mr_engineer

I found it very important to inform you that your censorship of dissent towards what's being done is a support towards authoritarianism, not democracy. This is your Life-Purpose, this is the impact you're having on the world. You are destroying democracy with your own two hands by supporting authoritarianism. Is this what you want for the future generation?! Do you want them to live in a world where the state controls everything and they get to do nothing outside the rules? What if a Trump-figure gets power in that world?!

The woke people blindly supported their governments in the lockdowns and vax-mandates. And, they supported the violent, authoritarian crushing of protests for people's bodily autonomy to not get the vax in the face of vax-mandates. Why?! Because their favorite politicians were able to characterize the counter-movements as 'right-wing' and that's a big swear-word in woke culture. Also, never ever forget how they used social-media to censor dissent. And how the woke people turned 'conspiracy-theory' into a bad word, following the footsteps of the CIA. The world will not forget your sins, woke mob. In theory. In practice, wokeism is communism. In theory. And that's the far-right you're describing. In reality, right-wingers are just normal people who want normal things, like a family, religion, work, money, national identity.

You think they see the election as 'democratic'?! And they're going 'Oh, but we don't accept democracy, cuz we're fascists, so let's storm the democracy'?! Or, are they thinking 'the other side cheated, because communism is something that most people won't go with'?!

Tell me, then - why would they feel the need to escalate, if they saw the election as 'democratic'?!

You're assuming the existence of a 'democracy' when you say that. What you're forgetting, is that the world's leaders threw it out of the window in the pandemic. No 'election' is going to be seen as legitimate from this point on, because peaceful protesting doesn't work to collapse governments or to get any point across. Would you call what's happening in Sri Lanka a 'tantrum' too?! Or, do they have legitimate reasons to overthrow their fascist government for destroying them?!

Look harder, then.

This psychologically manipulates people into creating more and more edge-cases for the acceptability of authoritarianism. And, when people accept authoritarianism in more and more contexts, this gives them a free pass to take over everything. And those protests were violently crushed. Peaceful protests were met with brute-force. Never ever forget what they did to democracy when they did that. This is a destruction of democracy. The democratic way to deal with it was to sit down and have a proper conversation about it. My point is that you keep mentioning that 'wokeism is for democracy'. And I'm disproving what you're saying. This is not democracy at all, it's authoritarianism. The fact that the woke people are for authoritarianism when it's time to choose between authoritarianism and democracy, doesn't bode well for the future, I can tell you that much. Because humanity has a lot of upcoming problems, like AI, climate-change, more pandemics, WWIII, to name a tiny few. The battle for democracy is going to continue through those crises too.

They did outlaw protests in most countries during the pandemic. No social gatherings allowed. Look at what they did in Australia, Canada, the US, France. I'm not saying whether it was right or wrong. Because I know you're going to make a special case for the pandemic. What I'm saying is that this destroys democracy. What you're defending is not a democracy anymore, it's an authoritarian regime.

That is correct for business. But, politics is a pure, pure, pure power-grab. Politicians advance because of how well they manipulate the masses. The problem with politics and government is that once a Trump-figure is in power, there are no checks and balances. Because all of the checks and balances are under him! If a politician decides 'I want to destroy the event-management industry, because I'd like to push for more online events, it promotes what Mark Zuckerberg, the guy paying me billions wants', they can just enforce lockdowns! They can indiscriminately abuse their power and put pressure on the police, who are their lap-dogs, to ignore their corruption. If a common person has a little bit of psychedelic/weed on them, they go to jail for years. (Heck, even breathing freely is a crime at this point. They want to partially restrict our breath by enforcing masks.) But, if a politician invades an entire country for wrong reasons, they roam free! And, of course, buying the media is an age-old textbook trick they use to manipulate the masses' perceptions. Outlawing peaceful protests is just cold. That is where democracy flies out the window and we're into authoritarianism now. This was the one trust-factor that democratic politicians held. And, they've broken it in the pandemic. This makes it so they lose the right to the monopoly on violence. The point of protests is to be able to interact with them in a non-violent way. But, looks like they don't understand non-violence anymore. And they want to shut down non-violent communication. Fine, then. Be prepared for more insurrection-like situations happening!

And, becoming big takes only one thing - decisiveness. We keep assuming that the 'big guys' actually deserve to be there, because they're so much better than the plebes, in terms of character. They're not. They're just more decisive. The key to becoming big, is decisiveness. And to decide that corrupt people don't belong there!!

The problem the right has with the left isn't that they don't agree with what the left says in theory, the SJW-talk. They simply don't buy it, because the left's actions don't align with the words the left says. They say they're 'for equality', and they destroy men's lives for it. (MeToo) They say they're 'against racism', and they actively hate on white people. (BLM-riots) They say they're 'for LGBT', and they actively hate on straight people! (Backlash against the straight-pride parade) This is the real problem. No real solution to the social-justice issues will come out of this, until the people on the left truly walk their talk.

Given how unconscious the leaders are, it is important to generate more and more backlash against them. And for the population to act more and more decisively, to take a stand for what they want. This is a step in the right direction. The truckers set a good precedent. Politicians and their police lapdogs, who banned protests during the COVID lockdowns, need to be taught a lesson for separating people and isolating people in their homes, putting everyone in house-arrest. They have abused their monopoly over violence very badly in the pandemic. They need to be shown who put them there and kept in line by the people, who are the real boss. It's not the 1%, it's the 99%. This also shows us that right-wingers aren't 'cry-babies'. When push comes to shove, they can act and they can deliver.

Sales is frowned upon in the world in general, but charity is praised and seen as a good thing. The reason for that is that selling is a purely selfish activity, done purely to bring in money and meet your needs. Because if you gave your product for free, that would be charity. Everyone would like you, see you as very 'ethical'. But, you wouldn't survive. About the video itself - systemic change is the only solution. And that is a long and tedious process. Because as much as you'd like to feel sorry for sweat-shop workers and stuff, the reality is that that's all they know how to do. And the corporation will still say that they're doing that society a massive service by giving those jobs, which they are. In fact, people in third-world countries love the idea of working their asses off at a multi-national corporation, getting promoted and getting to visit a first-world country on a project or something!

@Leo Gura Good points. Made me reconsider my positions. What I'm gathering from you is that the panic and unsafety these 'negative elements' create in society makes it so at the leadership-positions, indecision becomes the most unforgivable. Even moreso than corruption, criminality and low integrity. (This explains the whole Trump-phenomenon, doesn't it?!) Because of which, they just lash out at the perceived enemy. And, this 'enemy' is the 'enemy' of their group whose votes they want. This is a recipe for a world in which the most low-consciousness, fearful and psychopathic people rise to the top of it and govern it. Because they're going to be the most willing to work in patterns and not question anything, they're going to be the most fearful when it comes to questioning anything. They're going to be the most over-zealous people believing in their political ideology out of their entire political block. Which is the opposite of what should happen. What should happen, is that the leader is the most measured and rational, so that they're able to handle the radicals on their own side. What we truly need is an education-system that focuses less on teaching theory (which makes a wrong epistemic assumption that 'the map is the territory', and which is the reason for the scientific-establishment getting lost in their elaborate maps, according to my research) and that focuses on helping students face fear. This will show people how to own their minds, how to act rationally. And this will reduce the stigma around indecision.

For example?!

Erasing words from a computer-screen does nothing except silence those who wrote it and make those who missed it more curious about it, look for it elsewhere and not trust the person in favor of censoring it. It also makes people very suspicious of you, that you're trying to hide something from them. It's very, very counter-productive. I'm willing to entertain that censorship has a time and a place. By all means, censor people who make threats. What I'm not for, is inventing scapegoats and censoring people just for the heck of it. Cancelling people pre-emptively, because you don't like their style, because they remind you of someone who did something bad. Or, because you don't like their politics. This is classic mob-mentality. The function of the government is to suppress ideas which would destroy government. Not ideas that would harm masses of people! In fact, they are quite willing to harm masses of people if it benefits them. (For example, the Iraq-war) That's the reality of politicians. These are really dirty and corrupt people who will do absolutely anything for power. Speaking the woke language does not make them an exception at all. For example, BLM-riots, lockdowns destroying businesses, coercion into injecting a vaccine that was developed oddly fast, etc.

In the short-term, it's easier to limit hate-speech. But, it's a cope. Not the solution. And, don't give me this crap that the point of this 'performance of wokeness' is actually for the betterment of society. As if you give a damn. It's all about virtue-signalling anyways. Let's not kid ourselves here. The actual solution is to stop making economic-inequality such a huge political trigger for people. And, the way you do that is that all people in charge of education start to enable students to follow their passion. When we have more people doing that, they're too busy doing their own thing that makes them happy, so they don't have time to care about status or 'disrespect from the upper-class' or things like that. Then, politicians can't radicalize them. Focus on empowering people, not on taking advantage of their perceived victimhood due to what happened in history. And don't rely on government to do absolutely everything for you. Get your ass up and do something for society yourself, if you care that much.

It starts with them owning their lives and being held accountable for getting influenced by the 'bad influences'. You cannot brute-force 'good influences' onto them and expect this to happen, you cannot brow-beat them into doing better. You have to first understand what's appealing to them, you have to create a better solution for them and then you have to communicate to them in a way that wakes them up to the reality that they're choosing to be influenced and they can make a different choice, a better choice. And, it has to look better to their eyes. This is one of the primary reasons the West fails to install democracy in Afghanistan and Syria. Instead of getting local support and making sense of the ground-level situation there, they carpet-bomb the hell out of the place first and then put billions into installing their own infrastructure there! Doesn't work in the end.

@Consept It is very important that we wake up to our epistemic-power and take ownership of what we believe. Honestly, that's the only solution to the problems you're mentioning. On all of the issues you mentioned, gangs, terrorism, etc. These people are not consciously thinking about what they're doing and the consequences of it. When they do and they see crying families as a result of it, they leave! This ideology that 'young people are susceptible to bad influences' puts them in a disempowered position relative to their own minds. Your industry may benefit from believing thus, cuz now, you have an enemy to fight out there. But, I'd much rather you focus on helping the individuals build a decent life. Through good role-modelling. And this starts by them owning their minds.

Yeah, but if you have a good relationship with the middle-class and aren't taxing them too much for the sake of the homeless, they can help integrate the homeless more, if you involve them voluntarily in initiatives that cater to the middle-class ego, like charity-work/NGO-work. The problem isn't the homophobia, then. It's the murder, right?! And you gotta look into that individual's past to figure out why they did it. And address something more serious that's behind it, like, say, the economic-instability. This is what the police is supposed to do, ideally. For every one homophobe that commits a murder, there's hundreds, thousands that don't. And, when you make homophobia itself a taboo, you never solve it. And, the problems LGBT people face don't get solved, they get worse.

Physics.

I have 4-5 students that I teach for a living.

That's kinda insulting to the psychologically developed people. And, it's inefficient to dismiss the value they have to offer to you in solving the problems. I do know that. Your interpretation of a 'dangerous ideology' is entirely your choice. By your logic, if you start following the Taliban on Twitter, you'll get radicalized by them and you're a potentially dangerous individual. Whether you tune into Twitter everyday or once a month.

5-10 people. On this thread.

Yeah. I'm working with people here right now!