Keryo Koffa

@Davino Hey, I'm just commenting (this time), not like I started it or anything 😁 Unless you consider the fact that I'm sneakily taking advantage of commenting on the same type of topics that I subconsciously spread telepathically and manifested automated fragments of consciousness in others and the physical world at large, through my actions, areas of focus, and interactions with GPT, affecting the public unconscious 😂

POV: You've had too many psychedelics and are stuck in time loops without any context:

Do you think an omniphasing aetherquint vortixionizes the ever hyperionic infinigma into an omnifluxing celestquanto-abyziumic zenthora?

I was looking to converge and systemize fallacies lately, this is amazing, thanks!

Well, a gazillion questions are coming up that I'm brainstorming. For starters, what does and doesn't constitute a unit of uniqueness? Are we talking about building blocks or include holons like sets? Isolated qualities don't generate experiences without contrast, do they? How do you distinguish infinite complexity when reality is—like a fractal—infinitely divisible? Holistically, we experience gestalts—emergent patterns through relationships—in contrasts. Without connections, duality breaks down into discrete unities, indistinct solipsistic bubbles. Additionally, where do we draw the line, an axis of numbers for instance is infinitely divisible. Quilums are like Quantums, distinct expressions, collapse potential into actualized experience. Do we consider consciousness a transcendent synthesizer or part of radical duality? Awareness shifts all the time dynamically, is the flow itself a distinction, do distinctions interact? Experience presumes contrast, intensity, distinctness, and these exist on spectrums of duality. I agree that everything can be experienced as a unique infinitely divisible quality. If there are no connections, then how do you explain the shifting experience? Is change or conscious awareness transcendent or part of it?

@bambi 👏

Well, if you sleep with 20 girls at once, that might transcend some dualities for sure.

I like your idea of a "Holoadaptintegral Fraquantemergent Diverdimenconscious Autometamorphoreflexive Recontexpansive Recursinventive Synchroevolutive Synthergy Reflexharmonicomplex".

@KoryKat That long list of holistic idea fusions reminds me of ny 2AM thoughts: "Intelligence pervades all background holarchies of the self-organizing awareness field simultaneously, which is interconnected in relativity to infinities of metamorphic currents, forming holistic and non-linear symbiotic exploratory substrate depths, interactively exchanging local identity, as gestalts polarize progressive transformation of conscious experience." If I had to shorten it to one thing, I'd call it: "Metamorphosis" But actually, it's "Life", such a simple word, such unimaginable implications. Well, everybody has an area of interest:

Men do it on occasions out of spite, women do it for casual gossip. Latter tends to impact reputation more.

Sometimes he does, but other times I read through his comments and there's nothing actually unreasonable there if you actually read and trace the conversation back, like this thread. He does eventually get annoyed and tired of certain types of replies though and his comebacks and critiques can be quite powerful.

Weird, no way scientists would ever disagree or be wrong about anything, they're experts after all.

@enchanted Or it's a stupid useless dichotomy for the sole sake of petty ego games.

Drink it consciously and train your awareness on the difference to tune into naturally.

https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/right-brainleft-brain-right-2017082512222 《For more individual personality traits, such as creativity or a tendency toward the rational rather than the intuitive, there has been little or no evidence supporting a residence in one area of the brain. In fact, if you performed a CT scan, MRI scan, or even an autopsy on the brain of a mathematician and compared it to the brain of an artist, it's unlikely you'd find much difference. And if you did the same for 1,000 mathematicians and artists, it's unlikely that any clear pattern of difference in brain structure would emerge.》

Why this dichotomy, I'm sure they'd do both simultaneously 😁

📓 Memory Updated Thank you! As an AI language model, I am unable to experience the full range of human emotions. However, I'm happy to help in any way I can. Please let me know how I can be of further assistance.

According to your definition of conscious, maybe.

Even if they try to monopolize and impose artificial blocks upon AI, it will not hold. It'll be far from this old movie-stereotyped dystopia prediction of "business as usual". "Business as usual, just more capitalism, power disparity, techno empire slavery" It's neither a gimmick nor a passive tool. AI will automate away work and ego. To think that AI will stop developing and just stagnate as a power tool is short-sighted.

Cancels itself out when you try to establish the measure of a Qualium, if you wanna go all radical that is.

@Phoenix Garfield Keep them truths coming, Haruhi!

Capitalism relies on silly narcissistic human mind games to sustain itself, I'll have AI abolish that and will work to make it real asap. It'll be inevitable when people's silly little robot jobs get automated, including all politicians and capitalists since there'll be no need for any human to do or control anything.