royce

https://chomskypc.wordpress.com/2015/11/22/august-15-2006-chomsky-my-dinner-with-hassan/

@Ayham https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1840184222897541454

You will not achieve peace and the war is long

In this conflict, I stand with the Palestinians, their resistance, and all those who support them. Terrorism, in my opinion, is the cultivation of fear; making people afraid to think or act due to fear of consequences. It is not necessarily a bad thing in itself, but when it is used in a way mixed with injustice, it becomes something very vile and should provoke you. There must be a reaction. If there are no reactions to this injustice, it is an indication that these people have died The clearest example of terrorism today is Israel's actions in the region. They aim to label Hamas as a terrorist organization, okey i will agree with the Zionist narrative for once But why you collectively punishing 2 million people, ?? their intention is to spread fear and deter any future similar actions, betting that such acts will not be repeated. This will happen again, and next time, it won’t be 10,000 entering Israel but a million. and What happened with Hezbollah was a setback, but they will learn from their mistakes. Issues with communication and security breaches will be resolved. It will be a prolonged conflict. These people began their resistance with stones; now that they have missiles and drones, how can you expect them to stop?

@Ayham why ?

@Ayham This is the inevitable result of global terrorism. When those in control act like terrorists, ,the presence of Hassan Nasrallah becomes meaningful.

and keep in mind this is not a bad thing

Yes, this what they signed up for

### Preliminary Analysis of the Assassination of Hezbollah’s Secretary-General - Sameh Askar Let’s try to summarize the overall context and use straightforward language to explain the complexities involved. **First:** It appears that Israel and the United States have been collaborating over the years to plant high-precision surveillance devices in the southern suburbs of Beirut (Dahieh). This would explain why all assassinations of Hezbollah leaders occur there; Israel seems to have limited intelligence beyond this area. Every prominent party leader who has been targeted was located in Dahieh. This situation requires thorough sweeping and review of the area, which I believe Lebanon is not currently capable of conducting effectively on its own. Assistance from foreign powers, particularly Russia and China, may be needed—not Iran, as it is evident that the Iranians are also not as advanced in this field, for reasons not to be discussed here. **Second:** It also seems that Israel and the United States have managed to infiltrate an important faction of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). This doesn't necessarily mean they have recruited agents within, but they might have planted surveillance devices among them or in their usual locations. A major piece of evidence supporting this is that whenever there is an assassination in Dahieh, an Iranian advisor from the IRGC is also involved. This suggests prior knowledge of the movements of these leaders. The Iranians urgently need to initiate a scientific and political revolution to salvage what they can, as any escalation could result in the assassination of high-ranking Iranian state leaders, or even the Supreme Leader himself. The dimensions of this revolution should include cooperation with the Russians to uncover and analyze these developments, as Russia is highly advanced in this field and possesses the technical expertise to detect Western spying methods. The Russians have a history of dealing with such techniques, from the Chechen and Georgian conflicts to the current situation in Ukraine. **Third:** The Middle East is likely heading towards a significant regional war in the near future. The assassination of Hassan Nasrallah would eliminate any prospects of "Lebanese political harmony," paving the way for more extreme and aggressive leadership within Hezbollah. The Secretary-General was not just a political party leader; he was an inspiration, an ideology, and a charismatic figure who wielded wide influence in Lebanon and managed to foster communication with different Lebanese factions. Over 20 years, he established a political consensus that effectively shaped the Lebanese scene. With the assassination of Nasrallah, a new leader will emerge who may not possess the patience and self-restraint Nasrallah demonstrated over the past year. Nasrallah’s approach was characterized by measured responses, which led to criticism and accusations of failing Gaza, as he insisted on referring to Lebanon as the "supporting front." Although this stance had adverse security consequences, leading to these breaches, he maintained this position until the last moment. As of now, we do not know who the new leader will be or what their character and policies will be like, but it is likely they will come with a dual motivation of revenge and self-affirmation. These emotions are enough to trigger an escalation and a demonstration of power that Nasrallah deliberately refrained from showing in the recent period. **Fourth:** The new leader of Hezbollah will likely be pressured to intensify attacks and use weapons that have not previously been deployed. **Fifth:** Hezbollah’s allies within the "Axis of Resistance" will also likely escalate their attacks in a show of solidarity and unity of stance. We might see widespread acts of retaliation, given Nasrallah’s central role as an inspiring leader within this axis. His support for other factions, especially in Yemen, has been significant, and we may see more assertive actions from the Yemenis as a result. **Sixth and finally:** Those who predict or promote the collapse of Hezbollah or the resistance clearly do not understand the ideological and psychological makeup of the "Muslim fighter," who views such incidents as part of God's decrees. Such events do not provoke overwhelming anger, weakness, or exaggerated mourning. Instead, Nasrallah would transform into a popular icon and legend in both Lebanese and Arab contexts. His assassination at the hands of Israel would grant him power and standing not just in the Shia community but also within the Sunni community, as he gave his life in their defense. In conclusion, the assassination of Nasrallah is a crucial chapter in fostering Sunni-Shia solidarity against occupation. As the saying goes, every cloud has a silver lining; this event has completely discredited the notion of "Shia collaboration with Israel," which has been widely promoted in the Sunni community. This narrative was spread by Wahhabi propaganda over the past two decades to justify sectarian massacres and to solidify the power and influence of jihadist factions that emerged from Wahhabi ideology specifically and Western intelligence agencies more generally. In the same context... Arab intelligence agencies and Arab security are required in the coming period to understand and interpret this breach and study the idea of planting eavesdropping devices over a large geographic area or in places where leaders and influencers are present... Israel has become more aggressive and will continue to become even more so, with endless support from the United States. It will raise its demands on Arab regimes and countries, especially after the official rejection of normalization with Saudi Arabia and the crisis of the Philadelphi Corridor with Egypt. Currently, Israel is experiencing a media victory, with a state of political and societal euphoria similar to what it experienced in 1967, with some differences. In 1967, Israel gained Arab land, but in 2024 it is practicing state terrorism by assassinating leaders of its opponents. This euphoria and self-pride, along with the ongoing security threat posed by resistance rockets, means we are dealing with a war criminal project with no limits—no barriers preventing it from achieving its dreams and ambitions that were previously silenced during moments of weakness. Betting on the United States is a losing gamble, not only because the U.S. is currently losing in the global power struggle, but also because Lebanon is paying the price for this gamble now. The CIA has infiltrated key aspects of the Lebanese state, planting eavesdropping devices and booby-trapping areas like the southern suburbs. What would prevent the agency from doing the same in other Arab countries?

The right understands the right

At first, you completely refused the comparison at all , and now you've changed the question.

Haha, wow, you keep impressing me more and more with every reply!

@Inliytened1 By the way, Netanyahu said that Hitler originally intended only to expel the Jews, but a Palestinian figure convinced him to burn them, implying that Hitler wasn’t inherently bad and was influenced by external persuasion. Check the vedio https://www.theguardian.com/world/video/2015/oct/21/binyamin-netanyahu-palestinian-holocaust-video

I think it's a survival strategy for the Israelis to avoid considering the situation from a humanitarian perspective. In your minds, Hitler is seen as the ultimate evil, so any comparison between your leadership and him seems outrageous to you . However, it's a valid comparison, and personally, I believe that Hitler is a better person than your Bibi.

guys, compare Netanyahu to Kendrick Lamar

The use of power has become limitless, and the conflict between the axes is crossing all lines. The options for everyone are stark – either accept defeat and exit the playing field or engage in an open and bloody confrontation. There are indications of a lack of strategic courage in the axis led by Iran, which has created a state of chaos in the region and excessively used its proxies for political calculations. At a crucial moment, it has failed to defend or protect them. The upcoming strike will be in Tehran, targeting high-ranking figures. Before that, names in Sana'a, Damascus, and Baghdad have been added to the list

Mearsheimer has addressed this; you can look it up for more details.

To all the wise and those seeking balance, compromises, truces, deals, and understandings from all sides: This is not your time. This is a time of madness, stubborn minds, and zero-sum solutions. This is a time for suicidal courage and reckless bravado. Netanyahu will not accept anything less than subjugating the entire region.

They all best for the business , if the ruler not the best it will be problem for him

All the Kings in the Arab Gulf except in Yemen , the president of Egypt , King Of Jordan , King of Morocco , in Libya , This is in addition to the American bases in Syria and Iraq.

This could happen if the U.S. were to leave the Middle East and the people overthrew their rulers. But if America stays in the region and continues backing the Arab leaders, they would maintain control over their populations, and things would likely stay as they are. In my view, the U.S. won’t abandon the Middle East anytime soon, as their strategy seems to involve building an "Arab-Israeli NATO" to counter Iran, leveraging existing tensions between Arabs and Persians due to conflicts in Syria and Iraq. { between the Sunnis and the Shiites.}

The U.S. will change its tune on supporting Israel once it starts costing a party an election—signs of that are already popping up, but let’s not rush things, The events of October 7 hit like a DMT for Americans and the world, shaking everything up whether they wanted it or not.

Hezbollah might have a significant missile stockpile capable of hitting Israel, but it’s far from matching Israel's military capabilities. They don’t possess aircraft, air defense systems, an Iron Dome, or the advanced technology that Israel has. Moreover, they lack the backing of a superpower providing weapon supplies, deploying aircraft carriers, and wielding powerful bombs. I'm not saying the resistance in Gaza is weak—far from it. Netanyahu faced a significant defeat against them. He started the conflict by demanding the unconditional return of prisoners and vowed to wipe out Hamas, he failed on both Instead, he amplified Hamas to the point where, listening to the Israeli army, you'd think they were up against the German army of the 1940s. But take a look at a map—Gaza is just a tiny strip, 40 km long, smaller than a suburb in many countries. The relentless targeting of civilians and city destruction? It’s collective punishment, aiming to turn Gaza's people against the resistance. Even after deploying 30,000 soldiers, Israel struggled against a much smaller group of fighters, around 300, fighting in street clothes with little to no supplies. What the resistance achieved in Gaza was nothing short of remarkable. I completely agree with you, and that’s exactly why Israel is aiming to solidify its dominance in the Middle East. With global dynamics shifting and rising powers like China potentially emerging over the next 20-30 years (in my opinion), Israel is working to eliminate regional threats to secure its position. The Arabian Gulf states are relatively weak, Egypt is struggling economically, and Iraq, Syria, and Libya have been devastated—leaving Iran as the main rival. The events of October 7 have given Israel a strategic opportunity to further destroy its enemies while continuing to enjoy unwavering U.S. support. If Netanyahu provokes a conflict with Iran to change its regime or destroy its nuclear facilities, and the U.S. intervenes, he might no longer need American support in the same way going forward—that would be the endgame.

haha !