kavaris

The thing bout reality is that like, any rules or laws that are being generated, which is the default (theres never not-rules and not-laws) but the minute we walk into our own world—of what we think are the rules & laws, they are immediately broken, shattered, just like, theres never a time where things arent breaking into a million pieces, which we dont really hear or consider enough about in our daily-everyday lives, like there isnt a good way to even bring people down that road, let alone bring ourselves down it, and have the whole thing your explainin be breakin at your feets, multiple. Iuno. Somewhere out there theres like a super expert on all-things broken reality, and they are just like, antennae - just absorbing all of the craziness and can somehow navigate, and communicate it, and just be falling apart and living, and communicating—like our lord and savior, possibly a nature god who only talks to bears and elven folk, in some very remote area, probably most likely—he or shes prolly like 90,000 years old, anyway thats my guess. thats a good ripe age dont yous think?

Now and days with all of the auto-generated scripts and such, theres less and less quality in the way we tell stories, and more and more—almost eerie-levels of mechanically-made narrative. Like, now when you see a movie thats based on a book, its like a sign, or symbolic of having had, possibly, real people interacting w/ that script and storyline. And its like, thats different from what it felt like it meant before. Like, back when you heard that so-nd-so movie was based on a book it was like, "oh okay". Now its like, "oh wow, this might be a real movie", whatever real movie means. But you know what im tryina say its like a sign that there could be lots of thought put into it. And, iuno if any of yous are writers or artists, etc., but youve noticed, when something has had loads of thought poored into it (especially given a long time) you have so much time to make things right, to make them interesting, and to make them fit in the way you want and like, like the way you believe it should, given the context, time, date and environment. We are entering an age where like—the analog—or the thing thats been perfected to death is highly saught after, where as thee digitally reproduced and regurgitated stuff is what lives inside the mainstream and undulates on the surface, the center of all things popular and easy to produce (non fungible or whatever), alas, that is a fairly obvious place/situation for us to be in, and no matter how many times we try n start over or magine it diff—it would always lead to a vers., of this, just cause like, its so likely to happen. Like, if i counted 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13.... the chances of the sequence not being 14 afterwards are pretty slim—such is where we receive the story weve been told, that we tell ourselves. And as such, so too and important are the stories we tell all

Like its hard beyond our own personal taste, to say wat even is a dual thing in our experience, like we just see many things, all which could be the candidate opposite

Yes both male n female sex, and also, as a duality/ying yang of each other—and as opposed to things like white n black, rough n smooth, etc. in fact, the most finite thing that we could ever call a duality of each other is male female, as something weve experienced. Try to think of something more finite from experience that is like an opposite. Nothing for example, isnt an opposite of all things, cause those are synonyms for the unknown or infinity, but say we had to recognize two things as being the most finite dual items in our experience, wat would they be.. Now, granted, wat the point of this is other than as something to get yous thinkin -i do not know yet, i just though it interesting, nd something i feel inside.

I have a, idea for leo, for an episode, although it has to be within context or it would conflict with episodes about practicality/survival type episodesl. and that is, first, just imagine, it starts with like, the rifling off of all the things that ppl deem as 'X', in this case it would be all the things that ppl feel/fear are like the primeval statues blocking their way, like all the things that are perceived as being survival-requirements, and thereby the feared giants that they must obey. At some point those things are more like limbs in that, to live is to go through motions, though thats prolly not the way leo would go on to describe it, as im giving my really shortened/bad vers., so it can be reinterpreted in the right way. And so, then the idea is whether or not there is anything that precedes these tall statues, and what this temple of things looks like—again thats me describing it vaguely, and poorly so it may be recreated in the proper leo way

The beginning, the time where all time starts is happening now, but we are busy inventing, and not beginning. We could begin if we invent an end. Im workin on an ending, but its more of a beginning that you go to—cause iuno wat yous wanna do, or wat ya consider a direct ending, as i feel like a perfect form—is both, where one goes in one direction, the other the beginning direction; i mean, its like, have a dream you are like, goodbye, typeve thing. Now iuno why im even bringin this up but i just felt like yous could start thinkin bout it some more, really take it seriously and flush it out, and see wat yous come up w/, as the path that leadeth to a beginning cant really be a person, but an idea of one, or something. Iuno, ask yourselves wat is your first memory like... Thats what that path IS, the other is a real person, yourselves walking into the light, but you are observing it from a distance as the formerly-you you, and so iuno how you encapsulate that two-branch, but you could just imagine, as i said, one guy goes to the light, the other is just dedicated space, until youve observed yourself as gone guy, gone guy out, new era in, input ouput; Like, having the oxygen in the room pulled, or the lights turned off via man in the distance, you are just the second-path activated as the observer. Yousll know what i mean.

did this male and female thing ever come up in yall guys's psychedelic trips, that is, the usually positive negative-ebb n flow undulating—did that whole thing ever devolve into like a male n female thing. ill skip over the details, or the purpose/reasoning, since it implies going on a long tangent.

Elfen Weledol Spiritual experiments. Do some spiritual experiments. Draw a pentagram, or visit a cemetery and do some necromancy. Talk to the sacred groves, here https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacred_grove Ask the spirits there, what are the possibilities, and make a vast list. The trees will tell you all about the rules and laws, and the details of the situations you find yourselves in, as well as how to like, begin to understand or to investigate the scene you are in, as an instance of the very scene that always exists (the scene also = Elfen Weledol; or Element of Seeing), nd just understanding that is just like the cover of the book. Take some mushrooms and talk to the trees. ~ see the previous message for one of the primary premises, that still isnt even the highest node-premise, but a pointer to a more finite priority premise to have established later.

There are no rules Starting from that premise, ask yourselves, what rules have yous restricted yourselves to—although of logic, share slight caveats w/ each other—that is that "there are.. no... rules" E.g. when you die, that obviously is itself the idea of not being the version of you thats like, a however years-old person.. But then ask yourselves, what rule says you arent still YOU?. ... ? Right?.. Thats just one example. Consider everything now... like, possibly around the cycles that you consider as the baseline, consider if/or whether or not theres cycles within cycles, or cycles w conclusions to every cycle; consider everything you thought was an assumption, that you thought made logical sense, and then simply realize, "there are no rules". Reevaluate those self-imposed rules from there on with the freedom of knowing that there are no rules, except of course for your OWN, fake, very brittle, self-imposed ones. This is only one part to a part-bajillion-story of concepts to free yourself that, we have not even begun and properly go through and express in detail, and as such, we have been way off track as far as like, beginning that journey. Im just awaiting to see places to add just like, very small fragments of a story that is a bajillion-finite-point story.

I believe this is in the realm of intellectual, as its sortve about how to think differently and learning of the ways in which we may communicate w/ nature. This video popped up. I thought it might be interesting. Have i watched it yet? No. But we will find out if it was any good together.

@theleelajokerits also sortve a good thing to just say what you feel, when you feel it like we were—cause if you wait to long to ruminate on somethin,and try to really analyze it, you end up sortve, spoiling the spontenaity factor or whatever, like the thing that gets ppl talking, which is more of like, the subtle areas that havent been worked out yet. like theres a level somewhere between "too well thought out" and "not yet though about at all" where ppl want to give their input inside of, and if it exceeds either of those lines, it can lead to just, ppl not *getting it, so to speak, if that makes sense

@theleelajokerOh i say all types of crazy shit to ppl, i dont have time to be on the fence about anything. Yeah, i will ask things like this... because to me, ill have thoughts that feel they arent"a fully baked thought", yet, wherein ill wait for awhile until ive ruminated over it some more—and then, depending on how crazy it is, or how interesting/thought provoking it is to me, is a sign of whether, or not im going to be interested enough to send it to ppl (or write it down). Actualized is where i mostly send things that are sortve in an awkward state of not yet being fully cooked yet-yet still having something to it—that is a bit too.. err... i wanna say the word im thinking of is reasonable... like alot of unreasonable and unforgiving craziness is sent by me, every which way to friends and non-friends, like a submachine gun spraying bullets everywhere.

Identity i was sorta thinkin of something partly related, which is bout the notion of "identity". Like for instance, in the idea of the center, or the one, or unity or whatever, you might say we strip ourselves down to the fact that theres no identity—even if to say that, "this identity i have is really a learned—reasoned-over-time amalgamation, as opposed to a true identity that i conceive of...", thats also a form of seeing-it all-as a shared identity—which is the same idea. And so, this notion if identity is a hard one, to try and answer on the spot. Example: politically, if you are in the middle you might be on the independent side. Easy. Done. Hands washed of it. But if someone says, "whats your identity", or "do you have an identity", see now thats a hard one, especially in todays day and age where identities are every-which-way outside of the box, just runnin' rampant. So, who knows. Do you have an identity? And, if so, what is your identity—and then to follow that up, how would you describe your identity, and what it means to you, specifically for you?... Perhaps a better question is, does having an identity even matter—the minute you are born and existing, surely thats a form of identity that matters, or is that just a fossil-form of identification, and your true identity doesnt happen til later on???...

https://youtu.be/wdIUzxWYl8c?si=z2PeDqsgT-gN7Wyk

Math, science and technology have a similar, but differing way of evolving over time—and more and more the way we design systems has this notion of splitting everything into like, these individual components or commands in order to generalize/abstract the system—being that its incomprehensible nature leads to it being harder to work on without; Similarly, and increasingly, science and math have these notions too, like where you can choose to elaborate further at all of the points where it seems fit to do so. Although, its not always necessary, or right, to elaborate in such a way where it turns every point of understanding into an interfacing component—and it comes down to the lexicon-ographer, or whoevers in-charge (whomever has the most insight, holding the most pieces in their head at once) to make a refined decision about "how those *points of unknown* should be further interfaced with/or not"—and so, it is somewhat up to everyone to assume this role, that is, everyone who is in a position/viewport into that area of study, or that system. Nevertheless, when deciding on when it is right or not, there is a methodical way to go through all the material, such that you can begin checking off those boxes, and speaking up. Putting that aside, i think its always better to elect someone w/ the designated role of making those decisions, or passing it down to someone else, like a team mate. Anyway, the bottomline is that, i feel we are finding ourselves in a position where we are depending on someone to be insightful enough to make those decisions, but because the cities are all skyscrapers so-to-speak, we have to make sure its being designed from its foundation-from first principles. If your lexiconographer (im just calling it that for now) isnt so use to building everything from the foundation, then youve got the wrong person. p.s.its more useful if others specialize as the Historian, or the Inventor/Engineer, etc., in order to expand the amount of special insight into whatever area is being focused on, and then the Project Leader/lexicongrapher makes the bigpicture decisions. Anyway, thats getting off track, as i just meant to bring up the ever increasing likeness between math, science and technology, and the increasing need for organized teams that are comfortable with electing a leader. Things start to become aimless without an elected leader, wouldnt yous agree? Just to put it in perspective, even in families, the male is sortve the unofficial leader of the household, even if its never verbally communicated. Its just a role that happens naturally~if its about working on a project, then you need some form of a leader, especially as every male on the team is just gonna assume "well, im obviously the leader here", because no one has said otherwise...