daramantus

That's why millions of flat earthers truthfully imagine the earth to be flat, and it becomes totally flat, right? You're priceless my dude.??? Thank Zeus for your existence Leo. What's next? A LSD insight saying you created dragons back in the good ol' days ?? when we used to live in a flat plane because collective consciousness of humanity imagined the earth was flat? LMAO. Your logic is hilarious. The earth was round yet every single conscious being imagined it was flat, it wasn't. ? lmao. GIMME MORE NONSENSE, LET us all LAUGH MORE. So we can put more printscreens on reddit. Let us all laugh before you have problems with all the things you have said before that are also on screenshots.

Except that it's not. The reality of your room. Nothing about your room has infinity about anything.

There is no infinity. And you can drop that made up woo you said about infinity. Infinity REQUIRES numbers. Without numbers there is NO infinity at all. Even a infinity fractal set will have its first number, its first fractal, following others, 1,2,3,4,5.....thus "infinitely" but the numbers are finite all the way.... Until it's proven the numbers has a way of diminish therefore they won't go to infinity as there is no such thing as infinity.

The reason it's consistent it's because reality works, no matter what you think in your subjective mind-world. And if one is giving excuses to it, you bet they are running from occam's razor and with personal reasons about the deepest of the deepest facts rooted down facts about the deepest layer rooted in all existence, that reality, besides being separated from you, is not an illusion and never was, let alone a dream.

I know you gave a nonsensical radical hypothesis, but it's complete woo. First, we see things, we don't always "experience", let alone "entirety", you don't even see or experience the entirety of your computer of phone, let alone of your room, I won't even mention of your house. This whole omniscience is complete woo and false and obviously proven wrong by absolute common evidence, it's not even a debate, so I guess this is more like a radical hypothesis for a sci fi movie that even as a sci fi movie wouldn't work as a good script. And don't even get me started with this whole distorted definition of 'you', vs 'you' with capital letter, this just sustain woo

Eh, try sleep deprivation and you'll hallucinate things that don't exist, I wouldn't be able to see, only you, now there's a difference, find that difference and you'll see that how a meaning is created and how you are distorting it, what is more reality to that which we call reality by using the proper meaning? If distorted, then they all become vague and we won't communicate anymore. Definition is key.

Huh?? Cyclops, is that you?? ?FULL STOP. Light goes from the light bulb to your eyes, not from your brain.

Btw, I've watched his new videos, he talks about the concept of things being imaginary. He believes that "other people" is a made up concept, you have to imagine for it to exist, that in reality, me and you are the same as "oneness" of reality, other people do not truly exist outside of your mind's imaginary projection concept of them. Other people would be maya, the real thing, that don't need your mind's imaginary projection, would be absolute godhood, every distinction would be illusory, what exists outside your mind would be only Allah, and also creation of Allah's mind. so to say.

I don't think he ever said this, I guess he isn't dumb. Look OP I'm obviously someone who can pinpoint a lot of things about yourself, but as you do exist outside my mind (and this is obvious) I can imagine a lot of things about you, but in reality they can be different as I have never saw you physically in front of me, only you know yourself, but if you wanna believe this stuff, this is the works of God's dream, or maya yes, we are only fragments that incarnated as these finite beings we become. You wanna believe infinity fractals etc? Go ahead. I have nothing against it. But, as you said, our subconscious are powerful, but not as God's consciousness (which in Leo's view creates the fabric of reality), but IMO, I don't believe in any of this stuff, but I like to see different POV, I believe we are individuals with souls we are not interconnected as some believe, unfortunately, i had a NDE, and oneness was never found, my DMT experiences was also frightening, but different dimensions exist, but I had never seen any part of "infinity", I wish I could have these beliefs so I could also make my soul experience those things. But this was never found for me. I'm still struggling to understand this whole "see yourself in others" thing, as me and Trump are two completely distinct beings, and as I have completely opposite views of him, I could never see myself in him at all.

No, if you wanna take this philosophy as serious, it actually makes sense from this POV that it is God who is dreaming up the Universe, it's God who imagines and re-creates your house everyday, also re-creates your brain and etc, not you or your consciousness, and God doesn't hallucinate, because 'hallucination' is a human term that wouldn't exist if there was no 'hallucination' to compare to reality. So God's creating "matter", would be what we call reality and others would also see the same. Look, this is not something I'm making up, a blind and deaf person from blind, without the capacity of imagining anything in their minds, without the capacity of imagining, no matter how much LSD it takes and how many deep layers they reach and higher states of consciousness, they will never see anything, mind's eye totally blind, still they were born, and live in the world. Why is that so? To solve this problem and paradox, you would have to say it's God who creates matter and reality, not our consciousness/subconscious. Now if you wanna say you can be one with God using drugs, sure, I respect that.

Cool, but becoming "nobody " (I guess believing you become someone without an identity), doesn't automatically makes you what you think. Remember, the pizza analogy. A slice of pizza can never be more than a part of the whole. All slices together make up the whole, a single slice is a single slice. You're the slingle slice, your mother is another, and each slice combined is what makes up "everything". Btw, we don't even know what makes up 'everything', that we are part of, and what relies beyond us, as pieces. Sure, we can talk about consciousness, and is indeed way mysterious than we think, but many theories differ, and we should consider each subjective point carefully.

Look the amount of material online about this "create your desired life" "co-create reality", just google it and there will be a lot of material from genuine people or charlatans explaining it, why write more about it, and put more words into it? When it's something totally personal and for each person the method can differ to reach the 'gnosis' , there is not a "single method" for magick and intention. No amount of words will make you become the master of your life. The answers are within. See how people who really are in the top, such as Will Smith, Jim Carrey, Arnold Schwarzenegger, etc, just read a phrase or two and already catch up the whole thing? Will Smith just needed to read 'The Alchemist' book, and puff, he's done, no need to keep reading stuff online. Btw, trying to fool your brain into believing you "already have" what you want, can make your brain become lazy and not really want it, as it would feel like you already have it, you will then lose an important piece to create the alchemy, FIRE (INTENTION), intention to gain. Without fire, you won't get nowhere, and you won't then cause an effect and changes in the future set of events that are yet to come, and of course EARTH (Action towards the intention).

Aside from the fact that I don't watch his newer videos (as I did in 2016), it wouldn't surprise me if in fact he theorized this absurd; but I guess Leo is intelligent enough to catch up the gaps and flaws in this thinking and later on change his mind and rectify what he said before. It wouldn't make sense not to. Im yet to see someone who truly believes in solipsism, as arguing with others already proves you really don't. However, even if he believed in solipsism, he couldn't affirm that, at all, as solipsism is simply the skepticism you have about others existing and having consciousness and mind of their own, you doubt the existence of other minds, solipsism simply does not 'confirm' other minds to be true, however, it doesn't confirm the opposite either, for the solipsist, it's just the realm of 'you never know' , you never know if they truly have their independent consciousness. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. EDIT: I've watched his video, he did in fact said that nirvana you will become 'alone', kind of becoming one with that deity he believes in (according to him, our will differs from God's will, so we are separated from God, otherwise he wouldn't say that. So, this would ultimately be becoming one with God in that nirvana(void) state, you yourself vanish in God's ALLoneness ). However, I think he wanted to say that we ourselves are just living in God's dream, God's consciousness is dreaming/imagining reality...and that we invent things as we go through time as if they were real, but ultimately they are just Maya. He gave an example of Datura, but I think it was more of a "what if that was true" and to make you question reality with an emotional impact (which is a very dangerous thing to say to ppl), thus questioning your life, but since a blind and deaf person cannot hallucinate on datura, this wouldn't be a good example to compare to reality, so it should be God dreming and creating reality and that we mistake what we see for 'reality'.

As a counter point, I would say I can imagine a tree in my mind right now and I know how to differ a tree in my mind against a tree that is outside of me. That tree that is outside of me, is also seen by others, the tree that I imagine is only seen by me in my inner world. But we would probably get a never-ending excuse, to defend his point he would have to include many unnecessary details with the objective of making the narrative seem more convincing or believable, ignoring occam's razor.

Except from the fact that NDE experiencers and DMT experiencers and OB experiencers say you still have a form after your life is over . I can link you all the videos and reports you want.