Kuba Powiertowski

@Razard86 Oh fuck me, dear Razard, do we really have to treat each other like idiots who don't understand, or pretend not to understand, what the adversary is saying just to repeat the same thing over and over like a mantra? Just like you, I experience the ego persona. And it's a fucking masterpiece created to experience darkness pretending to be light. The ego is never about truth, only about being right, so that it can be on top, to feel supreme. That's why it creates these artificial categorizations, divisions, judgments, hierarchies, about which I see I have to write more in a separate thread. It will split hairs just to be fucking right. Nevertheless, we all share this matrix here... I am not, like anyone else here, free from this devilish octopus holding me by the snout, and let's not pretend to be surprised when someone sometimes gets irritated or pissed off. Are everyone here so liberated and enlightened? Well, I fucking doubt it.

@Razard86 "...Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. It is not rude, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs...". Corinthians 13 You want to be absolutely right about everything so much, my friend, that you are completely deaf and blind to what others say. You write about "bullshiting yourself" but have you even bothered to contemplate such a anthem of love? Where is it written that you have to reject anything? You confuse acceptance with the essence of forgiveness.

"Life is not about finding yourself, or not about finding anything. It's about creating yourself" - Bob Dylan. That's why you're in this show. To create it. Ok, to co-create it. The more selflessly you do that, more spontaneously, the more you see it's about the show not about you the more fun you have.

"Nothing to loose" is much better discovery than "nothing to gain". Despite be the same coin, feels better, kind of a relief. Conceptually at least, imo.

Where "to forgive" truly means "to forget as it never happend".

What if? Nothing was ever created or destroyed because the nature of existence is simply existence. What is manifested is only an endless cascade of dreams in dreams. There is no objective history, or evolution of man, nature, or the universe. Every story we tell ourselves is written in the dynamic scenario of human experience to give us a certain context of our experience. Experiencing in existence takes place through mutual relations. There is an infinite, multidimensional chain of relative relations. You will not fully experience your role without completely losing yourself in it. You will not look at the world through the eyes of a medieval farmer, remembering ChatGPT, space flights, the LHC, etc. You assume that the previous experience of human life was in the so-called past as people understand it. Your previous incarnation could have been on a very advanced planet, where beautiful people live in harmony with the cosmos, pursue their beautiful passions, and even master sub-reincarnation - transfer to another body within this peculiar paradise. Do you realize what resistance you would have to incarnate on Earth A.D. 2024? The same as now, when you think your next incarnation will be in the backward Middle Ages. Remembering "previous", often very different experiences from the current one, while believing in the absolutism of the current ones would be torture for most. If you are playing the role of the Godfather, mixing it with the adventures of Bridget Jones makes little sense, because "being macho" simply won't work. You may not always incarnate as human, or have human experience. As a human, you don't know how capacious human experience is, have no clue what infinity of existence really means, and in general, know very very little, almost nothing. The human scene is not the only one, nor is it the most important. Nothing is more or less. The whole existence is nothing more than a mega-theatre with an infinite number of stages, on which an infinite number of plays are performed so that you don't get bored because being eternal perfection for the sake of being is simply boring and pointless. You happened to choose this scene called Earth 2024 (enter your country, city, and family) and of course, you deliberately forgot what you are because otherwise acting in this play would make no sense. Just as we give awards to actors who can completely lose themselves in the character they are playing, you do the same. Some stories and novels are very long and extend over many years or even eras. Let's take Tolkien as an example. The same applies to our so-called earthly fates. Do we have any Tolkien fans here? Your attempt to understand what is happening without a real (not conceptual) reminder of what you are, however, included in your script, is simply doomed to failure. Seeing through closed eyes, levitation, and moving so-called matter with the help of intention alone is possible. Imagine that you are acting out a scene in which you are a conscious stone. Like in the movie "Everything, Everywhere, All At Once". Come on, stimulate your imagination! You put on a cardboard disguise and hold a still dialogue with another actor. You forget that you are a human being and you really can't move even a millimeter. Forget about jumping. But it's enough to simply remind yourself what/who you are, which is for certain reasons utterly hard. Duality extends much further than you think, far beyond this tiny, "material" dimension. It's all true. Relatively. As Pablo Picasso said: "Everything you can imagine is real". one, not so big "if" PS In this act of our play, we approach quite close to a little bigger picture from many directions:

💗we're all 1💗

@Javfly33 nirvana is a cessation of experience not existence. If some "meta-you" is in a state of absence of any experience and pure being is only aware of it's own beingness that means that something is left. But here is a catch. Our language is not able to express "this something beyond any experience" because its construction does not take under consideration existence of such states, at least not an English language. Maya is precisely an attachment to experience which is built from its content. That's my opinion, of course, I don't know for sure. I perceive existence as logical to the core. Meta-logic is a key tool used in Jnana to dissolve Maya. Sometimes we confuse "counter-intuitive" with what we conider basic human logic. Leo's video of devilry is a good example. It's logical top-bottom. Sometimes our perspective is simply too narrow to be able to comprehend higher levels of meta-logic of existence. And there is nothing wrong with that, I struggle with that on my path, therefore I try as I can not to form absolute statements because the fact is that I don't know.

Pure non-existence is not so pure. Even when this fractal spiral of dreams within dreams is transcended and pure empty being or para-being, empty para-consciousness is left alone without any content I wouldn’t call pure non- existence. Non-existence of content - yes, why not, but non-existence as pure nothingness is just a concept. Even if you dissolve your egoic multilevel structure and there’s no experience of anything left, the awareness of pure being remains. And this primordial awareness is not en experience of course. So, I would be careful with such claims as non-existence. Pure non-existence cannot exist by elementary logic.

@ChrisZoZo Thank U for this reminder. I rewatched this and yes, I agree with Leo in 100% on this topic. What I am saying that this downward spiral of selfishness exceedes human survival by many orders of magnitude.

@Ishanga That’s why, as Sadhguru says, it’s better to remain extra-ordinary😘

@Ishanga yes. When you are not capable of dealing with such amount or energy / vibrations - it literally throws you into spiritual multidimensional space. Because you don’t control your trajectory, very quickly massive electromagnetic objects / entities pull you towards them. Both positive and negative. The largest ones pull you gravitationally very quickly. Although gravity is a bad term. It’s more of an analogy of a model of space governed rather by electromagnetic fields of plasma currents. They are more kind of a plasmoids rather than stars and black holes, using gravitational framework. Nevertheless if you know how to navigate - positive or negative will tear you apart. I’m using here a certain analogy, of course. But yes, those experiences if not tamed, mastered will massively enhance your desires and fears, thus your karma understood as sum of your actions may massively rise with great probability.

This is the key. This process extends over a very wide space. I agree with You.

Duality is created by pairs of opposites. But duality extends much further than most assume. Even unconditional love has conditional hate on the other side. To some extent...

I can only agree with you, dear colleagues, to a certain point. Namely, thanks to my natural psychic abilities (which are mostly a curse), I have managed to look quite deeply into this gigantic, black well, in whose immeasurable depths the heart of darkness is hidden. Here I do not agree with the narrative that, on a human level, evil is solely the result of human ignorance and ignorance, and that evil is only a derivative of the survival function. Ordinary people, neighbors who suddenly skin their neighbors, women and children who are from the same, Christian cultural circle, are not driven solely by the survival instinct. Namely, imagine an entity who is the sum of all the suffering of all relative existence. All the suffering that has ever happened, is happening and will happen in the multiverse, the meta-universe, is gravitating NOW towards this one entity, towards this singular point. This entity is anti-existence. The only thing that drives it is an almost infinite desire to annihilate everything that exists. It blames God - Unconditional Love, for allowing this suffering in which this entity has been trapped/has trapped itself. Its suffering is intensified by the fact that as a giant black hole it is a fractal infinity, ergo, it has limits. Probably also its own meta-mega-illusion, but it will learn about that in due time... I suppose so. I find traces of this being in myself, as in the actions of all humanity. Okay, I will not go any further. To sum up - existence and survival are very broad concepts...

@A Fellow Lighter I follow some content on NewThinkingAllowed and always watch or listen conversations with Ronnie Pontiac, despite I'm not interested in occult practices. I'm just interested in diffrent approaches to spirituality as they are all valid. Ofcourse, some so-called non-dualist will say that these are all dreams and they are not real. Thing is, that despite dream reality is a relative one it doesn't mean it does not exist. It's like denying that one had a dream. Dream occured, dream happend and that is a fact. So important thing is to differentiate the relative content of a dream from the fact that dream was / is experienced. Now, coming back to the topic of occultism. As I see it, it's a very powerful tool that opens the gates between dimensions of reality. If it's done for noble, non-egoic goals we call it white magic, the opposite we call black magic. Thing is, that this requires spiritual, mental and emotional maturity to be done safely. Because you intentionally and fully consciuosly open your gates of spiritual fence to various, sometimes highly energetic entities you must know what are you dealing with. You must know the procedures and stick to the protocol. There are great deceivers on the other side / within you that can easily manipulate your egoic structure. I don't say don't do it as it's all for the people but wide research in this topic and proper guidance id highly recommended. I gave up my kundalini kriya practices as they became too dangerous for me. I wasn't prepared enough for it, not this place, not this time. I discovered the when I truly open to what is in a front of me, this guides me in a unforced and relatively safe manner. It's slow, maybe very slow but as an eternal being I have infinite time to learn to be patient. At least, I belive so😂😂😉. Take care😘

@A Fellow Lighter https://www.theosophy.world/solr-multilingual?search_api_fulltext=Occult Good understanding of what even term „occult” means is essential. For me these practices are the extreme ways of spirituality. Extreme fascinating and extreme dangerous. Like „high altitude low opening” wingsuit jump over mountains in North Korea.

@A Fellow Lighter Ronnie Pontiac is a living encyclopedia in this subject.

If anybody thinks that all this enlightement is a kind of escape from life challenges than one complete misses the point and belives in some lalaland. I don't know what sort of a neo-nondual bullshit some people listen here, with all my respect. Besides, even true nondual teachings require a lot of intellectual and emotional maturity to be able to integrate those. The line between a very deep experience of reality at its fundamental level and the possibility of going crazy due to the disintegration of the personality is very thin. This is jnana yoga, the yoga of knowledge where the foundation is the integrated, at the highest level, operation of logical reasoning and highly developed intuition with simultaneous emotional super-awareness. Along with kriya yoga and a few other tantric practices, this is a path for the few who are ready for it. These are the facts and no amount of conjuring reality will change that. I am sorry.

@PurpleTree so you are forced by nothingness..., so be it. If you ok with that I am ok as well😊. Good night (it's late here)😘.

@PurpleTree erratum: Maharaj.

@PurpleTree before you reach Ramana's Maharshi and Nisargadatta's Mahataj state of non-dual parabrahman ground yourself in your normal, sober experience, in what is. That's just an advice..

@PurpleTree so are you unconscious now?

@PurpleTree and do you understand my argument for consciousness? Per analogy it's exactly the same argument. Basic quality of consciousness is free will. It means that you are aware of choices you make and choice is when you choose consciously. That doesn't mean that there are no obstacles or limitations of what you can choose but that is not the point here. I know Bernardo Kastrup's argument for free will and determinism being basically the same on meta - level - that you can do what you will but you cannot will what you will and I agree with that to some extent.

@PurpleTree I am listening