SourceCodo

You don’t know me at all. Alas, you’re probably correct.

That’s a completely fabricated system. Even if I agree with your grouping! I’ll tell you something that rejects no one. That which is pure non-resistance. Without discrimination. Which is a trait of the highest unconditional acceptance and love. Death. Life cyclically grows itself, then dissolves itself into a myriad of forms and ultimately sends itself to death for renewal and reappropriation. Even if the temporary life forms do their damnedest to avoid it. Forever and ever and also over there. And it happens in a flash. Also, what is experienced isn’t technically real and is entirely impermanent. Just a continual forgetting and returning. Keeping the experience fresh. Prompogating McImmortal mental images. That’s just what I’m observing tho.

That person is the center of their experience of the universe. Just like you’re yours. That being said, do you think there’s something wrong with that person having a centered view on reality? Is there any other way for them?

Wat

What are you wanting to be proven? What do you consider your body? Where do you live in your body? Or is the whole thing you? What happens if you lose part of if? Is it still you or only part of you? Or not you at all? Is consciousness the body? Or is it the product of the body? If it is the product of the body, and you are consciousness, then how are you not more than the body? Consciousness is intangible and the identity you have is always changing through action, thought, experience… If that’s true, when are you actually a stabilized you? I’d argue that you’re just electrical evolution, not a real person at all. How are you certain that your body is not just another phantom, as if in a dream? We sense physical reality in dreams to be structurally consistent, but upon waking, we know it was all in our head. Because of how we experience reality, I’d argue that all experiences of identity and self are subjectively projected via the brain/mind/something else. The body is more like an avatar for this continually evolving energy. It passes from creature to creature, matter to matter, moment to moment.

I can’t seem to find the delete button.

ahhh nvm

I’m not sure that this “original” essence actually exists in any real sense relating to you, the experiencer. You were taught almost everything you know by watching, hearing, experiencing, whatever. And what wasn’t taught was extrapolated from what you’ve already learned. Limited to no originality. What of you is original? Outside of the exclusivity of being the only one that can be you…

The beauty in sexual experience is entirely subjective. Other than that, this thread is just a bunch of people talking about what they find sexy and or attractive.

The type of work will mean everything… We talking landscaping? Labor? Software engineering? Market Research?

Very interesting thread… What’s the verdict?

It was in OP’s post ?

How’s this tone? I was using strong tone to emphasize that I find it very important to draw the line between some and all when making statements about fetishized rape on public forums. My clearly disrespectful behavior was because people showed up to defend half truths of the whole statement we were discussing. It was confusing to say the least. I’ll leave you alone now. ✌️

Based on what I’ve said, you’d be right to assume all of this about me. And if you did, you’d probably be right. And yes, me sharing the projections makes me some kind of cruel self-assuming cynic. And do know, I am full of shit. Lots of it. I’m going to go use the restroom now. Talk to you later. ✌️

I don’t, never heard of him. I was just pointing OP toward relevant info regarding understanding what this friend knows. If it’s a book, I imagine there would be some summaries out there.

Sri was on one. Sri Aurobindo was the first teacher to stop me in my tracks and make question the limits of what there is to discover. Would be really cool to see @Leo Gura examine his work. Check out the table of contents for this book. The topics are mind boggling compared to what others usually wrote about: https://www.sriaurobindoashram.org/sriaurobindo/downloadpdf.php?id=36

I recommend watching a summary of Owen Cook’s energy worker if you want to better understand this friend. I think you’ll find many different meanings and interpretations of what energy work means or represents. Essentially, energy work is going to bring you into polarity with whatever you’re working on. Like being nicer to people, feeling happier, looking happier, etc. It can be worked on mentally / energetically and even physically. Your entire nature is energy… So it’s a lot like just training your body or mind. Some might also come in and wave their hands over you and say it’s healing you, too. Reiki is a type of this energy work. I’m not into al that though. The mind is powerful. Best wishes.

Thank you. I feel like these guys felt like it was their responsibility to convince me that this is a real fantasy people have. And they totally missed the ticket. I know that is a fetish and know plenty who indulge in the fantasy (role play). All they did was rush in to defend Osho or the rape fantasy assertion… ugh. So cucky. I prefer to shun or attack behavior like that. ? Everyone wants to play “I’m right” so badly and gives fuck all about how the things they say affect the people around them.

I feel, too ? Take is easy, player.

Seen the term used in many, many different ways, and usually without consistency. Mind transmission was a term used either early or late by some ZM’s to articulate the conveying of teachings. Perhaps that only came up during the translation. But that’s what it is to me. Clearly, many people use many words uniquely. What I read here was in the same camp of psychics, clairvoyance, divination, etc. Creating elaborate stories for basic things and pitching them like they’re legit, magical stuff. Who cares what I say though? Just enjoy and do you. I’m clearly playing a different campaign. Hence me talking about ideas I think are gross or unhealthy. And I just meant you. That’s what I mean by it.

“To be a me” Im talking about that me. Just that one. Been talking about it. Lose your mind, lose your self. That’s the end of this one. Good luck through the descent.

Dim

The identity is a pretty regularly evolving construct that embodies the persona, ego, self, etc. to me. Again, a construct. One of those real unreal things or intangible thing. Personality is influenced by it. Like data. Seems like you jumped to a conclusion on what I was saying. Alzheimer’s and Dementia patients can be the first signal fire for you though. People who have reinvented themselves, too. Anyone who has changed their values has changed their identity. Who am I talking to though? Why use semantic roundabouts to avoid the reality of your mind? Why is this version of God so ignorant? There’s only one God that is everyone, so why are you being so dumb right now? Is it just so I play with you? Open up and get real. Be yourself, God. I’m gonna send myself home soon if things don’t start changing around here.

Whatever those scales are for consciousness, I’d wager this person is close to the bottom. Such a terribly ignorant view. Terrible and ignorant. This is just a statement about character and chosen words. Don’t even care to discuss the implications of hyper inflation, ruling elites, politics, etc. etc. with you now. They’re all legit issues. You just seem like a real insect.

I don’t think you would really appreciate not being you. I’d quit playing with that fire before you actually lose your identity. What that actually means… Who knows. “me” is and always has been a concept for... The amalgamation of everything that is the one speaking or reading it. Don’t let semantics mix you up and get you trapped in fruitless identity arguments. I mean unless you find it fun or something. Cheers.