Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
kavaris

Structured opinions (N+1 stages) among those unstructure

2 posts in this topic

Posted (edited)

I had watched several different people talk about their opinion of different things; some related to physics, some that relate to programming, some are about language and/or semantics, electrical engineering, etc, etc. *i watch a lot of different stuff*...

The thing that i realized is like, you, as a person who has (and shares) his or her opinion gets more points if you are able to lead people into a very structured place mentally—like, its as if you took someones brain and placed it into someone in the 21st century when they had been way back in 100AD or something. On the other hand, for those who have a disorderly approach, or rather, an unstructured format for their ideas and/or opinions (whether its the ideas themselves or in how they communicate)—fail to align the sun crystals focus such that it can illuminate *on which timeline do the individuals traverse*, and continue on going down...

Its like, you have to point people towards a vector that has been clearly allocated towards a place where things arent chaos...BUT, with that said, those that have had a more disorderly approach sometimes have little microbits of information that they are clearly gathering hapazardly, but havent found that "neat & tidy" avenue—the sorts of traction that exist in the structured persons opinion. The point is like, there are things missed in the intentional haphazard approach, and if only theyd allocate some priority towards neatening it up, they might take people on their journey with them.

Iuno what the broader point of this is, but i just found myself getting lost in nightmares, and when i thought about what the commonality was, or what had most recently shifted, it was that i had followed up on a plethora of those microbits that dont exist inside the populus (i should also note that like, simply watching so many things, itll eventually start to bleed into a place that may or may not be normalized) Like, my own mind was of course very unnormalized/polarized (i also recently slept on my neck in the wrong position and my week(s) have been treacherous as a result..) and then, combining that w/ everything i watched this week, i was like, i think we arent looking at *structure itself* enough, especially because there isnt anything that is specifically about structure—however—actualized/leo is sortve in that realm, where he could make a series about structure (which there might be, but i cant recall it at the time + it mightve been more about reality, and not the N+1 stages of structure)

Anyway, my neck hurts. Im gonna call it there, Maybe yous can further add to this idea of opinions really thriving on structure, and wat r ur thoughts on it.

Edited by kavaris

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

p.s. im also curious if anyone had recently had nightmares, and whether or not they found/noticed that the common thread was in the content they had recently watched, and whether it was outside of the popular, structured status quo...

... another issue is about getting too comfortable—and how the more haphazard person starts to allocate more information if the other person gets too complacent in their approach, and the same is true if the haphazard person gives up early because nothing makes any sense and or they feel discouraged.

Edited by kavaris

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0