questionreality

https://apnews.com/article/meta-platforms-mark-zuckerberg-biden-facebook-covid19-463ac6e125b0d004b16c7943633673fc A lot of the leftists denied that this was happening, including many on this forum. This is why it's so important to have a balanced perspective, otherwise you will end up in either of the left/right bubbles and in turn be completely blind to what is going on. The fact that this happened should be alarming and disturbing to anyone, regardless of where you are on the political spectrum.

Nobody is stopping Kamala from coming on and doing these interviews, but she doesn't bother to. Instead of censorship, more speech is the solution, which leftists don't understand.

That's quite insane actually. Good luck explaining this though to the woke leftists, who are stuck in their ideological bubble.

@Leo Gura Trump actually said that he is pro legalization of Marijuana and Lex even told him that he recently did ayahuasca and that Lex mentioned to him that psychedelics should be legal. Starts at 25:00 Also, Lex said that Joe Rogan is the greatest conversationalist in the world and encouraged for Trump to go on his podcast. The fact that Lex said that this speaks a lot about his character.

How stupid can the DNC and Kamala be, to refuse to work with him and have him support Trump?

You are a man, so you should be the one leading. Drinking beer when you don't want to just because a girl is drinking it, is really really bad for many reasons. Focus on being authentic - if you don't like soft drinks, then just tell her this. If you don't feel weird about it, she won't either - it's all about the vibe that you are giving out. Focus on making the date enjoyable for YOU. If you don't enjoy soft drinks, don't drink them.

You are in total delusion and clearly have never traveled. Ask most guys who traveled abroad about how it compares to dating in US/UK, the answer will be pretty clear. Of course if you are attracted to more typical masculine western women, that's fine. If your dick gets hard for them, good for you, but that's not for majority of men! If you have the opportunity to travel, find the woman that's more compatible with you (feminine, beautiful), expand your worldview, why shouldn't you travel?

Very well said and I respect you for doing it. It actually takes balls and courage to do it, because you actually have to go outside of your comfort zone, and for most people it would be extremely difficult to do and scary. Not to mention that traveling in general expands your mind and makes you more interesting of a person.

Before learning to become a man, you need to learn how to write, and form coherent sentences - because I can barely understand what you wrote here. You also need to learn how to read, because: 1) Nowhere did I say that I wanted to get women easily or wanted an easy way out 2) Nowhere did I say how much of a man I am, where the fuck are you getting all this from? These are your own projections 3) I wrote that I live in an Eastern country and am from there, so you can't say that I escaped the west, etc. 4) The point of traveling is to expand your awareness and worldview, to understand what's out there. It also expands your dating pool, when you KNOW what you want.

If you want to find a feminine and beautiful woman, your chances will increase tenfold in an eastern european country. You probably have never traveled outside of the US, thus you can't comprehend any of what we are saying here. I am speaking as someone who is from an eastern country and lives there, but who also have lived in the west. US is far from being the best place to live, yet alone to find a woman. Once you travel and even live somewhere else for extended period of time, your opinion will most likely change.

Why are you so obsessed with race? I said nothing regarding their skin color here. On the video more than 70% of the women are white.

LOL, this is what you consider attractive? You clearly have never been to countries in eastern Europe. I wouldn't give these more than a 6. You need to clearly travel more.

It is not relevant to narcissism. If it happens to be true, it doesn't make you any less of a narcissist is my point. Funny you say that, when a lot of the time you expect others to see the world that you do or to hold your standards.

This proves my point. Weather if it's true or not - is not actually relevant. People who are not narcissists and happen to also be very wise, don't need to do so. Something to consider.

There are actually 7 to 10 forms of narcissism out there (depending on how you want to group them). The way that you speak and what you have said over the years, clearly shows otherwise. Why do you so often tell others that you have intellectual superiority over them?

Typical narcissistic response of yours - " You don't understand X, you don't understand Y, but I do". You keep denying that you are a narcissist - but you clearly are one. We clearly have different values in this case and instead of agreeing to disagree, you insist that I don't understand, because in your mind you can't be wrong.

I do understand what is survival and it is not relevant to what we are talking about here. I find it hilarious how you use these meta-justifications to excuse censorship. I bet 3-4 years back though when it was happening, you probably denied that there was any censorship from the government going on in the first place. Your bias is way too obvious, I expect you to be way more balanced and neutral when it comes to these topics.

Such "harmful info" included the idea that the virus came from a lab, how ineffective the masks actually were (proven later), and any other questions that people had, that did not go along with the narrative that was being pushed.

I 100% agree - the quality of women in both USA and UK is as low as it gets. The guys who say otherwise clearly have not traveled much outside of US. Not to mention that living in US would be 2-5x more expensive.

The problem here is that there are only 2 candidates available to choose from for the election day. The 2 party system is just so fucked, that some people don't have a choice but to vote for Trump, simply because the other choice is just not any better either in their eyes. Would be much better if there was like 4-5 candidates available from 4-5 different parties, similar to how you have it in Europe.

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/telegram-messaging-app-ceo-pavel-durov-arrested-france-tf1-tv-says-2024-08-24/ The charges are rumored to be support for terrorism, drug trafficking, complicity in crimes, mass fraud, money laundering, concealment, pedophile content, and more. He refused the demands on French government and didn't censor his platform - now they got him. Funny enough he left Russia as government also wanted access to all users but he refused, but ironically now the Western government has arrested him. Looks like they are really targeting those who stand up for free speech and privacy. Is Elon Musk next? Edit: The French Prosecutors had a press release today: https://www.tribunal-de-paris.justice.fr/sites/default/files/2024-08/2024-08-26 - CP TELEGRAM .pdf Pavel Durov is facing these 12 charges: 1)Complicity in the administration of an online platform to enable illegal transactions. 2)Refusal to provide information upon requests from authorized bodies. 3)Complicity in possession of pornographic images of minors. 4)Complicity in the distribution of pornographic images of minors by an organized group. 5)Complicity in drug distribution. 6)Complicity in the distribution of hacker programs. 7)Complicity in fraud committed by an organized group. 8)Creation of an organized group for the purpose of committing crimes punishable by imprisonment for a term of at least five years. 9)Laundering of money obtained as a result of the activities of an organized criminal group. 10)Provision of cryptographic services aimed at ensuring confidentiality, without mandatory declaration. 11)Illegal provision of cryptography beyond what is necessary to ensure confidentiality. 12)Illegal import of cryptographic tools beyond those necessary to ensure confidentiality.

@Leo Gura i was not comparing France to China - it was a response to Nemra. The Durov case is a very absurd one that can set a major precedent. I think out of all the people you should understand this. @Nemra No, the point is that there they decide who has it and who doesn't.

If you rather live in a country like China, that is your choice. There it's not a given.

Who are you to decide who needs or it who doesn't? Same goes for privacy. As Durov said, Telegram is either secure or not secure for everyone - you can't have the app secure for certain people and not for others.

Wow, even the progressives in this video like Krystal Ball here mentioned that this is concerning if you care about privacy/free speech. What I don't understand, is why do so many left leaning people stopped caring about this issue? It shouldn't be left/right issue, it should be a common value that we all care about, no matter the political spectrum that you belong on.