Basman

Politics is necessarily polarizing because it is essentially how you survive as a group collective. People almost always advocate for politics that benefits them and disapprove of politics that is detrimental to them. Your family are probably reacting negatively to your ideas because it doesn't benefit their socioeconomic position and group identity. Its incredibly relative. I find politics interesting because its the challenge of understanding multi-perspectival life situations. Politics is as multi-faceted as it gets in this world. Its so complicated because we have to figure out how to survive as a collective while everyone involved live in completely different realities.

Mission to test out new Boeing starliner fails due to mechanical errors with the shuttle, rendering two astronauts stranded on the ISS. Boeing's reputation continues to plummet with their dangerous incompetence.

The worlds problems are created as a result of finitude. Saying men cause all the worlds problems is sexist and reductive. I believe that patriarchal societies tend rise because they are better equipped to deal with inter-species competition where resources are more scarce. The disparity between chimpanzees and bonobos illustrate this well, both being patriarchal/matriarchal respectively. The bonobos only manage to survive in so far that they are isolated from chimps, who will otherwise easily overrun bonobos. I'd rather be a bonobo but chimps are better at raw survival. Pre-colonial native American tribes where no hippie communes. They where warlike and even genocidal towards each other. Practicing human sacrifice, scalping, cannibalism and other barbaric acts depending on the tribes culture and environmental pressures. Just look at the Aztecs or the plains tribes like the Comanche. The Black Hills which the Lakota tribe say was stolen from them by colonizers they themselves stole after kicking out the tribes that where there prior. Hippie communes themselves tend to eventually be overrun by drug addicts and criminals, like Christiania in Copenhagen. Don't romanticize tribal cultures. The underlying assumption here is that it is possible to survive without engaging in any from of violence. It is not and it has never been. People have a twisted sense of what living in harmony with nature means. Living in harmony with nature means you don't have direct control over the resources you need to survive and that you live at the mercy of the elements more or less. It means you have to give your all to meet the bare minimum of survival, where only the most well adapted live, pushing the genetically weak to die. Survival is a brutal and limiting affair. Most animals only live in harmony with nature because they will die if they don't. Then they still die in gruesome ways in natures "web". Most animals die by being eaten alive. Don't romanticize nature. Humans breaking harmony with nature is them acing survival relatively speaking. And as a result you live in the most prosperous age in human history. Think about what that takes. You zoomers love to complain.

I like how you ask what the meaning of life is then immediately dismiss any meaning making as untenable. That said, it can be whatever you want it to be in my opinion. The base message behind self-help is that you can accomplish whatever you put your mind to. It is a trap to think of life as only having a singular purpose however. It is an experience, not a destination.

It is normal for people to be relatively moderate, having both conservative and progressive perspectives. Moderates are the sandwich filling that the left and right are competing for. And it is a Dutch sandwich so it is cheese with bread instead of bread with cheese. It is why a far-left party has never won an election as far as I'm aware of (correct me if I'm wrong). When a left-wing party gets elected, it is always more or less a left-of-center party.

Because left-wing policies tend to benefit common people more with wealth redistribution policies and proactively finding solution to societal problems. "Free healthcare"? why not, right? The reason why people vote right-wing anyway is because policy doesn't matter when it comes to voting. People vote largely emotionally, based on their culture and values. Who your friends are going to vote for is probably the best predictor of who you are going to vote for. And to be fair, it is very difficult to be well read on politics. It is why we have a representative democracy as opposed to a direct democracy in most cases. Most people just don't have the time or interest. The right also has an advantage when it comes to messaging as they can shamelessly appeal to fear, insecurity and cultural norms whereas the left tends to offer changes to society and culture, which require more legwork to sell. It is easy for the right to demonize left-wing policy as destroying the country, etc. And to be fair, there is often an essential destruction. Immigration for example changes culture, destroying the culture of the past. The right tends to exaggerate and discount advantages however. Whenever the left makes mistakes, its like pouring oil on a fire for the right. But most of the mistakes the left makes in my opinion are not messaging well enough and lacking a coherent vision. Certain things the right are right on however, like mass immigration of people from less developed countries being problematic, but that is a different topic.

It is this spineless attitude that makes you unsuccessful. You want it to be easy because your weak as a person. Have some self-respect. One YT video for clicks is hardly hard evidence of anything. Even then, you are essentially taking advantage of women in non-lucid state assuming you can pull this stuff of. And all because you can't handle not being popular with the chicks. Rat behavior.

I've heard once that it is much easier to hypnotize highly driven people because they are better at focusing on their imagination and imagine vividly. Don't know how true that is.

Awaken the Giant Within by Thony Robbins is pretty good. Equips you to deal with life. as inane as that sounds.

It is not really productive to think like that. I don't think it really matters how "fucked you are" financially as long as you have the means to make it, which you probably do. You just need to get on with it. LucasPX64's advice is pretty good. You speak decent English and your smart enough to operate a computer.

Dishonesty and manipulation won't necessarily ruin a relationship but it'll never be the same again once they find out, which they usually do eventually. Just communicate if you have concerns or ideas you want to share. Manipulation is completely unnecessary. You might have a savior complex if your trying to save people from themselves.

Personally, I don't believe in soul mates. I think it can make people perfectionist and lazy about their relationships at worst.

what does "frame" mean exactly?

The mainstream is intellectually lazy, lacking curiosity and generally unserious. It is partially why political and ideological discourse is so bad nowadays. So hyperbolic and lacking in nuance.

I believe it started in the 80s with news channels looking to boost their ratings. Bipartisanship, polarization and drama is good for business because its emotionally engaging. As there can be no healthy discussion in a dynamic of mutual sensationalism of opposing views and errors, political ideologies entrench themselves into more extreme versions of themselves. Its partially a problem of the silent majority being invisible on social media which results in the loudest and the most extreme voices setting the tone of a conversation. Its why people associate extremism inherent to ideologies like MAGA, LGBTQ, veganism, feminism, Incel ideology, men's rights, etc. Its all tier 1 cringe.

You are all a bunch of nut jobs lol

Sometimes you have to be wrong to learn. Confident stupidity is frustrating because they tend to double-down instead of considering new info in earnest. Don't be afraid of being wrong and just try bouncing certain ideas around.

I find that I lack confidence in my knowledge of something if I haven't contemplated/researched the topic enough, at least to degree to feel like I know what I'm talking about. It is good thing to not over-commit to ideas you are not certain off by the way. There are already enough people confidently stupid.

This could give Ukraine some much needed leverage. Russia will have to divert resources their wide border and they could trade land during negotiations. If anything, this represents a moral victory which have been important in other wars despite not being directly strategically important.

An amazing breakdown of the situation:

Its hard to say exactly what the future will hold but there will likely be a decrease in available jobs due to automation as technology improves. In the book "Homo Deus" by Yuval Noah Harari, he points out that people will probably experience multiple industry shifts throughout their lifetime due to automation. Long-term job certainty might erode to the point where things like UBI becomes a serious talking point politically. The silver-lining of an increasingly uncertain job market is that you might as well just go for the thing you are the most passionate about. Then you are at least doing something you like and you have the motivation to become excellent at a skill. Today it is easy to trade passion for money and security but if the security is out then you might as well become a seamstress for porcelain dolls or whatever. Or run one of those enchanted forest fairy shops for women who had an unhappy childhood.

This is a good point, that there are social values that people typically don't get paid for but are important for a healthy society, like for example looking after relatives, especially older family members. A family unit combines the resources of multiple people which could ease the burden of the government to take care of needy people (besides being better for the mental well-being of needy people)

Yes you can. Survival doesn't work on what is "right" but what works. If you want to understand something, find its incentives. Consideration does not incentivize rape but it still happens, I.E. it doesn't matter how victims feel. This is not a moral argument, this is contemplating why rape happens. It is only humans that treat the morals of their society as self-evident. But those morals only work to the degree that its enforced, I.E. morals are not self-evident nor are they inherently good. For a lot of people, what is good is what is good for them personally. Its hypocritical to think otherwise. Humanity as a species is not a collective. Humans form collectives which then compete with other collectives for survival. It is only with time and development that different collectives tend benefit more from cooperation or are conquered and we get higher order collectives. This when you see an expanded circle of concern. It is no longer viable to exploit people from other groups with reckless abandon for the most part because of our globalized world. But that is only a relatively recent phenomena. Neither is that a quality inherent to base human behavior. If society collapses, humans will revert to exploiting others because its works. Does who don't do it will tend to be out competed in a lot of cases. You can't understand evil through moralizations. Exploring why evil exists requires you to see why evil is good from the perspective of an evil-doer.

I don't know about the wider UK but England is so conservative. I do understand the frustration, especially since you are black.

Of course the right act like idiots. That is to be expected. Its more problematic when the left doesn't do a good job of reaching out to the disenfranchised. Its the left that will be able to provide solutions to systemic issues that plague a country. Identity politics is a red herring in most cases. All this focus on racism is missing the point of a poorly run country. Nobody is rioting if they have money.