Windappreciator

Member
  • Content count

    1,148
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Windappreciator

  1. Is it really that hard to withhold you judgement? How does your example hold with his other numbers or in people where 911 is not involved? What are you afraid of?
  2. It sounds to me like you have already decided where he is coming from despite not having inquired further. You lack the background of circumstances and his perspective yet already you conclude. There is no reason for you to assume the emotional connection was established before hand and not after the incidences, in fact judging by the thread it seems like the opposite is the case, since op said they didn't make much of it at first.
  3. Haha, when he sees a lot of numbers everyday why would those be the more familiar ones?
  4. One should definitely not take abilify and ssri to numb them down.
  5. That's correct it is not, at least what we require to be as proof culturally speaking, but it's a form of verification, which is what proof relies on as well and which is all one seeks.
  6. Beautiful. Let's forget the dogshit PUA, whether it works or not doesn't matter because it's a low ass position to come from, and just be authentic in our communication with others.
  7. I see a lot of perfect fractions when I look to check the time. 11:33= 1/3. I have seen people into spiritually who, I believe they call it synchronicity, say it's a thing. And honestly, it has this sense to it that it is a thing. I am not sure it's a communication in the form of you communicating back. If it is a thing, they rather want you to pay attention to something im your life.
  8. Once on a hot summer day, two bats were hanging from a branch like broiled brats, when suddenly they saw a trace of a paw on the garden below from a cat who was chasing after a rat then the other bat thought and chat to its friend that it be funny to scat from our slat onto the grass bed for the rat and the cat to step at and so the plan was set.
  9. Go low fat vegan.
  10. This is not merely competition it's exploitation. Competition can be done when both parties agree to create in their own originality according to a standard of judgement they agreed upon.
  11. You guys, one can definitely become more in tune with their feminine and masculine side. It's not something you are clear about by default with yourself.
  12. Your problem here is wanting to be feminine enough for some skewed ideal not your level of femininity. If you are not attracted to strongly male dominated men, consider yourself lucky. Women who are accracted to male dominated men are not necessarily strongly female dominated themselves.
  13. @Vzdoh No, your whole comment is an attempt at justifying to yourself not accepting that. You will be a waft towards exactly that type of dating and relationship dynamics the PUA is talking about if you don't let go fo your man ideals.
  14. @Vzdoh Understand that men have a female side as well and it is not only in his nature to always complement your female side with his masculinity. Sometimes it's the other way around. If there is a balancing interplay between a man's female and male side and a woman's female and male side, is when the relationships are stable. Do not expect men to always be in male mode for you.
  15. @tatsumaru Are you sure this follows from competition and not exploitation? What is your understanding of the nature of competition, a definition. Can you not have a conscious way of competing and even out the results after a win?
  16. Nothing wrong with being an older women, you guys.
  17. @mivafofa It is not my intention to deny the atrocious acts psychopaths and alike commit, I am all for protecting people from such harm. Should anything I said trigger something personal I deeply am sorry for that. When I first wrote the post it was directed at Leokovski so I did not consider to formulate my response in more detail.
  18. what, no thankfulness for closing this hole? or is your name not seeker? all we do here is on paper, so if it sounds good to you there is no reason for you to deny follwing implications. it's pretty obvious that is an overarching concept. a lack of inquiry is part of what keeps people from approximating
  19. You go onto their frequency and from that slowly raise regularly over time more and more.
  20. You don't even know yet what and how his take would be implemented and already conclude. For someone on a spiritual forum you really do not try to understand someone's POV.