Harlen Kelly

Member
  • Content count

    782
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Harlen Kelly

  1. Ok, then take a screenshot of the message stating that, and pm me to see it.
  2. I meant here on the forum. Tag a comment of a man alleging women owe men sex on this forum, let me see it. Is this a joke? Of course it is selfish to state you are ''entitled'' to affection from a man, you are as entitled as the men who state they are ''entitled'' to sex from women, this is painfully easy to understand. Men (or anybody for that matter) don't owe you affection. There is no rule in the universe that asserts that, it's an artificially made up rule that you created.
  3. Women are not particularly proficient at giving dating advice for men, that shouldn't be a surprise.
  4. @Vzdoh I can guarantee you with 100% certainty that he will distance himself from you if you insist on moving in together. Have a conversation with him about where you want the relationship to go and see if he is on board, you can hint at the idea of moving in together but let him make the suggestion first.
  5. On the contrary, who said women owe men sex?
  6. @Preety_India Men don't owe a relationship, calling you back after nailing you or intimacy. Men don't owe you any special treatment and you don't owe men any special treatment, it goes both ways.
  7. If you try to rush things, he will distance himself from you. Let him be the one who proposes moving in together. Based on your post, I don't think he wants to move in with you just yet.
  8. The attraction you feel for a woman and her worth as a person, those two components are orthogonal. You not being physically attracted to a woman has nothing to do with her worth as a human being, it simply means you are not attracted to her. Something else, regardless of how much self actualization work you do, if you are heterosexual you will find attractive women appealing. Being conscious does not mean you won't feel attraction for beautiful women. Last thing, you don't need ''0 insecurities'' to attract beautiful women. You are artificially creating an unattainable ideal you need to reach before becoming good with women which will only slow you down. Just go out regularly and get on the habit of pulling, you will get better over time.
  9. Most likely. You will not care about your appearance if you start pulling attractive women with relative consistency because you will realize that you don't have to be that good-looking to reliably attract women. The solution is very simple: If you want to internalize the belief that your appearance is not an impediment for attracting women, become good at attracting them and you will subconsciously and naturally adopt that belief system. By the way, a good personality and psychological developement is not mutually exclusive with a high level of attractiveness. In other words, there are below average, average and above average women in terms of looks that have a good personality and are relatively self-actualized.
  10. @Leo Gura What's your take on CRT?
  11. Lol, the thing is dude, that these chicks are getting dozens upon dozens upon dozens of dicks thrown at them 24/7. Put yourself in that situation for a minute. Attractive women simply have too many options. But it is not difficult to stand out because most guys don't have the qualities that would attract those women.
  12. This line of thinking is analogous to white fragility. Feeble to say the least.
  13. Unless you get yourself a unicorn, in that case you would need to get her a second pussy and your dick.
  14. Very solid vid, sums up perfectly why women secretly love their scumbags and then allege they never liked them in the first place when they turn 30 +. It's the definition of self-deception, incredible to behold.
  15. @StarStruck Women, particularly attractive women, have a certain disdain for weak guys. Most women are not even aware of this dynamic, they unconsciously mistreat the stereotypical nice guy and reward the scumbag with unlimited sex with no strings attached. However, getting angry at that behavioral pattern is as unproductive as getting angry at a cat for meowing, the cat will meow because that's what cats do. What really is incredibly comical is that those same highly attractive women will proceed to complain about how guys are a-holes, when in reality most guys are too nice.
  16. @Axiomatic You don't actually believe that all women have the behavioral patterns you described, do you?
  17. @Axiomatic Lol, making her cum regularly will get rid of that issue. Watch the vid ''how to make a woman squirt'' by Leo.
  18. On point. I have noticed that unfortunately too many men on this forum are very naive in regards to women. It's very unfortunate. They actually believe that their girl is an angel fallen from the sky who has never engaged in fun sex for the sake of fun sex until reality hits them in the face.
  19. Optimistic at best. The reality is that if you don't have sex regularly with your male partner, if you don't stay fit, etc... he will with 100% certainty cheat on you or leave you, that's what would happen in reality not in a fantasy, unless he does not have any options or is a doormat. A guy with options would not accept such a proposition. If what you want is a weak, unattractive guy, he will definitely put up with that. Men don't owe you a relationship, it's ludicrous to think otherwise. It's as ludicrous as stating that you owe men sex. An LTR is maintained through mutual effort. By the way, you can test this in your life, there is no need for ''I believe'' or mental masturbation. If you are a woman and you are in an LTR, last a couple months without having sex with your male partner and see what happens to your relationship. Relationships in real life are not fairy tales from Disney. Or you can also add an additional 100 pounds and see how your good perfect prince from Disney behaves towards you.
  20. Very unwise decision given the failure rate. That does not imply nor suggest that you should engage in anti-intellectualism. Your response to my question was based on anti-intellectualism, which makes this discussion a waste of time for me.