Mellowmarsh

It can, if the thinker is the thought, and the thought is the thinker. Both are each and the other the same thing, in this conception. “Both” implies a knower and known conjoined as twoness.

Because a”thoughtless experience”is still a thought.

A “Thoughtless experience” is a thought. A “thoughtless experience” is impossible.

This is known. And that which is known knows nothing.

You can only know the you that lives and dies. You cannot know the you that does not live or die. You can only know noun reality not verb reality… in this conception. The you cannot predicate the you’s existence except in this conception as and through the (mental realm) or dreamscape phenomena.

I agree. Devoid of illusion , leaves a reality that’s an ineffable unknown. An illusion knowing it’s an illusion generates a paradox where there isn’t one in reality.

Why, because existence implies life which is impossible without death. What is written is some knowledge known in the immediacy of its mental conception, one with the knowing. . . Including living and dying. In this conception, what once appeared to be alive can also be later observed to be unalive due to irreversible changes. It can also be observed that there’s no existence of conceptual knowledge existing outside of its mental conception. Knowledge is a mental construction, analogous to an ever changing dreamscape. Insofar as nothing that can ultimately change from being alive to being unalive can ever be REAL.

The best feeling is when you look at him and he is already staring.

If death never happened, then an infinite self-transforming existence doesn’t happen either. Knowing/ knowledge can only point to the illusory nature of Reality, in this conception.

Awesome 🤩!! This is not for sale. It’s like trying to know what darkness is by shining a light on it. There comes a time when you quit being a useful idiot and just let go.

There is only “your” truth. Everyone else gets their truth from the exact same source, namely, from their imagination.

Yes, and fall without the temptation of clinging to that air for dear life, as there’s nothing there to cling to. 😅

@James123 Awesome. ❤️

I think it’s more about not knowing what we think we know, because we are limited relative temporal illusory beings. Knowledge is framed by history, language, and physiology, often making it impossible to confirm if it accurately represents reality. Knowledge can only point to the illusory nature of reality. We’re not any different to birds singing.

Grim. 😐

@Hojo War is normal. https://fs.blog/entropy/#:~:text=Here's the kicker: Disorder is,decays%2C and disorder always increases.

All evil does is ultimately destroy itself. But love doesn’t do that, as light cannot extinguish light. Light can eliminate the dark, but the dark can never eliminate the light. Evil destroys even itself.

Because to create anything at all, implies the existence of a creator. And a creator would imply lack or limitation. But God already being this immediate unlimited infinite infinity cannot lack anything. So the idea of “other minds” is never the reality of God.

Is that God doing whatever deluded thing God wants, and then asking itself, is it good?

Truth is when the mind does not long for anything, grieve about anything, reject anything, or hold on to anything, and is not pleased or displeased about anything. Not making anything or everything about a “me” No one is. It’s just ‘the mind’ like The Matrix. There isn’t anyone actually in The Matrix. Movie, analogy wise, everyone has to ‘jack into’ the matrix because it’s software patterns playing out, not real.

@Ziran Okay, thanks for your perspective on the matter. 🙂

The pursuit of truth is for the thrill of the unknown.

The truth is not in what you know or do not know. It is in the silence that remains when all knowing ends. But don’t take my word for this. It’s arrogant to believe you can tell another what to think, or how to be, or what to believe, as if truth is something to be achieved external to your own conscious awareness.

“Simultaneously” implies a two way mirror - where one side is unaware of the other side. Signifying the end of knowing. Knowledge can only point to the illusory nature of reality. Not to confuse illusion as non existent, but as unknowable. You can’t know you know because you are the knowing that cannot be known.

Difference where there is none. Many authors appear. But there’s only one reader reading what no one ever writ.