eos_nyxia

How does drinking that much soy milk not give people the farts/ shits, lol. Also: East Asian people would never.

Who would actually pass these hypothetical tests though, like what would be the criteria? I suspect it probably wouldn't leave many people, or it would be an astronomically high bar to clear. What if people are mainly doing it to escape poverty? Is that a mentally sound reason? What if they're neurodivergent? (I suspect quite a few sex workers are...) This could mean anything from "classic mental illness" (and couldn't keep a job even if they wanted to) to "person who is actually happier in this arrangement despite social stigma and judgement, living a more typical lifestyle".

This is so general and completely without context.

When you get too many messages, answering them becomes a part-time or full-time job. You don't even need to have a lot followers for this to be true. Other reasons why people might not answer: They might be going through a rough patch or an emergency of some kind they might be really busy at the moment, and they have trouble keeping track of their messages. it's a lazy, low-effort message. Aka. the person has probably seen too many messages like that already. it's overly invested, upfront, in an overly personal way. It's disconcerting. they literally just don't feel like it. Whatever you want from them, it's not what they want from you. Not everyone is interested in parasocial relationships, period. Just because someone puts themselves out there on social media does not mean that they're interested in having personal relationships and interactions with their audience. >insert other reasons< I learned recently that there's an informal term called PDA (pathological demand avoidance). It's essentially a psychological self-protective mechanism. We all have to chosoe what we priortize after all, whether moreso on purpose or by going with the flow. There is only so much time (and often energy) any one person has. I thought this would be fairly obvious though?

I care about coral lifeforms.

I've been waiting years for someone to make this post! Seriously, way more interesting than people claiming to be stage Turquoise/ Coral/ whatever, haha.

His comment toward Taylor Swift made my ovaries want to shrivel up. EW, lol.

If anyone is still following the issue with international students and temporary foreign workers in Canada (I hadn't until recently), this seems to have escalated quite quickly: https://toronto.citynews.ca/2024/08/26/canada-international-students-deportation-protests/ In a nutshell: I wonder how serious our government is about enforcing this.

Not everyone is obsessed with white women.

Ah, yes. Let's go back to the good old days when women didn't have choices. Where if you're cheated on, you're just expected to deal with it "because men", where marital rape is legal and divorce was phenomenally difficult to obtain. You probably wouldn't like your choices taken away (whether you made questionable ones or not), so why would anyone else prefer it? What a bummer, you can't approach finding a partner the way you shop for a car or house these days. It's a two-way process and people aren't necessarily interested in helping you get yours if you don't already get it. And those who get it are already getting theirs, but you don't necessarily see them either. If it's not part of the mainstream cultural narrative and they're not talking, then you probably aren't seeing it. It doesn't mean that they don't exist though. On a more practical note, to the issue you mentioned: the type of woman that a traditionalist might be interested in very much exists (at least in liberal suburbia, where I grew up), but 1) they tend to pair off very early, usually with people they grew up around, within their social circle. For a woman who is conservative-minded by nature: marrying outsiders where there isn't a good "culture fit" doesn't happen very often. 2) they're probably not lounging around in bars, clubs, etc., and there is a good chance that they're an introverted person with introverted interests. If you see them at a bar or club, there is a good chance that they're young, wanting to see what it's about, or being dragged there by a friend. 3) they're not necessarily living in a big city, doing big city things, so you won't see them there. 4) the women that many men tend to be drawn to, sexually and emotionally, tend not to be conservative by nature. By this I mean flashy women. This very much includes women who cosplay their conservatism for the purpose of garnering attention and income. This includes your Candace Owens, Lauren Southern, and Serena Joy types. You can dress conservatively, associate with conservative people, and have conservative talking points, but still have an unabiding need for institutionally sanctioned power, attention, approval, and adoration from the opposite sex that is in actuality more important than any other value system espoused. SOURCE: people I knew growing up and in my 20s. FYI, if you're going to another country/ culture to outsource your relationship needs, whoever you're marrying is by definition NOT really conservative by nature. They're at best, a picker and chooser of what values they'd like to keep. It's probably going to be in a purely self-interested way and it may or may not be in your favour. They are.... after all, picking you. Likely, you are NOT the exception lol. If you can't identify character because you don't have the instinct and inclination to watch and try to understand people on their own terms and come to your own conclusions from there, then you're stuck relying on mental models about how people are without having comprehensive access to the whole group of people you are generalizing about. Not only is this not reality, you're probably going to get screwed eventually regardless of where you are. Realistically, no matter of culture, time period, and local social environment, some people are going to be more intrinsically conservatively leaning. At least if you're a woman, it likely has something to do with your intrinsic level of risk aversion on a social, emotional, and intellectual level. Anyway, if you play the capitalist game when it comes to personal relationships? You win capitalist prizes.

Why don't you tell me why you want to be here? Not with your thoughts or rationalizing side, as they're not on board. I mean, what do you feel?

Many of these dichotomies are pretty arbitrary and are the result of socially generated tensions particular to a certain time period and culture. For instance: the number of people across the world in "non-Western" cultures where women are both "highly traditional" and financially independent (or are capable of being so) while potentially working a demanding career. This is a common enough dynamic, especially amongst East/ South/ West Asian immigrants in Western countries. Although to be fair, exactly what is "equal" about pregnancy, giving birth, or having to be the one who terminates the pregnancy, while you as a man can just blow-and-go if you want to? 1) Was anyone actually ever stopping you guys, other than maybe a handful of hyper-radical people? 2) Isn't this typically more of a dude obsession with other dudes?

I read her book 10+ years ago. I am aware that this can be a phenomenally hard thing to not do, but how can you be free if you make war with a fundamental aspect of your human expression? Desire is more than about sex, romance, women (or your gender of choice). "Desire" is also tied to the will to live, to express yourself, to be creative, to have ambition, aspiration, and vision. The libido/ life drive (yes, even in the classic psychoanalytic sense) cannot so easily be divided and isolated in one aspect without affecting the other aspects. Not that it isn't possible, but you really have to be prepared to fully shut the door on the aspects you intend to minimize and/ or eliminate. You almost never see the required degree of commitment necessary to properly shut the door, especially outside of monastic spaces, for those of us who have to live in "the real world". It's basically a traditional ascetic path; I'm sure you've seen it before. You have to be willing to crush and erase yourself and your desires to serve some higher purpose (and not simply the avoidance of one undesired outcome or another), to not spare yourself nor make any exceptions, and to hide absolutely nothing from yourself. Otherwise, you get groups of like-minded people banding together over their shared bitterness, unresolved trauma, and unfulfilled desires. Like MGTOW, which is made up of men who appear to be doing the exact opposite of "going their own way".

@Javfly33 Do you not also find that an obsession with avoiding attachment is at least equally neurotic and misery-inducing as the attachment itself? I mean, yea. You feel like you're saving yourself... for a while. But then what? Say you want to get off this particular hamster wheel forever and that it is technically possible... I can assure you that there are no halfway measures here.

TBH, I don’t place much trust in novelty addicts, at least when it comes to people, even if I myself am capable of providing sufficient novelty to such people. I find it tiresome. Maybe this is because I've put a huge amount of energy in muting and transmuting these tendencies in myself across my own lifetime, as I didn't wish to live and die by my impulses, at least as they were. I also don’t place much trust in people who take things and people for granted the more they are present, though most of us tend to do this to a degree. There is often an unconscious self-loathing quality here that I find difficult to explain; I just sense it. I'm not as good as I could be at constructively managing emotional claustrophobia (without being distant and detached), but I've gotten a lot better at it over time. Patience and showing restraint in your judgement are phenomenal qualities of character, particularly to those which you have deemed worthy of personal love, and who are not likely to take you for granted overall (even if you are not so perfect in your ability to not take someone for granted). So is being mindful of your own potential flaws.

A few other thoughts: Is Denmark (you're Danish, right?) not a great place for what you're interested in? I thought the Nordic countries all skewed more liberal, even hippie-ish... Maybe city/ suburban boys just ain't your thing.... (they're not my thing either)

Have you tried going to meet-ups and places where people of similar interests would congregate? (e.g. conferences, retreats, etc. These types of events only tend to attract people who are more seriously invested in said interests, as opposed to an online group where the interest is more likely to be a fleeting one, as monetary investment and a time commitment have a way of filtering out people, for better and for worse.) My brother, for instance, met his now-fiancee at an extended meditation retreat. In no particular order: "law of attraction" sometimes has a nasty way of facilitating your "lowest common denominator" reality, not your aspirational one. As an analogy, water also flows down toward the lowest possible place due to gravity and your proverbial bucket (the reality you wish to attract/ create), a mirror reflection/ refraction of your mind itself, is leaky for whatever reason. Often this has something to do with past trauma, and if not, then definitely it's strongly ruled by the residue of our social conditioning and what we've been conditioned to accept as tolerable, unavoidable, necessary, etc. This is a huge reason why people get into "shadow work" in the first place. Unfortunately, many women get stuck with this lesson in their intimate relationships with men: ...that our closest relationships ought NOT to be a charitable cause, including after when a relationship starts to become very serious and established. Realistically, too much charity with the wrong people in an overly close way without boundaries results in all of you sinking to the lowest common denominator. With many men, "sticking it out" in the name of being loving and virtuous is not worth what you reap from it. There is a difference between helping someone who needs help, who you truly believe deserves it, who generally respects and is conscientious of your time, energy, and purpose (even if they fall into a bad place), and also you have both explicitly agreed to that dynamic (not that it devolved into something deeply undesired over time). IMO, if you don't want to do that mommy stuff, you have to shut it down ASAP. Shut it down, walk away, and don't apologize for it, for wanting whatever it is that you truly want. Don't let people waste your time or let others make you feel bad about it. After all, if the tables were switched, would they care or would they be content enough to keep draining you? Unconscientious takers often don't care. (Though it seems you've already got that down pat.) I have noticed a reoccurring pattern in heterosexual relationships: a draining man easily drains you of your radiance, your beauty (not just your physical beauty and youth, though it could be that too, as the "spirit" reflected through the body), your health, your drive and purpose. Like literally, it drains our life force. And for what positive ultimate benefit for either you or him? Keep in mind that making him complacent, comfortable, and satiated for absolutely no higher goal or purpose isn't actually in his ultimate best interest either. Other than character (including sufficiently similarly aligned values and priorities), IMO both people need a strong sense of reciprocity and what feels balanced and sustainable for the both of you individually. You need your partner to fundamentally not be ok with you being drained, neglected, stressed, unsupported, etc., while he takes and gets to be comfortable and even prospers while you suffer.

You guys are all on the technically SFW (??) fetish side of Youtube; I don't think you're using that material for what it was originally intended for.... (At least that's the vibe I'm getting from Ms. Fart-in-Jar over here.)

I'm not offering advice since I don't feel qualified to give it: But even without reading what you wrote, you have your whole life story written in your eyes, like this sense of self-rejection and unlovability. It is very... real and out there, as if nothing is veiling it. People, especially strangers, likely will shy away from this. If at some moment, it's not your eyes, maybe it's your body posture and language. Perhaps in some moments, you are not so conscious of yourself and how you come off, so something else is shown. Or perhaps you are painfully, paralyzingly self-conscious and that also shows? Maybe there is something contradictory in the way you present yourself, like a sort of cognitive dissonance (for example: trying to appear confident even as you also feel very unconfident), and this can come off as suspicious and untrustworthy with strangers, as in, it makes people's spidey senses go off. Unfortunately. And if none of my projections are true, say you are super excellent at masking. Still, these deep beliefs about ourselves have a very nasty way of coming out at the end in some sort of self-sabatoge. Not sure if any of this rings a bell. (But this is not meant as a criticism against you as a person, really.)

To those of you who said that rape is not common in the Middle East @LSD-Rumi @Moutushi (??), and anyone else who knows anything and is inclined to answer: How do you know that it's not underreported? What's the process for going from filing a claim, handling and investigating evidence, to actually getting someone convicted? How safe do people actually feel reporting? If someone reports their rape, is there the possibility to be violently retaliated against (either from the police or others in their community), along with extreme social shaming and ostracization? (Note: people often don't feel safe reporting here in Western countries either, because of the social shaming/ ostracization factor.) Corruption and Social Values: How trustworthy and invested are the police, basically? Like, there can be a huge disparity between the law on paper and how it's actually handled most of the time... Also, do primarily religious authorities handle these cases in some Middle Eastern countries? (Alternatively, how subservient is the government, even if not technically hyper-religious, to religious authorities of a fundamentalist nature?) What is the actual definition of rape from country to country in the Middle East? I'm under the impression that it's defined much more strictly and conditionally than we define it here. In Western countries (at least in Canada/ the US), we have the term "sexual assault" which is an umbrella term for a whole bunch of things where proper consent is deemed not possible, including: having sex with an inappropriately aged minor as an adult (aka. "statutory rape"), rape, molestation, drugging someone so that they can't consent properly, molestation and groping, etc. ....basically, I'm wondering how easy is it to by-pass legal loopholes?

Yep, I was just going to say this. The wealth disparity is extremely in-your-face too (at least with HK; I've never been to Singapore).

My feet, ankles, knees and general posture feel a lot better while wearing them, even if just for an hour or two a day while doing outdoorsy, athletic stuff. But they are not cute. I found some of the nicer ones too. Also, I love my Dr. Martens.

Society in the "West" is still trying to make sense of what it means when the ones you are supposed to be able to trust and love you instead violate you. We are still very much in the process of adjusting how we think and talk about it, especially in public to other people. IMO a lot of progress has been made in the last 20 years or so, so that sexual assault isn't just seen as something that mainly happens when strangers jump out of dark alleys or manage to roofie your drink in a bar. Nor is it something that mainly happens while you are wearing the wrong kind of outfit, being in the wrong place, at the wrong time, while giving out the wrong signals. (Because apparently just existing is also "giving out a signal".) If people who are raped are solely responsible for preventing rape (both on a moral and a practical level), then the uncomfortable implication of most rapes (allegedly) being done by someone the person knows is to just not trust anyone and let them close to you, lol. To live in a bubble, to stay single, and to not have any male friends or unnecessary acquaintances. But if everyone who was raped, sexually assaulted, or molested avoided the opposite sex, somehow that would be women's fault too for "depriving men". So this whole issue has gotten tangled up in the gender wars along the way. It seems like sexual abuse amongst family members is the hardest thing for people to wrap their heads around though, out of all the things people want to not talk about, sweep under the rug, and minimize (either that it could not possibly be that bad, that it never happened, or that it doesn't happen that frequently therefore it probably never happened to the person speaking about it). It has gotten miles better though. Actually, one benefit of Youtube and the internet is more people being able to tell their stories without barriers to entry. The actual strong deterrent to this fixation that people lie about SA for attention is that not that many people actually want being raped or molested as their "claim to fame" unless there is a goddamned good reason for it. There is usually some amount of shame, humiliation, or at least reticence to get over, and that's even if no one shames you along the way. It's also much harder to blame someone for not avoiding SA, usually a child, without looking like a complete sociopath. Unfortunately, based on some of my own early experiences, my expectations of a good number of people are so low that I assume that if they could publically blame a child for being raped, they would. The "rationality" is just a cover for whatever it is that they both want and can get away with justifying.

Fun Question: how well would our major city infrastructure run if legally underpaid international students were not a thing?

Everyone I know growing up who wanted to have kids and not rent forever left Metro Vancouver a long time ago. Like 10+ years ago. Often to the farther reaches of the Fraser Valley or to Alberta. I can't blame people for neither wanting nor feeling financially secure enough to have kids here, period. The rest of BC seems to be following the rising rent prices, including places that many of us growing up in the Lower Mainland (Metro Vancouver) thought of as the absolute boonies. I didn't realize how badly it had gotten until I started looking around very recently at rental prices all across BC and even in other major cities in Canada (excluding Toronto, Montreal, etc.), including the East Coast, Alberta, etc. It seems like post-Covid has been especially bad, like the last 2 years, the reality of which I've been blissfully insulated because the price of my rental has mostly been locked in since I moved to my current location in about 2016, and only started rising significantly within the last couple years. Many places have doubled or even tripled the cost of what it would have been less than 10 years ago. Instead, we have many people house-sharing, and renting single rooms for what used to get you a 1-2 bedroom suite (albeit a cheaper one). Pretty much no one here has any chance of ever buying a house unless your parents help pay for yours or gift you one. It really doesn't matter what sort of traditionally upper-middle job you and your spouse work. It's not happening. Overall: we're not really the fighting and protesting sort, are we? Critiquing and complaining, yes. I think we're fatalistic overall, and often trying to make the best of whatever is given to us circumstantially.