koops

🙏

Words can become obstacles. Absolute = God = One/Infinite Mind = Nothingness

That guy looks sleazy af Would never let this guy be in the same room as my daughter.

LOL

Reality is single mind, and is limitless.

One is really Infinity (same as 0, or Nothingness) Hard to express with numbers.

Haven't read it yet, just read this from amazons preview pages.

Meditation. Shadow work. Psychedelics. Awakening. Yoga. Building a great body. Learning how to fight. Having deep intimate relationships. Art. Learning an instrument. Travel. Hobbys. Raising a family. ... ... No AI can do this for you. Tons of stuff to be curious about. The problem of course is unemployment. UBI seems utopia, but who knows in a few decades. Even Musk said that it seems inevitable, and he is no hippy woo woo leftist.

Its funny. Everyone is defending their own worldview and demonizing the other. Look: They say 'just say you want to fuck young women. We all have this impulses.' Then they say about Vylana: Psychology and intellect is one thing, but your biology and your instinct is going to override that'' But haven't you just said that body and your biology (instincts) are telling you to to fuck hot young women? Do you have to listen to your body in that scenario or not? Which one it is? Is Vylana wrong for not listening to her body and you are right? Like I said. Rationalization of their own perspective. After: 'It requires a repression of your instincts and a total abandoning of your nature to say yes to something like that' LOL Thats the definition of monogamy!! Then he said: I'm not surprised she cant get pregnant' Wow. Maybe she is +40? Come on guys...

youtube and social media is now where people spend time, but if. your blog is top tier people are going to read it anyways. You need high level SEO and social media promotion. Also, if you want to make money build a email list and nurture it.

Vylana is with other men too. https://www.instagram.com/aubreymarcus/p/DJx4oChxeky/

Exactly! If they 'fail' they will be judge, but that's a double standard. Whats the divorce rate in monogamy? (and the 'satisfaction rate' in couples that are still together?) I get this, but I feel Aubrey comes from a place of good intentions, even though it seems woo woo (so is everyone at the table). Thats stage green shadow. But every stage has its own shadow. Is stage blue monogamy more healthy? Is hookup culture better? Is 'scarcity polyamory' better? There is a lot of subtle manipulation, gaslighting, withholding, lying and emotional darkness in all these anyway. Are they getting roasted as hard as these guys? Thats the double standard. This. He could just fuck other chicks behind her back. Or he could open the relationships to just sex, but not emotional attachment. He is being honest in his intent and desires. If all men where REALLY honest about their needs, wants and desires with their partner, what would happen? The ship will sink. So thats the name of the game in monogamy for most couples. Isn't most of monogamy built on sexual and emotional repression, unfulfilled needs, lies, withholding, lying, even cheating? Also, for me this is different than conventional polyamory. David Deida says that if you are in a monogamous relationships and you want more women because you feel stuck, thats a bad move. Its a scarcity move. I feel this is way different. I feel that they are in a great relationships (it seems), so this is coming from a place of abundance and love. There can be some manipulation and woo woo talk, I agree with that, but it seems that is coming from a healthy place.

Are those teachings online or in his paid programs?

For me aesthetics, beauty, art and stye is different from luxury.

Do you think by awakening you are going to be happy with your current lifestyle? Do you really want to awaken; or do you really want to have sex, make good money and have an overall chill-happy emotional state? There are 2 different things.

He said she has more lovers, and they upload some pictures to IG. But look how you frame it: 'rail his wife'. For my perception, is way deeper than that. But you don't have to agree.

@Leo Gura in your 'What is Truth' video, you say that these sounds, sights and colors are also Absolute Truth. And that form and formlessness are identical. ''The entire relative domain is absolute truth in disguise.'' You mean that Absolute Truth is always here, whether you are aware or not, you just need the realization of it (awakening); so the relative domain/perception is still Absolute Truth while not awake? For example, if Leo from 2013 is watching the basketball game in his sofa in his relative-dualistic domain (maya we can call it)... thats Absolute Truth, because that's what Is, he is just not aware of it until he awakens and he realizes Oneness, God, Form=Formlessness, Absolute Truth? -Also, you say that Absolute Truth is pure objectivity, which I get where you are coming from, but for example David Hawkins says is pure subjectivity. Truth cannot be proven objectively and can only can be access through 1st person ''experience'', directly, so how is that not pure subjectivity? How do you reconcile that? Doesn't really Absolute Truth transcend labels as objectivity and subjectivity? It just Is? Is this just a semantic thing?

Yes, I get that NOW/Absolute Truth is all there is, and we can't find it somewhere else, but still... it seems to me that there is a 3rd category. 1. Im looking at a tree and measuring it, concluding is 7 feet tall, or thinking that is bigger than the tree in my garden. Thats relative truth. 2. Im looking at a tree. No labels, no concepts. Just what is. Now. In this dual everyday state. 3. Im looking at a tree and I have an awakening. I realize everything is One, Consciousness. I still 'see' that tree but I realize there is no separation. My confusion is in the difference between these last 2 points. It seems that there are different levels/degrees of awareness of Absolute Truth. Would you label #2 as grasping Absolute Truth? Is my error putting #3 above #2? (I consider #3 Absolute Truth, but not #2)

He is far from perfect example haha And really, the insight has to be backed up in real life, not just talk.

I hope him the best, but lets see how long it lasts.

hahaha Dan, a man walking his talk...

Ok, now I understand you. Thanks! I had an awakening last year with your video 'Realizing you are God' and one of my realizations was: THAT was Absolute Truth. It was glaringly obvious. But then I lost it. My confusion was that when you said your hand is Absolute Truth, it is, right, but you are not aware of it RIGHT NOW, directly. You have that reference from the past (from awakening). Like you know what an orgasm is, from the recall of having an orgasm, but you are not having one right now (I hope!)

So you can be aware of absolute truth only after (not before) awakening even if you are not in that state now, right? Thanks for your responses! I'll keep doing the work.

mmm.. when you say you need extra awareness to be aware of Absolute Truht (and perception becoming being), you mean awakening? Or something more simple as realizing how my mind distorts reality? As William Blake put it:''If the doors of perception were cleansed every thing would appear to man as it is, Infinite.'' "Doesn't that 'cleansed' refer to awakening?"

So you say when I look at my hand and there is a sense of self/I perceiving it, is still Absolute Truth? Is when I add a concept/label that 'becomes' relative truth? My realization was that Oneness/Consciousness/God/Being is Absolute Truth; and that perception/experience/duality is relative truth. I remember you said: Being = Perception - Ego Am I missing something here?