Gesundheit2

Then you did not waste money on VR porn.

Maybe consider using the term "my sexuality" more often instead of "female sexuality".

@TK2021 We're all a work-in-progress.

New phase. New breath. Feeling psychologically refreshed. New faith.

Wisdom.

Sounds terrible. Depending on your location, there might be feminist seminars that teach you how to self-defense against predators. They teach you stuff like hitting weak points (crotch) and running away, developing quicker reactions, using available tools, etc. See if you can find something like that near you.

but unfortunately, dead ==> Her value equals zero. Nothing objective here. Similarly, and put him in one class with 10 single women, 9 out of those 10 women will be attracted to him, because he's in their reach as a potential partner, which was not the case in your hypothetical case. You've ruled out his presence and made him an abstract concept with no actual value. You've ruled out the most important factor in attraction; the medium that makes attraction possible in the first place. Male and female sexuality sure are different, but the comparison you've proposed here is very simplistic and unfair in many different ways. I can't even begin to describe how wrong it is.

You only reap what you sow.

@Emerald You're basically just saying that it's impossible to attract all women. Well, duh. It's fruitless to even attempt that. Everyone is different, and no one can cater to everyone. I'm not disagreeing with that. I'm disagreeing with the relative importance you're attributing to the objective attraction in comparison with the subjective. You're saying the subjective attraction rules and dictates female sexuality, and you're marginalizing the objective as secondary. It's like saying the conscious mind rules and dictates the subconscious mind. Well, it might do for highly conscious people, but only slightly. And for the majority of people, it doesn't do anything at all. In fact, it only reinforces the objective as absolute truth. You might be relatively highly conscious among women right now after years of experience, and you might have gained a little bit more quality control over your sexual choices, so your subjective attraction might be able to override the objective, at least sometimes. But most women are unconscious as fuck, and they are deeply enslaved by their subconscious mind, which is why they make bad choices all the time. No intuition and no being in touch with feminine core works. Unconscious human is still unconscious human. Machines are harder to hack. Women are biased because they want to be hacked. They co-operate

@Emerald Pick up advice works on creating the subjective attraction as well, it's called building rapport (early phase attraction) and attachment (later on). Female sexuality is not so sophisticated; A low consciousness self construct that responds positively when stimulated right, and otherwise negatively. That is all. 99% of the times unconsciously so. By the way, subjective vs. objective is a duality you're creating. It doesn't really exist, except in your mind.

A cynical attitude would be to think that the collective is doomed either way, which is my perspective. I am cynical, Peterson is only delusional.

Observe. Recognize. Question. Repeat.

Lol.

Most of the video is correct, but there are a few wrong information. For example, polygamy in Islam is not restricted to war times. That's just trying to separate moderate Islam from radical Islam. The truth is that the lines are not that clear. A radical Muslim is simply a Muslim who takes their (could be female, too) version of Islam very seriously. A moderate Muslim is a Muslim with half-assed dedication. Which explains why radicals are few, because not everyone can be fully dedicated. But generally the core is very similar, although it might somewhat differ.

31487461876948982 All I saw in that number was the 69. But you're free to ignore the signs

@Vzdoh I really don't know. But maybe as a first step you could try to make him more comfortable with sex by doing it only in your non-ovulating days. That way, he might be able to relax. You said you don't have sex that many times generally as of now, so it might be a good start. Then after a while of doing that, when sex becomes part of his monthly routine, maybe it'll become easier for him.

It just shows how much these guys love what they do. Inspiring!

Don't know. But I know he recommends authenticity and thinking for yourself.

@Vzdoh Poor guy... Turns out he wasn't avoiding intimacy, only pregnancy. For a man it does.

Greens make poor judgements. Integral theory is one of them. Never take a hippy seriously. Orange rules.

@Carl-Richard I really wish I could agree with you and believe that that's how things actually work in reality. I just don't see these developmental models applicable. They're not in alignment with my perception. I am open-minded and sincerely trying to accept them as factual, why would I not want the world to be working that way? Right?

@mandyjw Why?

It's absolutely one of his best behaviors! He hits the nail right on its head. Rarely ever misses.

You don't really own them, though. Maybe just a kid.