Lila9

I heard that children by the age of 3–4 often experience hallucinations. I think that this may be because the ego hasn't formed yet, so the connection between this world and the other world is still very open. When I was 3 or 4, I remember talking to beings that were not physically there. I don't know if it was just childish imagination or if I saw someone or felt entities. I remember that someone told me that when they were a child, there was a green human always in their room watching them and their sibling, and they thought this was normal until one day it disappeared. Later they realized how abnormal this experience was.

@No1Here2c Maybe those dreams were glimpses of memories from past lives. Not necessarily as a human.

If the implication is that women have more power and privilege in society, then this is not accurate. Most issues women are dealing with, such as misogyny, rape culture, unpaid emotional and care labor, systemic oppression, and gender-based violence, can't be resolved without men cooperating (which they are mostly not willing to assist women with). On the other hand, men's issues can be resolved by actions men can take but often don’t because of patriarchal gender expectations to which they conform, since they do benefit from the patriarchal system to a large extent. Patriarchy harms both, but for women it literally oppresses, while for men it mainly imposes constraints along with privilege. Men would tolerate the constraints as long as they are given the comfort of privilege over women. As long as men, as a collective, do not understand that in order to remove the patriarchal constraints from themselves, they need to give up their privilege over women and consciously address the horrors and issues women are dealing with under patriarchy, there will be no change.

Billionaires Are Airheads That’s why they are such poor leaders. That’s why material abundance doesn’t necessarily equal spiritual or intellectual abundance. F them.

Yes, but only if “more sober” means more insane. There is a link between creativity and insanity.

OMG 🥹

1. The dog breeding industry is a real, corrupt evil, and people need to stop buying dogs and adopt them instead. There are tons of dogs in shelters, good and healthy dogs, but people still buy dogs for crazy amounts of money just because of their breed. I used to volunteer in a dog shelter, and the number of dogs there compared to the number of people willing to adopt them is huge. Many, or most, dogs in these shelters are killed by humans for no reason, only because some selfish people want a pure breed. 2. Dogs are not suited for the city or for the modern lifestyle. Many of them are alone and bored at home while their humans are working. This is horrible. They need fresh air, space to run, attention, and love. 3. People treat their dogs like children. This is natural because dogs and cats are childlike in some ways. They are vulnerable and fully dependent on humans for survival, like a human child in their early years. As long as they do not abuse the animals or cause them discomfort, I don’t see a problem with it. Dogs and cats are a source of love, and the attachment is often mutual. 4. The phenomenon of people walking their large and potentially dangerous dogs in crowded areas without a leash is not okay because it can be frightening for children, small dogs, or people who have a phobia. I have a phobia of unfamiliar, big, and potentially dangerous dogs, even though I have two dogs myself, so I don’t want to imagine what other children or people with dog phobia may feel. 5. On the other hand, there are people who simply don’t like dogs or even hate them, and they can make life miserable for dog owners and their dogs. Some of them can be very violent, to the extent that they may cause harm or even poison a dog. I understand that barking can be annoying to some people, but for some dogs this is their natural instinct, and they bark more than others even if their needs are met. My dogs which were adopted and are mixed with a guard breed that barks excessively (the other mixes are unknown), and I have nothing to do with that. I can ask them to stop, and they will, but I can’t completely prevent their random barking when they feel alert, which some people simply don’t understand. 6. Most people shouldn’t have dogs (or animals) for the same reason many of them shouldn’t have kids.

Men and women are complementary. There is no superior or inferior. Women, biological females, can give birth. We have a portal to life, we have the womb, which is a great power that was exploited by patriarchy, but it doesn't mean that we are inherently superior. Our ability to give birth gives us better resistance to pain than men because birth is one of the most painful experiences a human can ever have. We are the beginning, the first sex. When there is a fetus, it always starts as female and later, if it is destined to be male, it converts to male. We have other biological such as living longer. Males, on the other hand, have other advantages, like physical strength. Women attempt suicide at higher rates than men and are more prone to mental illness and autoimmune diseases, mainly because of repressed anger, which is often penalized. Women make most household spending decisions simply because men do not want to be involved in those decisions, and often this burden falls on women. Men, on the other hand, spend money on things like cars, electronics, gadgets, tools, and sometimes investments in tech or hobbies. They usually hold more expensive assets. All humans need both. Also, healthy feminine energy and healthy masculine energy need some of the polar energy to become balanced and healthy. If there is only feminine without the masculine, it becomes chaos without structure, and if there is only masculine without the feminine, it becomes too rigid without the flow of life. This is why a healthy psyche need to integrate both. Feminine energy is Shakti, the life energy,creative energy that flows in each cell of our body and breath, and masculine energy is Shiva, the awareness, direction, and structure that contains life.

First of all, no one should have kids only because they receive benefits for it. Society needs to be reconstructed in a way that, first of all, the basic needs of all humans are met and are protected by law, such as food, shelter, healthcare, education, and being in a community. The space also needs to be constructed in such a way that it is friendly for communities to gather, walk, and exist. Unlike the modern structure of many cities, which is built for cars and consumption. This is not science fiction and is technically possible to do. Secondly, society shouldn't push anyone to be a parent, especially not women. For thousands of years, motherhood and marriage have been tied to womanhood and worth. There shouldn't be social pressure on women to have a partner or give birth. But if someone wants to be a parent, they should receive the help they need from the government and the community: basic education, shelter, food, and basic needs for their children. The idea that children are individual possessions is a patriarchal idea. Children belong to everybody, and society is responsible for providing for children so that they grow up and become good adults who contribute to and move society forward. Patriarchal people need to realize that while there are some biological differences between men and women and gender roles can help with order, they are not fixed, and both sexes can and historically have done both roles. People are more complex and nuanced than the black-and-white version of patriarchy.

May 15, 2026. I opened a new journal. I write about all that wants to be written through me.

I’m fascinated by black holes. I imagine or I heard a theory about aliens knowing how to use them for travel and for energy. I hope to be alive when there are some major discoveries about them. I painted one with gouache last year. I put it on my sacred altar. It reminds me of the greatness, vastness, the mystery, and the horror of the universe.

She is the real deal. Here is her Substack article debunking misunderstandings about matriarchy: https://lettersfromayoungmatriarch.substack.com/p/its-not-women-rule

“Women are conditioned to be the shock absorbers in patriarchy” Exactly. Patriarchy is built on our emotional and physical labor. Withdrawal is the smartest thing, energy, safety, and time-wise. The more women opt out of doing free, unpaid labor, the faster patriarchy will collapse, until society, as a collective, understands that care labor is the most important and valuable labor on which society should be centered, rather than on dead materials and possessions.

Her videos are gold.

This is a good series. He described the transition from a more egalitarian society to a patriarchal and colonist one due to the shift to agriculture (due to desperation and survival necessities basically) and he also agreed that the former is more natural to humans than the latter, which creates many problems that we are facing today. He believes that, moving forward, we will return to a more egalitarian system (which I believe is what feminists today describe as a more matriarchal society that is focused on life and care, similar to the egalitarian one) which is more socially and economically liberal and benefits everyone. He covered things that we discuss here and that were dismissed, especially by people who believe that patriarchy, male dominance, and rigid gender roles are natural and inherent to human nature. I also liked that he acknowledged that the manosphere did not come from nowhere and has roots in patriarchy which is basically like a cult to which both men and women introduced to from a young age without any reference to other possible social structures. In another video, he stated that the manosphere is a backlash to feminism and to the Me Too movement (which is the part of the fourth wave of feminism that people love to say in such a conformist way that they do not agree with, only to look like a critical thinker, while in reality they have no clue what the fourth wave of feminism is even about). I am looking forward to the remaining two videos in the series.

Upon checking, her IQ is unknown but is estimated to be over 130–140, maybe even 200. This is very impressive. I wouldn't dismiss that so easily. Did you check her work? Do you have access to her brain to declare that she is clueless about the actual physics and metaphysics of reality? Are you fully aware and informed about the actual physics and the metaphysics of reality? Is anyone here? I doubt it. Even if she is “clueless” she is still very young (32) and has a lifetime ahead in which she will become even smarter.

I suppose it depends on the prison, how strict it is, in which country, etc. There are prisons so horrible, like the Black Dolphin in Russia. I don't know how far one can go with personal development there. But even in the lightest prisons, there is the charged energy of all the crimes people committed (the karma and suffering they caused), their trauma, their mental disorders, the tired and overworked staff, and the distrustful, dog-eat-dog survival energy.

Sure.

I don't know whether taking children to church would be considered abuse. Maybe forcing children to go to church is, versus simply having it as an option for them. Regardless, churches (or some other religious “holy places”) are among the most negatively charged places in the world, along with prisons, hospitals, psychiatric wards, casinos, cemeteries, and even schools.

This is not a cult. But it has some cult-like elements that probably exist in many groups. There is conformity, spiritual bypassing, virtue signaling, bootlicking, passive aggressiveness, power dynamics, ego, scapegoating, bullying, over-intellectualization, misalignment between the teachings and the actual behavior, lack of tolerance for others, over-judgment, etc.

So don’t tag only me. Stop being hyperfixated on me. Stop over-obsessing and overassessing my posts while you don’t do the same for others. This is why I can’t take any critique or advice from you seriously because of the bullying and witch hunt you take part in. So many people derailed this thread, but you decided to target me and my post which was neutral assement intended only to the OP.

From birth to death, to birth, to death, to birth, to death. The endless cycle of life-death-life 🙂

Of course, the problem is always me. It's not my job to do your job. Work on your bias as a mod because this is disturbing.

The thread was derailed by unrelated comments to the article, despite what the thread opener respectfully requested, and no mod says anything. So convenient.

My communication style is sincere, yet I do put lots of time and effort in my posts, and they are often backed by resources rather than moody rants. My communication style is not very different from other men whom you would regard as "rational" and "intelligent" on this forum. There are men who literally say the most horrible things here, and you will brush it off because they are not women. I already explained that when I say men, I don't mean all men. It's the same way I say humans and don't mean all humans. I don't know what else I need to do. I see multiple men here, including you, as a woman, who generalize women, and no one blinks an eye because this is the default. Why do you hold me to high standards that you not only do not follow yourself but also do not enforce on other men the same way you enforce them on me as a woman? Do you suffer from internalized misogyny? If so, you got some work to do girl. I will not shrink myself or fawn to appeal, to be liked, or to be convenient so people who hate women or expect women to shrink themselves feel good. I know that I am a very kind person, and I have radical empathy for humans and animals, and I don't need anyone's approval for what is already obvious to me. I know that I was very kind and respectful on this forum, beyond what is even necessary to people who blatantly disrespected and demonized me which was a very traumatizing experience for me. This made me realize that this is not really about my communication style, as I was often gaslighted to believe, but about my presence as a female in a male-biased forum with opinions that challenge the status quo. Please let us be real and stop brushing this under the rug. As I already said multiple times, those who want to understand me will try to understand me in good faith, without demonizing me, without personally attacking me and my character, without calling me names and disrespecting me, without projecting their biases onto me, and without distorting my words to suit the box they want to put me in.