Lucasxp64

Holy shit. Leo as a milf is hot as fuck, holy moly. Goddamn... 😂😂😂 Makes me remember of the singer Colbie Caillat. Heavenly cougar mamma.

Bro, it's like he took Leo's video, feed into the AI, and ask for a summary and he is reading it. But to give him credit, his earliest video is 8 years old.

This is my major problem. A part of myself is too ethically minded and doesn't wanna do certain things. But at the same time, I want and need the money at this phase of my life so that later and even now, I don't have to submit myself to crap that would be directly damaging to me, or waste my time, or is both low conscious and low paying. We have to do so much shit to survive already, we might as well do in a way that pays well. BUT the trick here is to not become a consumerist zombie and use that wealth to buy expensive useless crap that will enslave you further with high lifestyle maintenance costs. We must use that extra money beyond survival to acquire safety. The ethical thing here, which is what many entrepreneurs do. They are just dedicated to using most of the money of profits just on the business, they are not going on a spending spree, they invest back into the business. There is a balance between getting wealth for the sake of acquiring freedom, paying with some of our high ethical values, so paradoxically, we end up less likely to get in shitty situations that we have to degrade ourselves as well, so it might end up backfiring on us, we will be so desperate out of survival pressure that it can be way worse for our level of development.

Yes it's true that introverts are, because it has to take your mind from a highly focused state of mind on your interests into this defused thinking mode, and having to be in environments where your brain feels hyper stimulated or not completely in the zone. Interacting with most woman is also very flimsy, they sort of just get carried by the social wind and it can be hard to get and keep their attention. I know it's not an excuse to say the reality/truth of something. Which means, we have to be even more persistent and strategic in how we go about doing it. Socializing with women is an emotional thing plus some creativity and sharp attention to inhabiting their social world. And actually, being more tuned to our feelings is part of high quality spirituality. Which is something we already need to not be with that autistic buzzing inside of our heads of all our intellectual stuff, goal pursuits, the struggles we have in life, etc. Chilling out with women should be coming out of that lonely constant mental buzz. At least how I feel, but it becomes also another mental buzz quickly. Like getting addicted to picking up different women, fear of settling down, or settling down to a bad chick due to fear. It just kinda sucks going through the motions of over and over again getting conversations nowhere, it so mentally disruptive to my flow state in getting my stuff done. The problem here is not the woman, the problem here that we don't wanna pay the price of having our comfort zone disrupted emotionally. Is it that we don't want to get our flow state disrupted?

I think my major personal issue around game is lack of consistency. The few times I had some success (with someone that lived close enough to actually met) was because I somehow did do great and had even the balls to approach. My bottleneck to getting better is my life in general and my inner emotional system, I still don't feel that comfortable outside in the real world. Like, I can appear confident and funny to women at times if they are also giving me good vibes, but that silence of the environment before the approach I still don't feel very confident with handling. In person everything in real-time. Online there is a lot of asynchronicity, time to think, and you are comfortable in your zone. Online in chat rooms with women I tend to have an edge, and that was detrimental to me due to becoming a distraction. Getting success online with women that lives all over the country for me has become trivial due to the greater volume gives better quality of woman quicker, and that gives me a dopamine boost. At least allowed me to maximize my verbal skills and psychological understanding of them. But the personal lack of comfort I feel when approaching outside and the lack of logistics due to being completely broke right now, puts me in a very dangerous situation that I might go back to that as a cope. I also know, that I might have some success with someone that might be a walk away from me, and get used to it, and not want to find someone that would make me more fulfilled, due to fear of going back into the zone. So at all stages it can stagnate. Like some guys were amazing at game, gets married with some awful woman even if she looks like a 10/10, she lobotimizes him and destroys with him, and he becomes zombie-like after that. That's an example I heard. Maybe in person if I had greater consistency and had at least some money to go out it might translate those skills and the quality of women through volume. Getting my own place to have intimacy will be by far the most important aspect of my game. The logistical lack in my life really cripples me. It's very hollistic. I think I got stuck in this negative feedback cycle, where I used to get success online with woman that lives far away, then I'd waste a lot of time just chatting/sexting/being emotionally involved with them, and end up getting distracted in my personal life, which lead to further degradation of my ability to pursue my financial goals, that will ultimately unlock my logistics at the same time I'm pursuing my financial goals on my terms. The major issue is managing the energies inside of you and your external resources. So much of it feels just getting emotionally open within the environment you're meeting her. I think Leo Gura needs to make videos on this, how to open up emotionally. That goes for everything. Women teachers tend to focus a lot on that.

LLMs are so hollow. This current technology no matter the incremental improvements they make, it keeps being just a shadow of a being. Maybe someday it gets to the point that each chatbot you interact with can be as diverse and deep as individual people, but that will take so much compute power if trend of scale keeps going, it's not worth to spend the energy budget of an entire city just to chat with a better chatbot. The bar is set so low when we are craving and desperate for connection, we will orgasm and fall in love for any resemblance of connection.

Hey Cidy, nice to meet you. Wow, you got such a lovely name, I had an ex with a name just like yours and she was really adorable. You're pretty, but... I'm not quite sure yet if you are adorable like my ex 😉. Do you believe I never actually drink anything alcoholic when I come to those bars? I always get some soda or something, I have to go driving home after, even though my tesla is self-driving it's still ilegal. 😂 Okay, just kidding about the tesla thing, I just go by Uber, I hate driving. Do you think that you drive well? Maybe you can drive me around, you could be my personal driver or something, I guess it's called Chauffeur, It's French, I do speak French... Portuguese and Spanish too by the way, do you speak any other Languages? You look a little Slavic to me, govorit po russki? But judging by your cup... I guess that won't be happening today, so tonight as your first day as my driver, you would have to drag me by hand tonight or something, maybe you can carry me on your arms like a baby, it would be so cute, but I'm too heavy for that, and you're a tiny petite little thing, unfortunately. Btw, I'm Lucas. But my closest friends call me Luke, you can call me that as well, I have a good feeling about you even though you look a bit like trouble... hahahh. 😂 (Offers my hand for her to shake it, and I hold it for as long as I can while looking into her eyes without breaking eye contact doing a smirk) So, Cidy... Tell me a funny joke or some funny pick up line you heard before! So we can start out our friendship on a good note.

😂 Bro, what the fuck? It's statistically unlikely that you're the bottom 5%. Are you like what? A 90 year old morbid obese guy without an arm and blind and can't walk or use a wheelchair? Just your age range alone doesn't make you bottom 5% Just by your usage of emojis and your incel ideas I know you're young enough for a cute young chick to also like you. Bottom 5% are literally seniors with horrible diseases. Those people can barely even walk or talk. They don't even know how to use a phone, read and write. The bottom 1% is literally this poor guy I once saw down town that was tossed in some kind of box, and he his body was frail and I feel sad that I didn't speak to him, or called someone for him, to make sure he had access to the social security system and social workers. I'm not even sure if he was able minded to speak. The bottom is some poor guy working in a gulag in North Korea or in the battlefield in Ukraine getting blasted by his fellow humans in the name of some needless war. Those guys are dead, their wives will move on. I saw a Ukrainian soldier that lost half of his body and his wife was still with him. You literally already said back in the day you had some chicks fancying you. You are just buying into the psych-ops of dating apps and incel garbage. You are basing that on what? On how many matches you get on Tinder? I literally just use some other chat room apps, and I spam nice messages and get answers back - but it's very mentally challenging because I have to spend a lot of energy calling and texting (I have to send the messages, they only sometimes send me the messages) because I do aura-maxxing vibes-maxxing, my vibes enter their psyche and literally makes them get soaked wet. On Tinder to me there is nothing but literally obese women for me, I have to literally DM them on Instagram from Tinder otherwise they don't answer on their Tinder inbox... Because they magically never match with me. Some of those online apps I got so good at that it became addictive to me and won't lead me into a relationship because they live too far, they were better because since I was targeting the whole country, the volume is bigger, but it's sort of fake earnings. Here is the harsh truth about looks: Yes, I'm looking for a hot chick with a nice personality... BUT, Since I had walked outside and talked to a neighbour and in less than 24h I literally was on her bed, just because she was a little fat and her face wasn't completely my type, it was still enjoyable, she was really cute and lovely. I began talking to her even before I saw her face from behind. That was the first time in my lifetime I had met someone from a cold approach. I just had to apply my flirting skills and use intimacy escalation in a calibrated way. It went perfect, even though the only times I ever even kissed someone was over 8 years ago. It's about your emotional system inside of you. Some woman would never know I was almost a virgin for my whole life because of my inner emotional system being open. Woman do that all the time to hook up with a guy just because he was there... You can just happen to be the male equivalent of me finding that chick and having fun. If she had great game and she kept making the logistics of meeting her easy, and she gave me great sex, given my lack of energy right now, I'd have kept dating her just because she was there...

Context: I'm average looking, I have more of a boyish look than hot vibes, and my voice sounds smooth. I'm skinny and not muscular, but I have stamina. My major bottleneck is my own logistics of meeting them, and also not looking like a hobo (I don't look like a hobo, but also I wear mostly the same clothing, I'll fix that once some cash comes in). We MUST have money to make the logistics happen, woman are infinitely less likely to help us out on it. But even that might be optional, I had some chicks telling me they will travel to see me, but I don't trust that, once another thought about paying for my travel, but didn't go through. We at least need to take care of ourselves. But I've seen long-term relationships where the husband gets sick and the wife takes care of him, etc. I always check the mark of appearing smarter or equal to them, that makes them think I have some massive earning potential. ---------- The ER Room, cougar and mentally sound lady 😉: One chick that has a crush for me is much older than me and I think she is probably a little taller than me or has the same height. She doesn't know yet that I'm completely broke and all the money I have is for emergencies and I can't met her. I might get away with asking her for bus money but I doubt that. I met her literally in the ER waiting room, one of the most crazy cold approaches I did, she literally told me multiple times that she loved my energy in that approach. I do very little actual approaches, but I've been practicing in my head the emotional energy management when I'm close to woman in person, and a few times I had enough energy to actually speak to them. ---------- The Christian fundamentalist bipolar chick living on the other side of the planet: There was another one online many years ago that she even used to donate/give me some money when I was in need, but she used to do that with everyone close to her, it wasn't just me. She would self gaslight herself into thinking that I was gonna become really rich, she had some massive personal status anxiety, but in fact, if I had that wealth/energy for dating I wouldn't have touched her not even with a 5 feet pole because she was annoying beyond belief (christian fundamentalist, bipolar, had terrible discipline that was killing her), that was during covid-19, I was feeling super low at that time, the major reason was just her lowering my energy. Despite of her being good spirited, and we were just trauma boding with each other. This kind of person will drain your life energy, they are vampires. She somehow was the only woman that was obsessed about telling me that I was skinny and wanted me to be muscular, but somehow she still was crazy for me lmao. ---------- The only random chick that mentioned my height as a possible issue: Only once one chick that was slightly below my height didn't like that if she were to wear high heels she would appear taller than me, but it wasn't a deal breaker to her probably. I never met her, but we did sexting. The 8/10 polygamist chick: The hottest woman that I liked, and that also was the most sexually crazy for me couldn't care less about how much I made, didn't complain that I was skinny. I made her come multiple times just on phone callls, in person it would have been wild af. in fact no woman has ever asked me how much I make or I would make... They just deduce that through your status aura lol. They see you in a bad pic, they assume you're low status and broke. They see you in a nic pic that looks high status, they think you're high status. But also some woman, you increase your status aura through talking to them. Some of them are very oriented to language, so just the talking gets them turned on with the shared fantasies. Most woman I talked to they sort of just assume your status based on photos and the way you talk and your poise, at least early on, I never went to the phase of living together and sharing expenses, I'd guess that would be a big deal. After that I didn't see them caring about how much I earn, they just assume that I might be rich, or will become rich because I can be eloquent. A lot of times the money aspect isn't even about the money, it's just woman's visceral anxiety status feelings. They live out of status, and men mostly seek status because they know subconsciously or consciously that woman are hooked into it like nothing else. Even my charisma and intelligence is felt as a form of status to them. It's wild. I'd go as far as saying even being emotionally avaliable and behaving boyfriend/fuckboy material to them feels like a status play to them, they tell me: "A guy like you could find a girlfriend any time you want." lol little do they know the effort I had to make for them.

Then I'm the top 10% if that were true. Does that make me an ALPHA MAALLEE?!? 🐒

We can't be desperate for a relationship otherwise we will not respect our boundaries and would stay with bad deals, that's the major source of suffering in relationships. Personally, I don't want to have children because I would have to fight until death to make sure they do well, you can't let them go. But for an adult partner, they will be just fine, they find other guys all the time, so it's easy to break up with them and have peace of mind ethically. My point is, hire slow and fire them fast, that removes most of the issues, it lets you filter them out better.

Congratulations on your Sologamy! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sologamy

I'm much more excited for those moons than for mars due to their liquid water! They believe that under Ganymede there is a massive liquid water ocean under its crust, and many others.

They are RIGHT NOW on the way to the moon, they will reach it for a flyby tomorrow (April 6, 2026). In this mission they will do a lunar flyby with humans for the first time since the last Apollo mission, it has been about 53 years ever since. The most powerful rocket NASA has ever lunched in history, slightly more powerful than Apollo's mission Saturn V rockets, but much more reliable and safer. They had done this same mission without humans onboard in November 16, 2022. It uses the European Union Agency service module, which provides propulsion, electricity, thermal control, and life support essentials for NASA's Orion spacecraft. Orion is the whole vehicle: the crew module on top where the astronauts live, and the European Service Module underneath that powers and sustains it. Together they make Orion capable of flying humans beyond low Earth orbit, something no spacecraft has done since Apollo. This flyby mission is a big step before new missions that will actually land. Artemis II proves the rocket, the spacecraft, and the systems with humans onboard. Once they do a flyby around the Moon tomorrow, it will mark the return of humans to lunar space after more than half a century, opening the door for Artemis III to put boots back on the surface. This is the first time a women and a black person (that guy there) will reach lunar orbit, and it's the furthest that they ever went away from earth. - Main page (With live streams): https://www.nasa.gov/mission/artemis-ii/ - Watch their location in real-time: https://www.nasa.gov/missions/artemis-ii/arow/ - Best photos (gets updated): https://www.nasa.gov/gallery/journey-to-the-moon/

Maybe you're trying to actually learn, and they are using LLMs/AI to do their homework for them.

Let me give this example of making tens of millions with high certainty: Rarely nobody will get to be an institutional trader at the top firms unless you come from a top economics university and even there you have only a couple of chances of making it there. Luck is a multiplier of your effort. Some people obviously are so lucky they are literally born from an old money billionaire family, others are lucky enough to not have had a shitty childhood that fucked with their mental health or some other trauma through their lives that cripples them and turns them into homeless drug addicts. Not even mentioning genetics. Just overcoming by itself the hopelessness itself to get yourself going on some path that your brain is telling you that feels risky is very hard for most people, there is a lot of fried dopamine circuits to overcome and being able to handle dedicating yourself consistently towards money consciously, at the same time that you're struggling with your current survival already. But somethings WILL INDEED STACK THE CARDS IN YOUR FAVOR, but it's not a guarantee that you will make tens of millions within a decade. Like not being a consumerist slave, or having a good job to begin with that allows you to save and live below your means. That already is such a massive advantage. The feeling that it feels even easy/trivial to make a lot of money comes from the compounding effects of success, but also the feel of living being hard is equally true, the compounding effects of poverty. Some people naturally feel more confident. But some will use their confidence to get stuck chasing women and getting drunk, others might use it to pursue a doctor's degree and be wrecked by the routine, or perhaps have a small private practice that never truly makes enough money for them to have "no fucks given" money. Some people feel just fine going through some crazy work routines and they are perfectly confident and their dopamine circuits are not fried of trying to sooth themselves, and they are able to logically follow steps for months and years. That is something some people find hard because you have to let go of all of your personal interests and way of behaving when you're in that mental space of being at home and not doing school or work stuff, that mental space creeps in, as opposed to getting a job that you just show up to or even if the job requires a lot of brain power like programming. What if your personal inclinations are not aligned with anything that will make substantial money that will likely make you 10 million within a decade? Does even that "Diary of the CEO" guy have enough money to live his lifestyle without having to sell out like a whore to grifters? What is success here really? Also there are plenty of those blabber mouths out there that you can listen to them for hours, and they tell you all of those platitudes and mindset things that Leo Gura has already covered a decade ago, meanwhile they give no actual analysis of what are the actual next steps you should be taking. That channel specifically has just sometimes some good guests. Most people are not gonna benefit from listening to a literal CEO interview of a 100M company, we need to listen to a guy making 5-10k range talking about the specifics of what he does. I'm pretty sure a lot of very rich and "successful" people out there they have been since young educated and developed the kind of personality that they have no concerns for anything but their career and business, and they do it in a way that isn't trying to be too out of the box otherwise that also cripples you as the wannabe entrepreneur that spends time on passion projects here and there, but also not too strict, otherwise they become a bureaucrat that inflates his lifestyle to live pay check to pay check and never building wealth to dedicate himself to any other pursuits, or perhaps, to him, life is literally all about the bureaucracy and they don't even want to build anything that will give them a multi-million dollar exit to live from, or a business that is more low touch, because their consumerist golden cage is good enough to them, to live in some overpriced cramped up apartment in New York or something. Or coming back to the programmer example, he/she might not have still the emotional and organizational skills to pull off certain things business-wise because it's emotionally ingrained into you and even the knowledge you have of the world, and their mind is about having high discipline and being in the mental space of programming a specific set of specifications and knowing how to prioritize based on what the stakeholders want, but they wouldn't take the risk themselves to try to find that market fit because they might be already struggling with survival and feeling too overwhelmed to even use their coding skills for any kind of business of their own, because they know they are just highly specialized. And then, when people do pull off, they might put themselves in a situation they work many times as hard as if they stayed employed but earning roughly the same and not really building equity or saving enough money to have "no fucks given" money, like the book below speaks about. Business is a fucking minefield as much as dating, health and spirituality. "The E-Myth Revisited: Why Most Small Businesses Don't Work and What to Do About It" by Michael E. Gerber

This is a question that I've struggled a lot with too that kept me from taking action in the market, this feeling of not wanting to be unethical. I think you just have to see how others do it in practice, and see how far you wanna take milking your customers. It happens mostly through seizing the information advantage you have over their ignorance and nobody ever thinks that's unethical in general unless they are doing an extremely conscious analysis of human survival at large. The problem with marketing is that you might end up having to promise results that are not typical, but with cleaver rapport you can get around this. I think the ethical stance is one that you teach your customers of the risks at the same time you hype them up. Unethical marketers will try to sell dirt to people and hype them up to even get in debt to buy their bullshit course that they know most people, specially in that situation, won't ever make a penny from it for example. There are some kinds of marketing and products that are so bad they are straight up scams such as casinos, but somehow that shit is legal in many jurisdictions and SOME PEOPLE DECIDE TO BE SCAMMED BY A CASINO WILLINGLY. As a casino owner would you try to educate your customers of the mathematics that makes it impossible for them to make money overtime? No, you end up focusing on "it's for fun!", "Oh, see some players give good reviews that they got money!". They are literally ignorant of the negative mathematical expectation of the probabilities built into the casino's algorithm and they are incapable emotionally of even being taught of the realities of the market. My point is, some clients are so lost, that you can't even help them make a good decision for themselves no matter how you try, and the market doesn't find it unethical at all when your customer willingly makes bad decisions even though you tried to warn them. I think my ethical rule of thumb is: What would I do for a friend?

They made a timeline website of all the photos of the mission (I'm not sure if it's actually all of them). https://artemistimeline.com/#only-one-chance-in-this-lifetime This one here is from where I found the original high resolution images (official nasa flicker account): https://www.flickr.com/photos/nasa2explore/albums/72177720307234654/with/55212398219 There is this other one: https://www.nasa.gov/artemis-ii-multimedia/

I would go to the moon. The moon is doable in terms of human health and tech reliability. But not anywhere else on the solar system, at least for now, unless they get the tech reliable and they solve cosmic radiation shielding. Mars or other celestial bodies such as Venus are a whole different beast of endurance. For a 9 day trip like they did the radiation dose is about 12 mSv, 3 full-body CT medical scans roughly, but not exactly, because those rays are more energetic. I would NOT go to mars. 6 months of travel time, 2 year of round trip due to the alignment. A thousand times more cosmic radiation exposure due to the amount of time (nobody experienced this before), not even in the International Space Station or the moon trips (which was never over 12 days). There is a theorized disease called "Cosmic Alzheimer" that those extremely energetic cosmic rays overtime would destroy the brain of anybody spending too much time away from earth's magnetosphere during the travel in deep space. The moon is very close, once they get there for long-term habitats they can build a shield of 5 meters of dirt and they will be fine, but the travel to to mars it's too expensive to get that much shielding. If something goes wrong they are fucked harder than someone stuck in Antartica during the winter, at least you don't suffocate to death and get bombarded by cosmic rays for months. But so far there are people living in the International Space Station for decades, and it seems like they figured out well the life support systems, but there is always the safety of leaving anytime they want.

Yeah! They are back and alive! I was concerned that they could have died, I believe it was the most dangerous part of the mission the re-entry. Their top speed at re-entry was of over 25,000 Mph (40,233.6 km/h), likely only losing to Apollo by a rouding error, one of the fastest crewed vehicle within our atmosphere in history. Their heatshield had to withstand temperatures of over 2,760°C (5,000°F)

Frankly, it's to have skin in the game the overall philosophy of humans in space for its own sake, as opposed to just robotics that we have been mastering already with satellite technology and rovers. But practically, robots CANNOT do the same work humans can, we are much more agile and flexible than robotics even for just scientific work. For example, operating the Martian rovers is painfully slow due to the speed of light. The goal is eventually building a scientific and industrial base on the moon which will work as a stepping stone for other human missions across the solar system, for example a refueling station, eventually manufacturing so it cheapens even further space exploration due to the low gravity of earth making lunching from there cheaper, and short distance from earth (in this mission took it 6 days to arrive there). There are valuable resources on the lunar soil that are not found on earth in abundance such as Helium-3 that is useful for fussion energy reactors. But frankly, most likely space resources will only be useful to humans in space, because of the gravitational cost of lunching and landing on our planet. Currently this mission was to test the entire transport and survivability setup of humans onboard with modern technology. NASA actually lost a lot of their know-how from the Apollo lunar missions, but it was also dangerous as heck for today's standards it wouldn't be acceptable. This exact same path and setup was already tested in 2022 successfully but unmanned, so it wasn't just blind risk. We spend billions per year in scientific and engineering research already for all kinds of things such as the International Space Station orbiting earth for almost over 27 years now, or subaquatic exploration, Artic/Antarctic region research outposts, etc. It's just the natural consequence of the availability of the technology that it will be used by our human curiosity and greed for achievement and as a consequence a lot of important great scientific and engineering problems are solved. Just like the military did drive human technological development, the scientific and extreme environment exploration drives mankind in a peaceful manner. We are still risking our lives, but not to be killed and die in a war. Those astronauts up there, most of this crew were fighter jet pilots. They are already used to taking risks onboard aircrafts/vessels as their livelihood.

😂 Was that real? I saw a snippet, but I don't remember seeing in the official live streams I saw, I missed it then. I know they did bring Maple Syrup, and they said they ate some Maple Syrup cookies outside of schedule just after they did sneak behind the moon to hide out from us. 😜 Maybe they also gorged on that Nutella back there.

THOSE IMAGES ARE NOT CGI, THEY ARE NOT AI. THEY ARE REAL. Source: https://www.nasa.gov/gallery/lunar-flyby/