Nemra

She literally helps to continue the settlements and has laid out her plans. How is that a misrepresentation? Isn't she doing what most Zionists dream but couldn't dare to?

Thanks for the recommendation. I watched that documentary a few minutes ago. That scene was tense. I felt her anger. Zionists are such unique bullies.

@Leo Gura, so is God loving evil the highest form of love? If so, then why would God also love lessening devilry at the same time?

The Power of 'Magic Truffles':

DMT, The Spirit Molecule:

@vinc3nc, is making realistic gifs your full time job?

Psilocybin Medical Trial:

The Psychedelic Frontier:

Nepalese Honey That Makes People Hallucinate:

5-MeO-DMT Live Experience:

The Toad Venom That's Stronger Than DMT:

U.S. veterans with PTSD take a psychedelic journey in Mexico:

Tracking the Supply of LSD:

Saying "unconscious thing" is already problematic, because there isn't a thing existing separate from your experience.

We should consider that there is only one's experience in which logic can be understood, which means that logic does not exist independently in the world, waiting to be discovered outside of one's experience.

You do not understand how seriously ironic you have been. 🥲

For you, of course.

You could say that if you imagine 300-ness, then you cannot include not-300-ness within 300-ness because 300-ness isn't everything. But oneness can, because when we account for everything, then the everything can be viewed as one.

You are too humble and thoughtful.

Is your sole mission to confuse people with cheap tricks and make them agree with you? I'm starting to understand what Leo felt when he came up with "epistemic scoundrel".

They are different. That does not mean the absolute depends on the relative. E.g., if someone tells you something that gives another context to a situation, does that understanding or situation depend on that person? Of course, it does not. I'm saying that if those are opposites, then they are not absolutes or one of them is absolute.

Relative must depend on the absolute. The opposite would mean that the absolute is not absolute in the first place. I'm saying that selectively using the terms "feminine" or "masculine", which are relative, to describe absolute things is pointless and even confusing if you can't or don't care to distinguish relative from absolute.

One of them is relative and the other is absolute. Also, notice that the terms "feminine" and "masculine" are not tautological.