questionreality

People that have revealed you your true biases have all been banned by you or your mods.

@Natasha Tori Maru I would have never thought that you are 40, you look much younger than your age. Very intelligent and also logical person, your thoughts are very well structured. One interview and being able to see a live human instread of an avatar reveals to me a lot more about a person than if I was to read 1000 posts

@Emerald I know we’ve disagreed in the past on a different topic, but it’s genuinely been a pleasure reading the gold you’ve been posting here. You’ve articulated the truth with remarkable eloquence and delicacy, putting into words an observation that I think is shared by many people who have spent enough time on this forum and paid attention to the same patterns. It's remarkable to me that there are people who say that they "been doing this work" for many years and yet can't spot the obvious pattern that seems to be lying on the surface.

You couldn't have put it any better, one of the best posts in this thread imo. Good luck though trying to get this a person who believes he is the most conscious person in the world to understand this.

Coming from someone who claims to be the most conscious human on this planet (levels of consciousness that no one has reached) is just hilarious.

You keep describing it as being “accused,” but that is already the frame through which you’re interpreting what people are saying. That is the way your ego frames it. Just because someone is observing a pattern or being critical of you doesn’t necessarily mean they are accusing you of something. The same applies to “I’m being accused” and “you think you’re right and I’m wrong.” Those are frames you’re putting on the conversation and to me, another example of the ego reacting, rather than neutral descriptions of what is actually being said. What do you think is more likely, that there is something here you may not be seeing in yourself, or that all these different people who have independently pointed out a similar pattern are the ones lacking something?

Just because you don't have a partner or kids does not make it a higher option.

The fact that you take it as people "accusing" you of having a spiritual ego speaks for itself. Perhaps in some years you will look back and realize what you were told, but at this point nothing more can be said to you.

Totally agree, very underrated post in this thread.

I never said that those differences don't exist.

Multiple people already in this thread have clearly pointed out you having a spiritual ego. This is another clear example of it. Until you stop dividing people into "higher" and "lower" consciousness categeries etc, nothing good will come out of it. Putting Leo on a pedestal (who is in his 40s single and without kids) and thinking that you are above others are just few symptoms over the bigger issue at play here. Dropping "spirituality" or trying to be "spiritual" is probably the best that you can do, for yourself and for your dating life at this point. Yes you can be spiritual without being "spiritual" , at some time that role will have to be dropped.

@Miguel1 Have you considered the possibility that your framework of “higher” and “lower” consciousness could itself be flawed? In my opinion, for someone who has been involved in spirituality and self-development for as long as you have, the whole concept of “higher consciousness” versus “lower consciousness” is something that should eventually be dropped. It can be a useful framework in the beginning and intermediate stages, but at a certain point, going further requires that framework itself to be dropped or transcended. All of this overconceptualization could actually be what’s holding you back, and in general, I just don’t think it’s a particularly healthy mindset to have.

What makes you think that it is a "higher" stage? Human beings are social creatures and he mentioned that he is an extrovert as well. Higher stage is building healthy, nourishing, fullfilling relationships imo, which is what he desires

I would say it has more to do with certain types of people in general, not just women. The more someone’s image (or identity) is built around being , "highly conscious", more developed, unusually compassionate, wise etc the less I take that image as evidence of those qualities. Character is revealed much more reliably by how someone behaves when their values become inconvenient, especially toward people they dislike, disagree with, or have nothing to gain from. Authenticity is something that cannot be faked.

@LordFall She did the same thing with me. Just ignored my main point, pretended like she didn't notice it. She made me repeat it and for the 3rd time she just said "declined" and did not go any further. I thought it was just with me, but looks like it's a pattern.