Dodo

But "crashes" happen to the upside too, if the chart says bullish and you can get in deep profit on a long you can then set the stop loss at break even and in event of said crash u dont lose. So you either win or dont lose... We are approaching the 21000 resistance i mentioned earlier, today from 20050 to 20800 or so, above 21000 begins a brand new bull run where 21000 will be the low... so bring it on, bears! I expect some shake before we push 21000 to keep the sellers interested.

Crashes are for buying, you see low rsi, it means the sellers are exuberant and winning, they sell any price in panic or greed to win from more dump. Thats when smart money gets filled on their sell pressure LOW. (buy low is not easy) It depends on your leverage. The game is different if you are 1x and 100x. On 1x its right you can just buy any price, if you are happy with the amount of units you got, you only lose at 0. If you are on leverage you have to play smarter and catch good spots where your trade wont get stopped out before it keeps pushing. So its not that easy to buy any price, many buy extreme leverage at tops and small retrace takes them they get angry and start making mistakes. In this market you can win both ways. The trend on all time chart is bullish. There are always dips, but the trend is bullish, thats how you know you need to be a buyer on lows rather than a seller on highs. My 2 cents.

Not only stocks, but crypto too is flipped bullish. I believe Gold might be selling off into them.

Rebound... not only it rebounded it reversed the trend Pshhh dont listen to some random investors, listen to me an actualizer with 13 yrs of experience in charting. Now price is 20100 you still have until magic blue line at 21000 to secure a low risk high reward long. At 21000, when this line gets passed, its then that the bull *begins* 😤 it might shake before it passes it, thats why you want to buy before, so you can watch those tests in profit, not in loss.

When everyone's fearful, the greedy are the sellers, they dont want to lose, don't want to meet the big red candle with a buy, due to fear of loss, they might even short, to gain from further dips... The chart gave me a buy signal low which played out perfectly, so I have no reason to doubt it. I dont know how and when, Im just very bullish right now. Capital is at risk both in a long and in a short.

Which trader, because like 10-13 yrs ago a pro trader told me the same, to only look at chart and never at news! Chart is telling me bottom and I am taking the risk. Capital at risk, capital at reward. Hehe When the news were at their worst was the 16k bottom, best buy (which I took while it was dropping on my magic line at 16600) , how do we ignore that, now at 20k.. btc has exact same bottom btw, its very sus! Ofcourse there is risk, but SL below diamond, risk management, and chart is saying absolute bottom, never to test the diamond bottom again. Should be seeing 23k 24k in nsdq index.

Short answer: yes. Long answer: yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeees.

I don't know if im reading too deep into it, but I dont exclude reason for removing the video is not backlash or whatever, but a subtle attempt to make people turn to the emptiness and silence left when the video wass removed, instead of the words he claimed to be Absolute Truth in the video

Babies are joy and love. Pure souls. Baby Hitler was not evil

I am one with Dodo

Im one with the person, love that guy.

Yes the thing is by pushing nonduality as truth it creates duality between it and nonduality. One says nonduality is true, duality is not true. But hey, this is a duality right there! So they both true and neither true or its not absolute nonduality hehe Real nonduality should have enough space within itself to also include Duality, i think it is happening, we call it life 😀 has good and bad sides to it I guess!

But the singularity has expanded, we call it the big bang, right? I get some say the big bang is right now, but it seems like there was an initial more dense singularity that has expanded into multiplicity, as in this creation, it makes sense to me... like a dot becoming a sphere made of infinite amount of dots, like next dimension representation of a dot.

My two cents, i believe one thing many teachers say is the Truth cannot be said in words. If I believe that, then any time someone presents the Truth in word, I can play the contrarian, as the thorn that removes the thorn stuck in your teeth. Then better not stick the new thorn in your teeth after you remove the old one, they say!

I'll double down, in dreams we cant draw parallels with reality. In dream at night absolutely all communication doesn't happen in words, it happens telepathically, because its part of your subconscious mind speaking with you, not other minds, your subconscious part of the mind, as you uncover it with the light of awareness. In awake reality we communicate through moving our mouth, creating sounds. We can create a screeching noise or any noise we like, but we cant telepathically communicate with others because they are not us. Like now, I have to type this to you for you to know it, i cant telepathically feed it into you, like it would happen if it was a dream.

I get what you mean, its all the Emptinness, the silence, appearing as noise / somethingness, but its not just, because there is a qualitative difference between being able to hear and not, or being able to see and not. Seems like the waking dream Does include necessariy duality for it to operate. A payer, a payee. An attacker, a victim. A good guy, a bad guy. From outside the lense of spacetime non of these are real, but within this book/story/movie/wakingdream they are real, just like the street would be real for a GTA character if they were sentient, despite the streets not being real to their creator, but just pixels. The character that the creator plays still is a creation as much as the streets and house

Think can say many things and still Ramana would be right about Silence tho as the highest truth in words. Leo need to post hour long video where he just sits and does nothing, that would be a banger. Like not even meditating, like being focused, just sitting there, being. Hehe

If you say there is only God, you are creating a singularity. That's not it either Diversity in Oneness. We are separate and connected, we live in the same reality and there is no other reality. You dont know what I had for breakfast, I dont know what you had for breakfast. And its best it stays that way.

I love Rupert Spira, but not with him on this. I can use his argument against him, he is limiting God to not being able to create other beings. God is limited to being alone forever, as if! A king is not a king without a kingdom to rule, a God is not a God without its creations. The thing I point to when I say I in everyday speech is a creation which has a beginning and an end. I need to go pee, not God.

Its the same in normal chess, black usually has to react to what white is doing... in this version thr centrr is balanced. First movrt advantage removed. You would give white thr first move, but not give black a premove before the game? Thats selfish and white supremacist *joking xD* All the weaknesses you mentioned for black are there for white also, if the opening is mirrored, and black has this beautiful g6 knight to attack with. Black not gonna just sit there and take it, it can make threats. I played so many games and thr variant feels amazing. Evaluation bar starts from exact even and then tbe best man wins. This is just a patch I would do, a new expansion, if I was the owner of Chess. Giving black a premove such that the game is fully balanced from beginning 👌

Its not the only best move, all 3 top moves have the same 0.00 eval. Just a little variety. What's wrong with h4, why red flag? Because you're conditioned to have that white advantage and snap the center. In chess 960 variant there are many positions where h4 is best first move. Why not in this variant? The idea behind h4 h5 is to try to dislodge the knight from g6 which is helping black with the center and try to turn it from an asset into a liability. To me this just adds more strategic depth to the game. Why not just play me and see how it feels. Here's the link. https://www.chess.com/daily/seek/1058693149

I completely disagree. From g6 the knight is immediately controlling the center without moving! Its precisely what helps black in the fight for the center. It's the engine that says its completely even, not that it looks even. Full 0.00s with the 3 top moves and responses. If you set up normally the evaluation is +0.2 for white where 1 is a pawn. The engine is the most equipped to evaluate the starting position. I know for fact that knight on g6 helps the center, because its attacking it, but also because one of the 3 top moves is h4 by white, completely abandoning the center mission, because now white doesnt have that extra center advantage and the engine goes to challange and dislodge the g6 knight which yes, is a bit awkwardly placed, but slightly better than before. After all we don't want black to have the advantage, but all even.

Thanks Leo (thank the engine)! If you or anyone else want to play this version in correspondence 7 day per move, here's 2 open challenge links: https://www.chess.com/daily/seek/1058693149 https://www.chess.com/daily/seek/1058693365 ----- I know a bit of "theory" as ive analysed the position with engine and know some standard openings like h4 h5 to start challenging the g6 knight immediately. And blacks best defence is to do the same with his h pawn.. Notice the knight helps black control the center, so now white can go for a flank attack on the first move, as black can easier contest the center.

Guys I have balanced chess. You know how there is first mover advantage. Well I thought, what if we make half a move for Black, before the game even starts, we can achieve a position without any advantage for white. Currently its 1/5th of a pawn advantage for white at the start. I opened up engine and tried many "half moves" and if black knight starts on g6 rather than g8 (so in front of the pawn) then we have complete 0s in the starting position. And this setup makes sense because the black knight we moved still iss on the same colour square as before. I went ahead and made a correspondence tournament which is in progress and has been for a long time, now on round 2. The games have been fun, and i feel equally mighty with both colours. https://www.chess.com/tournament/no-white-advantage-tournament-1

Addiction knocking at the door 😀 Not needing psychedelics, but consciousness work. Realizing this is one thing, staying grounded is another. There is a qualitative difference between nightmare and a good dream. If this knowledge gets in your head, the ego corrupts it. You try to be king rather than God. Jesus is the only King God. 🤴 Jesus is the anti nightmare pill. This is what I'm talking about. Enlightened members who can talk about "it" vs non enlightened members who can't. It seems to me the form identity is asuming some form of victory here, and i believe this is a big trap. Spiritual elitism, spiritual ego, etc. Comes down to this, are you the form identity, the member who had a special breakthrough, or are you consciousness, the thing you keep mentioning you have grasped yourself to be during your trips. How come you can't know yourself without taking a drug is my question here. Do you have to make identity around psychedelics to be enlightened and to have a deep conversation on the nature of reality?