Schizophonia

To my message. You got the clairvoyance superpower too

Both 🔫

It's too bad Princess Arabia left suddenly.

Orthodoxy isn't about being more conscious so indeed it is entirely possible for someone raised as a Mormon to actually become hateful for some reason, or simply turn away from it.

Wine tastes good

You're trying to steal my role as the new Nahm. Watch out things are going to get ugly.

Idk

@LordFall People vote for Trump because they like his personality, and/or despite him because they want to vote for the GOP; out of opposition to immigration, or opposition to taxes because they are entrepreneurs/self-employed (people often call it a paradox for poor people to vote for free-market policies, but those poor individuals might be entrepreneurs meaning a platform of lower taxes is actually in their interest, while a salaried worker earning $4,000 a month in Delaware might want to vote Democrat; income does not equate to social standing). So you have a funny, impulsive guy ready to be even be belligerent in defense of the dollar and American interests in general, who wants to halt mass immigration, who proposes a typical GOP program broadly favorable to entrepreneurs, who appears to support conservative Christians and so on. What is self-destructive about that? It's an ordinary project except that Trump has a stranger persona than most other US presidents. It certainly isn't perfect for his electors but you view it as self-destructive, stupid, or whatever else simply because you fail to recognize your own interests and by extension those of others. That doesn't mean, of course that the Trump administration won't see its strategies fail, just as a Democrats' strategies could fails, or those of a socialist government.

It seems fake or exaggerated.

Perfect girl

@eos_nyxia Oh you're a girl, I saw it on your profile. Sucks loudly the saliva out of his braces*

@LordFall Everything you say is based on an inability to put yourself in others' shoes and their priorities. In this context at least.

No because if you are intelligent you will project intelligence. You will see that they vote for Trump because it aligns with their interests given their social standing, their integration into a collective identity, and their general environmental conditions. Simply put they have lived through experiences that shaped their brain plasticity, or they are the heirs to a specific genetic lineage, such that voting for Trump becomes the logical choice based on the signals they receive from him (program, behaviour, vibe...) But if you don't put enough intelligence here you won't perceive all those underlying signifiers; instead it is precisely that stupidity which will serve as the signifier itself. Everything is projection; what fills the gap of representation as Lacan might put it, what enables the transition from the symbolic to representation is the self, and thus in reality the phallus; In other words to put it very simply our sense of power in relation to the environment and the social body. Viewing things from this perspective is not only limiting but also as Karl Marx might put it an expression of bourgeois morality. In other words because you didn't had to expecience some thing that Trumpists did, because of the differences in social conditions (one is not obliged to structure the psyche around specific, very symbolizable events; it is highly fluid and even transgenerational hence the idea of schizoanalysis and by extension opposition to oeudipus complexe in Deleuze and Guattari for example.) you dismiss the personas of people who needed and continue to need more violence, brutality,or something you project into them that is actually lowkey necessary to them given their social position. I am not saying we need to become like the Trumpist, that being Trumpist is good, nor am I saying we need to become like policed democrates ourselves; I do not believe there is any specific place to aim for other than perhaps the shifts in mindset driven by the evolution of new technologies, that the ego generally craves. The core of my argument is that: 1) every judgment, mental representation is projective in nature. 2) this projection stems from social relations and a desire, conscious or otherwise, to carve out a place for oneself. Therefore if a democrat truly wants what is best for the people, they must discard the notion of stupidity and other such condescending ideas in order to grasp the intelligence underlying Trumpism. Everything is a matter of intelligence and adaptation; there are only different points of view. Social relations in the United States are currently characterized by a distinct paranoia featuring a "submissive," self-policing axis (most visible among polite, gay Democrats who use the word "problematic") and a brutal, "stupid" polarity that is more apparent among the collective groups drawn to Trump. In reality, the underlying mental structures are the same; stemming as they do from the same society and its collective groups, yet the symbolic positioning (identification versus projection) differs shaped by the varying power dynamics between the collective groups to which the individual belongs.

Why your cerebral cortex was led to form this conclusion: because you are hateful, want to feel superior etc. If that weren't the case, you would have arranged your life in such a way that the idea of bringing that up wouldn't even cross your mind, because the time or energy to symbolize this idea wouldn't be there. To take another example for the sake of clarity: someone involved in politics who is frequently angry tells themselves that they want peace, but are forced to be unpeaceful due to the material circumstances. Yet that is merely a relative, ego-driven truth. The absolute truth is that they enjoy being angry; playing the role of the angry person over some global issue that disrupts peace; and that if they truly wanted peace, they would never have entered politics in the first place, or would have gone about it in a completely different way. The ego's lie (by extension, the illusion of separation; from a non-dualist perspective): "I want peace, but I am forced to be angry for the time being." The truth: "I want to play at being angry, using an objective problem as a pretext; otherwise, I would be doing something else as is already the case for most people on Earth." Once you grasp that you realize that people actually betray themselves every time they open their mouths. The guy who sees gay people everywhere and talks about gay people is probably gay himself. The guy who says girls love scumbags gives off scumbag energy, the guy who sees violence is violent, the guy who sees stupidity is stupid, the guy who sees stinginess is a cheapskate/someone who actually would lowkey like to take advantage of others and so on. That’s why I’m increasingly trying not to be offensive, because it’s becoming more and more obvious that I want to click on a topic because it actually concerns me, and talk about someone because I’m projecting something onto them. I say it often and I’ll say it again; it’s exactly what I’m doing right now. I could be doing anything, "buying a toaster" like Peter Ralston sais to you lol, I remember that and yet here I am writing all this to you, because I am projecting my "egoic hypocrisy" i described onto you. The day I truly move past this, the day I’ve genuinely shifted into love, I’ll go about doing things and I simply won’t need you as a mirror anymore. Not necessarily Leo in general but the Leo who says that.

If you are moving closer to purity why aren't you the Mormon type with eight kids, memberships in a gardening club and a charity, and a permanent, ear-to-ear Colgate smile There is a dose of hatred in your persona, things that aren't love in general, other things, and this manifests itself through other people.

If you are authenticaly hateful* and in denial, and thus projecting onto other people who are "attracted."

And so what. What difference does it make if, for example, you are a non-dualist and she is a Christian, and you believe your paradigm is superior to hers? Does that make her someone you cannot cooperate with. Viewing the object not as something ambivalent that serves me to a greater or lesser extent, but as something split into good or bad, is an attempt to cling to infantile narcissism. There aren't really any stupid people; that is an illusion arising from the clash of different subjectivities. People have different life experiences and genetic makeups, leading them to hold different viewpoints on life; yet, the origins of these differing perspectives are entirely logical—everything in the universe is logical. Your bank advisor might actually be cool, it could be strong potential for a genuine human connection, dialectic with her but you are unable to see that from your cliveage. The people your ego deems "ideal" shield you from your insecurities and mental blocks, yet they also perpetuate your unconscious voids.

Also that whole thing about dividing people into "high and low consciousness" is paranoid and megalomaniacal; as if the people here were great orchestra conductors or something lol.

You could just pick an ordinary person your age whom you find attractive and compatible. You talk as if you have a lifetime to find someone and maybe start a family.

The ego can't manifest because it's nature is limitations; acting to manifest something is part of the "I don't have it" fractal. That is why you might briefly think of someone and run into them later even though that normally never happens, yet completely fail to consciously manifest a specific person or thing. The Law of Attraction is a twisted game that is very difficult to manipulate consciously, because it is meant to be a background process of the human experience rather than a deliberate prerogative, involving the attempt to force an ego-driven desire to manifest by conditioning one's attention and love to focus in that direction. ( Attention is the gateway to the infinite. If God is infinite then there is inevitably a scenario where you (the avatar, the ego in general) take action to manifest a particular object yet it does not happen. However there is no scenario where you shift your attention to the object and it fails to appear, because attention is consciousness, it is the infinite.) It’s like practicing semen retention or taking drugs to force an excess of energy in a certain direction because otherwise, you would see the lack of love, realize there isn't enough karma in that direction, and conclude, "What's the point?"

Yes even though there is also a trend. In general nutrition (and related practices like fitness) attracts and is manipulated by people's neurotic tendencies. This is evident in the magical thinking that "whatever tastes good is bad for you, and vice versa." Consequently since wheat often tastes good and has a pleasant texture it will gets demonized in favor of something blander "because the gluten"; pork is vilified in favor of dry, bland options like chicken; peanut butter is shunned in favor of flaxseeds "because of O6/O3 ratio etc", and so on.

Banning weapons for people with a criminal or psychiatric record

😹

Asceticism is a nihilism; in the Nietzschean sense. If we are truly non-dualistic, then we must also transcend the limited/infinite duality, “maya/god”. We incarnate, and the game would be to leave? That's illogical.

😹