Chives99

Why create pain and misery and suffering? If God is all loving and loves itself, Why create problems that lead to people seeing the world as not as perfect, Is it to embrace oneself in a unlimited way even if one is suffering? why does god want to experiences these states? Surely a god that wants to create perfect reality woldn't have suffering and misery in it?

new this would be on the forum, only difference is that it will take cash flow from criminals i say thats a good thing

its essentially synthetic mushrooms, they are very powerful I had a couple and reality was reduced nothingness

@Emotionalmosquito I dont think you realise how difficult it is for women to prove rape, many dont bother because they dont want their lives dragged before the court and to be interrogated by the police to see if they're lying. A woman has been locked up in the uk for eight and a half years for lying about rape and being held in sex trafficking ring framing several innocent men, she even went as far as to hit herself in the face with a hammer to fake injuries ( who the fuck does that , thats gonna bloody hurt) its cases like that which make it so hard to be believed for a woman . One woman lured multiple men into pub toilets then try get attention by saying it was rape, but the police can psychologically identifiy lies and the cctv showed her laughing after the encounter so you wouldn't be laughing if you had just been raped, another case where someone seeking attention and trying to ruin mens lives has made it so difficult for real victims to be believed

no i appreciate hair that is lushes and well maintained

i have a hair kink so suppose plenty of people would think im weird i can litterally get off touching some beautiful soft long hair

they dont hold any relevance for modern day democracy , its just pageantry and tradition

its not about being scared, its about being practical, the government can just reorganise the police and enact law change if the police aren't serving their interests and those in power are elitist. The royal family are basically immune to arrest, we had a strong liberal labour leader a few years ago that was popular with young people but the media (which serves the elite) painted him as a dirty communist just because he had true values to make society better for every day people but of course we can't stop the rich elite from becoming any more rich than they already are. The french had the right idea beheading their monarch and now they hold those in power to account.

rimming feels good sure, but i dont find a butt attractive, boobs on the otherhand are just raw beauty, its like a mosaic

its populist the police wont make arrests if its unpopular because they will have to deal with the fall out, criticism , demand for police restriction and budget cuts etc. If on the other hand people peacefully demonstrating causes widespread offence they will also have to deal with the fall out, people rioting , counter protests, criticism of the police for tolerating it , then lack of police support then budget cuts and further restrictions on police autonomy . Its unpopular to arrests palestinian protestors due to the emotion involved in it, although I think they have draw the line at death threats and direct support of terrorism. On the otherhand people criticising the monarchy is just going to cause brawling and aggrovation between the far right that love ma queen and country and the left that like to make a noise . I do have to laugh though when people through eggs at king charles he litterally doesnt flinch 'is that all you got ole chap ive been dodging eggs since i broke up with diana'

rejections simply means sorry im not interested geez dont overthink it, nobody owes anyone anything

whats the appeal of butts? i dont get it? you want to tongue that asshole?

ive never ever met a hyper masculine man that was happy, always got a chip on their shoulder , always looking for a fight. They get off on conflict , they make group settings awkward because people have to tip toe when they're around them. The hypermasculine man senses this and stops engaging with the group as much because no-one wants to feel awkward .

he used to very aggressive and lacked complete sensitivity exploding at people which looked really immature but i dont see that so much any more, when he first started a kid in his youtube comments was like what do i do ? theres a girl in my class i like? do i just talk to her??? and leo retorted back in full caps of course you have to talk to her, what are you going to do? rape her in an alleyway???? . dude you dont talk to kids like that

modaphinil helps a lot for social anxiety, gives a burst of energy and mild sense of euphoria, not as euphoric as mdma though

if you are at a loud music venue every is on molly so it doesnt matter in those environments ,

@Spiral your not socialising with a muffin? i dont understand your point

logic is too rigid for socialising, consent can be revoked at any point which is why you have to pay attention to their cues and what they are saying not going off a formula like a robot. You couldn't sign consent forms for stuff as the person is allowed to change their minds but they have to let you know, regret does not create assault. Laws change between different jurisdictions but i think its generally accepted that consent is given when both parties are enthusiastic and participating , that doesnt mean you cant consent if you've had a little to drink or smoked some weed, but if the person isnt coherent and doesnt know where they are thats not being an enthusiastic participant, if the cctv clearly showed the two of you smooching each others faces off and then one said they didnt consent the footage would show otherwise. The law has the hard difficulty of pinning rigid laws with the fluid dynamics of socialising, peoples interested level can go up and down, the woman might be having a bad day and therefore not feeling like fliriting and participating and thats why autistic rules dont work , you can't lock down social dynamics (how people feel) into a computerised formula

rules are for autistic people, and autistic people struggle with socialising because logic is used as a tool to get what you want from a person not relate to them for who they are. relating to a person requires selflessness responding to things in the moment not using people as a tool. Giving up on yourself is a scary thing to do but things flow much more easily as the person doesn't feel as strained by your rules and logic controlling them, instead observing body language and cues and vibes in the moment , leaving it open ended for them to come and go as they please.

you can't logically formulate it, you have to respond to things in the moment and respond to social cues and body language the vast majority of social interaction is non verbal, words are just like sign posts and their meaning changes so much based on a myriad of factors. Its hard when you're overly logical cause social interaction and emotions aren't logical at all

" I don't like sexist guys" no you silly woman you don't know what you want you have to have the patriarchy tell you what you want now get back to your household chores

@Spiral isnt that the same thing.

so your saying women are dumb and dont know what they want???? not all women are the same some prefer more ruggish men, and some prefer more gentle types like bob ross, any everything in between in the same way men have different preferences

the best way to be socially calibrated is to give up on yourself, even if you make mistake , accept that, love that, apologise move on, with relationships you always go to give, a connection is not about you its about building something thats bigger than the two of you, your intuition will build as you learn how people react to stuff , you can't logically formulate it as emotions are very much in the moment and can change rapidly based on a myriad of factors . Thats why mdma can help loosen people up and make you love yourself and everyone no matter what. Reacting to whats going on, but love yourself if you make a mistake anyways

why haven't the aliens made contact ? maybe they are shapeing our civilization and cant interfere by letting themselves be known? If they've crash landed surely the governments would harness their futuristic tech and used their communicaiton devices to contact back home?? I watched a documentary once where I cia agent admitted he fed aload of fake info to a ufo enthusiast so that when the us military was testing advanced new aircraft rumours would just go around that it was aliens and not the us ramping up technologhy for the cold war