Natasha Tori Maru

There's an assumption here videos are the ultimate priority. You are looking at how Leo can be of value to you through his work, not what is an intrinsic value to him (above searching for root). Videos could possibly be a byproduct of his work, only.

Fucking crushing the pattern finding dopamine button with these interwoven references across the forums ☉ ‿ ⚆

@Emerald I like these insights. I am really quite fascinated with this trainwreck. I think its the levels of delusion that really intrigue me - how did they begin down this path? I wonder how the slow progression went. It just seems it had to be recursive at some point - it had to fall into feeding its own narrative... The most horrifying part is, cases such as these always make me look at myself. I end up hunting for my own little crazy narratives. It's the ones I DON'T know about that scare me, more than the ones I do! I am forever looking to put the light to my shadow, even though I know it will always be there

He would have a mental breakdown if his cock stopped working. I mean, he is basing his entire existence around his cock lol. It's his life purpose. skeet skeet skeet But in all seriousness, I do think this is the beginning of the end for him. Downward slide in relevance. Good fame or bad, he cannot top this

If it helps anyone reading - you are basically looking at not just a photon, but the entire quantum universe. The entire quantum universe as it dreams up infinite routes. And then that infinite route interferes with itself. It's not proof we experience an infinite hologram, but it suggests what we see as 'solid' is really a projection of something deeper and more abstract... Like consciousness

Adding onto this, the photons behaving as 'particles' traverse every single possible path. So not just slit A & B - Its Slit A while also somehow looping through Slit B. Then wiggling through both. Then going on wild, loopy detours. Going to Africa and back. Basically every possible, insane looking trajectory. Every path has a complex number (probability amplitude) and when you add them all up, then you get the interference pattern. So the sum of all paths gives you what you actually observe.

@Keryo Koffa Ha ha >.< Bit of a WOOSH

Try looking up: Copenhagen interpretation, Von Neumann–Wigner interpretation or Decoherence theory. These will help with a base for interpreting the double slit experiment. They go into this in high school physics, so it might be a good refresher But again, science is the glass ceiling It all implies consciousness directly effects reality. Implies being the keyword there.

We aren't really form. We are made of atoms. What's in an atom - 99.999999999% nothing. A tiny amount of matter in neutrons and protons. The bulk of the rest? Electrons. Charge. Energy is actually the bulk of YOU. The reason you cannot put your hand through a lead wall is not because of matter, it is because of electromagnetic repulsion. Now think of how you interact with the environment - maybe this is a good way to frame it as a thought exercise? But this is hitting the glass ceiling of science...

@Lyubov I think you raise some good points. Within the scope of relationship, good strong boundaries (know thyself) are the structure you can use you facilitate more intimacy. Intimacy = truth. This is for interpersonal dynamics. It is always subject dependant for sure. I conceptualise truth like a nuclear bomb. The 'fallout' are the emotions that result from the information. Each sex (in my experience) deals with the nuclear emotion fallout differently; men have a bit of a lead shield and can move on quicker, less sickness. Women tend to be more vulnerable to the radiation and sickness that results. I do think both sexes are just as emotional, whether aware of it or not. Men appear to me, to simply be able to compartmentalise their emotion to deal with cold hard facts in a quicker manner. Generally speaking, of course.

While I think both genders, depending on topic, can be sensitive to how truth is delivered, women are less able to handle a cold fact. But mainly due to how we function: women tend toward prioritising harmony. This is just a generality as there are some outliers. I would say the women of this forum would be a bit more off the general mode on the bell curve. Tending towards being able to handle truth. The main reason I can handle it is due to construction work and working in extreme male dominated fields. It's a different language out there talking to steel guys who weld at 3m high, fall off and climb back on to finish. Rough-as-guts concreters and brick layers. I deal with almost totally men on construction sites, and when it comes to that domain, it's cold facts that speak and motivate. They may react in the moment, but they handle it and get on with the job. It won't rattle them enough to prevent work. Women can really be rattled so bad by truth delivered poorly they cannot function optimally after. I think it comes down to processing the emotions that rise up. Untactful truth will ripple out emotionally inside a woman for hours, days. For men in general they will react, oh yes, but they integrate and process it quicker. Just my observations witnessing men in hardcore male domains

I got no penis tho 😜 But in all seriousness if that is an assumption you would make, take care, as that also could be read as a defense mechanism to protect you from some truth. I'm very good at assuming and being wrong. Also very good at making quick decisions and conclusions, and discarding relevant information! I need to work on assessing all facts, as I make connections so quick I discard what doesn't fit 😬

Which is dead/dying. There is a serious decline in quality investigative journalists, coupled with most information channels (IE internet) being flooded with turds of misinformation. Budgets for it shrinking... It's a sad state of affairs. Makes you question if these conspiracy theories would have half their momentum if information and investigation was quality. Instead the layman is left to do their own probing and make their own conclusions...

It's been a big day Boss, being called out by all the ladies and such

@meta_male Well aside from the irony of your last statement, considering I am a woman who identified that trait in you, you're missing the nuance in the discussion. Truth can be delivered with tact. When you know and care about someone, you are more likely to put in the effort to deliver said truth with tact. Your confusing what women want within the scope of relationship (already committed) and in the attraction phase. Please don't also forget this goes both ways. It applies to men also. I am sure you wouldn't want me to tell you your penis was hardly satisfactory after sex, would you? The truth has a time, place, intention. Think about its application in these 3 areas. I sense you have goggles on looking for what will confirm your bias. So, I will bid you good day.

The truth checksum filter for women?

I can tell you with 100% certainty what you did was an act of love & care. You chose what was right, at the expense of harmony. The path of honorable masculinity. Sometimes the truth must be said. 'Don't shoot the messenger' You don't want to regret not acting. I don't have much advice myself, and without detracting from your story, I have faced a similar impossible situation. The result was being hated and cut off. But I sleep well at night as a result. I hope you do, too!

I mean - truth, lol But really drilling down I think women don't want the truth when its delivered like a sledgehammer, weaponised to assert dominance, lacking empathy/timing/tact, threatening a core identity, relationship or emotional safety.... Plus they tend toward valuing harmony over conflict, connection over cold facts & tune deeply into tone and subtext. I'm exhausted just writing that - so I can't imagine even thinking about wrapping the Truth up in a nice little package, with a fucking bow on top, PrImeD foR DEliVeRy. Tailored to each individuals needs. Exhausting. Sort of applies to men AND women (subject dependant) - but women require this little gift of truth presented in an appetising manner much more than men.

@Emerald Eerily similar progression to me. It didn't help I have 4 brothers (1 sister). I learned to handle boys, but not the underhanded politics girls employ. Boys were great - say it to my face. Girls - I had to learn to interpret everything but the actual words. Maddening. I was a pilled little girl lol.... Back to the topic though - What women want? Safety, love. Done!

He fucked himself. Literally stuck his own dick in his arse. I predict he will lose a substantial amount of viewers and followers.

@Emerald You got it. Sometimes my writing style is a bit jarring when it is on the fly.

You don't make yourself the subject like Teal does. Her personality is very much present. I don't get that as much from watching you or Emerald. It could be just the nature of her work in comparison.

Had a bit more of a think about this while fucking around onsite today re Teal Swan ego. Big difference between Emerald and Leo - they inject a lot less of themselves into their work. Obviously you can't completely remove yourself from your work, but you guys have done an excellent job of it. It is much more professional. Teal's personality is very much PRESENT.

@Basman I think Elon is into eugenics if I am not mistaken? Probably believes he is spreading his superior genes. Wiping out other races by breeding away weakness. He could also have a huge impregnation fetish (ngl I think both could be true). I think this thinking is endemic among the silicon valley elites

I bring you - another fucking Australian monstrosity that is... THE PLATYPUS This mammal comes complete with no teeth, no stomach, a duck-like bill, poison in their ankles - and lays eggs. It is also bioflourescent, semi-aquatic , nocturnal and has no nipples.