Mellowmarsh

All that is not thought is pure nothingness since we can think only thoughts, and all the words we use to speak of things can express only thoughts, to say there is something other than thought is therefore an affirmation which can have no meaning.

All that will remain of us is what is written down. Unwritten. The future is a perfect blank slate. Unwritten.

Because it’s how we can all agree to understand what it is we are all talking about.

Fitch's paradox of knowability (or the knowability paradox) is a logical proof demonstrating that if all truths are knowable (the "Knowability Thesis"), it follows that all truths are already known ("Omniscience Principle") In other words. That which is ( KNOWN ) knows nothing. As that which is unknown will or can eventually become known. But that which is unknowable can never be known. You cannot know omniscience because you are omniscience.

We only showed up a few minutes ago within the grand scheme of things. And already think we’ve got everything figured out. Like this entire universe exists just for us. Yeah, kinda arrogant really. Lol

Knowing nothing is a binary knowing in the instant that knowing arises one with the knowing. Hold that thought. 👍

“Nothing” exists as a known concept in this conception that knows nothing.

In this conception there are infinite you’s. And yet this conception is absolutely inconceivable to a conceived thing, which ultimately means nothing can know itself, because things know nothing, because ultimately, nothing knows all things.

If a wave only sees its form, with its beginning and end, it will be afraid of birth and death. But if the wave sees that it is water and identifies itself with the water, then it will be emancipated from birth and death. Each wave is born and is going to die, but the water is free from birth and death. Liquid Mind = Surrender: It involves moving from a state of forced, rigid control to a state of "surrender," trusting in a higher flow of life.

Something is nothing. Nothing exists.

Yes, everything which is nothing, knows this nothing. That’s the understanding, insofar as there’s nothing to understand.

Nothing knows this.

This happens automatically. Everything that appears disappears instantly in the exact same moment. Reality is unwritten, apparently rewriting what is ultimately unwritten as a false overlay. Which makes it all BS .. I agree.

There’s nothing to understand. A concept is known, and the known knows nothing.

Exactly! 👍 And absolutely nothing can know this, because absolutely nothing is this.

The purpose of all this is to ………

Yes, I personally have transcended this duality.

Thanks Leo. Great job. 🙂

Something that can formulate a label knows the label. While the label in and of itself, knows nothing of itself. In the same context, a tree never asks why it is a tree.

It is recognised that a situation or problem that is exacerbated by attempts to struggle with it or fix it, leads to becoming more "stuck" or involved. The practice of no practice is child's play. Real reality has no theory. Less struggle, less tension, leads to alignment with thee actual theory less truth.

Exactly, absolute truth doesn’t demand or require, your, our, truth. Scratch all relative truths, to reveal truth.

Words can answer that question. And the answers would appear to be the same unknown known answers.

I know that I don’t know why I know because I can only know something that I’ve read in a book, or have been told something by someone else, I can remember being a blank slate once upon a time, then came belief in what I was being told or what was written somewhere. Then I repeated the knowledge to myself and others as if it was a real knowing. In truth, all I’ve done is believed in words as real and true, before words entered my life, there was zero knowledge of anything. Words then, are the only source of knowledge. If humans hadn’t of invented words what would they have known about anything? What does a tree know about anything? Does a tree know how to read the human alphabet?