Schizophonia

Indeed 😎 No more seriously, I've never been seriously suicidal because it would piss me off too much to die; to see "Valentin" disappear, or even everything around me. Even if I were tortured horribly, I don't know if I'd want to be killed. I'm visualizing. Perhaps you could use the work of Neville Goddard; I preach like a guru, lol, but perhaps reprogramming your subconscious to find a state of consciousness less disconnected from reality could work. In fact, technically, it's entirely possible.

Which planet is in retrograde professor. I felt quite good, better than usual.

The second sentence meant nothing mea culpa.

New technologies tend to foster a more "ADHD-like" consciousness; more manic and making the present moment less enjoyable. Do you mean you'd like to return to a state where you enjoy yourself more continuously, where your energy isn't lost in mental chatter and particularly complex worries?

I have spoiled the temple of God, I have freed barabbas. We have.

Cauz i'm not here. Jk.

@Emerald I've seen that women also have these kinds of fantasies, just more twisted in other ways. Because it's a fantasy, there's even a sense of disappointment in considering its falsehood. It's the possibility of a more "optimistic" paradigm that's being repressed and downright frustrating for reasons that remain to be elucidated. Personally, if I focus on why I'm tempted by this scenario: The answer that comes is that for some reason it gives me a "casus beli" to express aggression and take power in this way. It's like, "Being imposing is illegal in my system, so if I get proof that life isn't on my side, then that gives me the right to be aggressive, to attack others, to become a Nazi, or whatever (unconsciously becoming "phallic," in a depraved way). We're back to the Oedipus complex and obsessive-compulsive neurosis, or paranoia.

It's cool.

About relations, especially intimate ones.

https://www.16personalities.com/fr/résultats/entj-a/m/4mbb4s2t8 Lolz, it says i'm ENTJ; I don't know why. I often found the questions unclear.

It's very good but i still wait to see what this will get as political outlet. Bernie Sanders barely got more than half of Joe Biden's vote in the 2020 Democratic primaries; and that's still soft socialism. Idk, a less clivant republican will both takes trumpist votes and those of people who could have voted republican but have been disgusted by trump figure.

It's the karma.

Social networks and work.

She suffer from depersonalization/derealisation, is under neuroleptic, and even if we stick to the relationship problem she is not sociable and has its own psychic flaws in general which can generate unwanted results in this area; As everyone else. Look how you jump on her answer to force your paradigm.

But Kamala is not really on the left, it is essentially a liberal. When I speak on the left, I speak of a real Marxist paradigm, or at least anti-capitalist in general; Not only play the card of wokism.

In your world. He's speaking from a relational point of view, I think.

This is always the case. To give a materialistic perspective, for a change, lol; there's a reason why our central nervous system chose to be interested in spirituality rather than bonatics, big cars, or cinnamon apple pies (yum). There came a time when the energy shifted there, and there had to be a logic, an algorithm to explain this direction, and this was a survival logic; human logic. The more "spiritual" someone is, the more one might suspect that anything that doesn't fall under spirituality, that is, from a childish point of view, a language of submission based on castration anxiety, is forbidden. (Hence the fact that spirituality is generally a women's affair, with slightly neurotic men at the top of the pyramid.) And this prohibition will create an avoidance of social relationships and/or love and/or sex. Since the cause of the ban is painful (I'm sure that if I post love poems or things like that, even if it's not my personal thing, you and many others will cringe), a persona that doesn't involve this threat will be compulsively maintained by mental discourse, even if it seems pessimistic. Of course, there are many couples who love each other and are very romantic, I see them everywhere; but this can trigger feelings of discomfort and anger about my more or less conscious sense of dissatisfaction and the trauma I've experienced. So I can also turn my head toward other mirrors, people who seem to be together out of spite or something like that, and ruminate on how all of this isn't love for one reason or another, because even if it's pessimistic, it still hurts less, subconsciously, than being confronted with reality. Often, pessimism, rigidity, is a strategy developed during development to avoid falling into psychiatric decompression; because again, for the ego, survival is what matters most. You didn't just say that; you also wrote a paragraph about how women are eternal adolescents and that it would be better to be in the gulag than to be a woman who lives in attention. It's certainly motivated by aggression, but still hidden beneath layers of rationalization where you escape into your persona as a spiritual seeker. Not even because you'd like to be in the woman's place, but because you suffer from your lack of relationships, even in the male role, if you know what I mean, but it's illegal in your system. Spiritual -> Submission strategy; Prohibition of complaining, of rebelling, of having a libidinal agenda (sex, love, money, involvement in politics, social connections in general, partying). Again, no matter how we get lost in layers of language, in the end, there are only strategies of survival, of power.

@Breakingthewall It's a projection. Generally, spirituality attracts people who dislike matter and other human beings. Even if it's repressed, and even though I love spirituality, it's fundamentally a twisted strategy to gain power. It usually begins early in childhood during the Oedipus complex (omitting other possible scenarios during the transition to the phallic stage); an overly powerful father, a love-hate relationship exaggerated, and you end up with a negative preconception about social and romantic relationships that you obsess over; this is inscribed in the self-concept. The goal of persuading oneself that relationships are bad begins very early and is a unconscious strategy to avoid oedipal temptation, and generally it's a sign of poor superego development; comorbid with other obsessive-compulsive neurotic tendencies. If you want proof to the contrary, abandon the idealistic mirrors and turn to the materialistic ones. Spiritual people are actually the least filled with love.

Mea culpa yea i was unnecessary aggressive (I was in the anima ) But yes, there are people with low economic and social status and/or physical appearance who are cool just about everywhere, and vice versa. There's a self-flagellated self-concept behind these stories.

I am a scammed scammer.

It's paranoid; There are plenty of 60 IQ human trash who have girlfriends.

You have to want love it. And the ego is very strong.

Yes, but you have no passions and you even take antipsychotics instead of anxiety medication. Happiness lies in social connections and building a tomorrow. No duality, no suffering, but no enjoyment either.

Can you give an idea of Peter Raltson techniques ? 🤔

I know tons of communist thinkers; They're by far the most rigorous. The far left, in general, is where the intellectual level is the highest, even if I don't like some of the ideas that are quite common in this milieu (laxity with justice and immigration, typically). Whereas it's quite weak on the right and basically completely nonexistent among liberals.