Sincerity

I said I’m not pursuing discussion with you here. 🤷‍♂️ No hard feelings. We’ll talk someplace else. But talking on „your level” of heavy conceptualization and dualism is just a needless tiresome exercise and again: a detraction from truth. You do you, but leave me out of it (when talking about the most basic things).

It doesn’t matter whether it’s really an alien talking or not. What matters is what’s being said. And the teachings (especially the most basic ones) I find of high quality. He can say a lot of bullshit too imo. So you take what’s useful and disregard what isn’t. Openmindedness + judging words based on their merit.

@UnbornTao You make some good points. What if someone is attempting to communicate their truth, but it so happens that there's already a term for it which more or less encompasses what's meant by that truth (at least in the communicator's mind)? Is it not useful to label a truth (eg. the truth of X, or "solipsism") to then fluently refer to it in conversation? I don't like the word solipsism. But for me it's the closest single word to what I wish to convey: This right now is all that is. There's nothing beyond this moment/experience. You are God. You are this. (And, of course, there is no "you".) I understand. I respect your value of striving to be very epistemologically rigorous and to not take on beliefs. I think it's a nice counterbalance to others' posts. Your perspective is valuable, even in just the simple fact that it's rather unique among most others here. I honestly appreciate the diversity. Eh. Yeah, you're right. It is a waste of time. 🤷‍♂️ I appreciate his perspective (especially his most basic formula and teachings) and I like to think about what he says. But ultimately I'm always the final arbiter of truth anyway. I can as well contemplate from scratch, with more genuine "results". External perspective can be useful too though, as grist for the mill.

Noo, nothing like that. The first implies a process (which there's none), and the second implies control over Will (which there's also none). Moreso this. I (as God) am creating this right now. In fact, I am this. There is no difference between me and it. Oh what joy! You = God = Imagination = Reality. A complete blending of the infinite nothingness/awareness/formlessness and form.

No, you’re just aware that you’re creating them. Imagination is still the case, and the walls are still not passable. Even if you’re in a high enough state, you can’t change Will. You just see that Will is.

I’d say this: You don’t have limitations as God. But You do imagine walls right now. And since You do, you can’t walk through them. Why do You imagine walls? Why is reality the specific way it is right now? I don’t know. But the fact is that it is that way right now, and it’s Imagination. And what’s Imagined is the case. You’re not aware that you’re creating walls because you’re not in a high enough state. If you were, you’d be able to see that. I have a recollection of these insights from my awakenings. You can reach that state where you see that you’re creating walls. You’ll see it as just you doing that. But you’ll probably still not understand why. I think the why isn’t answerable in a definite way. There’s definitely not any one limited reason. You Imagine because you „do”, it’s what You are. And that’s it.

This question stems from misunderstanding. You are God AND exactly what you are right now. And it’s perfect. The need to be able to fly is just an idea you have.

Consider the possibility that you might have too many ideas about the word. It’s not complicated. I am God. There. 😉 No need to bring avatars into this. I don’t like the series. It’s dualistic if you make it. Truth can be (and is) expressed in a non-dualistic way. I said „sounds weird” for the sake of politeness. To translate: I think what you’re saying is bs. „God knows everything”. What does this mean? Why are you framing it that way? Yes, what you’re saying is weird and tells me that your understanding is not direct. And you didn’t elaborate like I asked. Your points weren’t „logically consistent”. They were incorrect in their dualistic nature. God is not „in everything”. God IS EVERYTHING! So don’t cover your arguments with „logicality” please. God is above the logic you’re implying. And please don’t imply that I’m only coming from some vibe-oriented perspective. I don’t appreciate it. Not „conceptually informed”, bruh… consider this might be what you have too much of. A lot of words, but not enough truth. Yes, only THIS exists. Only this moment exists. This isn’t complicated. To imply that there’s something beyond This is fantasy and being lost in concepts. If you understood „my” solipsism as dualistic, then you are making an effort to misunderstand me. Sorry. * * * * * Ultimately, to me your understanding is dualistic and overconceptualized. There is not a directedness to your words. Which is a shame. I have no intention to pursue this discussion with you specifically any longer. After I wrote this response, I only found it a detraction from truth and a waste of time.

Yeah, like Inliytened already said, what's lacking to me is "I am God"... unless you insist that you're in a selfhood state right now and don't want to say something "ingenuine" right now? I don't know. God is in everything, God is in X, God is outside Y seems really dualistic to me. "God knows everything" also sounds weird, perhaps you can elaborate. I don't agree that this is illusion. And I don't agree that God is "beyond" physical experience. I'm thinking more about it and this "where is other?" question is actually quite a good pointer, if you understand it. I don't agree that "Avatars are concerned with what you can see, smell, touch, hear, feel". There is (or actually isn't) self, which is illusory, and then there is CONSCIOUSNESS. The "self" doesn't actually interact with anything and it's only concerned about "itself" - it's basically a state. Then, even in a self-less state, senses are experienced. Consciousness experiences itself, which includes senses. From the POV of consciousness, everything is the same; there is no "avatar" and "other avatars". But perceptions and senses are still the case (and also aren't distinct from everything else). The witness/nothingness/awareness and experience are completely one. Nothing is everything, and vice versa. And You are it (not the ego - the "real" you).

I don't remember the video too well. I'd have to rewatch it. The insight is still quite fresh for me, so I'll just let it be processed. First my understanding, then I'll (maybe) confirm with Leo. 🤠

Idk. I wouldn't ask that, but maybe this question points to something worth contemplating too. When I try to answer it, it's a mindfuck. 😃

For clarity's sake. My insights regarding solipsism/oneness arose during intense meditation and contemplation from scratch (primarily on LSD), mostly only focusing on "What am I?" for hours. Every time, the awareness is basically the same but deepened, and also other things come to light. This understanding isn't my lived experience right now; I'm in a state of selfhood and my thinking is corrupted for that. But the insights and vision are fresh because my recent awakenings were at the start of this week. Also, I'm actively investigating the nature of self-thoughts every day "sober" during meditation. I can also recall the states I was in, and do - for integration purposes. Lastly, I'll also add that I awoke to an insight that's more or less contradicting solipsism. I've seen glimpses of it before, but this time it became really clear. And both it and the insight of solipsism are true. So it's not this or that - it's this and that. A cosmic joke. I've said it in my first posts here. I wish there was a better word for solipsism that's hitting the bullseye and isn't an -ism. Or maybe I just don't know it. Nevertheless, to me, it's not beliefs. More like remembrance through the fog.

I pretty much agree with everything in this video. Yes, there is only one Dreamer*. Yes, for all intents and purposes, you should act as if there are others - this is right behaviour. I also said this before, which this guy repeats when he says that there are "egos" once you yourself see yourself as "an ego": Yes, there is ONLY Pure Awareness, which the guy states. ONE Experience, ONE Consciousness, ONE DREAM. So what the fuck is the problem? *However, I also agree with @Inliytened1 here. In fact, this is my most recent awakening. That the witness/dreamer/nothingness/awareness is the exact same as what's being perceived. There's no dreamer and observed reality. It's more like reality seeing itself. A complete oneness of formlessness and form. One "thing" witnessing itself, no duality whatsoever. God.

I wonder why nobody (except @Inliytened1 of course) responded to the clip from Bashar I shared. @Carl-Richard, could you describe how reality "works" according to you, in the simplest way possible? Without jargon, and in as few sentences as you can? If you could mention: God, experience, "me" and "others" (what these are, whether they exist, etc.), that'd be great. Instead of simply denying the insight of solipsism/oneness of reality, I'd love to hear some of you clearly state what your actual understanding is. Or, if it's your view that no true understanding of reality is possible and that every statement is a belief, clearly say so.

Seems like you suddenly felt insecure with the feedback you received, and needed to compensate by posting these videos. Your situation is your own making. You'll stay in your helpless victim position until you decide to change. Up to you. Asking for attention with these threads is quite low, since it's not your intention to learn anything anyway.

Bread was just an example. 192 euro should last you much longer than 2-3 days.

That is true. However, it’s not so simple as to say that everything revolves around you. That others serve a purpose for you, personally. They can assist you and often do, but that’s not their sole reason for existence. Reality simply is. It’s all about God. Of course. But assigning limited reasons to why particular things or people exist is faulty.

A view of "personal dissociative complexes", as you call them, is only valid if consciousness (All That Is) is in a "selfhood state". If it isn't, there are no "minds".

No, that isn't solipsism. That is your personal definition of it, which has a lot of fluff added to it. The universe doesn't revolve around you. You're adding a lot of selfhood to the definition. To me, what you're describing is a naive, self-serving interpretation of solipsism.

If they're in your field of consciousness, they are "real". But fields of consciousness outside of "yours" is an idea in your mind. THIS is all that is. I don't know how I can say it clearer. I sense that you're purposefully trying to misunderstand this - if so, I won't stop you.

There is content to your consciousness that you're unaware of. But it's all still consciousness, and one "thing" in the end.

There's an infinity of you that you're unaware of. But awareness of it doesn't change a thing. It's always the case. No matter what.

I found a clip from Bashar. "You are physical reality itself. There is no physical reality except for your experience of it, and THAT is what reality is."

My point is that while solipsism/oneness is absolutely true, there is also an insight/awakening that more or less contradicts solipsism, and it's absolutely true as well. Both are true. It's a cosmic joke that you either get or not. It's a mindfuck, but Reality is Mysterious and Paradoxical, so it's actually nothing new under the sun. At least that's my experience.

I've heard Bashar teach solipsism on occasion. He doesn't use the word per se, but he says it in between the lines. The insight referred to as solipsism is true. The One Experience, is all there is. But also, it's not the end of the "story". There's more.