royce

https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2024/10/03/geert-wilders-for-breitbart-why-european-patriots-should-support-israel/

No, you're too simplistic to respond.

If Israel attacks Iran once again, the Iranian response will be swift and devastating, unlike before, where there were delays of a month or two. The reason for this is that before carrying out the strike yesterday, Iran had prepared a "response to the response" plan, and satellite images revealed that the Revolutionary Guards had already set up their missiles. This led some to mistakenly believe that a second wave of strikes was imminent. Israel was significantly damaged by yesterday’s strikes, and the evidence for this includes the following: 1. **Noticeable Reduction in Air Strikes and Flights**: There has been a clear reduction in Israeli air force operations. Before the Iranian military strike, Israeli air forces were highly active around the clock. However, this activity has now partially decreased, indicating potential damage to Israel's air force capabilities. 2. **Satellite Imagery of Targeted Airbases is Blurred**: Since this morning, satellite images of the targeted airbases have been unclear. Experts believe this is due to an artificial electronic cloud placed by certain companies over these bases to prevent the extent of the damage from being revealed. Notably, this cloud did not exist a few days ago. 3. **Lowered Morale Among Israeli Soldiers**: The morale of Israeli soldiers has declined, following the drop in morale among their leaders and the Israeli public. The direct result of this has been Israeli soldiers falling into easy ambushes in southern Lebanon—four large ambushes so far. Before the Iranian military strike, the morale of the Israeli army was high, and they had a significant amount of confidence and arrogance, positioning themselves as the strong and assured attacker carefully choosing their targets. Yesterday and today, Israel lost what it gained last week. This is the nature of battles, meaning that it is possible for the Israelis to regain their strength, but they will not be able to achieve this while facing the readiness and vigilance of the opposing axis. Iran is ready to respond quickly if Netanyahu decides to take a risk. As mentioned yesterday, the Israeli file is now in the hands of the Revolutionary Guards, not President Bazashkian, who prefers diplomatic solutions. The commanders of the Revolutionary Guards are angry over the killing of their colleagues and now have an opportunity for retaliation, especially with Israel embroiled in a ground war with Lebanon and Palestine, scattering its forces and exposing them to attacks, as demonstrated by the recent strike on a tank gathering near the Gaza border. It is not far-fetched for Israel to resort to the Samson Option or act recklessly, whether by assassinating a prominent Iranian commander or bombing nuclear sites. We are facing perhaps the most reckless and arrogant Israeli leadership in its history, and the coming days will reveal more about the nature of this conflict, of which we are living through one of its most significant chapters. - Sameh Asker 2/10/2024

Your neighbor or Netanyahu?

@Inliytened1 It's not about the numbers; your neighbor might be worse than both of them. Can i compare Netanyahu to Stalin or this is insensitive too ?

why insensitive ?

@Inliytened1 After that reply, I couldn’t take you seriously anymore.

yes you angry

don't be so sure bro

haha calma calma , what made you so angry ?

The people are exhausted due to the U.S. imposing sanctions for 50 years to fuel internal tensions.

@PurpleTree You are acting like my gf, haha

i didn't say Everything is Trumps fault you said

So, have you studied Trump's policies in the Middle East during his presidency, or are you just replaying like this without knowledge?

The conflict in the Middle East started as a result of actions taken by Trump, but some people can't piece the full picture together.

**Preliminary Analysis of the Recent Iranian Military Strike on Israel** - Sameh Askar **Firstly:** It is clear that the Revolutionary Guards intervened against the wishes of Bazashkian, who had been reluctant, hesitant, or fearful to respond to the assassination of Haniyeh. This strike is clearly the work of the Revolutionary Guards, not the Iranian presidency. This is a complex situation understood only by those familiar with the nature and fabric of Iranian society and its political system. **Secondly:** The strike was larger than the one on April 15th, and it is likely that it involved dozens of hypersonic missiles. This explains the inability of the Zionist air defenses to intercept them, as most of the missiles passed through the American defense wall that NATO has established around Israel since the "flood." **Thirdly:** The results of the strike are still subject to speculation, but it is likely that it hit significant military targets, destroying equipment and aircraft, and possibly killing high-ranking military or political leaders. This remains within the realm of possibility, given Israel's strict military censorship on news about strikes against its military zones in particular. **Fourthly:** Iran has effectively entered the war, as Israel will undoubtedly respond, prompting the Revolutionary Guards to retaliate with an even fiercer blow multiple times larger. **Fifthly:** The timing of the strike was critical in boosting morale and regaining the initiative for the "Axis of Resistance," which had previously lost it due to Bazashkian's policies and his mismanagement, including sacrificing Lebanese resistance leaders. **Sixthly:** Today, Israel received a significant blow, a "shock" that will force it to step back from its peace and truce initiatives. As mentioned before, Israel will not seriously consider peace without a significant shock. What happened today, including the Lebanese and Iranian strikes and the recent operation in Tel Aviv, has created this much-needed shock. Israeli leaders will inevitably consider the balance of interests, a thought process they had abandoned when they sensed fear, cowardice, and weakness within the Axis, particularly from the reformist leadership of President Bazashkian. **Seventh and finally:** I had anticipated this strike, regardless of the delay, and criticized its postponement. I predicted that delaying and showing fear would lead to Israel's further aggression and ability to seize the initiative. Had this strike not been delayed, Israel might not have dared to assassinate Nasrallah. However, better late than never. **Currently, in Israel, there is one main focus: (Assessing the Iranian Military Strike)** Israel's behavior in the upcoming hours and days will reveal the extent and impact of this strike. Based on the reports and visuals from within Israel, captured by Israeli photographers, the Iranian strikes have destroyed military bases, airports, and institutions. The initial Israeli reaction is one of "threatened frenzy": promises of total annihilation, comprehensive war, revenge, refusal to stay silent, and targeting the Middle East. Statements such as "The enemy will regret it" indicate that the Iranian strikes were highly effective. According to the spokesperson of the Israeli Defense Forces, an announcement was issued urging citizens not to film or document the sites of missile impacts, termed as "impact locations," and threatening punishment for those who do. Those who filmed the Iranian missiles will likely face punishment from Ben Gvir’s police, possibly on charges like threatening national security. However, Ben Gvir seems unaware that the range of Iranian airstrikes was so vast that even Egyptians in Sinai captured footage and live-streamed the Iranian missiles striking areas in the Negev and the surroundings of Gaza. Israel now faces two options: 1. **A strong response proportionate to the magnitude of the Iranian strike**, which will expose it to a retaliatory attack from the Revolutionary Guards. This would likely involve a wider attack that would, for the first time, target civilian areas. 2. **Swallow the poison and de-escalate military tensions in the region**, either by delivering a token, agreed-upon response or by remaining silent and choosing not to respond. Should this happen, Israel's deterrence balance would collapse, shifting the initiative to the Axis of Resistance. We are facing critical hours and days. While they may not be decisive, they are significant as they form part of the ongoing conflict between Zionism and the diverse peoples of the Middle East. This is a struggle that, even after 80 years of the entity's presence, demonstrates that it remains a malignant outpost, rejected by the people of the East, who will continue to fight against it regardless of the sacrifices involved.

@PurpleTree haha Netanyahu Care , The euphoria is evident on him After Killing Nasrallah , I take pleasure in seeing my enemy’s ego rise. this is good

The Israeli plan for Jordan involves relocating Palestinians from the West Bank to Jordan, a concept known as the "alternative homeland." Jordan already hosts around 3 million Palestinians displaced from Palestine and heavily depends on U.S. grants and aid. The country has a joint defense agreement with the United States and relies entirely on Israel for its water and gas supply. The Israel-Jordan border stretches 350 km. The King of Jordan understands that if this plan is implemented, his rule may be at risk, as the Palestinian population would outnumber Jordanians, threatening his reliance on support from Jordanian tribes—a crucial pillar of his authority. However, the execution of this plan is expected to follow the elimination of the "axis of resistance" in Lebanon, Iraq, and Syria, which is considered the strongest front was Hezbollah.

The claim that Palestinians will only accept 100% of the land is a myth; they are in a weak position. In reality, Netanyahu has no intention of negotiating with them. Instead, his strategy involves bombing and invading southern Lebanon, targeting Iranian-aligned forces in Syria, Iraq, and Yemen, and further normalizing relations with authoritarian regimes in the Middle East. He intends to carry out exactly what he stated at the United Nations.

Firstly, I disagree with your tone. Anyone listening to you would think that the Palestinians just landed from Mars and that you were forced to deal with them, which is the opposite of what actually happened. Secondly, the idea that everything was fine before October 7 is outdated. With the internet, anyone can easily find out what the situation for Palestinians has been like over the past 100 years. I’m not sure who you’re trying to mislead on this forum. Thirdly, the way you talk about the people of the Middle East, clearly aimed at a Western audience, paints them as if they’re savages and only you know how to handle them. This is a trivial perspective, and the Palestinian who defends his family barefoot in Gaza is more developed than you and your entire country. and I am genuinely unbiased, but you behave like a tribe. So, to correct your question, it should be: How do you achieve peace with my "red-stage" country when dealing with "red-stage" people? Give these people their fucken rights

https://chomskypc.wordpress.com/2015/11/22/august-15-2006-chomsky-my-dinner-with-hassan/