questionreality

I cannot believe what I read, I had to read this 5 times. What makes you think that you have better understanding of politics than almost everyone on the planet? Politics is not even your main domain. The problem is that you don't actually hold yourself accountable, and just brush off being wrong with circumstances changing. People who are actually wise and conscious, don't usually make such statements. In the past you claimed to be the most conscious human on the planet and that you reached the highest levels, and now this? If you are serious and truly believe this - then you have to be delusional. How do you not see the problem with such statements?

We are not talking about spirituality here. We are talking about politics and the probability of a certain candidate winning. Are you sure that you are posting in the right sub? If this "work" that you do, does not make you more humble and makes you think that you know better than everyone else in every field - then you are doing the wrong kind "work". There is a clear difference between giving authority to others and being a total delusional, full of ego, arrogance and thinking that you know best. If you do the right "work" for long enough, you will see the amount of ego tripping majority of so called "gurus", including Leo do. Pride goes before the fall - remember this.

What makes you think that in this field you have higher intelligence and higher competence? What makes you think that you always know best? Your condescending attitude towards others (ex: depraved bookie), and the amount of arrogance/ego that you display is surprising to see, given that you been doing this "work" for so long.

The point is people pull out odds out of their ass but usually don't bother to put their money where their mouth is

My point was, that the odds that you came up with are exactly reverse opposite of what the bookies are giving. So if you truly believe what you are saying, it should be a very +EV bet for you. In general, I would not argue with the bookies, the vast majority of the times they are proven to be correct. Follow the money as the old saying goes.

I am glad to see that not everyone on this forum is anti-Trump and just repeats the MSM narrative

If you truly believe those are the odds, then you should bet a good amount of money on Kamilla, you would be printing money.

Where do you get those odds? According to bookies it's actually the other way around, Trump is a 60 % favorite to win the election: https://www.oddschecker.com/politics/us-politics But you also some years ago said that Trump has no chance of becoming president, correct?

So are you suggesting to do what the bolsheviks did in Russia? Perhaps study history and understand the danger of leftwing Marxists and the damage that they have done. What was done at the olympics is a disgrace and I myself am not a conservative, nor a Christian.

I myself am not a conservative and consider myself a liberal, but this was just purely disgusting to see. This is when I can really understand conservatives who call this type of stuff "satanism". These guys are clearly pushing their agenda down everyone's throats and people are just not going to have it

Yes! This is a must, I really hope that it happens. Not to mention, it would give his audience an exposure to your YT channel, a win-win

While war can land on any president's term at any moment, there are different probabilities to it. While 4 years is a small sample size, it still says something in the limited amount of information that we have. Trump is a negotiator and while he was seen as Russia's agent (failed Russia gate), this is one of the factors that could have prevented the war from happening. Why do you take Trump's rhetoric of being a dictator for a day so seriously but other rhetoric of his you just dismiss as lies? You really can't have it both ways. Also, knowing you - if the roles were reversed and wars would have happened under Trump's presidency, you would be saying the exact opposite. Putin has proven time and time again that you cannot trust anything that comes out of his mouth. Did you forget when before the invasion he was asked if he was going to attack Ukraine and he kept denying this for months? I find it hilarious that you actually believe Putin's narrative - perhaps if you actually followed Russian politics and knew Russian language, you would know that it's a load of BS.

I am not saying that was the only reason that he didn't invade Ukraine, but the fact is he didn't. 4 years of sample size is more than good enough, given that the US presidential term is only 4 years, and we need to go off something. The idea that he was trying to come to some diplomatic arrangement is pure speculation on your part, we don't know this for sure. You need to give the credit where it's due - while Trump was president there was no wars.

@Leo Gura @aurum How come Putin did not invade Ukraine while Trump was president, but invaded it under Obama (Crimea) and under Biden? We have 4 years of sample size of Trump presidency, but for some reason you guys tend to ignore this and come up with your abstract theories Also, Trump is more likely to finish the war and have them make peace, rather than have the war prolonged with more lost lives and more American tax dollars going to the war.

As in comparison to Kamala Harris LOL? Kamala Harris would be perceived as a joke by Putin, who are you kidding?

Respect in this context means not to be perceived as someone who he can easily run over, someone who can be unpredictable and can take bold action if needed. For someone like Putin, it is actually easier to deal with Biden's administration than Trump's - because you actually never know what you can get with Trump, it may backfire at any point.

That's not what he said - he meant for dealing with ruthless leaders like Putin you need a guy who Putin will respect and will not perceive as weak. Not everything comes down to childhood trauma as you think - sometimes things are way more simple than that.

If this is what you guys think is true vulnerability and admittance of wrong - you are beyond lost and cannot be helped. And I am not the first nor the last to point this out. Not to mention that this is a man who claims to have reached the highest levels of consciousness in human history. I am not the first, nor the last person to point this out - just see what the ex mods and ex high level priests of this forum have said.

At first I gave you the benefit of the doubt, but now I went and watched the 2nd half of the video. You didn't actually say what you were wrong about in particular. And at the end you still justified it and said the mistakes that you made led you to reach "god levels of consciousness", and sobbed a bit over that. Where do you see true vulnerability and regret in that? Another thing that I noticed, is that you made the video about YOURSELF. (how you reached this and that, yada yada) A true admittance of wrong, is when you actually admit that you were wrong and apologize to the person/group directly, without any excuses, justifications, and you don't make it about yourself. I have yet to see this from you, anywhere - weather on a video or a forum. You say that you are far from being a narcissist, but if you studied this domain enough, you would know that there is many forms of it (not all look like Trump). It's beyond astounding to see that someone who has been doing this "work" for over 10 years displays so much ego, arrogance, and a lack of humility.

Have you not promoted the same "leftist dogma" for years on this forum? I meant admitting you are wrong on a personal level - not making a video breaking down psychology of it, or broadly talking about how you may have been wrong in the past. There is clear difference in those two - as one requires actual display of vulnerability, which you never show. You call Trump a narcissist (which you are correct to do), yet you are in deep denial of your own narcissism on clear display. No wonder you hate Trump so much (as a character alone on subconscious level, not taking into account his ideas/beliefs,etc), he is your clear shadow.

Do you consider all of your responses to be of "high quality"? When someone actually has a constructive position, and bothers to put in the effort to do research and bring historical examples, you shortly respond with the following: -You are too brainwashed to understand me - You are too biased to understand me -You are too low of consciousness (if it comes to spirituality) to understand me And at the same time you always act like the smartest person to ever live, all knowing, and you never admit that you are wrong.

I had no idea that they shredded all the documents in 1953, thank you for sharing all of this

I cannot believe that LEO is actually denying these obvious things, that are right on the surface. My guess is people don't want to admit these things to themselves, as deep down it would show the damage that was done in the name of secularism, progressivism, freedom, democracy.

The standards should be equally applied equally, regardless of your political position/take. What I see, is for example people who are Anti-MAGA get a pass, just because they have the "right" take, while a lot of the times still posting something of low quality that just repeats same old mantra, without any substance. It would also be helpful if you could provide some characteristics of what you consider to be a "high quality" take. I consider a high quality take to be a constructive argument, a political position that is well though out without emotional attachment. Sometimes a high quality take, can also be a constructive question, which leads to a higher quality of an answer from a person involved in a discussion. For our example, just calling Trump a "devil" and not actually bring examples of policies, and what he has done in 4 years that was damaging would be a low quality take imo. This type of rhetoric is also dangerous, as it creates an echo chamber and people just repeat like parrots, without thinking for themselves. This in turn destroys their critical thinking, even if they have the "right" takes so to speak. Most importantly, is that it would be in the best interests of this forum if the owner/mods would be neutral, and not show their biases towards a particular political side/position/candidate. This would encourage critical thinking, and not create echo chamber as it is happening now.

You really have no argument. All you are saying is - intelligent people don't like Trump and if you are not seeing why he is evil, then you can't be helped. I can use the same argument against you - and can find intelligent people who support Trump and don't like Biden. Why do you think that you are smarter than people who hold a political position different from you? So far, you could not state a single devilish thing that Trump has done in his 4 years of presidency. You became a parrot for Leo and for Mods. People like you actually scare me on both sides - when you lose to critically think and become the parrot npc is quite scary.