Harlen Kelly

And because of the fact that the there are so few of those men as you just admitted, the OVERWHELMING majority of attractive women get primarily attracted not to the virtuous lion who has the ''capacity'' of violence (because they are so scarce as you just said), but to your typical, every day, borderline sociopathic fuckboy which is what Leo said and you have denied. Would it be better if we lived in a society where more men had integrated their masculinity fully while being very conscious? Yes, but that is incredibly rare and is not representative of today's society. That would be equivalent to me asking for a 9 or a 10 that meditates and does consciousness work, are there 10s like that? Yes, but that is incredibly rare and is not representative of today's society.

@Raptorsin7 Emerald doesn't understand that critical point. She is not a representation of the average woman.

@EmeraldThe average good looking woman is not doing consciousness work and meditation, consequently she will not be attracted to the ''attractive man that is like a very ferocious lion with an expertly skilled lion tamer'', instead she will naively fall for the ferocious lion that is deeply selfish and will eventually hurt her. How is this so difficult for you to understand? The typical fuckboy that women secretly love is not a conscious man capable of violence. It doesn't have to be that way, but that's the way it is at this moment in time. You are inferring from what I said that I am glorifying unconscious behavior and untamed masculinity which is just pure projection. I am NOT making a prescriptive argument, I am making a descriptive one based on scientific studies and observation. I am not emotionally attached or in denial about what the sexes are attracted to, I simply observe it and that's about it.

@Emerald Something else I wanted to mention, the vast majority of men and women are unconscious and they are getting attracted automatically, impulsively. The average guy who has the ''capacity'' for violence ends up being violent towards his girlfriend whether verbally, emotionally or physically, there is no ''containment'' or a conscious management of masculinity with the average man who is your typical asshole fuckboy, nevertheless, women flock to him. The guys you are describing are not the guys the average good looking woman is dating, because most guys who have sociopathic, very assertive behavioral patterns are deeply unconscious and selfish.

@Emerald There are no misconceptions. You are simply in denial about this. There have been studies conducted about the percentage of women who are turned on by violence and borderline rape and the percentage is scarily high (not that I condone sex without consent, simply an observation). Studies with huge sample sizes. Don't call it a ''misconception'' when you are evidently and clearly in denial about this. It's like if I started staying that I am not attracted to a perfect, symmetrical pair of titties, that would be ridiculous and disingenuous on my behalf.

@Emerald Why is it so difficult for you to admit that the average woman is unconsciously attracted to behavioral patterns that can be considered ''toxic'' or ''sociopathic'' ? Why does it bother you so much? I am not bothered by the fact that men get instantly attracted to a woman only based on her looks even though that might not be the best strategy when it comes to selecting the most conscious partner, so I can observe/admit the shallowness of the attraction triggers of men, but you can't seem to wrap your head around the attraction triggers of women and/or are in denial about it.

@aurum I have a wake up call for you, most normies who get laid through their social circle have a pathetic dating life. Having an abundant sex life is a rare occurrence which most guys don't get because they are lazy. And no, social circle is not a reliable way to consistently meet new high quality women. Plus, knowing cold approach at a high level allows you to build social circles more efficiently because of your social skills. And what does being anonymous have to do with anything? I didn't get that.

@StarStruck Tay social

@StarStruck Most likely you are making the mistake that most newbies make at the beginning which is not to make the conversation man to woman, you typically do this unconsciously to avoid a hard rejection. Todd v and Tay have great advice on this. I want you to understand this, if you are not getting results from ''cold approach'' or socializing, it is not because cold approach does not work, because it has worked exceptionally well for me and thousands of guys who persist and keep going. If you don't get this through your head, you will end up quitting before you can harvest the fruits of the learning process. This is perhaps the most important mindset you have to adopt at the beginning.

@aurum I have slept with over 70+ chicks primarily from cold approach. Cold approach is challenging at the beginning because it has a steep learning curve, but it gets ridiculously easy after a while, it's actually incredible how easy it gets once you have done it for a long enough time. Most of my friends who were into pick up met their current partners from cold approach as well. OP needs to realize that he is not going to get results immediately because it takes time to perfect the skills of dating. Social circle IS NOT a reliable way of dating because it is severely limited and normies who are naturally good with women usually meet them through socializing even though they don't call it ''cold approach''. @StarStruck For how long have you done cold approach?

She was playing coy, which most women do. Next time, tune-up her emotions and go for the kiss when she is emotionally stimulated. This is incredibly simple my guy: Stop trying to turn every chick that gives you any attention into your future wife. Your job is to attract her and make her horny for you, her job is to consolidate the relationship. If you were dating 4 - 5 girls, this would not be happening to you. Go out and have fun! Again, have fun and stop taking the game so seriously. You are too young.

@vladorion It is actually the case, a group of people doesn't commit crime for the fun of it, there are sociological and environmental factors that play into the behavior of a certain group, which if you were not biased, you would actually study the subject properly and think of solutions instead of pointing fingers. Your talking points are the same talking points of the average dull-witted right-winger.

It was not a ''simple mistake'', it was a fatal mistake.

@Epikur Quick question genius, do you think a group of people would start protesting for the fun of it? And if you think that, what does have to say about your critical thinking skills?

@vladorion Maybe because black people in America are disproportionately targeted and killed by police? So, instead of having compassion and thinking systemically about the solution for this issue, you fault them for protesting.