royce

https://x.com/pocobelli/status/1843315636208054291

@integration journey make a one and put your insights and videos

**A Word on the Day of the Flood** I will speak to you away from emotions and whims, and will talk about many facts and evidence. The purpose is to clarify the nature and future of war in general and the Palestinian issue in particular. I will summarize my article in a few interconnected points, using a panoramic style as usual. **First:** Those who are rushing for victory, whether from Israel or the resistance, are mistaken. This war is long, and rushing its results is a kind of ignorance and fanaticism. Likewise, those who measure victory and defeat by material and human losses are also mistaken. Wars are a struggle of wills; whichever will prevails and imposes itself on the opponent is the victor, even if it suffers greater losses, and vice versa. **Second:** Since the first day, the Palestinian resistance has not been fighting Israel alone, but also the United States, the G7, and NATO. The G7 has provided political cover for the occupation and supported it with weapons. Since October 7, 2023, military support for Israel has reached over 100,000 tons, a rate that matches four times the "Nickel Grass" operation, where the U.S. supplied Israel during its 1973 war against Egypt and Syria. More than 500 ships and hundreds of flights from the West to Israel over the year are the reason behind Israel's current aggressiveness in #Gaza and Lebanon. **Third:** The issue of possessing weapons is fundamental not only in wars but also in imposing wills and influencing matters of economy, society, politics, culture, and religion, etc. Imagine if Russia would react strongly if it learned that NATO was transferring missiles to Poland or that the U.S. was developing missiles with greater ranges and heavier warheads, or that stealth aircraft were being produced that Russian air defenses could not shoot down. This is because the West's military superiority would negatively affect Russian society as a whole. Russia specifically made the S-400 system against American stealth aircraft and developed hypersonic missiles to ensure its superiority and impose its will over the West. Meanwhile, in our Arab region, we were well aware that Israel would acquire F-35 stealth aircraft, and we did not act. We knew they were developing long-range Jericho ballistic missiles and did not act. We knew they were enhancing their air defense systems with Arrow missiles and the Iron Dome, and we did not act. This is the main reason for the current chaos in the Middle East, as the decision for war and the possession of power lie in the hands of one party, which explains the shameful silence in the face of the crime of genocide happening to two Arab peoples. **Fourth:** The "Al-Aqsa Flood" cannot be understood only within the geographical context of Palestine. From the first day, we said it would lead to a long and wide war outside of Palestine if a ceasefire is not achieved. The reason for this is its religious connotations in naming—equivalent to the religious connotations of the Zionist naming of Al-Aqsa as the "Temple of Solomon." Those who criticize the flood for its religious naming should also criticize Israel for its religious naming. This flood is merely an Islamic religious reaction to Zionist extremism. **Fifth:** Who would have believed that Iran would strike Israel twice, including partially destroying three airports and damaging a significant part of the Zionist air force, which roamed freely day and night before October 1? Who would have believed that Yemen and Iraq would be striking Tel Aviv on a daily basis? And who would have believed that Israel has been living through its longest state of emergency since its establishment, with the battle moving for the first time to its own land, cities, and settlements? These are some of the results of the flood, which have not ended, and it appears that there are still many surprises in store. -Sameh Asker

Interview with Yahya Sinwar, the Hamas leader of Gaza Sinwar is a former member of the group’s armed wing who spent more than 20 years in an Israeli prison after being convicted of abducting and killing two Israeli soldiers. He was released in a 2011 prisoner swap. -June, 2021

@Heaven you are a bot, not real

Thank you for everything

@Nemra

Various sources on the Internet report that a 4.6-magnitude earthquake was recorded yesterday in Iran, the decoding graph of which differed from the typical graph of a normal natural earthquake. According to some analyses, that graph is similar to an earthquake caused by a nuclear bomb test. It is believed that maybe Iran performed its first test. This information is the result of analysis, there is no official, factual data. https://radar.am/hy/news/social-2656414095/ https://x.com/DD_Geopolitics/status/1842977474113851444

Everything is clear, but you're stubborn and biased, accusing others of bias while refusing to accept that anyone else could be biased except you

This has been my true color from the beginning.

I'm with Palestinians

After the glorious October 7, the brutality of the Zionist entity was exposed, revealing Israel's true nature to the world. The mask was torn away, reminding everyone that it had always been this way.

They are soldiers who served in the IDF—don't forget that.

oh https://x.com/N12News/status/1842631718932767173

@Nivsch you posting nonsense . you're ruining the topic with your shitty low quality translated tweets

Regarding the political assassinations carried out by Israel, which it has placed at the top of its priorities, I’d like to remind everyone of a few points: - Sameh Asker Firstly, World War I was sparked by a political assassination—the assassination of the Archduke of Austria. This destructive war claimed the lives of tens of millions and didn’t lead to a decisive and clear victory for any party. It weakened all sides involved—Russia among the Allies, and Turkey and Austria from the Central Powers. It also weakened Britain and France, leading to successive declarations of independence from their colonies, including Egypt, which witnessed the revolution of 1919 and achieved independence in 1922. Secondly, U.S. President John F. Kennedy was assassinated in 1963 during the peak of the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union. This did not harm the U.S. in any significant way, as he was promptly replaced by another president. Thirdly, history has witnessed the emergence of religious extremist groups specializing in political assassinations, such as the Kharijites and Assassins (Hashashin) in Islam, and the Zealots and Sicarii in Judaism. However, these groups failed to establish a powerful state or to create any intellectual movement or renaissance of any kind. Fourthly, numerous political assassinations did not drive countries or groups to change their policies or weaken them. The assassination of Gandhi did not put an end to the Indian-Pakistani peace project, the assassination of Sadat did not halt the Egyptian-Israeli peace process, and the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. did not end the struggle against white racism. In most cases, such political assassinations lead to a firmer adherence to the principles of the victim and a moral challenge to ensure their mission succeeds. Fifthly, in recent history in the Middle East, dozens of leaders of the Lebanese and Palestinian resistance movements have been assassinated. However, these movements remain strong and well-rooted, connected on the ground, and continue to fight against the Zionist enemy in various ways, receiving support through different channels. Sixthly, in Egypt, thousands of leaders and soldiers from the Egyptian police and military have been assassinated in a series of terrorist acts that have spanned from the 1970s to the present day. Despite this, these acts did not weaken the strength, unity, or support of the security forces. Instead, they gained deep expertise in dealing with such incidents and developed an understanding of the psychology of terrorism, enabling them to respond to it appropriately. Philosophically, political assassination raises questions about the morals and values that drive perpetrators to commit such acts. Despite the brutality of war, there remains a glimmer of light or a window for political dialogue and peace. Political assassination breeds inherited hatred across generations, making peace elusive, and raises generations in a spirit of revolutionary revenge. This reality is evident in Palestine, where one of the reasons for the continued violence and war is the ongoing political assassinations that have occurred since the establishment of the State of Israel up to today. Political assassination neither creates victory nor peace; it spreads fear and distrust, serving as a prelude to revolutionary acts of revenge. Fear is not exclusive to the weak but also to the strong, as a driving force behind their oppression is often a deep sense of fear. Moreover, the strength of a resistance movement is not built by a single individual but is rather the product of a complex and diverse network of emotions, beliefs, ideologies, and convictions that generate military, human, and material power. The assassination of a single individual—whether a member or a leader—does not alter the core functioning of this network, which requires intellectual responses, moral projects, and peace and tolerance to properly absorb. Israel’s overarching policy of political assassinations since its establishment has not brought it power. Rather, its strength is derived from just two factors: (1) American and Western support and (2) the internal religious and national conflicts among Arabs and Muslims. Beyond these, Israel is quite a fragile state with significant social weaknesses, especially due to its colonial nature. A detailed discussion on this would be extensive. In general, wars are not won without good planning, military capability, adaptability, intelligent strategies that avoid creating excessive enemies or underestimating opponents, as well as social cohesion and a moral and ethical project to sustain oneself. Israel lacks most of these conditions. It consistently creates new enemies out of thin air, underestimates its opponents, and lacks a moral project that could prevent it from transgressing basic human norms and laws—such as killing children and women or committing acts of genocide. In short: The Zionist policy of political assassination is not only morally and humanly flawed but also politically and militarily flawed. It represents one of the significant weaknesses of this entity and will eventually lead to its demise—whether by ending the occupation and achieving Palestinian independence, or by resulting in the destruction of the Israeli state itself through horrific massacres. Personally, I do not support the latter model, as I do not advocate massacres against civilians. The end of the occupation would suffice as a result of this Zionist recklessness, allowing for peace that we have been denied for the 76 years of Israel's existence. ----- There's an additional model I'd like to bring to your attention: the case of Qassem Soleimani, the commander of the Quds Force in Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, who was assassinated in 2020. Practically speaking, the Revolutionary Guard struck Israel twice after the man's assassination, and the transfer of lethal missiles to Yemen and Iraq also occurred after his death, not during his lifetime. In essence, Soleimani's assassination did not weaken the Revolutionary Guard.

https://x.com/khamenei_ir

uff

The world should engage with Iran and work towards releasing their frozen assets, as this move could lead to significant progress and development. By doing so, society in Iran would naturally advance. At present, anyone who criticizes outdated internal policies is quickly labeled an American agent (which, in some cases, may even be true), fostering a toxic environment. Making a deal with the Americans would open the door to more constructive criticism and dialogue, gradually making it more acceptable to challenge outdated policies. And the last election results make it clear where the people stand—they want a deal. Pezeshkian, the elected official, has made friendly statements towards the Americans, indicating that Iran is open to entering a new phase. However, Pezeshkian has currently handed over the steering wheel to the Revolutionary Guards, who know how to handle gangsters.

The primary goal of sanctions on the Iranian people is to make life so difficult that they lose sight of their real enemy. The idea is simple: make life hard and conditions miserable so that the people revolt, and repression increases. Despite this, the Iranian people have endured these sanctions from 1979 to 2016, when Obama reached an agreement with the Iranians regarding the nuclear program and decided to release some of their frozen assets in banks. Iran accepted many American conditions, but in 2018, Trump canceled the agreement. Any Iranian – whether atheist, leftist, nationalist, or Islamist – who thinks strategically understands that Iran's strategy toward the world has been correct and successful, as a reaction to the injustice faced by the Iranian people. Fifty years of sanctions is evidence that the U.S. punishes the Iranian population in healthcare, food, technology, and social sectors. These sanctions target the people, not the leadership. Does anyone think that if the current regime were to fall, Iran would turn into a country like the Netherlands? Of course not; the world would seek to tear Iran apart, and it could potentially split into several countries, especially considering that its borders are already tense and volatile.

What really happened on October 1st? https://x.com/s_yas_1/status/1841597649113514474