JuliusCaesar

I had a nightmare once where I was being chased around in circles in a gymnasium by these beautiful well-endowed vampire ladies. It was a delicious nightmare.

Thank you for the clarification.

@aurum for whatever reason, it seems to be different for everyone. Though the conventional practice I advise against rather strongly. I don't believe in common sense because such a thing is impossible. As it requires common experience which is not part of reality. Every human is unique, coming from a specific culture and economic milieu, varying parents, hell even gender has some impact on how entities make decisions. But if common sense were real then not staring into the Sun would certainly fall under it.

You and I may not be, but there may be others here that have or are serving.

Truth is prior to human language because existence itself is prior to specific things existing.

If that's in reference to me, I may just change my name.

@Tech36363 I once tried to do the conventional method. So, I went out in the early morning about 40 minutes or so after sunrise and stared for 10 seconds. And while I did feel a burst of energy, and indeed didn't feel hungry for hours longer than normal, I was seeing spots for about 2 and a half hours after the fact. And so, I concluded that people doing this practice are imbecilic morons. However, I did some thinking about the fact that it did seem to kill my need for food and frankly made me feel amazing physically and mentally even though I only did it for such a short duration. As such I decided to try it with my eyes closed. See, if you stare into it with eyes closed, your lids block most of the ultraviolet light which is what destroys your eyes. Doing this eye closed practice, I've been able to stare into the Sun for in excess of 40 minutes even when it's highest in the sky without causing any measurable damage. And while it's not as powerful as eyes opened, it still has some impact. However, I've mostly abandoned the practice as of late. Though I did manage to cure some Squamous Cell Carcinoma I had been developing on my phalanges by doing this. So, it certainly seems to be beneficial to physical health at least in some capacity.

I have one word for you. Ibuprofen. It works wonders. On a side note, you know what the difference between a soldier and a medic is? Soldiers believe that water cures everything, whereas medics believe that Ibuprofen cures everything.

You're welcome. In the sense that it's just an electromagnetic radiational message bearing your image, it could be called an illusion. As it appears to be an exact duplicate of your physical body but is not so solid. In a more absolute sense, there is no such thing as illusion. Even what humans call optical illusions, because the truth is whatever reality is. And all you have of reality is your experience of it, therefore any experience you have is truth/real/absolute.

It's funny you write this, as I just came from Church, we did the Christ the King mass. And I'm of course probably the only person in there that's God realized, but that doesn't stop me from practicing Catholicism and pretending not to know what I know so as not to offend the laity.

Get yourself a monthly subscription with Pimsleur and do their Chinese.

Maybe try some AL-LAD instead?

It does as you know. But anyhow, it's clear that you seem to have a strong desire to know how I feel about the matter. My human entity does not feel that rape is inherently evil. But that it can be in that it can inflict harm upon innocent people. So strictly speaking, as a generality I would say that it would not be ideal. If I felt strongly about such a hypothetical situation, were I in that very reality, then I'd likely do something to change it. I render verdicts in honour, with justice, and equity for all. You wanted to know what my position is, and now you have it. To help alleviate your misapprehension with my way of thinking. Know that when a Judge has been sitting on the bench for a considerable period of time, the attitudes and procedures of a Judge wind up bleeding into other areas of their life. So, you should understand that I may utilize legal thinking in everyday life as a sort of professional hazard.

What will do you to gain clarity in these matters? And not for nothing, but you are what you are regardless of thinking or not thinking. God is God, and God's thoughts are God's thoughts always. Even when that includes God thinking it isn't God.

When under the influence of certain psychoactive substances. Humans gain increased levels of clarity and perceptional capability that from an ordinary human's perspective is insane or bordering on insanity. Enjoy.

I can't find any dictionary reference for this term, so it would seem that I've accidentally invented a new word. So I'll define it below. Superstimusly, ADJ, of or pertaining to Supernormal stimulus or the quality thereof. For more information about Supernormal stimulus, please read the following Wikipaedia entry. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supernormal_stimulus

And to hopefully provide a higher degree of clarity, know that time is nonlinear, and every point in time is concurring simultaneously and superstimusly.

This word implies that in your understanding, there is a contradiction between the notion that body is merely thought and direct experience being all encompassing. This is incorrect. Let's take apart your statements so we know with what we're dealing. You mentioned "5 minutes ago", "was actual", and "direct experience". I'll define these things to the best of my ability currently. "5 minutes ago" is in reference your human entity's experience of some past perceived event. The fact that it was very recent in human terms is irrelevant. The bottom line is that this is in reference to the sphere you call Earth's spacetime continuum illusion. "was actual" falls under the same analysis and general definition as the above. "Direct experience" refers to an individuated entity consciously observing a dream/reality or reality/dream. Now I'll define a term I've used. "Thought" "Thought" refers to consciously rendered logical judgment(s) by an individuated entity. These may arise in the form of an idea(s), concept(s), or any other shape or form that can called a logical conclusion, or anything that is logical or truthful in any way shape or form. Which also includes anything that may be appear illogical or untruthful, as these are merely low-quality logical judgment decisions. Now I'll define "Individuated Entity". An individuated entity is the One Infinite Creator taking the form of a limited aspect of itself. Typically forgetting the true divine identity and reality, it bears. Some examples would be any single human you can think of, e.g., Julius Caesar, Leo Gura, Donald Trump etc. Because it is possible even for human entities to manipulate the physical environment by thought alone. It's clear then, solely on that basis that everything we as humans experience is merely a mental construct or in other words a thought. Or in other words, that reality is a dream. Because reality is a dream, everything within reality is essentially a thought or thought form. Except for the self, because the Self is the Infinite Creator. Therefore, all of your direct experience is just thought of yours's you made yourself to forget that you ever thought it as the Infinite Creator. At least, this applies to most of human dreaming, there are instances of lucidity where the entity becomes aware in varying degree and extent that their mind created it all.

It is not necessarily clear that the man in question is in fact guilty of this. If we were to rule based on the ethics of his day and culture, it is certain that Genghis is innocent of the charge. If, however, we were to rule using the ethics of people living in the United States in the 21st century, then in all likelihood yes, some of his conduct would be viewed as rape. However, which ethical standard is the correct one? Which legal system is the correct one? You don't have Jurisdiction over 13th century Mongolians. Therefore, in our judgment you don't have any right to charge him with anything. Do you understand?

If that is so, then you ought to forget the whole thing, as this notion itself is an idea. What if there are toxic and non-toxic thoughts and thought-forms? The essence of being is doing, not dying. So, this is very true.

What makes you think your body is anything other than thought? Or people, are they not just thought forms?

Nothing and Everything. The relative is absolute. Too general, you would need to be more specific to make that thought stream functional. It seems these days everyone's tried psychedelics. But have you tried thought? Hence why I responded in a quasi-meme manner. What if your current life is a future life? What then? What if the inverse of what you suggested is more direct? Who is to say whether turning yourself into nothing is easier than to turn yourself into everyone and everything? Then truth loses all meaning and value. This is the burden of the price to be paid for clarity. Is it truly denial? Or is it self-affirmation?

Yeah God, why so stupid?

If truth is paradoxical, then why not try and do exactly the opposite of all that and see if it yields the desired effect? Suggestion brought to you by Leo is God, God is Leo Incorporated, thank you for your business, citizen.

Are you certain this is the appropriate inquiry? You don't want to make it more specific? Nonsense. You are not fly, but man. Mankind is far more capable than any fly.