oOo

Emotions are there to transform us, not for us to transform the lesson they are designed to teach. It's a nuanced lesson, a perfect time to practice self-discernment then. Think of the most immature adults you can think of, they have the most ambivalent relationship to emotions you can imagine. And they often call themselves intellectuals or personal development teachers of some kind (I.e. spiritual). They call themselves these things because they cannot see that which is calling themselves these things nor can they name the action of that calling, RFI (relational network theory), and the funnel that leads to that calling, RFL (reality feedback loop) - [ Those two acronyms are my own designs and can therefore be ignored ]. Wishing you strength and resilience.

Literally step back, run a real-life simulation of Nelson Mandela saying the exact same thing you said. I am confident I won't need to explain why. It's a dilemma because you can't see the delusion. This comes across more as a narcissistic projective defense. Go to a health food store instead. Spend time building a healthier emotional language and subsequent vocabulary on where you begin and where another ends in the context of your own extraversion. Is the extraversion there simply to gain fuel from another, or develop a genuine connection or at least not seek anything in return? Build your own set of questions.

Human (me) vs. AI -------- Music. A human listening experience of a heart made machine. Let's see if AI can beat me from the future looking back to this moment when this music improvisation was first made. A musical improvisation (all off the cuff late at night) that in hindsight, feels prophetic when measured against global patterns that have transpired since till now. I made this song 5-6 yrs ago, the night I uploaded it. Alright, let's start off with me, then we'll jump to AI. Okay, alright, now, let's here what AI's vocal chords have to say. I am listening the AI's version of this song LIVE with you. I made a few AI variations in the last hour for experimentation. I am confident after the adjustments I made AI's attempt here will be sturdy. I also, have not listened to my own improvisational song here for about 6 months to a year, so that will be better for my ears. I made this song after my first two weeks of musical training, before then not much just relied on talent. I haven't trained that much since, too busy. Actually I think it was about a week and a couple of days. Now let me warn you, I gave Suno my voice and this song (dont sweat on that fact), so its trying to emulate me. Lets do this. NOW! AI's variant of my improvisation above. Awaken The True War - AI generated. https://0ooo0ooo0.bandcamp.com/track/awaken-the-true-war Remember, this is being shared live, so I have not listened to it yet but. Keep the heart strong. Otherwise, concerning my lyrics at the time, youll now understand the comments I made here yesterday. Things are picking up on my side again, ill be fully devoted until the September PROJECT : MEANING drop. Awaken the True War, which starts from meaning within. Best regards, oOo

Howdy, Due to the sensitivity of the work I am involved in its difficult to have a self reflective journal, even in relation to medicine. I am looking forward to this changing next year, where I get define the purpose of my own humanitarian projects in Ukraine 🇺🇦. Between now and then, I would like to return to making music with AI (for now). The fact that I stopped at a darker (yet romantic) song in my journal "Individuated Boundaries", kept gnawing away at me [its my second last comment in that journal if you want to listen to it]. We are going to return back to songs improvised within 30-60 minutes. Arguably, the song of the three I made in "Individuated Boundaries" that held the most weight across time was the song I spent the least time on, Divine Reason. Divine Reason - https://0ooo0ooo0.bandcamp.com/track/divine-reason The second song, Returning to my Lightful Throne, I spent over 15 hours and evaluated it as only being about 65% complete at the time. For me, relative to where I am in my development it feels a bit too intense in the direction that doesn't truly help my own leadership. Towards cultivating towards the inner worlds, yes, it has weight and thats its purpose. The third song "Rage of Love", the darkest and most romantic, becomes like a tuning fork towards activating my own protective instincts, and can often lead to anger that doesn't consistently help me over a larger span of time. On the subject or anger, and therefore briefly returning to later mention in my journal, PROJECT : MEANING, one extremely solid truth now that I have been crafting for months now is the fact that the next fold to the heart-activation exercise, is learning to concentrate that energy towards the gut region, which at least for me, a lot of my anger has been programmed to be stored. Although this is still pre-stage 3, it is now bullet proof in my own experience, that the ability to direct energy towards other key parts of our nervous system is a key tennet to the exercise itself. Anger is a fantastic example of what I can now extremely well control as a consequence of learning this extra action. Following as well, my mastery of stage 2, we get an understanding more and more of pinpointing just where jn our nervous system different emotions are activated. My anger is almost always arising as a felt experience from the gut, there are other regions, however I see them now in relationship to the gut now more than a standalone contributor to the final frequency. Anger has enormous value, directed with intelligence, and when its without such, anger corrupts intelligence. So after heart-activation is sustained, one can take that cultivated positive warm energy, and direct it towadds the gut to in effect, heal those cells that were initially programmed out of pure survival states, not groeth states. Moving forward all the way till the end of the year, or at least until September when the horizons are a bit clearer on next year, I will only add to this journal, focusing on songs more along the lines of Divine Reason. After I created Lightful Throne, I didnt really vibe with Divine Reason, now it feels more resonant as well as me realising thats the resonance I should to move towards taking in next year. At a minimum, I will share one song per week that I have written on the fly and that explores various prototypes of "lighter vibes", however the creative direction I take there. So only songs here until at least September, heh, let's get rockin! Best regards, oOo All in practising a state of creative flow: I do all steps on the fly, within 60 minutes. I write my own Lyrics completely. I write my own Style the music is in completely. All in the creative moment. I let AI do the rest, using Suno. [though choosing a variation it creates can sometimes take a little while heh]

An aspect of my day to day work that has a good outcome for everything else, is that I have to be incredibly imaginative. Beyond movie director imaginative. This gives me an enormous advantage that I feel I have been overlooking for a long time that I feel people would gain a lot from if they trained their imagination. I can perform time lapses with ease across any domain, so meta-perspectives are pretty straightforward. I have shared how I enjoy learning about history. It gives me a tremendous advantage to be able to seamlessly perform rapid time-lapses in my imagination (full sensory imagination, so sound as well, i.e. but mostly visual) across human history based on the things that I learn, across many different scenarios. I have only in the last some months or so started to take advantage of the time lapsing ability in this sense, but it genuinely makes me feel: Far more at ease Far more secure living in the skin as a human being Far more at peace within myself and humanities progress at large Far more resolved in my mission and its objectives Fsr more forgiving towards people Far more aware of how stupid and fragile I am despite the strength I need to show in barbarian analogous situations Far more loving towards the causes least in alignment with humanities growth while also more boundaried Etc Timelapsing ability, well I should say timelapsing skill as its something that has evolved as I've needed to train my imagination "in motion" for a while now, is something I haven't seen discussed on the forum before, maybe it has i just haven't researched it, but I hope my mentioning it now, benefits at least one person. I have mostly, especially this year, strayed from providing advice involving the mind because I see a lot of people uniquely dissociated in different ways, which is normal for a human living in a video game created by a civilisation on the brink of collapse in its memories of the sacred, like non pseudo honouring of peoples sovereignty and freedom, and I still stand by this. However at the same time, I feel that people have come to read my patterns enough that, at least for those following, they totally get they habe to put their human body, their nerves system. First. Groundedness. Earth bound solidarity, fluidity in the here and now. The groundedness comes first, contact with the body. That creates the baseline signal. Meta-awareness through imaginative timelapses as one strong example here, are the wings in the sky for a steady plane trip. I hope my sharing this helps people in both ways. Just a casual mention. Best. Stay safe and peace within @YIDIRYIDIR .

Great topic. In the past I have partially dismissed belief as a concern due to seeing it purely through the lens of mechanical emergence that altered with perception. In retrospect, despite this having truth about this, it was the incorrect appraisal, or belief, about belief. I have, interestingly, as I didnt imagine spending my evening this way for nearly the last hour, arrived at a new perception, that to me seems to hold greater weight than previous estimations. Feel free to be entertained as follows. A belief is a co-observed meaning-pattern. Our condciousness shapes that perception in real time, then experiences itself and the objectified, so the belief, through it. I arrived at this, what for me was a breakthrough at the time, now about 15 minutes ago, by registering the co-interaction between a belief, or the assigned meaning pattern that comprises that space we call a belief that holds a perception, and our consciousness. The co-observation is not in the belief perceiving direct consciousness in return in some way, although my mind did arrive at the double slit experiment momentarily for this connection, its in the observation of the observation of holding the pattern of meaning we call a belief itself in real time. For me this built emotional closure with respect to how I used to previously conceive of beliefs, because I was in part right, while st the same time, it revealed to me that even though yes, belief formation has a multidimensional structure that arises emergency, in hindsight it was a little bit of a cheap way to characterise something that captures so much of our collective imagination on how we think, feel about and navigate our personal lives and our views about it. So I still have some phenomenological work to do to fully integrate this new perspectivesed appraisal because you have to work with your awareness a bit to fully grasp you cant just read a definition and immediately understand if you haven't understood it this way before, but that seems like an adequate new cementation I am to go with from now on. Belief is a pattern of meaning. A pattern of meaning occurs through observation of the seeking, the path found through the seeking, and the answers arising through that pattern of action. This pattern of action can be described as a behaviour of co-observation. That is the gestalt right now, where the behaviour of meta-aware objectification is like the place-holder of that. Degrees of meta-consciousness on a belief to me kind of seems like a good way to peg the pendulum between healthy co-observation of the process that forms a belief versus say, extreme absolutism, and somewhere in the middle that described the neutrality of being that allows experience to arise and fall as it suits itself. Co-observation has some assumptions that at first glance may seem hidden, but the extra observation is a part of the organic recognition, acknowledgement and act of identifying perceptions, which give a belief, the heart of its meaning. I am open minded regarding other ideas shared here, I will integrate further perspectives privately. Thank you.

@LordFall @Infinite Tsukuyomi Now that most of AI's have stripped a lot of their sycophancy bubble wrap & companies are no longer spending billions on NVIDIA just to tell me how good I vape on human wisdom. I actually get to now enjoy leveraging it to give okay feedback on my own periodic chip malfunctions. My dad would say, "Thank god for humanity". It's really quite amazing just how unconscious we really are, each morning I devote time purely to awareness expansion and human history. Decouples some of the ego's biases it goes through upon awakening. I've come to realise just how ordinary my inner life relative to what I could make it.

Less about “where”. More about “who”. ”Where” comes after you have profiled yourself accurately. Many guys and gals find themselves through relationships. This can be healthy, and other times it can be very unhealthy. Maturity levels this eventually to where at the very least self knowledge is leveraged towards becoming more of a strategic actor. When you start acting in a way where you start reflecting deeply on your own self awareness to the point where you don’t want your strategic drives to be a burden on your partner and so you actively arrange your life to ensure your partner feels emotionally safe to be in that world knowing you will complement theirs. Well, providing you are still putting your mission first thats one of the positive signs that they could be a keeper, or rather, that you could be. Phase one of a relationship always begins with yourself never your partner or a potential partner. This is where you establish the boundaries between yourself and the world at large. Phase two of a relationship happens now through a place of self-knowledge and the greater world at large. Now you get to instrumentally insert yourself into life where you receive a return on investment instead of wasting your life away. This is where your “where” begins to mean something, and “attraction” should happen naturally, not forced. Phase three of a relationship is where you begin to understand one another’s worlds and how those worlds intertwine for the long term, because chemistry is already established emotionally and cognitively; psychological balance is settled. This is now compatibility with respect to the temporal worlds. Life paths compatible or not? Marriage or no marriage? Children or no children? Healthy family (their surname) to bridge with or irrelevant? Etc. Most guys on this forum seem to have the Ashley Madison version of wifing or girlfriending up. In reality though, a “click and play” life partner in the digital world is not how people live in the real world or in the short fling space that momentarily caters to a short lived fantasy. Truly mature bonding between two people (or even more) occurs with foresight, which, as I began this, starts first and foremost, through hindsight. At least 40-70 percent of people I recognise will likely take a long time if ever to properly digest this sound advice, much less follow it in setting up a potential marriage. Thats about the global average of divorce with a big swing. The very fact that people have turned against marriage because of divorce rates rather than critically thinking about the underlying reasons and proposing a more refined model accordingly for themselves to follow, validates this reality. A reality, any reader here would likely wish to avoid for themselves. Our partners are not about “I”, as one last point, we are creating a shared meaning space and in order to create one that is balanced, we must first organise the meaning space that exists within ourselves, and from here, with the world at large. This invariably leads to a relationship that genuinely benefits the world directly or indirectly, or at the very least, not being a burden on the world nor the people around oneself. This is stage four. Best wishes.

This is an excellent subject to raise. Most self-concepts are not truths more than they are frozen tests. That said, the deeper issue is that the state producing the belief often goes unquestioned, even though the state may be more important than the belief itself. Human beings dissociate constantly. Sensation blurs, emotion loses its origin, and the nervous system generates meaning from fear, lack, identity, depletion, or avoidance, then calls it “me.” That “me” can then become the very dissociation that justifies avoiding what one would genuinely want to do if their nervous system, heart, and body were activated in the right way. Only this year have I become vigilant enough to distinguish wanting something from trusting the signal that says I want it. Reopening self-study means not only testing beliefs, tho testing the state that created them. Today I was halfway through an extended training where one of my casual realisations was that I was unconsciously distracting myself periodically during, from strenghtening my devotion to the action. That coincided at the same time as noticing that every time I noticed x deactivation in my nervous system, the distracting habits began. Thats not bad beliefs, and often its not but they are an interface, thats a phenomenological bottleneck combined with not always knowing where to activate thr nerves system to either reveal the false condition or simply reverse it. That is what I find exciting. Eventually, the cultural conversation may shift from “What beliefs make me give up?” to “Where did my nervous system deactivate, reactivate, or fail to activate in a way that generated this meaning-state, produced this justification, and led to this behaviour?” For the first time ever in human history, despite this meeting ground slowly forming from centuries ago, it means we are shifting from second hand ideological density and socialised labels to training for phenomenological depth and nervous system mastery. I can't even fathom beyond a few thresholds or two, just the kind of incredible implications that will develop from this. Beat wishes.

Good work. Yeah, a piece if wisdom I have self-installed that seems to glue pretty tight. Any absence of strategic action towards my highest ends, is essentially a form of seld-annhilation. Shorter: Strategic absence is self-annhilation. Unconscious day-dreaming is now clinical, normative reinforcement is now on asocial autocomplete, and digital technologies are makinga a priori existential striving obsolete. By its reversal then, memetic self-awareness needs to become a digital motif (artists rapping about it helps) rather than on social autodial to build friendships, AI converging social patterns also helps people use synthesis as an interface rather than a struggle. This reshapes day-dreaming into social intent with force. Rather than being a symptom to the machine that is reinforcing isolation through digital social separation, combined with the new social outgrowths that wear new outfits and banners that no longer rap lines of rebellion but leveraging information for cohesion, community is able to build a bridge with the collective after the news collapse forms from being able to distinguish better signal from noise where AI meets the downstream intelligence to interpret it. This, is a mirage right now for me, and something I will only contribute to compartmentally. To end, without building artistic systems that forge insight through collective integration that liberate the individual, we are preparing for our collective self-annihilation. This is the line between where self actualisation needs to meet collective actualisation, from a more informed mature frame, and this is where the best artists will shine for the future. Irrespective of being a mirage, artists thst can tow that line, is the line between staying something real and genuinely moving the colllective frame forward for peopple, in a way they will undoubtedly, uncompromisingly, respond to. All of our earlier artistic frames from rebel punk to folk community to pop sensationalism, were all riding or predicting through spiritual catharsis future questions that needed to be answered through art that digested through memetic re-architectures. Music will integrate across the styles just as much as information will, so if you are an artist, always be thinking integration, reformation and mature rebellion relative to thr times. As much as artistry is about annihilating oneself in a kind of cathartic way, more precise than that, it is about disowning parts that are either not true, or need light shed on them to reappear through introspection or social currency. The strategy is in planning it so you are not lost in the darkness of annihilation itself, and upon summoning, making strategic repair the heir to artistic thrown, for that particular aspect of oneself. So irrespectively, strategic absence is self-annhilation as much as its inverse is strategic self-annihilation is strategic self-actualisation, where absence is where only the truest of life, not the absence of life of what has tragically befitted many artists, is all that remains in unitive cohesion. Best.

@integral there's performance empathy, so fake empathy or just "fake social", I brought it up in the past when another member asked me what to acreen a woman for concerning empathy (as i said i only look for high empathy as it predicts so many other positive qualities) and therefore what to screen out more than what to tick the green boxes on for simpliciity. And then one level above that is strategic empathy. The latter, is a very different ballgame, and especially when combined, potentially extremely risky without the right experience to vet the environmental conditions of how that strategic empathy plays out with a woman. It usually involves framing techniques, contextual manoeuvring, social weighting, leveraging and probabilistic countering. Strategic empathy sometimes does or doesnt involve performative empathy, because when you operate through social calibration using cognitive empathy, predictive processing for for anticipatory affective empathy as a phone a friend. We all have anticipatory reactions like these, however for people that have honed it due to a nurtured Machiavellian disposition, it becomes a phone a friend option in turning the dial either to safety or their next calculation. Women are particularly more skilled at this, which is why I stated to a gentleman at the time to focus on indicators of performative empathy. Because even if you cant spend a lot of time in the beginning with a woman to see how her other arsenal of empathy plays out, especially in this case relating to cognitive and less affective empathy, failures in affective empathy through performative processing are given the chance to be put under the light through one on one interactions. This is why its so important to emphasise personal well being in dating, tuning and balancing one's own energy, these things allow us to not only be more objective in dating but place more emphasis on how the vibe is in our social interactions more than just our attractions, focusing more on subtle body language changes across the interaction when going back and fourth, and allowing the signal to emerge through mutual non-performative vibing. Thats the best read on affective empathy, which is the best predictor of non-performative cognitive empathy that is summoned from genuine affective empathy as opposed to comparatively cold strategic (cognitive) empathy. Performative empathy is strategic empathy pretending to be affective empathy in the moment. Picking up on it, while vetting strongly for personal biases, allows one to tune for how that strategic empathy may play out over longer term horizons and social situations. Like avoiding a gold digger. And thats for either sex, not just women. There are some grey areas here, for example some people simply learning or a little awkward or anxious in social situations, like we all are sometimes, are going to be performative, what matters is context and patterns overtime of course. Both men and women are used to dealing with the statistical average, any man or woman above that statistical average in cognitive empathy with machievellian tendencies, is going to be naturally more skilled and experienced pretending to have empathy on far more contexts than someone with the same cognitive empathy but less Machiavellian tendencies, as the latter person has run far more social simulations about what to do, how to do it, and how to change and prop based on ongoing changing circumstances. Politicians here have the most experience out of all of us! It's also why propaganda, is just never going to end until the genetic cell-grinder, is switched off either on the environments that nurture it or the biologics that are born for it. Thats another subject. Best wishes sir.

The Sacred. Only desire and reach for the sacred and a being will break through every conceivable personal development wall imaginable relative to that beings potential. The sacred provides the ontology for teleology within a being, before a being even needs to think about their purpose, they are already guided by the light and the divine within them. They're not their overanalysing or juggling between false realities because aligning with the sacred forces a being to come into truth alignment across multiple axes (energy, mind, action). The sacred is the playground truth plays in, truth is just teleology, its not axiomatically functional, its axiomatically structural to the sacred path across the multiple axes of truth that encompass its revelation. Truth alone then as an objectification, especially intellectually, will not save you and some of the smartest people in history wasting away their years for truth are evidence of this, it became a shielded armour that always partly camouflaged the very sacred alignment every human truly seeks and is already the very answer to honouring within the truth of the sacred. So here's a practical step to take action on today, get out something equivalent to a digital notepad and think up any ambition your heart desires and see how the sacred is going to either help you get there, or be what shed's greater light and truth on the desire to have it fall into alignment of what you truly want. Understood with wisdom and maturity, there is nothing lost with this path, instead every door opens that you ever could have imagined relative to what is true to your divine sacred path. Best wishes. Rock out.

Hello again. To anyone suffering right now, stay strong. Beat regards.

Study this image I created. Whenever you run out of motivation, study the art again until the pattern clicks. I won't reveal my theory of motivation just yet. That said, this picture reveals an intersecting layer of my theory of motivation. This intersecting layer, is the crux. Without it, existential motivation is impossible. Find the layer and each time you make the interconnection your bandwidth will reunfold, or at least light the spark, and give the directions to turn spark into fire again. I created this image art today in the space of an hour or so. It is in its "very useful stage", a finalised version released around September-December. I am sure at the very least it connects with pre-existing theories on motivation, or theories that are similar, but are not popular enough yet to carry cultural weight. Or, this is genuinely novel, and well. An extremely accurate organ to motivation figuratively speaking. That said, this picture teaches the functioning of that organ both in the practice of trying to understand the image and in the understanding of the existential triads and loops themselves combined with the picture as a whole. ChatGPT is getting pretty solid now at turning design into finished product. Best regards.

From a non-clinical perspective, depression is the inability to embody a positive consciousness reality alternate to their present experience. With that context, I created the following questions that may aid in developing the self awareness of another, or at least, aid with said attunement. Who is the author creating this character and its story in real time? What is the author doing right now through this character? Why has the author created this character and story, in this form, at this point in the story? What story is the author dreaming about now? Is the dominant dream creating the author’s next action the best available dream, compared with every other story the author could create? Does that dream add the most to the author’s life story, regardless of how the author currently views their life story or what has happened so far? What is the author going to create and test next? How does the author construct their life story in their consciousness? Is the life story being constructed linearly, non-linearly, relationally, multidimensionally or through some combination of these? Is the author being bold in perspective, or perspectively bold? What is the most perspectively bold frame the author can generate without losing contact with perspectivism itself? How quickly can the author generate and shift the perspective they are creating? How quickly can the author recreate the story of the character inside that new perspective? How quickly can the author implement and test that character against reality in real time? What changes when the author moves between the meta-world and the meta-substrate? Does the author’s imagined perspective produce a real change in attention, body state, emotion, behaviour, decision, discipline, or reality contact? What would prove that the author is not merely imagining the character but rather actually authoring the next movement of the life story? These questions are by no means complete and are very preliminary at best, I created them haphazardly a little time ago. My lifestyle requires me to be very fluid while my adherence to any one modality quite assured, so at the time I found these questions useful and may in return, aid anothers discovery route. This challenge acts as a daily stress test on my level of self awareness. The capacity to shift and energetically embody different consciousness realities becomes its own protection and evolution beyond friction inducing condciousnes realities, where depressive symptoms are an example of those. Paired with the grounding of self and broader bodily awareness, the capacity to embody alternate condciousness realities becomes its own healing, and unique avenue of personal growth. Further combined with a deeper empathic imagination, one could say this also allows one to relate to, learn from and understand experiencer's of depression. My non-clinical advice for anyone looking to expand on a similar pathway is to move from map to action as 1:1 as possible. Moreover, quite often depression is a combination of learned helplessness and imbalanced external and internal locus of control, the very symptoms that control the gravity of even attempting to embody an alternate state. That said, by at least being aware of these realities, combined with maturity on how ones emotional system works from a grounded baseline say through a disciplined meditation and emotional awareness practice, training consciousness through a feedback loop of exploration, embodiment, learning from those shifts, then realigning to neutrality, will in most cases than not, strongly mature ones ability to curb negational consciousness states that fall outside our healthy human experience.

On "Life Is A Dream": For me, the most dream provoking is on the idea of how everything is imaginary and or "Life is a dream", rooted along railway tracks like advaita and buddhism. In many ways however, blindly stating it as it is without the vision of its return landing to reality, can become an oversimplification in as much as there is misinterpretation, which can become, and has proven itself to be, quite problematic. People can easily confuse spiritual ideas with the absence of having contact with reality, when the very definition of reality in the human form, is contact with reality relative to the apparatus we have to make contact with reality and through the predictive natural technology we assign with the generalised meaning of "brain". This is what we have seen within this particular spiritual community, with other communities committing similar mistakes without their social nervous system adequately autocorrecting. With the spiritual notion that "life is a dream" being one example of creating outcomes rooted in an epistemic failure to adequately translate spirituality to reality. This is where rail-road tracks derail rather than align ones existential train to the next train station in their spiritual development. The pattern here is two fold, that all dreams and spiritual ideas contained within, need to have a funnelled process by which they increase contact with reality at least on arrival if not during their train trip in life, and two, that all spiritual ideas when properly understood, are all reality based principles. Reality based principles implies there is an acting within reality for the attunement of reality or ones reality, and therefore practical actions that have measurable feedback at the very least as an end goal with intermediary actions towards that end at the very least, as measurable. If this cannot be achieved, then outcomes read as just poorly taught, understood and digested spiritual philosophy that creates the very case studies which reflect the very opposite pattern of the goal of genuine spiritual mastery, and broader actualisation. Operating analogously to a propaganda engine that moves social currency with the paperweight of actual reality masquerading as truth, however unintentionally spiritual ideas become weaponised against the individual rather than calibrated by the very truth they seek. The spiritual ideas instead become the UAP that cannot be named, identified and reverse engineered to become useful to practical reality and instead maintains authority purely on the efficacy by which illusions can distort indiviudal to collective software enough that delusions turn meta and become almost impossible to completely eradicate as a mental virus. Spirituality is the philosophy of making higher direct contact with reality, therefore it must be the goal of spirituality, especially when much of its "counter culture" in today's age, an example of what is a collective mind virus, is far more invested in escape from the meat grinder of capitalism and the noise making juke box of modern social entertainment. Further substantiated when modern mental illnesses are not historically spaced but normatively weighted. "Life is a dream/imaginary" should become ones personal case study of a higher level spiritual truth whete the bridge in their own understanding, is bridged not through where philosophy meets only mind, but where the minds discernment meets discernible action. Some examples on how to integrate this insight at the tertiary, secondary and primary level are as follows. At the tertiary (beginner) level, self organising direct practical guides that intersect on the major patterns that make-up the major categories of human experience from how the sense of self is formed, how meaning is formed in a sentience, how perception is formed, how emotional dysregulation distorts vs emotional regulation better aligns and amplifies in the right ways, etc would be a strategically sound platform to build a foundation for this insight, thereby increasing the fidelity that increases the very contact with reality that makes it an insight that eventually becomes truly transformstive. At the secondsry level, by mapping the dream space of sentience against each category explored at the tertiary level, awareness becomes the recalibrative engine that converts those meta insights into maturity against each of those subroutines that govern the laws that forge our sense of reality. When we have the triad between right path, right understsnding and right action settled, this is where an insight, like life is a dream, becomes recursively optimised, and therefore where learning turns to adaptation that attitudes and rewires the sense of self until fully integrated. So the tertiary stage is about mapping an insight, the secondary stage is where insight needs to meet repeated practical actions, so where psychology meets nervous system recalibration, and the primary stage, or third tier, is where reorganisation completed from the secondary stage meets lived experience, aka higher level contact with reality, higher alignment between where knowledge, understanding and wisdom, have actually led to better aligned perception that hones the internal engines that govern behaviour. The tertiary, secondary, primary approach is a triad that complements the knowledge, understanding and wisdom triad, with its deepest roots arising from the Kabbalah, rather than replacing it. By the primary stage, the third tier, relearned self conditioning has honed the reticular activation to better spot signal from noise in the context of dreams that have more calibrated reality based contact. Emotional noise has become say, vipassana that quietens the dream space, unhealthy mental patterns become reorganised through questioning spaces that reinvent the dream space, and unhealthy relationships become filtered through this to hone more prepared choices, or to its inverse, unconscious defensive actions that prevent social contact, say via dissociation like using "life is a dream" to protect oneself from social realities, realign a more balanced chemistry to better enable the world's between nervous systems to meet. The second tier is therefore the shift from learning to adaptation towards consolidation not of the meaning of the insight, but of the meaning architecture you are building through its ingestion that changes where perception meets behavioral reoganisation. Right path meeting "right patterns" now becomes recalibration of an already working nervous system that was always seeking truth from signal to noise discriminations, aka going back to an earlier sentiment, the UFO has landed on the front lawn of the White House, and the aliens are ready to talk, "make contact". With the individual not realising they were the aliens all along, and now, they just see and experience reality with more multidimensional crisp. Without the distortion of a spiritually unrooted insight 😉. We are meant to touch, make contact with the divine, not merely praise it. As per Jesus, "Until you become like a child...", well, this is just one insight, "Life is a dream", that when paired with practical acquisition, parts those clouds, with clear blue skies that give the actual physics of dreaming, lift-off and controlled orbit.

Mr. Newman seems particulalry performative. Absence of any signs of adequate affective empathy is not a bumper sticker for enlightenment. Something that has slipped by niches within this demographic concerning this subject as a whole. Psychopathy and non-dualism is perfectly compatible. And so is non-duality and empathy. This is the distinction between moral centrism and generative morality I brought up earlier: Nondual experience will likely render moral centric stances incompatible with ones own organic generative morality obsolete, rather than brain damage to the ability to adequately empathise. A moral compass, is first and foremost functional (nervous system) not structural (social programming). Generative morality differs by sex, hormones, genetics and has epigenetic effects from culture and environment like most other standard functional resolves of similar complexity, like the way fluid intelligence tends to be presently measured. Non-dualists indicating to be more enlightenment by lacking affective empathy is likely the result of simply falling higher on the narcissism and psychopathy spectrum. People are naturally more likely to be attracted to non-dualists that fall higher on the psychopathy spectrum simply because they also tend to be more charismatic speakers. This isnt demonisation, it is characterisation and determination. People are far more easily to be misled if they take every claim of people falling higher on this spectrum at face value. Zero emotional response to killing babies is probably a red flag, and comedic gestures thereto, at the very least a yellow flag. Absence of empathy, or, wisdom that just seems performative, does not mean one cannot learn anything from a teacher, it means the architecture of the learning experience, like the categories of how learning is filtered and funnelled, needs better performance metrics from the learner. Psychopathy does not equal extreme danger, this demonisation needs to be refined, it actually means less biases in some areas but enormous blindspots in others. Psychopathy and spiritual teaching is compatible, but its compatibility is very different, and one where a more experienced student is probably more appropriate to discern rather than a beginner starting off with a psychopath.

Numerology works surprisingly accurate for me. I would encourage those who are unhappy with their numerological results to either introspective more deeply on who they are and or avoid stressing about it completely as you can simply wait until you've matured a little more in your development. I used to be very sceptical about numerology, however the case study results including relating to myself, cannot be simply thrown out as happenstance. Unfortunately, I cannot suggest a reliable source to measure your own, I can only advise that you be more scrupulous in your assessment of a provider more than being sceptical about the underlying idea itself. Determinism and free will, destiny and intentionally maturing ones life path are both compatible. Numerology lays where the numbers have landed at the seed. Changes in the environment, including ones internal environment, inclusive of establishing personal agency, all play a part in how those numbers finally land by the end of ones life in how much they fell in alignment with your truest numerological path. Finally, I recommend as much as its practical, to keep your numerological results private. I'll share one humorous detail, it basically said that I am destined to be batman, but my higher version is a loving one rather than being fueled by pain as batman was. This was based on my numerological chart, not based on any qualitative information about me. Yes, pretty fucking astonishingly accurate. Test it out. Introspect. Begin a private journal. And be left with at the very least, a partly journalled matrix on who you are underneath that you can use as a life path direction at a minimum.

My perosnal take. Love cannot be divided. Human propensity for love can be divided across capacity. Unconditional love then, by that same authorship. If one wishes to know unconditional love, then either they must be a recipient or a giver. Philosophising from or on emotion when for the former condition, it is the blind bias of say the nihilists unrealised depression, and for the latter it is weakened by experienced immensity and or the collective memory of that emotion is fractured, is like looking through the keyhole of truth with your friends colourblind. If you want to know the condition upon which love exists in the authorship of another being, then let that author have the contours of their expression reveal the truth beneath the current of whatever truth they are trying to circulate. However, if you are trying to teach love, do not preach it as if you know it in whole when you can neither divide it in its parts, nor build its whole from those same parts followed by building it back up and down across a range of contexts. The irony of many spiritual discussions i have viewed on the forum is that most talk about things as arising from survival, when they neither know anything or much about biology as compelled by said survival. Nor have enough division to separate themselves from conceptualisation enough that they see the life force of those concepts independent to the puzzle pieces that have thus far been created about them. Causing them to look at the puzzle of life they have created not through fresh eyes that extends their view the next mornings rise, but justify through lived experiences why the puzzle pieces they have unknowingly created about life must stay the same, rather than introspective from the edges of those puzzle pieces and fathom, just what unexplored territory awaits them. From an emotional sense, unconditional love is indeed not only possible, but axiomatic to any proper condition for love and by that metric is a relationship of genuine meaning determined, or by its inverse, its fabrication. This is the same mathematical fabric that tethers the meaning between a human being and life itself, where their mirrored opposites overlap to explain their conditional to unconditional relationship to life. Moreover, in order to understand conditional vs unconditional love, remove the word love and understand these first as spectrums by relative circumstance, inclusive of disposition. Unconditional curiosity, joy, positivity, resilience, all of these are equivalent to then uncompromising states of human character in the same way that steel is to a certain velocity and viscosity. Unconditional love is no different, thus when we speak of the state of this condition, in order to view it accurately, you merely need to understand it as the resilience of a meaning system in maintaining that status, unconditionally, where unconditionally is unused relative to its character. Most peoplles adherence to the truth and seeking the truth including the repair of their own mind in forming the truth, is totally and utterly in a state of conditional meanings born out of material attachments. This is the great irony of ever being able to understand something as deeply human as unconditional love if one has neither felt it or cannot provide it, the latter two conditions being equal to the summation of our growth, not our destiny, something which I can personally attest to. It is not that love cannot be found in biological cells in the same way that its said that "god is in the neurons", it is that most talk between one another very arrogantly as if they understand the concepts they use deeply, from an analogous perspective, how god, neurons and all our biology works, missing entirely for example in this discussion the spectrum of love and the magnitude of that experience across from one human, culture, tribe, race and historical context to the next. Biology plays an absolutely pivotal role in love, both in self-healing and advancing human consciousness to higher frontiers of love, in no less ways then too, in understanding how we can bridge, however far some believe that adjacent to be, with unconditional love, made from a conditional ephemeral existence. On a personal level, unconditional love is undoubtedly a choice, but one thst is a part of a choice matrix that shares governance with multi-cursor structures from the injuries one has experienced to their nervous system to the safety felt in their environment, and how these give birth to attachment styles that lucidly prebias lenses concerning to the untrained philosophical styles that attempt to encapsulate it with the mathematical rigour of a primary schooler that does suicide bomber classroom raids with their native languages alphabet. Turn subjects like these into a deep discussioon, and you will turn minds to the only place that matters in understanding their deeper truth, in this case of unconditional love, as we each know it, from our own relative perspective. Unconditional love has many unique phenomenological properties that cannot simply be pinned down by measuring the x and y axis of certain biological strata, while at the same time, particular strata do allow for some mammals not just humans, to experience love and act on love, in ways that appear more unconditionalmcompared to other mammals. The reasons for this, should be enough justification to widen the horizon line for the puzzle piece that contains everything thought on this subject and deepen the number of dimensions, by which one may believe they could however slightly more deeply experience it, in the next mornings rise.

A Brief Note - Project : Meaning My context window for Claude has magically increased for edits. Changes: 1. "Why? The Question that no longer begs." > Now much more obvious that this front page button is a clickable option. I didn't realise the confusion earlier. Behind the button revealing the present standing philosophy underpinning the project. > The main picture on the front page is now accurately viewable across all devices : perhaps a further update applies at the next assigned date. 2. Stage Three will be released September irrespective of any context window lapses. 3. Further updates will be carefully introduced September 1st - 5th. The next improvised song will be released no earlier than August 1st. "One Heart. One Brave." (in post directly previous) feels like a limp I made inside what feels like an untouchable sacred subject, and I did it with little writing preparation. For both reasons, I avoid thinking about the production, resonating only with the sentiment. Take your time and appreciate the songs core, creating the space for a deeper sense of perspective on your own meaning space of reality, and how that meaning space coexists with the rest of creation, and our small humble planet called Earth. Further, imploring the listener to learn more about Ukraine, the multitude of their daily struggles across too many contexts, and the relationship this major conflict has with our greater geopolitical context. Best regards, oOo

One Heart. One Brave. - Одне серце. Одна відвага. - https://0ooo0ooo0.bandcamp.com/track/one-heart-one-brave An hour of writing and design. An hour choosing a variation on Suno. Sleep deprived. But my will insisted. I will get back into writing again now, post my next on the flow piece in a month or so. I enjoyed this one, it was very meaningful to me. A lot of strong emotions 🇺🇦. Initially I was not going to post it, but now I look forward to seeing what I create next. ( AI is only used for Suno variations, not writing or designing thr music )

Math equations go in three ways here and interlace on the fourth. The appraisal. The order within that appraisal. The stimuli that fit into that appraisal. The fourth equaton harmonises all three where self-regulation meets empathic boundaries. The level of intelligence in empathy is what formulates generative morality versus being purely morality centric. Moral centrism is being led morally based purely on the social contract, generetive morality reflects what a healthy brain does and the functionality of intelligence within empathy. A dichotomy I have never observed before outside of where the former encompasses the latter as a sophisticated social act in traversing across cultural boundaries, but remains unnamed. Moral centrism, is what many confuse here with justification that there is "no such thing as morality", when in reality, it is the absence of dividing the social contract with brain function and a healthy nervous system, that would otherwise build a bridge of understanding the greater order through more intelligently deployed empathy. Constituting again, generative morality, the very function that is designed to forge moral centrism, and upgrade in sophistication in the same ways a good court system should advance laws overtime. This confusion runs across most demographics, even in unnamed grace. By isolating a trait, like "stupidity", justification becomes as blind as there is the missing observation in the dividing line between the moral centrism that is being created, or in analogous form, and the generative morality that serves the role of valuing the sophistication of its deployment. This is inherently an emotional equation that is balanced in this particular instance, by neither that which is (morally) generative or that which has become centric or the centric evaluated, but the line of equanimity that stands between them. If that line is not resolved in this way, to that extent, stupid consequences will follow. Enlightenment takes time. I totally get that.

Only a few days away now 😉. Check it: https://o0ooooooooooo0o.github.io/Project-Meaning/ After unlocking, I will work to propose changes once per week and update it once a month from here. In the meantime, I have added the technique taught from https://www.heartmath.com/ . It is an excellent technique that began a large part of the work I have generated. For this reason I have decided to share it early combined with the fact that it’s also a fantastic introductory lesson. The introductory technique itself will expand to more nuances by the stated time in which it unlocks. The voiceover you hear will improve overtime as voices get better haha, otherwise you have the option of turning it off after learning a technique. I will master the art of adding theory overtime, right now however it’s without a doubt a mastery in progress. With the ending of the journal Stage Coral and before heading to bed, I have decided to stake my claim a little further on my newly stated stance there by embracing my greater altruistic side with the stated deeper faith in life by going even deeper with this project by seeing how good I can make it over the whole year. I purely want to just learn to be empowered by moving forward as much as possible with the deepest intrinsic essence of who I am irrespective of the rest of the world, because as much as it is a faith in life, it’s a faith in oneself and feeling in alignment with what that means in action. And the project will remain anonymous, so feel free to use the resources how you like. I don’t need credit. I need my project to translate well from stated aim to desired outcome. Please no comments in this journal. All the best. Best regards.

Due to unforeseen circumstances this journal will cease until September 1st-5th. As such, the journal will be made "LOCKED" to preserve content up until this date and this date alone. Nevertheless, I have endeavoured to spend the last 30 minutes or so with what little time I have to create this little pocket book version of the promised elaboration on one of the newly named concepts for PROJECT : MEANING, Meaning Drift. This pocket book entry on Meaning Drift is given this name for a reason, the terrain extends further than the horizon provided. My forum activity including online status will also cease until September. Best regards and best wishes. ================================================ Meaning Drift: Where mind battles with the heart's truest entry. ================================================ Meaning does not stay true just because the same word, symbol, mission, insight, vow or explanation remains. A person can keep saying the same thing while the original intention has shifted from its original poetry, reflective of the hearts truest intent. This is a core area of Meaning Drift. Meaning Drift occurs when a living meaning loses fidelity as it moves through body-state, emotion, memory, imagination, language, audience, identity, repetition, time, and conduct. We get angry (see post just above), we have hidden unprocessed emotions that need reprocessing through vipassa like exercises that I too instruct, if that is not already natural to you while doing stage one and two, to implement till aligned with their, overtime as you get better, dual implementation. But start small. Start at Stage One. Meaning forms its own language, but these tectonic shifts from emotion to influence to covert ideological overlap, can be the silent earth quakes that create Meaning Driftm a shift away from true heart-mind-action alignment. Us being a part of the digital zombie generation, even if we are only affiliated by codependent relationship with a related drug addict, politely enabling while calmly signalling to a better path to avoid youtube, social media, etc as much as one can help it, we are fully aware of how much it can take us off track as opposed to just being a short spell of laziness. The word of our meaning remains, but the energy towards it weakens. The symbol even remains, though the tonality has taken on a hidden pigmentation. The mission remains, however the motive now is coupled with a hidden parallel environment. The insight remains, but irrespectively, the embodiment evaporates into someone stepping into a former shadow of their own embodiment which feels however slightly, mpre performative. Even when explanation for the Why and the greater purpose of what we are doing remains, behaviour suddenly does not feel as attuned or meticulous with time benchmarks, or at the very least, the end of the day feels slightly... heavier. This is why PROJECT : MEANING treats meaning as something living, trainable, measurable, correctable and protectable. Not merely something we think, say, believe, repeat or perform like an actor on stage as some seedless and rootless self-help sermons try to install with... a lack of precision. Alright. Core Law In avoiding Meaning Drift of this kind, we must discriminate across multi-factorial checkpoints when we, literally "check-in" with the self. Just because we are using the same language of our chosen life meaning and purpose, all of its symbology and what it means to us whatever analogous Philosophers Stone that emerges relative to a person's inner religion concerning and however cut back by "discernment to the bone", having the same mission, remembering all the insights and explanatory purpose for the next step. None of this proves we are in true alignment, we prove it to ourselves by truly checking into the felt signal measured against time measured performance. Even if the best of your improvement arc for your life meaning purpose is to meditate all day, checking in on where there is meaning drift can be as simple as doing thr check-list i provided three posts back. This is a small preview of the future diagnostic depth of PROJECT : MEANING. It is not a new stage. It is not a standalone module. It is not a replacement for Stage One or Stage Two. It is not permission to skip ahead. It is a brief mirror dialogue, a sneak peak on the road ahead for the larger map I have built. Moreover, this pocket entry is a simple daily mirror for noticing whether meaning: stayed alive, nearly drifted, drifted, was protected, or was corrected. All that said and done, on the subject of check-lists concerning, I have another CheckList for you to deepen and open up reflective questions you can formulate and answer for yourself before I release a larger entry on Meaning Drift in September. Analogous to Stage 2 concerning the internalisation of reference points to quickly scan and run through when self-reading the inner experience (that you then learn to apply to Stage One), including too when you get good at stage one, learning to activate the heart's charge during the day and how to modulate it in a healthy way following ongoing life changes, quickly map the following audit map on Meaning Drift. And, as you get good at it you will naturally spot patterns that become learning checkpoints that become self-protection against Meaning Drift, which becomes its own feedback loop with personal growth. As you spot the patterns and correct them, when you reach a higher stage of meaning alignment, those earlier undoing's no longer become a part of not just what meaning alignment truly means, but your entire personality structure. This now becomes an integral complementary role for what meaning means to personal growth overall, psyche integration to psyche integration, consciousness stage by consciousness stage. You get the point. Again, best wishes. And good luck. Meaning Drift Daily Self-Audit Score each item 0–10. 1. Source Contact Did I stay in contact with the original living signal behind the meaning, rather than only its words, memory, image, or explanation? Score: __/10 Evidence: 2. Charge Integrity Did the charge weaken, leak, inflate, distort, or disappear? Score: __/10 Evidence: 3. Motive Integrity Did the motive shift into image, approval, control, avoidance, superiority, fantasy, or performance? Score: __/10 Evidence: 4. Proportion Did one lens, emotion, category, or audience reaction become too large and distort the whole field? Score: __/10 Evidence: 5. Missing Category Did I omit a relevant body, emotional, relational, social, ethical, historical, environmental, or behavioural layer? Score: __/10 Evidence: 6. Audience Pressure Did another person’s reaction, imagined reaction, approval, rejection, or misunderstanding alter the meaning? Score: __/10 Evidence: 7. Language Trap Did I mistake familiar words, symbols, slogans, explanations, or labels for living meaning? Score: __/10 Evidence: 8. Conduct Custody Did my behaviour prove that I was still carrying the meaning correctly? Score: __/10 Evidence: 9. Near-Drift Recognition Did I notice the moment where meaning almost drifted before it fully moved? Score: __/10 Evidence: 10. Drift Avoided Did I preserve the meaning where drift could have occurred? Score: __/10 Evidence: 11. Correction Did I correct, re-contact, and re-embody the meaning after drift or near-drift? Score: __/10 Evidence: An Improvement Feedback Loop Detect -> Name -> Return -> Correct -> Re-test Detect: Where did the meaning begin to move? Name: What kind of drift occurred, nearly occurred or was avoided? Return: Re-contact the original alignment in the body, heart, memory, image, vow, oath or felt ethical demand. Correct: Change one behaviour, phrase, boundary, explanation or environmental condition. Re-test: Later in the day, check whether the meaning is still contactable and conduct-aligned. The point is not to overthink meaning. The point is to stop assuming meaning stayed true simply because the language, memory and even "slogans" stayed familiar like a bad MAGA day. A living meaning must be protected.

Extremely briefly: In the presence of anger, I get very good results by combining the Stage One technique with Ho'oponopono. With one minor but significant revision applied, "I'm sorry", "please forgive me", "thank you", "I love you", is applied to planet earth, and I only make it about my relationship to planet earth; anything else is a distraction for me. It works extremely well, for me. This will and minor adaptations like this, at least for all of this year, not be added to the site. I want minimal clutter site wise, maximum fluidity between comprehension to action. Моя клятва не забута. Любов.