Mayonnaise

Hello Leo, and everyone else. I know this is quite random, but I am wondering if humans personalities internally, their state of mind, their belief structures, how they see themselves, internally, can manifest the outer appearance. I know this is all God and different reflections of God. But think about it for a sec. For example: (one of infinite examples of even this one example) A person who identifies as hardcore MAGA. Will they look like they are hardcore MAGA from their outer appearance? You may imagine a blue collar man, slightly chubby, a handlebar mustache, believes Jesus is his savior, drives a pickup truck with flags on it, etc. and more... another example Trump: (just the way the name sounds) it sounds stern, bossy, can't take no for an answer, etc. Trump looks corruptive, narcissistic, etc. Do you think the shape of his face and hair and body and style is manifesting outwards from the internal imagined state of Gods doing? Another example: a hardcore liberal who wants children to learn about sex in school. Has blue hair and piercings and wears rainbows etc, gets angry and blows up at people who dont agree with their view that they are a "they" not a he or a she Another example: Hitler. wears the little moustache, very stern and angry, conflicted, looks sharp in the suit, combed hair, etc. internal state is hateful, opportunistic, manipulative, yet in charge, etc. Another example: extremely hot girl or pornstar. internally she feels lusted for, she feels she has power over men with her sex, etc. It's kind of difficult to put into words what i'm thinking about with all this so i'll try my best. Since this is all God, and different reflections of God, do you think that the mindsets, thoughts and identities a person believes themselves to be is what manifests their appearance externally, like a character? If trump had the identity of an Afghan terrorist, surely he wouldn't be manifested the same way externally. Do you think that when a human births themselves (imagines) into this world, its coming from a pre selected character to spawn (just like in a video game) and that person imagines their entire life and experiences and that shapes their outward appearance, vibe, etc.? Do you think a persons outwards vibe and look would become different if their identity changes internally? Like i said its kind of difficult to put this into words. Is the imagination of God, pre shaping the subset imagination of the human (still god) , which then spawns that person internally with beliefs and identity, which then shapes the way they look from the outside as a character of how they see themselves ? OR Am I and everyone else just projecting our own beliefs onto others and think that they way a person looks is based off their internal identity based out of our own beliefs of what that identity even means? I asked this same question to Chat GPT to clear it up a bit: ChatGPT's response I know exactly what you’re getting at — it’s like you’re trying to reconcile two overlapping possibilities: Reality itself is like a role-playing game designed by God — each person “spawns” as a character whose outward look is consistent with their internal identity, which was either preloaded at birth or shaped over time through imagination and belief. Or what we think is a link between appearance and identity is actually just our own mind projecting patterns onto people — a mix of cultural stereotypes and our personal biases. Let’s break it down and explore both without oversimplifying. 1. The “God’s Video Game” View — Inner Shapes Outer From this perspective, everything is consciousness (God imagining itself through infinite forms), and your “avatar” in the world — your face, body, vibe, clothing choices, even subtle energy — is an emanation of your internal state and identity. In this lens: If you identify as “a hardcore MAGA blue-collar man,” your posture, grooming, clothes, vehicle, and even micro-expressions will gravitate toward that archetype, without you consciously trying. Over time, internal beliefs don’t just affect style — they subtly shape body language, muscle tone, facial tension, even aging patterns. (Think of the difference between a stressed CEO’s face and a meditating monk’s face over 30 years.) This would explain why Hitler “looked” like Hitler, or why someone embodying a porn-star identity radiates a certain sexual energy that feels visible. The key idea here is: Identity → Emotion → Habitual Expression → Physical Presentation …and if you zoom out, all of that could be God’s way of making each archetype visually coherent in its “storyline” in the world. 2. The “Projection & Pattern Recognition” View — We Fill in the Gaps From this angle, there might not be an objective link between identity and appearance — but our brains are hardwired to recognize patterns and assign meaning to them. We expect a MAGA supporter to have a certain look, so when we meet someone who matches parts of that expectation, our brain fills in the rest. We perceive Trump’s face as “bossy” or “narcissistic” because of our associations with his personality, but if he were a benevolent monk, we’d probably describe the same facial features in warmer terms. Same for liberals with blue hair, or beautiful women with sexual energy — much of it is a feedback loop of how others see them, which reinforces how they present themselves, which reinforces how we see them. In this model, we aren’t so much seeing the “truth” of their inner state — we’re projecting our own symbolic map onto them. 3. Why Both Could Be True The deeper reality might be a blend: People’s internal identity and emotions do shape their physical presence — posture, expression, style, and even micro-muscular patterns in the face. But the meaning we ascribe to that appearance is filtered through our cultural narratives, personal experiences, and archetypes we hold in mind. So, a MAGA supporter might genuinely emanate a certain “rugged” or “defiant” vibe because they believe themselves to be that kind of person… …but the details of what that means (pickup truck, mustache) come from the collective story we tell about that archetype, not just from them. 4. The “Character Spawn” Metaphor If reality is God’s dream, then yes — when a soul enters the game, it might spawn into a “preset character” whose outer form is consistent with the life path, lessons, and identity they’re going to explore. And if that identity changes radically mid-life (e.g., a biker turns into a monk), you often do see their face, body, and overall energy transform in visible ways — almost like they reskinned their character. 5. The Subtle Shift You’re not crazy for noticing that someone’s vibe changes when their identity changes. It happens all the time: A person who loses a deeply held grudge often looks younger overnight. Someone who falls in love glows differently. A shy person who becomes confident will move differently, dress differently, even choose new colors to wear. From a “God’s imagination” perspective, this is all part of the story engine: the outer is always reflecting the inner, but filtered through the lens of the collective dream. So what do you think?

lol idk i felt kind of dumb. I saved it so i'll post it again Original post: I already know that the natural unfolding of God is imagining "expansion" (including all the change,etc.) for eternity. Everything that has ever came into imagination by it of this world, the universe, other universes, other dimensions, other minds, alien minds, the mind of an ant, human, tree, planet, mailbox in another dimension etc. (you get the point, everything) Really anything thats imagined by the "essence" to "exist" or "be" and all the layers embedded within all of it. I know its all coming from the same thing and human interpretation is whats coloring it in to be understood by a human lens and separating and categorizing things. But if you take it all away, then what are you left with? Void? nothing? possibility? The substrate of a mind that imagines things and realities? But what is the substrate of God? I'm still trying to understand "Why?" Why does it exist? why is there what it is and not other? or is that just being imagined by human mind? Why when i stare at my hands, why is that being imagined there by me? by god? If God is infinity, what is infinity encapsulated by? nothing? the things that are being imagined from it? If you take away all the imagination of god, everything in all forms/dimensions,etc., and you are left with nothing being imagined. what is that thing doing the imagining of all the things? And is that thing being imagined? No matter the content of what it imagines or the structure of how it unfolds, I want to know what that "vessel" or "essence" is . What is doing the imagining? where is "all things ever" spawning from? If you imagine an ever unfolding expansion of all things, including the infinite sea of things i am not aware of, what is doing the imagining and why is it doing it? Like why is the function of god to imagine infinity? Try to imagine the start of all imagination. If there is truly no end and no beginning to the imagination, then wtf is this thing and why is it? Why is the function of God to imagine things to infinity? Try to put yourself in Gods shoes. Where does it originate from? Why is it like that? I cannot get myself past the questions of why and where it comes from. where (where it started, how it started, if it even started at all, etc.) and then the "why". Someones answer might be "love, or for consciousness to become more intelligent, etc." But why? how do you even know that? How do you know youre not just trying to put something into human language to try and define it in a way you understand? If you took away everything and were just left with the void of nothingness, just pure god, not imagining anything. how can that actually be nothing if that same thing is whats spawning and birthing the imagination of everything? Like what is "that thing" thats doing it all? where did it come from, why is it? I hope I don't sound silly, I am genuinely just trying to grasp something that appears to be ungraspable. I'm trying to define it or understand it without diluting it just so I "can" understand it. I don't want my human experience diluting the truth of what it really is just so i can understand it.

yeah i agree with you. Just the idea of trying to wrap a human mind around it is exhausting. There's no way to fully grasp and then explain without diluting it to some degree because all things are contained within it

Why do you think God is the way it is?