yetineti

There are an infinite set of intelligences; or as Leo says ‘infinite intelligence.’ You can be infinitely intelligent about an infinite amount of things. Traditionally though, there has only been ‘intelligence.’ This typically refers to the standard IQ Tests, pattern recognition, etc. It was only within the past 50 or so years, I believe, that the term ‘emotional intelligence’ (EQ) came into existence. As you can see, it has not been widely adopted either. Still, not many people are concerned or familiar with ‘EQ.’ But I wouldn’t get too concerned with types of intelligences. It is nice to box things up and say this person is ‘emotionally intelligent’ or ‘classically intelligent’ or ‘spiritually intelligent.’ But it is something much bigger to surpass of that into INFINITE INTELLIGENCE and start pondering, what is intelligence? (In general) Of course, infinite intelligence has the ‘no intelligence’ perspective - which is confusing because it has that phenomenon of the old joke: ’So smart only a dumb person could have come up with it/So dumb only a smart person could have done it.’ All in all, though, might I ask, and maybe I should’ve immediately - yet - why is it you’re curious about this?

You chose how many levels there are; that’s how many levels there are.

Definitely a problem. I didn’t figure out I was an auditory learner until after high school. Throughout all of school I felt so dumb because they’d show me a perfect diagram but unless they could chose their words carefully, I wouldn’t understand. It’s why I Love Leo. 90% of what he says makes sense to me the first time I hear him say it. I may not like it, I may not embody it - but I’m learning.

There are endless levels, so there are no levels. In this case, 0=infinity

Hi I like this post because I don’t think there is one answer and a lot pops in to my head after reading this. The main options I see are, one, at least, consistently, ‘pluck’ away at one ‘belief’ at a time.’ But notice the sort of belief you immediately pick up following the pattern (a belif about getting rid of beliefs). Nonetheless, forget the clause about beliefs about beliefs for a second and assume we are just going to get rid of all of beliefs, you could also dispose of multiple beliefs at a time; say if they were connected beliefs and went one after another, nicely, or maybe even all at once. It’s not one way or the other; getting rid of beliefs requires context. Last note, for me, is my beliefs almost tend to leave me as a feeling or ‘tension’ and in the moment my thoughts have the option to ‘expand’ or ‘contrast.’ It is only later the feeling tells me some belief, with words, in my head.

You can not prove I am having a inner subjective experience, much less a robot. Certainly these robots could reach a point beyond our distinction - where we take them as a sort of ‘conscious’ ‘human like’ thing. But there’s no difference between being fooled into thinking the robots are conscious and them actually being conscious.

Ironically though, I’m holding you accountable Maybe your idea isn’t so bad

@Tobias L It is more than 70-80% of people. The problem is literally doubled. Even if you do find someone to tag along that’s motivated, you’re just getting second hand motivation and the next time you need to do something alone you’ll just want someone else again. Not to mention if even if you do find someone equally motivated - you don’t sound very motivated. But like you said, if you’re lucky… Why’d you want to add luck to your problems anyways? You could just go and certainly get some work into your goals but you’re here - betting the sun won’t rise. I know I am just shutting down your partner idea but really this is good news. You don’t need anyone. You never did.

An accountability partner is one of the Devils greatest tricks, in my opinion. The logic flawless allows nothing to get done. Ex: The rules of an accountability partner. Person 1: I will do this if you do this. Person 2: Ok. I will do it if you do it, too. [Ready. Set. Go.] [error] Person 1 cannot go with out Person 2 and vice versa. You basically just doubled your problem. Now you don’t just have to do it, you have to get someone else to as well. Easier just to do it your self. Still quite hard, which is why your here.

@Aquarianwolf999 Maybe they seemed interested in it because you were. I’ve had friends paraphrase my words back to me or even hold a conversation about certain ideas. But rarely a ‘ah-ha’ moment; sometimes though. Most times they’re just talking. Sometimes they get it enough just to scare them into doubling down on their dogma. Many possibilities, but quite odd your story about so many becoming ‘born agains.’ I do not know really. Just from this post though, I like your curiously and what seems to be an opposition to this new Jesus stuff.

@Reciprocality More similar to your ‘stream of associations’ description. Emotions are more so how I describe the intuitive feeling that goes with vision logic. The fluidity and guidance that appears to let you dance quickly between thoughts and/or compare/hold thoughts. It is not like I am jumping from happy-to-sad-to-euphoric. Also, do not really have a deep understanding of vision logic. Heard Leo mention it in the SD Stage Yellow video, I think, awhile ago, and thought it novel; since started to notice it more and more. By no means an expert. I will say though, as I have been eating better, feeling better and thinking better - there does seem to be a sort of magical, lovely, quality to using the brain now.

Personally, I’d want to do one on the philosophy of competition and how silly it is to compete through philosophy. But that probably wouldn’t go so well.

I have experienced something similar. It usually happens when I am in deep thought and feeling especially open and emotional.

Everything we make as humans seems to be made for something other than itself. Art seems to be made for itself.

https://doowikis.com/m/xqjzTZtdHL

Look up ‘Vision Logic’ Leo talked about it somewhere, but it is also a concept separate from him. As you become a stronger thinker your brain gets better at integrating emotions and abstractions in the form of ‘vision logic’ or what I think of as a sort of screenplay movie of thought. Started to turn into controlled day dreaming almost.

Because you imagine it to be so; and that’s the game we play. Do not confuse imagination with the unreal, though. I am sure what you’re going through is quite real and hard - but the only way out is to begin constructing your narrative as something a bit more loving and practical. Imagine you’re a salesmen and you have to sell your life to your self, in the state it’s in. Would you pitch it as ‘constant cycle of misery’ or ‘invigorating process of redemption.’ If you won’t ‘buy’ yourself, who will? Im glad your not suicidal. I’m glad you sound like you want to work towards more. This is just one way to do so. Change your narrative; imagine it better. Do not fantasize. Imagine it better.

It should be obvious why our entertainment has violence and sex. It’s entertaining and presented through safe formats. As far as why it keeps getting ‘worse,’ people just want more. Once they’ve had A, they want B, then C, D, E, etc. Like a porn addict watching more and more hardcore stuff, just to get the same pleasure any video used to give. Or a marijuana addict taking more hits to achieve the same high one hit used to give.

@aklacor727 Personally I see a lot of value in meeting people at their stage. I grew up arguing with people, so meeting them where they’re at seems like the best case scenario for me. The ability to do so seems to make interactions much smoother. But that’s something I am working on. Like Leo said, sometimes they’re ready to hear something beyond themselves. That’s always fun, otherwise I just try to remember: If I can’t meet them where they’re at, I don’t have to be a dick about it.

@Moksha I agree, it is self communication. I started looking at it this way after my first trip. While tripping, I could not stop pacing and thinking - but the thinking changed. There was a me and there was another me, almost like the whole devil-angel on the shoulders thing but it was just me. I could feel these ‘two’ come together as one through this sorta of beautiful merging via this meditation prayer thought thing I had going. It was awesome. Now when I pray, it’s like the sort of begging I did as a child in church. It’s a real surrender to myself and that moment when I take the time to well, self communicate.

@Fearless_Bum It is sort of weird. I wonder why I chose to respond to the things I do. In this case, it seems weird, also, to me, the neediness for Leo’s content. I am defending him, but not begging for him. For the record, I’ve been checking for his videos the past couple of weeks too. Thats the crux for me here. I want it too, but I suppose for me it’d be too much to come here and ask for it. Seems pointless, and I portray that in a, yes, weird sort of defensive way. Moral of the story I have my implicit begging and a ego drawing a line between it being public and private. That’s way I came here. Death be to that. Amen. Thanks. sO uH lEo, cOntEnt? jk. Love you guys

@Sempiternity You said it, but you don’t see it. Hence your problem with the lack of communication. Or maybe you didn’t really have the problem. In which case, especially, why pressure him with a post? Like @LordFall said, he’s been active, he’s just a regular guy on top of all the Actualized stuff, he might have something going on.

Very difficult topic, for myself. I see 3 big problems with meeting people on the spiral. 1. Not forcing higher perspectives. 2. Realizing you can stoop lower than you think. Obviously have to be respectful still - but respect looks different to some people and what you or how you should say something may be different than you think. You might think it is totally rude and it may be just what they needed to hear. (With caution) 3. The framing of ‘different stages’ can be both practical and impractical in conversation.

@Sempiternity You definitely said something of that nature. Leo can do whatever he wants; within the bounds of the law, obviously. He doesn’t owe you videos; especially when he already has one of the largest libraries of content - that is also some of the most intelligent and loving!

I like to hit stage orange people with the most logical bullshit until they submit and then I hit them with the stage green love. Super vague response, I know - but really this has worked. Stage orange people have that ‘athlete’ banter. The type of insulting you see on the show shark tank. As I have developed I gotten more and more concerned with insulting people - but forget how ruthless stages like blue and orange can be verbally to each other. Consequently, I will watch my words more when really I could just give them some easy rationalization about how they are screwing themselves (which they already know, and is why they are miserable) and then let them know how loved they. It is one of the things that got me out of orange. Anytime I would have a problem with myself I’d have to start letting myself know that ‘it is okay, someone else has been here.’ And that’s stage green in a nut shell; the community. The other option that has worked for me with others is acting ignorant in a smooth way. Instead of going to the over rational route and then hitting them with the love - just act ignorant. What going on here? Can you help me understand? And use the Jordan Peterson tactic of ‘only try to explain something to someone when you have already explain their points back to them in a way they agree with.’ Basically just act dumb so he has to explain him self and then really listen and repeat his words back to him, not to make a point, but to give him the closure he wants. Also, idk what your brothers deal is. There is almost certainly context I’m not getting here. these Were just ways I have successfully worked with people, specially stage orange.