no real insight and just bigged up in your youth/church. Any mofo who dares assue I "must" look up to them is a fool and cannot navigatge basic shit in life.
  11. Do indians in temples get taught broken English, thus designed to try and "mess" with people? Or do they hav this "ordained" angle to try and fuck with others? And thus betray the "kind" personas they attempt to push into the world?
  12. Take Taylor Swift, Venus Williams, Pokimane and Jake Paul. They get seen objectively and clinically due to these reasons: - how they look - their race - their countenance And that overshadows all other considerations. So if they are told they are depressed by these "therapists", they will have their concerns taken objectively. If they want a partner or to shag around, they'd be seen holistically as humans. But not others? OH yes...of course. coz of their looks, race, and countenance. No room for basic medical ethics. or diligence. No training, often spanning years, of how to engage with patients, oh no! It's all forgotten as soon as one leaves the training centre. Just like how a person passes their driving test and all they learn exits thei brain as soon as they receive their driving licence. So AI fits. SO ALL can get proper treatment. Those who disagree are evil nazis. yes, NAZIs. A core plank of Nazi ideology was to denigrate and limit. So in spirit one who disagrees is a NAZI in heart. Yes, I said it. NAZI - SIEG! HEIL! SIEG! HEIL!! SIEG! HEIL!!! DER FUHRER would be proud.
  13. Therapists are partial asf and hypocritical. They are pretty much selective. It’s all based on race and looks. And people who deny it are evil and hypocrites.
  14. Name a law stating one has a negative look up to pretties. Seems your only comeback is a childish desire to chase after pussy. so a hot bitch at random kills your dog. Is that acceptable? Cos she’s hot?
  15. He’s been in high end political life for many years. And people are shocked by his conduct ? Lol
  16. Yes therapists are scum. You might come a shoddy country that wishes to keep people down. Don’t project that elsewhere.
  17. It’s a fact that they’re partial. And fail to uphold ethics. Is that good then? Or you’ve been spoilt by looks not to care? Well I do. I’m glad it’s good to say otherwise or stand up for good.
  18. The issue is to ban them all. They’re scum. Ai is the answer. Like data from st tng.
  19. Since therapists are corrupt. My system better aids people.
  20. The ethics are there. Therapy should be banned. Simple.
  21. If it’s objective then fine. Another Hitler mind who hates betterment. Double speak.
  22. I do a post-grad course at a uni. A new entrant came in the past semester. this really hot foreign lady from South America. I haven't spoken to her. mainly since I genuinely dislike hot ladies. I have no specific reasons to welcome them or like them, and society that we should have grace to racists and sexists as they are only "human". So why not? Does it hurt people's brains to apply a rule consistently? I told someone I know in a different class about this, and they said I was "out of place", and that I didn't know, so I cannot judge her that much. I said, actually, not knowing somebody gives somebody more leeway to judge, and nobody is exempt from that. I feel that if there is the KKK and others, then I can hate hot ladies. And somebody of actual integrity and decency should condemn me and others alike. Since there is no fundamental difference between them. Seems rthe only reason to like hot ladies is sex. I feel getting sex and the "baddies" is childish, and grown men should get out of that. Most people in life are average-looking anyhow and get by well enough in dates and relationships. In my mind, looks correlate with a bad character. I don't see any group of people as inherently better. I believe others should stop projecting their double standards onto others.
  23. People who claim to be aware. Edgelords who want to be right People who distrust power.
  24. You're clearly not as wise and social as you claim. It's clear to all and sundry your plots here. And don't engage with strangers in such a manner.
  25. So do society's rules stand or not? if you and your hottie lady cadre are shady, so be it.