kavaris

ha, when you said "suite" i thought u meant like this stuff, Like... fkin, "Dreamweaver" or somethin (i dont even recall what dreamweaver was...) Like all this sht, neverending adobe stuff,

Ill be honest i dont know much about photoshop or psd files, etc, as im assuming thats what .psd means. You know whats funny though, i get emails from people who are still tryina work on these dead projects, like stuff that could really up-end all of these things, that is like, working on old OS, and image manipulation tools, like open source work that i once had subscribed to on github a long while ago, every now and then someone is asking if the project maintainer will accept their fix/patch, like its like... The drive to work on these things is there, but not enough ppl are on the same page. I just kinda laugh, as i find it funny. sad but funny in a way, cause its like, alot opportunities are there, nd everyones like, eh i dont really care.

i guess it depends on wat this is for, as when you say adobe suite, im thinking all hundred of those little programs they made for very specific jobs around like, drsign and illustration and such. thats wat i was meaning... but if theres something more specific you meant, like digital sortve animation arena, thats something very different.

Ill be honest, back when i used Windows, or an OS that could run Adobe and Apple products, etc., nothing really beat Adobe, or atleast, the old photoshop stuff from back in the day... w that said, now if i were to use something id do everything in watchamakalit, gimp or w/ image magivk, etc., like free linux tools, cause theres nothing specific im tryina do... but, if you need all that illustrator and all those other tools, im not actually sure there can be a replacement since adobe really revolutionized those areas. like, id be surprised if you find anything remotely like their tools, unfortunately. With that said, i have tried some cheap alt., tools, but they werent very good, granted this was like over 6 years ago, so you never know i guess.

(Cont.) it also cant be a synthetic material, like human constructed nano crystals in a lab, because i feel the whole point is like mother earth nature, and the like, fraility levels, and things naturally withstanding or breaking down over time, so in that sense, it cant be like an alien material. or it cant be synthesized in a lab either, as thats getting to specific around like... the chaos of divination (or the alien specificity around it) which is more like, a balancing act w nature that we want to be apart of, and not like... well you dont want too many synthetic elements going on i guess is wat i meant. The natural cycles already are that alien thing And dont get me wrong, if someone out there spent the rest of their life working on the perfect runestone material that never broke but still had the same feel/quality as normal stones thrown on the ground, id appreciate it and id use em all the time, i just feel like its just another big waste of our time here on earth.

Hey, thisll sound crazy, but im actually looking for certain kinds of stones / crystals, specifically the kind that can be worked / shaped into tiny runestones for rune casting, cause the cheap moonstone break (along hidden inclusion lines... when you really chuck em on the ground), nd its prolly too expensive to take sapphire or ruby nd turn that into tiny runes for runestone purposes, so im looking for something thats neither a cheap hard stone, but isnt like a perfect diamondy, crystaly thing either... if anyone even understands that stuff, lol.

Oh nice, Hey i was surprised that my dad showed me something that i actually liked, cause my dad usually brings up crazy conspiracy things, but then the other day he was like "You hear of Bashar?" nd i was like "it sounds familiar, but im not sure". Ive only watched one video so far, but theres alot of em

@Breakingthewall Is it better than The Secret, the quintessential toxicity? Or does it beat it out ~in its surface lvl sludge factory/foundering? Surely nothing beats out the Secret, on that front, right?

Hey, if we had more of that in the world ~ it might just be the right catalyst towards making the world better...on a practical lvl. Like, we are using tech right now, predicated on the inability for the lead designers , or those in charge of the tech direction, etc, who r af'raid to admit when theyve been wrong ... Take Gmail or Apple mail for instance, it borrowed ideas from others making similar things at the time, Aol, yahoo, etc, etc, but as it turns out, it doesnt actually make sense in the app, functionally speaking... Like you can create a message, but that message is attached to something fundamental across all the other inboxes you manage, like its an old system made fake-modern... One that is actually less functional than having a stripped down message system that you manually arrange things in, without metadata or any of that junking up the place, since thats literally wat "trash" and "sent" things already are, like... "A copy" is also a reference, in my opinion, And it doesnt have all the garbage collected junk in it... And thats just the tip of the iceburg... Theres so many things that are just terribly wrong, but that we gotta deal w/ for now cause someone wasnt brave enough to say "Im wrong and the idea doesnt make sense, so we should try again.. give it another try..."typeve thing. Or maybe they didnt even realize it was wrong either... Iuno.. i guess im saying that, i dont know how prevalent honesty and innovation is ~i guess thats wat im tryina sae

Thisll be hard to explain, but when you find ideas, take for example "no thing", that itself could indicate "nothing" (or it could indicate a "thing" that exists, just at a different time), etc, etc, depending on how you see it, function, meaning & form can arise out of these paradoxical ideas, and it often *does* — of which you might not **see clearly, like, what the friggin hidden meaning / intention is, at first sight, but it only strengthens that strap of misunderstanding along the edge. Its hard to explain, and i dont think ill even write it down myself, as its more of a minor detail of/within a structured existence / experience that has more going on than realized, at any given moment or point in time. You kindve see what im getting at, right? Like, you are the ignorance in manifested form, but everyone is misunderstanding manifestation. Hidden meaning/power and the enthusiasm of yourself, it shapes a veil over what is suppose to eventually become the *known* portions of Being at the fundamental lvl. That then changes how you see everything else (or it can change how you see everything else). I guess its confusing, iuno.

"Spiritual transmission", not channeling. My mistake. my b... Channeling today more implies "Im getting the spirit of ozzy osbourne in the room". This vid is a spiritual transmission ~ as its transmitting a spiritual thing, as opposed to invoking a spirit of a person that was once a live being. This is Being, but as an invoked spirit, as it relates to a starseed thing, if starseed implies seeding spirit / ethos into people, as the seed whos alive, towards rthose who are too, already alive. Like, real people in front of you, i think. I dont know if i made that up, or if thats wat it means...

i tried tellin people, the [it] thing is gonna be words, concepts, definitions ~ function, form & meaning... Its just a matter of time til everyones on the same page, for you need letter/words for everything, thus the-thing-itself = words In reconciling past, present, future... words... Writing songs and need to not name everything "New Song 5"?.... inventing ideas, or wat about programming on comp, you need text, i e., words implemented, or u gota weird, wordless engine that dont make sense (it wouldnt make sense trust me) Words are like, a requirement you didnt know how much you needed until it was needed nd its like, Oh shit, you actually need that for everything... The words are the first layer of the engine to life, wherein prior to its just like, pure libido realm or something... But once livido world fades its back to words again, libido vs words. p.s. santos bonacci fibonacci tamagotchi

I dont often find myself listening to rap.. but when i do.. its Dion-\* Tabakis... The Greek Orthodox Priest who dnt give a fk, he'll play rap, rock, country... Anything you can think, he plays it, including the traditional (or non traditional) chants nd such.

... It also reminds me, i had a dream, whereby, within the dream, there was several flashes, and i seen a flash of Leo G.'s family history, and i was like "Oh... Thats surpising, i wasnt expecting that.... Oh...Thats surprising i was expecting that..." ~I kept seeing things that were surprising, that i wasnt expecting, but that were nevertheless familiar'y/relatable.

I feel like Rupert Spira came from either a Jewish or Catholic family, or something that had like, its own monastic lifestyle, but in that sentiment... i also feel like these monastic monk-esque monasteries were so prevalent, that you had local monastery / apothecary's everywhere tending to farms or whatever else, making the world more like a monk world, regardless of it being christian, just apothecary monks for the sake of everywhere. Its just compatible w/ being farmers and things like this...

Everything debunks itself as the debunking that debunks itself. thats sortve like "i seen how the hand that writes itself is the hand that writes itself.... Therefore... i realize this one thing within the hand the writes itself isnt the thing anymore..." Its still relevant to you, if veganism is helping you... In the same way, \*not being a glutton is a value that normal ppl can partake in, not being a prisoner to the senses is something you can partake in, as we are exploring mind, body, soul, two pillars and a door, the ultimate paradox, where nothing gets debunked in the way you are thinking ... And, even when it does get debunked, thats a perspective, an angle that youve chosen to observe or practice, but its not debunked by the hand that writes itself... Everything debunks itself as the debunking that debunks itself. p.s. i would remove "debunking veganism" and just ask yourself "what is solipsism... what is awakening", or rather "what is solipsism AND what are you doing to awaken yourself through what you think solipsism is?" As solipsism and awakening are enough to yield aspects of yourself that represent that debunking premise more directly / though its got perspectival aspects that make it look like [insert-what-it-looks-like]

Im lookin for actors who feel like theyve fundamentally changed, Not just in age, but something in their roles and personalities is a little off... Like for example, Josh hartnett and his current 2026 stock-character- personality is so different, Like im waiting for him to snap at any moment, As hes not even a psycho in every movie, yet every movie still feels as tho hes like the husband with a dark secret (that hes about to fkn snap now...). I didnt see the one w/ him on the plane, i forget wat that one even was bout, but his personality use to be so different, back in the 90s movies...wtf.. p.s., i dont remember, but did famke janson turn out to be an alien, or was she actually one of the ppl who actually wasnt one, and it was all the *unsuspecting* people who turned out to be the one (i remember the ending, but not the other stuff... like i remember elija wood was normal... and i think he survived the ending in the gymnasium or watever... etc.)

Note, Theres prolly always lessons. Ive learned like 15 things just today, like everyday is a world-to-student translation, individual or world lesson in the least; receiving: on the end of consciousness. ^note2, this is kindve like~a really interesting list of ingredients: world, student, indie/world les., receiving: consciousness.

You could become the student of a world without lessons to be taught?... Perhaps, if thats even a thing.

I feel ya. And i realize you are in incredible physical pain. If you were to have read back several years ago, i was on the forum talking about similar sorts of pain from Crohns disease and other issues. That was before i got the chance to be level headed towards a more direct solution. My mom, whos a bit older, shes going through a situation not unlike something regarding chronic pain and anxiety, etc., long story, but she needs a very specific medication. You have an opportunity to atleast try something ya havent tried before, As theres nothing else left, right? Im assuming you are sortve at rock bottom. Call up some psychiat., or therapists, and whatknot, eventually someone will understand your situation. Granted, if you live in like Texas or in the south where its like, hours to get to the grocery store, then i could see how thats a totally different problem to try to remedy. At that point you do need something thats beyond my knowledge. And im just assuming things here, so you may clarify, correct me if im wrong, or if i fk'd up or got anything twisted up like a branch, Or if theres anything you want to add to the trees of possibilities. P.s. Theres something else i was gonna comment on and it slipped my mind, dangit! well, anyway, for now, keep in mind, or in your pocket of thoughts that, "dying" is a verb we invent to describe a feeling we feel.

Or another example is if you got back a response that said "Wise wisdom of wise men". How would Ai re-render "wise" that many times, once for wise itself, once more for "Wise wisdom" than another render for "wise men" than ANOTHER for "Wise wisdom of wise men", Like... What is she even talking about? Theres like no way that can happen just, like, some incredibly rare mistranslation systemic to "wise" and through a re-rendered lens thats happening more xtimes than whats been provided.

Hey, im currently in the middle of an argument w/ a friend who whole heartedly believes that what she has seen recently has been an Ai trope and common behavior of NLP, fundamental to how it builds words, And im trying to tell her that that situation she thinks is Ai, is very unlikely to be an Ai creating meaning out of nowhere, cause she is simply misunderstanding the techn., nature, behind it. In my opinion, its so rare, that its just "creative input" given (concatenation of tangentially similar words to build meaning ~similar adjective+noun, concatenated together with the correct meaning of the 2nd noun~ even though the model has only been given TWO friggin words to translate) Is that something yous would understand and be able to comment on, if i asked yous (in more detail) about the situation and how likely it would be?... I realize this isnt like an Ai tech forum, tho, some of yous are VERY smart, and id be curious to see what your answers are to this dilemma / argument.

I think you fundamentally are separation, merging w/ Love, so idealistic is the love you want, ya know? isnt it fundamental?

And bare in mind, its a very very simple question and scenario, but the person whos debating me is a wee bit older (roughly 70'ish) so shes not really experienced with Ai... Nevertheless im trying to explain it to her, in a way that she will understand, though the following is perhaps a little too technical (even though she worked on computer programming during the dawn of the computer era, but shes been retired for like 40+ years): When a model mistranslates a phrase like saggi ladini, the error almost always sits inside the words that are actually there. It might pick "sages" instead of "essays," or misread ladini as something other than "Ladin". Those are wrong choices among the real senses of the input words. Inventing an extra adjective is a different kind of error, and it's much rarer. "Wise" would have to enter the output as a word the model decided to add, with no token in the input pointing to it. That's the key distinction. A polysemous word can bleed its senses into an output ("sages" or "wise men" for saggi), but "wise Ladin essays" ("Wise essays of the Ladin language") needs saggi to be rendered twice at once, as both the noun and its adjectival sense. That's an unusual output for a translation task... Dont yous agree? How would it render "saggi" TWICE (now in two different contexts, its adjective and its noun sense), plus once more for ladin? You could use the argument that its like defining "feast" to mean "a lavish meal", but lavish is quite far apart now, As the whole point is that, the meaning is being pulled from "saggi"... or a word that has an adjective and noun function.

pterodactyl, fledgling homoerectus of the historic, towards the rhetoric, freed by the energy by which we free, trapped by the staggering that we keep alternating.