Hojo

Member
  • Content count

    4,975
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Hojo

  1. @Carl-Richard Its an original name but thats just physicalism then isnt it? Where are these mystical experiences taking place if not conciousness? And if you had one wouldn't that automatically change the view?
  2. @Carl-Richard I'm not sure i need it explained like im 5 because I'm retarded and thats alot of big words.
  3. @UnbornTao This is why I seperated opinion into solipsism and fact into duality. When I fall and hit my head facts don't exist in the universe. I'd argue your opinion is the existential thing in reality. Facts ( duality) dosent exist to solipsism the same way opinions don't exist in factual reality. Which is more real your personal experience or everyone else's? If you get hit in the head and you black out does that happen in physical reality? No its your opinion that you blacked out. Your lights going off isn't real or fact in reality. If your lights go out in your mind thats a massive fact to you. But its not a fact its your opinion. One you are arguing is less factual than your fingers existing. You are saying your finger are a fact and I'm saying no in the same light as the lights going off in your brain and you not existing. You are still existing in physical reality with 0 personal evidence of the experience so its not a fact anymore. The fact is nothing is there. If someone is sleeping their opinion is nothing is happening ( that's true) but in physical reality they would say you weren't sleeping you were lying down with your eyes closed faking snoring. They cant know. This is where the difference between fact and opinion lies. The fact that you weren't in a void of nothing and other people were doing things is the lie of facts. We take hallucinations as fact dreaming as facts sleeping as facts. None are real to the 2nd person witnessing it happen. You can read brain waves but thats not a fact either as the first person experience isn't brain waves. If someone came up to you and said you were just laying there with your eyes closed faking snoring you would argue with them that you were sleeping. Why argue that and just not accept the fact that you were laying there with your eyes closed pretending snoring. The answer a strong opinion on that you were in a void of nothing either dreaming or experiencing nothing.
  4. @Nemra I'm saying youve said nothing. Is that clear?
  5. @Nemra the master proof. No proof. Can't argue that logic.
  6. @Nemra you didn't say anything of value to change. I simply used the word you used against me against you. Whats your agenda here? How can I try to prove your point wrong where there is nothing to prove wrong? I said you were in the brain you said no I showed proof you said I had an agenda and its a nonsense without any other response to the claim and now I'm like an fbi agent with an agenda. I'm not begging for a response after 3 back and forth I don't need your response cause you clearly have nothing. I don't beg for peanut shells of information. If you got nothing just say it. Even if you had a machine that could let you witness the brain from the outside you would still be witnessing it from the inside in the exact same way I drew.
  7. @NemraI dont know what see more of yourself there and less outside means. My agenda is discovering truth. I dont know your agenda you arent saying anything. I very clearly stated what I mean you havent said anything. Nonesense is not an argument. I am not saying you are the brain or eyes I am saying you are witnessing objective reality from a subjective screen. You arent the screen you arent the brain you arent the eyes you are in it looking at what the body is doing. The question in this topic isnt asking what am I its asking where I am located. Please explain how this cant be true and if you cant please tell me your agenda here by disagreeing with no counter argument besides nonsense.
  8. @NemraNot looking out the eyes per say but light is shining into the eyes into where you are in the brain. To say thats not possible is not true.
  9. @cistanche_enjoyerI saw both. Finding God is like a realization that life itself is so intelligent it created an entire other dimension to avoid death. Like the picture of a plant breaking through concrete to survive life does that on a dimensional level too.
  10. @Nemra Yes you can the body has eyes that can see outside of itself. You are inside but can look outside from the inside. Like a box with a security camera and a television on the inside of it showing the security footage.
  11. @cistanche_enjoyerKinda there is another dimension to life like imagination world all of everything you idenfiy with is there, everyone is there on like a hard drive forever. There is physical data and there is meta physical data like imagination and everything. We exist in that dimension and when we die we go there. The metaphysical world of imagination catches you before you die. You arent the akashic records you are the thing that can witness the metaphysical dimension and the physical dimension at the same time. That thing can go to the metaphysical domain and remember. When you go there your entire body dissapears and 'you' arent there anymore you are something else. The light you see is completely void of information and personality. All of that stuff is taking place under the curtain of reality. The akashic records are like all the information about you and the earth.
  12. @zurew I think I am in a computer on in a simulation that aliens created named God. I never parroted that from anyone. I do parrot things but all this guy does is parrot. This man has no single unique belief that means he isnt doing philosophy. Here is a unique perspective on philosopy youve never heard you arent looking out your eyes your eyes are actually like 15 feet in front of you and up. You are actually way tinier than you think you are. Even if you are staring at a wall your real eyes are in front of you and up someone looking at a bigger world. If you look at the sky your eyes are behind the sky and bigger than the sky as you witness reality inside your head. THinking you are looking out your real eyes.
  13. Well when it happens it will probably elon musk party and he will ruin America.
  14. An explanation is you are not even in your body right now. The body is not remembering it, something else is that has memory. And its effecting that thing so much, that its radiating love through the entire body. Something else is being effected by awakening ie your soul and your soul is so tiny and so powerful that it is able to cause the entire human system to convulse therefore reacting to the event it isn't even having. As if your car was ran not by gasoline or an engine but a tiny nuclear reactor that isn't even in the car its in another dimension entirely. If the body was a car your soul is like a person wearing a vr headset sitting in a house and putting a camera in the driver's seat of the car and then driving like that. Awakening is like the person in the house realizing they are not in the car while they are driving it. Somehow its like the person in the house getting so excited that it effects the car that they aren't in. Thats how powerful the soul is. The car then says something just fkin happened to me!
  15. @UnbornTao Like is it a fact that there are other people when there are not other people around. Every fact relies on reality still existing as it as when you are not experiencing it. If you went for a walk alone and fell and hit your head and got amnesia of everything would all those facts you have still be facts? If you had to relearn everything those facts don't exist anymore. I don't know if facts are real when they are not being experienced and I don't know if I have been indoctrinated into making them appear as reality. All I know is that my entire life people have been pushing me out of every individual opinion I have had. Is that a feature of reality? I do not know. I only know my opinions and the fact that people don't like them and want me to change my opinions to learn 'facts' of reality that take 2 or more people to have. Since I can't remeber when I didnt have opinions as my opinions are me I can't know. All I know is my opinions about reality come first then facts come later. Is a fact fifine tuning of opinion or satan? I think you are talking from a 3rd person perspective and I am talking about the first person perspective on these things. Opinions don't exist in 3rd person only facts do. If the opinions don't line up with the already put together facts life will force the opinions out of the individual and change them. If the person refuses to change their opinion will reality change? Physics has already been proven to be broken or incomplete as a fact. That means we don't know if the first rule of science is your opinion trumps facts.
  16. @Dodo Spiritual practice hinders my happiness. Never did it and don't want too. I force myself to do it and its a chore everytime. Meditating is gay. I am happy when I don't do it. I found God without meditation or spiritual practice and should abandon them all.
  17. I bought a fly swatter cause flies crazy this time of year. I put it on my table and left it. When I came back I saw a fly on the fly swatter and thought it was ironic but it turned out to be a realistic picture of a fly. I had a brain blast in the moment about stickers and representations. The fly swatter is a device with a representation of what it does on it ( a picture of a fly) . Thinking deeper i see that my body is a flyswatter with build in stickers for what the body was meant to do. Every interaction with my identitity is a sticker pointing out to me a representation of what I want /desire or am. Every human interaction is a sticker and what they represent as the sticker on my dashboard of life is what they are without the sticker on them. When I go outside the trees are a representation of the air that is in my body. Not a tree the physical form ,that is just a sticker on my dashboard what the tree represents is what I am. The sky is a massive sticker on the dashboard representing expanded conciousness. The limitless of what I am open and free. The sky and trees do not exist physically they are stickers on the dashboard of my life representing what I am. The food i eat is not a physical thing its a representation of my hunger. When I eat the sticker it represents healing regeneration and stability of what I am. I actually don't need these things they are just representations of what I am. When you learn this you can change the meanings of what the stickers represent. You can look at the sky see its just a massive sticker on your dashboard representing your open and expanded conciousness and change it to whatever you want. You can look at the sky see it engulf every direction of you and see that it represents anything you want. You can look at the sticker and say this represents Gods love for me and its engulfing every edge of my being and feel it. You can have reoccurring situations in your life and be representing them as things you dont want to be representing them as because of arguments against reality. Like you can go out to pick up a woman and it dosent work and you take that representation as a failure on your dashboard when you can make up anything about the representation of the sticker you just experienced. You can look at a table and think its just a table or you can recontextualize the sticker to mean stability grounding. Everything in life is a sticker from thoughts to feelings to physical things. Not only that but you define yourself ( your body) as a sticker on the dashboard of life and have it represent anything you want.
  18. A computer and AI is humans replicating their headset into physical reality. Its basically the replication of a human body from the first person perspective. Its very strange loopy. Its like a human ( a computer) saying this is what I see from inside my computer and I can make it and show you what happening from the inside. Its like using science ( a thing that says you have no first person perspective and dont exist) to make something that proves that we are existing and science is wrong.
  19. @Carl-RichardAlex connor is the math book. Just Go read a math book. He wont expand your view in away text wont. You arent seeking out a new perspective with alex connor you are seeking others perspectives hes memorized. Him the individual is just parroting philosophy. You dont need the person it wont expand your world view hes quoting philosophy thats it. Its like talking philosophy book. If you went to a youtube channel and the person was just saying philosophy theories would you say that youtube has a beautiful mind? No hes just quoting people hes like a robot. Its like getting a video cassette of people talking about philosophy and saying I really like this cassette it has a beautiful mind. No it dosent its mind isnt even working. Its just a cassette saying what other cassettes have said. Maybe a good place to hear philosophy terms explained but you can do that by looking them up. Now the beautiful mind is useless. If you watched a video about someone reading a mathbook you wouldnt say this is a beautiful mind. Hes just reading text. All alex connor is the knowledge of others that will get you nowhere. Wow words. Hes also state that he was changing to pantheism based on no understanding about conciousness. How can you do that? Only when you are stuck in word games and dont know what you are talking about. You can tell hes doing this by everytime hes asked to explain his position he brings up a philosophers theories in order to ground and explain his own positions. Math maybe have been a bad choice but the explanation works with it. Its like hes reading a math textbook without understanding what math is hes just doing the math.Philosophy is about understanding what math is and he is claiming he knows when he dosent so that turns him into a philosophy regurgitator. Hes making his philosophy around other philosophers not himself.Hes not doing philosophy. Hes reading a textbook meaning hes a philosophy teacher not a philosopher. Theres a reason in the video the people dont let him explain, its because all his explanations are just telling them opinions other philosophers had that they already read so they dont need to hear him explain himself. You can in essence read him and understand his opinion before it leaves his mouth. So he dosent have to say anything at all. And he desperately wants to get his 'points' in so people think hes smart but hes just repeating philosophy theories he dosent understand. His logic is looping. He is secretly self referencing himself.
  20. @UnbornTao Its not my finger when I'm alone its me. Other people tell me its finger so we can relate. Its just me if its just me. If no one else was around I wouldn't even differentiate between me and parts of my body. I wouldn't even make up that I had fingers it would just be me. If you tried to take my finger i would say you are trying to take me which is another layer of fingers just being fingers they are more. I'm not saying facts are life I'm saying opinions are logical conclusions. You not being able to be alone is supporting my argument. The facts are lies,' you can be alone'(group think, you actually can't be alone) the opinions are true. I don't need any of them to exists(solipsism truth opinion). I can be alone factually and not be alone via opinion ( God is there). Opinion trumps here and everywhere. By saying that these don't exists until someone tells you is going towards the opinion over fact argument. The only time you can force opinions is when the person dosent have any, like a baby and force facts on them as fast as possible. We were heavily indoctrinated into facts that aren't facts. Reality dosent have facts. Or if it does the facts must exist at all points in time in your field of view. All facts breakdown into opinions as we don't know anything and are making everything up.
  21. @UnbornTaoIts not my opinion that have 5 fingers and it never has been thats group think. Someone told me and i believed it. Having 5 fingers is group think. How can i come to the conclusion that I have 5 fingers on my own. I have 4 fingers and a thumb thats my opinion.
  22. @Carl-RichardYou dont have to adopt the knowledge at all. All the knowledge of others will get you is the same spot you are in right now.